
- Chinese Optics Letters
- Vol. 19, Issue 6, 060006 (2021)
Abstract
1. Introduction
Lithium niobate on insulator (LNOI) is emerging as a promising platform for integrated photonics thanks to its large electric-optic coefficient, strong second-order optical nonlinearity, low absorption loss, and wide transparent window (from 400 nm to 5 µm)[
Despite these advances, efficient coupling between a lithium niobate (LN) chip and optical fiber is still a major challenge, mainly due to the large mode mismatch between the fiber mode (diameter of 10.4 µm) and waveguide mode[
Recently, several one-dimensional (1D) GCs have been demonstrated on the LNOI platform[
Sign up for Chinese Optics Letters TOC. Get the latest issue of Chinese Optics Letters delivered right to you!Sign up now
The two-dimensional (2D) GC, an important building block in photonic integrated circuits (PICs) to overcome polarization-dependence issues, enables coupling between the fiber and waveguide modes (TE polarization), regardless of the fiber mode polarization. Many efforts have been devoted to improving the performance of 2D GCs on the silicon on insulator (SOI) platform, including integrating a backside metal mirror[
In this Letter, we demonstrate the first, to the best of our knowledge, 2D GC on the -cut LNOI platform. The 2D GCs are one-step etched along with LN waveguides and 1D GCs, which significantly simplifies the fabrication and is much more cost effective. The measurement results show that a coupling efficiency of with 1 dB bandwidth (BW) of 64 nm is achieved. The polarization-dependent loss (PDL) is about 0.4 dB around 1550 nm.
2. Simulation and Design
The schematic structure of the proposed LN 2D GC is shown in Fig. 1, which is fabricated on x-cut LNOI wafers for the sake of serving LN modulators, which are mainly fabricated on x-cut LNOI wafers, benefiting from the strongest EO coefficient ( at 1500 nm), for the implementation of polarization multiplexing modulation of signals. The indicates the coordinate system of LN materials with the axis corresponding to the optical axis of the LN crystal, while the X-Y-Z represents the geometric coordinate system of the device. Two orthogonal polarization components of the fiber mode (Z polarization and Y polarization ) are coupled into the corresponding waveguides, with coupling efficiency of and , respectively. The total coupling efficiency can be defined as . The cross section of the device is shown in Fig. 1(b), the thickness of the LN thin film and buried oxide (BOX) layer is 360 nm and 2 µm, respectively, with air cladding. The etching depth, grating pitch, and hole radius are defined as E, P, and R, which need to be further optimized. The sidewall angle of the grating is .
Figure 1.(a) Schematic structure of x-cut LN 2D GCs. The angle between axis Z, Y (direction of grating) and optical axis z of LN material is β = 45°.The angle φ represents the polarization state of the fiber mode. (b) Cross-sectional view of the LN 2D GC.
Three-dimensional (3D) finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method is utilized for the simulation. The simulation volume is , and the mesh accuracy was two in the FDTD region. An extra mesh override region of , was adopted in the grating. Anisotropy of the -cut LN thin film is taken into consideration. The design methodology is basically the same as that of SOI[
Firstly, we did a parameter sweep for E, P, and R to tune the central wavelength target on 1550 nm. In this step, the thickness of the BOX layer is fixed to . As depicted in Fig. 2(a), we pick out the optimal parameter combination of R and P for each E. One can find that the highest coupling efficiency corresponds to parameters of , , and , with a coupling efficiency of 31.8% () at 1550 nm. However, it is more reasonable to determine the etching depth as , considering the coupling efficiency of the 2D GC varies slightly (from 31.8% to 30.8%) when E decreases from 220 nm to 180 nm, as depicted in Fig. 2(b). Furthermore, the etching depth is also the optimal value for optical waveguides and TE 1D GCs; therefore, the one-step etching process can be implemented, which enables an easy and cost-effective fabrication, meanwhile guaranteeing the high coupling efficiency of both 1D and 2D GCs. These advantages are appealing for polarization multiplex circuits[
Figure 2.(a) Coupling efficiency of the 2D GC for different structure parameters, when HLN = 360 nm, Hb = 2 µm, θ = 10°, and α = 60°. (b) The dependence of coupling efficiency and etching depth for 1D and 2D GCs at a wavelength of 1550 nm. (c) The coupling efficiency as a function of BOX thickness Hb at 1550 nm, with the parameters E = 180 nm, P = 982 nm, and R = 400 nm for the 2D GC, and E = 180 nm, P = 1.02 µm, and no = 2.21, with a duty cycle of 0.38 for uniform 1D GCs. (d) Coupling efficiency of 1D and 2D GCs with a gold mirror when Hb = 2 µm.
