• Journal of Radiation Research and Radiation Processing
  • Vol. 42, Issue 6, 060209 (2024)
Jingfeng CHANG1, Guanghua ZHANG1, Guozhong WU2, Rongfang SHEN2, Kaifeng DONG1, and Kanghai ZHENG1、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Shanghai Jinpengyuan Irradiation Technology Co.,Ltd.,Shanghai 201707,China
  • 2Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Shanghai 201800,China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.11889/j.1000-3436.2024-0106 Cite this Article
    Jingfeng CHANG, Guanghua ZHANG, Guozhong WU, Rongfang SHEN, Kaifeng DONG, Kanghai ZHENG. Investigating the performance of polytetrafluoroethylene solid free radical dosimeter[J]. Journal of Radiation Research and Radiation Processing, 2024, 42(6): 060209 Copy Citation Text show less
    Hpp signals of different dose values
    Fig. 1. Hpp signals of different dose values
    Response curve of PTFE solid dosimeter tablets (background subtracted) (a) and partial enlarged drawing (b)
    Fig. 2. Response curve of PTFE solid dosimeter tablets (background subtracted) (a) and partial enlarged drawing (b)
    ESR response vs. absorbed dose curves of PTFE dosimeter
    Fig. 3. ESR response vs. absorbed dose curves of PTFE dosimeter
    Gamma irradiation field dose rate distribution map
    Fig. 4. Gamma irradiation field dose rate distribution map
    Dose response at different measurement times after irradiation
    Fig. 5. Dose response at different measurement times after irradiation
    Responses curves of PTFE to different rays
    Fig. 6. Responses curves of PTFE to different rays

    样品

    Sample

    重量/ mg

    Weight

    标准物质信号 / a.u.

    Standard material signal

    剂量计信号Hpp / a.u.

    Dosimeter signal

    响应 / mg-1

    Response

    信噪比 / dB

    Signal-to-noise ratio

    腔内温度 / ℃

    Intra-cavity temperature

    163.005 914.6118.290.2950.8432.25
    263.805 901.0325.170.3970.8632.21
    363.605 912.0919.360.3151.6932.19
    463.605 903.8123.540.3751.7032.15
    563.905 915.3131.950.5047.6632.12
    663.405 905.6429.420.4743.8932.10
    763.605 901.4127.120.4259.5732.08
    863.905 910.1327.180.4372.4132.06
    963.205 901.4119.790.3155.7032.16
    1063.005 899.5127.580.4476.64531.89

    均值

    Average

    63.50N/A24.940.3958.10N/A
    Table 1. Zero dose ESR response test data

    样品

    Sample

    旋转角度

    Rotation angle

    剂量计信号Hpp / a.u.

    Dosimeter signal

    响应 / mg-1

    Response

    响应均值d¯i / mg-1

    Average response intensity

    标准偏差SDi

    Standard deviation

    125 457.52382.41381.980.38
    90°25 441.99381.69
    180°25 443.68381.64
    270°25 448.05382.18
    226 143.66392.68392.680.67
    90°26 115.58392.24
    180°26 135.29392.19
    270°26 233.71393.62
    326 415.28396.42397.051.16
    90°26 435.03396.57
    180°26 414.78396.43
    270°26 532.23398.78
    426 090.45391.44392.340.97
    90°26 100.86391.75
    180°26 129.13392.57
    270°26 194.38393.61

    变异系数 Coefficient of variation[14]

    CV%=(ni-1)(SD2/d¯i2)1/2/(ni-1)×100%

    0.06%
    Table 2. PTFE dosimeter flipping uncertainty test data table

    样品

    Sample

    翻转前后

    Flip top to bottom

    剂量计信号Hpp/ a.u.

    Dosimeter signal

    响应 / mg-1

    Response

    响应均值d¯i / mg-1

    Average response intensity

    标准偏差SDi

    Standard deviation

    1之前Before26 539.26398.94398.051.25
    之后After26 481.60397.17
    2之前Before26 158.24392.86393.490.89
    之后After26 193.12394.11
    3之前Before26 199.79393.77394.511.04
    之后After26 268.01395.24
    4之前Before25 441.96382.15382.290.20
    之后After25 447.03382.44

    变异系数 Coefficient of variation[14]

    CV%=(ni-1)(SD2/d¯i2)1/2/(ni-1)×100%

    0.12%
    Table 3. Uncertainty test data for PTFE dosimeter flip

    辐照点位

    Radiation point position

    剂量计信号Hpp / a.u.

    Dosimeter signal

    吸收剂量 / kGy

    Absorbed dose

    平均剂量 / kGy

    Average dose

    偏差[(A-B)/B] /%

    Deviation [(A-B)/B]

    静态吸收剂量率范围3.0~4.0 kGy/h

    Static absorbed dose rate range

    10 053.1514.00

    A

    13.94

    0.61
    10 043.5513.96
    9 929.9613.59
    10 124.6814.22

    动态吸收剂量率范围2.7~122.2 kGy/h

    Dynamic absorbed dose rate range

    10 106.3714.10

    B

    13.86

    10 047.3513.93
    10 001.6713.81
    9 936.7813.59
    Table 4. Comparison of irradiation responses at different dose rates
    不确定度分量Uncertainty componentsA / %B / %
    校准曲线拟合Calibration curve fitting2.12
    剂量计重复性PTFE dosimeter repeatability PTFE0.20
    溯源不确定度Traceability uncertainty1.15

    参考标准剂量计和校准剂量计在剂量上的差异

    Dose difference between reference standard dosimeter and calibration dosimeter

    0.34
    红宝石信号修正Ruby signal correction0.27
    剂量计重量称量偏差Dosimeter weight measurement deviation0.45
    旋转影响Dosimeter weight measurement deviation0.06
    翻转影响Flip effect0.12
    开始温度修正Initial temperature correction0.10
    结束温度修正Final temperature correction0.12

    方和根法合并A类/B类不确定度

    The square and root methods combine Class A/Class B uncertainty

    2.131.32
    合成不确定Combined uncertainty2.51
    扩展不确定度(k=2) Expanded uncertainty5.02
    Table 5. Uncertainty analysis of PTFE dosimeter
    Jingfeng CHANG, Guanghua ZHANG, Guozhong WU, Rongfang SHEN, Kaifeng DONG, Kanghai ZHENG. Investigating the performance of polytetrafluoroethylene solid free radical dosimeter[J]. Journal of Radiation Research and Radiation Processing, 2024, 42(6): 060209
    Download Citation