Secondly, we calculated the angle between two LN waveguides using a large simulation volume of . The two strip waveguides are replaced by an LN slab waveguide to investigate the intrinsic propagation direction of the coupled waveguide mode. As shown in Fig. 3, the coupled mode propagates and deviates about 2° from the Z axis, which means the angle of two LN strip waveguides connecting the 2D GC is 86°. It should be noted that it is feasible to transfer such a design flow to -cut LNOI thin film, theoretically. However, the optimized structure parameters such as P and R may have a minor change due to the anisotropy of LN.
Figure 3.Propagation of the coupled mode in the LN slab waveguide.
To investigate the performance sensitivity of 2D GCs to the input polarization state, we calculate the coupling efficiency of , , and as a function of polarization angle , as shown in Fig. 4(a). It is seen that and vary from to when the polarization angle swept through 360°, giving an extinction ratio of . Moreover, the influence of the polarization angle on is relatively small, which can be expressed as (dB). This indicates that the PDL is about 1 dB, the maximum is for S polarization when and 270°, and the minimum is for P polarization when , 180°, and 360°. Figure 4(b) illustrates the coupling spectra for the case of , where , and the 1 dB BW is 61 nm. Figure 4(c) presents the dependence of the central wavelength on polarization angle . As seen, the central wavelength varies slightly around the target wavelength (), which is far less than the 60 nm 1 dB BW, indicating that the influence of the polarization angle on the device performance is limited. Furthermore, we studied the fabrication tolerance of the proposed 2D GC. Figures 5(a)–5(d) summarize the variations of coupling efficiency with variations of etching depth E, grating pitch P, radius of hole R, and sidewall angle . Overall, the proposed 2D GC shows a good fabrication tolerance.
Figure 4.(a) Coupling efficiency of CEZ, CEY, and CET as a function of the polarization angle φ. (b) Coupling spectra of CEZ, CEY, and CET when φ = 75°. (c) Relationship between the central wavelength λc and polarization angle φ.
Figure 5.Impact of the variation of (a) etching depth ΔE, (b) grating pitch ΔP, (c) hole radius ΔR, and (d) sidewall angle Δα.
3. Fabrication and Measurement
The proposed devices were fabricated on a commercial 360 nm thick -cut LNOI wafer (NANOLN). The optical waveguides and grating cells were firstly patterned by electron-beam lithography (EBL) in hydrogen silsesquioxane (HSQ) resist and then dry etched by the argon-based inductively coupled plasma (ICP) etching process. Figure 6(a) shows the scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of the fabricated 2D GC. The inset picture presents the details of the grating cells. As depicted in Fig. 6(b), one pair of 2D GCs was connected in a back-to-back configuration to measure the coupling efficiency and PDL. The 1D GCs were also fabricated on the same chip to calibrate the polarization state of input light by maximizing or minimizing transmission of the 1D GCs. As shown in Fig. 6(c), a broadband tunable laser (Venturi TLB-8800) was used as the light source. The polarization of input light is adjusted by a fiber polarization controller and two six-axis stages, enabling the fiber-to-chip alignment with high precision.
Figure 6.(a) SEM image of LN 2D GCs. The inset shows the zoom-in picture of grating cells. (b) Optical image of the LN 2D GCs. (c) Experimental set-up scheme: TL, tunable laser; PC, polarization controller; PM, power meter.
Figure 7(a) shows the measured spectra of the fabricated 1D and 2D GCs. The peak coupling efficiency of the 1D GC is about , lower than the best experimental result of reported in Ref. [21] using chirped gratings. The 1 dB BW of the 1D GC is 63 nm. The waveguide propagation loss is about 0.5 dB/cm for the case of air cladding. The coupling efficiency of the 2D GC is about and at 1550 nm for S-polarized and P-polarized light at best, which is 2 dB lower than the simulated results. This is due to the fabrication imperfection, including insufficient etching depth and larger sidewall angle of holes, as indicated in Figs. 5(a) and 5(d). Some minor fluctuations () can be found in the measured spectra, which is caused by the weak reflection at the interfaces between the grating region and waveguide. This effect can be eliminated or reduced by using a special design[
Figure 7.(a) Measured and calculated coupling efficiencies for the LN 1D GC and 2D GC. (b) Measured coupling efficiencies of the LN 2D GC with different hole radii.
4. Conclusion
In summary, we have demonstrated the first 2D GC on the LNOI platform. The measured coupling efficiency is at a wavelength of 1550 nm with 1 dB BW of 64 nm. The PDL is about 0.4 dB around 1550 nm. The devices are directly etched on LN thin film, and the 180 nm etching depth enables the best efficiency coupling for both 1D and 2D GCs. One-step etching for both GCs and waveguides significantly simplifies the fabrication process. Our work provides new polarization multiplexing approaches for the LNOI platform, which enables various critical applications including polarization multiplex EO modulators and nonlinear optical circuits, on-chip quantum polarization state preparation, and information processing.
References
[1] A. Boes, B. Corcoran, L. Chang, J. Bowers, A. Mitchell. Status and potential of lithium niobate on insulator (LNOI) for photonic integrated circuits. Laser Photon. Rev., 12, 1700256(2018).
[2] L. Cai, A. Mahmoud, G. Piazza. Low-loss waveguides on Y-cut thin film lithium niobate: towards acousto-optic applications. Opt. Express, 27, 9794(2019).
[3] M. Zhang, C. Wang, R. Cheng, A. Shams-Ansari, M. Lončar. Monolithic ultra-high-Q lithium niobate microring resonator. Optica, 4, 1536(2017).
[4] Y. Liu, X. Huang, Z. Li, Y. Kuang, H. Guan, Q. Wei, Z. Fan, Z. Li. TE/TM-pass polarizers based on lateral leakage in a thin film lithium niobate–silicon nitride hybrid platform. Opt. Lett., 45, 4915(2020).
[5] T. Ding, Y. Zheng, X. Chen. On-chip solc-type polarization control and wavelength filtering utilizing periodically poled lithium niobate on insulator ridge waveguide. J. Lightwave Technol., 37, 1296(2019).
[6] J.-Y. Chen, Z.-H. Ma, Y. M. Sua, Z. Li, C. Tang, Y.-P. Huang. Ultra-efficient frequency conversion in quasi-phase-matched lithium niobate microrings. Optica, 6, 1244(2019).
[7] D. Pohl, M. R. Escalé, M. Madi, F. Kaufmann, P. Brotzer, A. Sergeyev, B. Guldimann, P. Giaccari, E. Alberti, U. Meier, R. Grange. An integrated broadband spectrometer on thin-film lithium niobate. Nat. Photon., 14, 24(2020).
[8] L. Cai, A. Mahmoud, M. Khan, M. Mahmoud, T. Mukherjee, J. Bain, G. Piazza. Acousto-optical modulation of thin film lithium niobate waveguide devices. Photon. Res., 7, 1003(2019).
[9] M. Xu, M. He, H. Zhang, J. Jian, Y. Pan, X. Liu, L. Chen, X. Meng, H. Chen, Z. Li, X. Xiao, S. Yu, S. Yu, X. Cai. High-performance coherent optical modulators based on thin-film lithium niobate platform. Nat. Commun., 11, 3911(2020).
[10] M. He, M. Xu, Y. Ren, J. Jian, Z. Ruan, Y. Xu, S. Gao, S. Sun, X. Wen, L. Zhou, L. Liu, C. Guo, H. Chen, S. Yu, L. Liu, X. Cai. High-performance hybrid silicon and lithium niobate Mach–Zehnder modulators for 100 Gbit s−1 and beyond. Nat. Photon., 13, 359(2019).
[11] M. Zhang, B. Buscaino, C. Wang, A. Shams-Ansari, C. Reimer, R. Zhu, J. M. Kahn, M. Lončar. Broadband electro-optic frequency comb generation in a lithium niobate microring resonator. Nature, 568, 373(2019).
[12] Y. Qi, Y. Li. Integrated lithium niobate photonics. Nanophotonics, 9, 1287(2020).
[13] Z. Chen, Y. Ning, Y. Xun. Chirped and apodized grating couplers on lithium niobate thin film. Opt. Mater., 10, 2513(2020).
[14] J. Jian, P. Xu, H. Chen, M. He, Z. Wu, L. Zhou, L. Liu, C. Yang, S. Yu. High-efficiency hybrid amorphous silicon grating couplers for sub-micron-sized lithium niobate waveguides. Opt. Express, 26, 29651(2018).
[15] A. Kar, M. Bahadori, S. Gong, L. L. Goddard. Realization of alignment-tolerant grating couplers for z-cut thin-film lithium niobate. Opt. Express, 27, 15856(2019).
[16] I. Krasnokutska, R. J. Chapman, J.-L. J. Tambasco, A. Peruzzo. High coupling efficiency grating couplers on lithium niobate on insulator. Opt. Express, 27, 17681(2019).
[17] Y. Liu, X. Huang, Z. Li, H. Guan, Q. Wei, Z. Fan, W. Han, Z. Li. Efficient grating couplers on a thin film lithium niobate–silicon rich nitride hybrid platform. Opt. Lett., 45, 6847(2020).
[18] X. Ma, C. Zhuang, R. Zeng, J. J. Coleman, W. Zhou. Polarization-independent one-dimensional grating coupler design on hybrid silicon/LNOI platform. Opt. Express, 28, 17113(2020).
[19] M. S. Nisar, X. Zhao, A. Pan, S. Yuan, J. Xia. Grating coupler for an on-chip lithium niobate ridge waveguide. IEEE Photon. J., 9, 6600208(2016).
[20] Z. Ruan, J. Hu, Y. Xue, J. Liu, B. Chen, J. Wang, K. Chen, P. Chen, L. Liu. Metal based grating coupler on a thin-film lithium niobate waveguide. Opt. Express, 28, 35615(2020).
[21] K. Shuting, R. Zhang, Z. Hao, J. Di, F. Gao, F. Bo, G. Zhang, J. Xu. High-efficiency chirped grating couplers on lithium niobate on insulator. Opt. Lett., 45, 6651(2020).
[22] Z. Chen, Y. Wang, Y. Jiang, R. Kong, H. Hu. Grating coupler on single-crystal lithium niobate thin film. Opt. Mater., 72, 136(2017).
[23] I. Krasnokutska, J.-L. J. Tambasco, A. Peruzzo. Nanostructuring of LNOI for efficient edge coupling. Opt. Express, 27, 16578(2019).
[24] L. He, M. Zhang, A. Shams-Ansari, R. Zhu, C. Wang, L. Marko. Low-loss fiber-to-chip interface for lithium niobate photonic integrated circuits. Opt. Lett., 44, 2314(2019).
[25] Y. Luo, Z. Nong, S. Gao, H. Huang, Y. Zhu, L. Liu, L. Zhou, J. Xu, L. Liu, S. Yu, X. Cai. Low-loss two-dimensional silicon photonic grating coupler with a backside metal mirror. Opt. Lett., 43, 474(2018).
[26] B. Chen, X. Zhang, J. Hu, Y. Zhu, X. Cai, P. Chen, L. Liu. Two-dimensional grating coupler on silicon with a high coupling efficiency and a low polarization-dependent loss. Opt. Express, 28, 4001(2020).
[27] R. Halir, D. Vermeulen, G. Roelkens. Reducing polarization-dependent loss of silicon-on-insulator fiber to chip grating couplers. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett., 22, 389(2010).
[28] W. Bogaerts, D. Taillaert, P. Dumon, D. Van Thourhout, R. Baets, E. Pluk. A polarization-diversity wavelength duplexer circuit in silicon-on-insulator photonic wires. Opt. Express, 15, 1567(2007).
[29] D. Bunandar, A. Lentine, C. Lee, H. Cai, C. M. Long, N. Boynton, N. Martinez, C. DeRose, C. Chen, M. Grein, T. Douglas, A. Starbuck, A. Pomerene, S. Hamilton, F. N. C. Wong, R. Camacho, P. Davids, J. Urayama, D. Englund. Metropolitan quantum key distribution with silicon photonics. Phys. Rev. X, 8, 021009(2018).
[30] L. Carroll, D. Gerace, I. Cristiani, S. Menezo, L. C. Andreani. Broad parameter optimization of polarization-diversity 2D grating couplers for silicon photonics. Opt. Express, 21, 21556(2013).
[31] Y. Wang, W. Shi, X. Wang, Z. Lu, M. Caverley, R. Bojko, L. Chrostowski, N. A. F. Jaeger. Design of broadband subwavelength grating couplers with low back reflection. Opt. Lett., 40, 4647(2015).

Set citation alerts for the article
Please enter your email address