• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 62, Issue 2, 0237012 (2025)
Xinlei Wang1、2、*, Chenxu Liao1, Shuo Wang1, and Ruilin Xiao1
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, Jiangsu , China
  • 2School of Electronic Information Engineering, Wuxi University, Wuxi 214105, Jiangsu , China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP241236 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Xinlei Wang, Chenxu Liao, Shuo Wang, Ruilin Xiao. Lightweight Network for Real-Time Object Detection in Fisheye Cameras[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2025, 62(2): 0237012 Copy Citation Text show less
    Overall framework of Fisheye-YOLOv8
    Fig. 1. Overall framework of Fisheye-YOLOv8
    Faster-EMA module and convolution calculation process
    Fig. 2. Faster-EMA module and convolution calculation process
    Calculation process of EMA module
    Fig. 3. Calculation process of EMA module
    The fusion mode of BiFPN
    Fig. 4. The fusion mode of BiFPN
    Internal structure of RFAConv
    Fig. 5. Internal structure of RFAConv
    RetinaNet architecture
    Fig. 6. RetinaNet architecture
    Comparison of G-LHead and original detection head modifications
    Fig. 7. Comparison of G-LHead and original detection head modifications
    The detection effects under different conditions. (a)‒(c) Original images; (a1)‒(c1) detection results of EfficientDet; (a2)‒(c2) detection results of PGDS-YOLOv8s; (a3)‒(c3) detection results of YOLOv8m; (a4)‒(c4) detection results of Fisheye-YOLOv8
    Fig. 8. The detection effects under different conditions. (a)‒(c) Original images; (a1)‒(c1) detection results of EfficientDet; (a2)‒(c2) detection results of PGDS-YOLOv8s; (a3)‒(c3) detection results of YOLOv8m; (a4)‒(c4) detection results of Fisheye-YOLOv8
    Front camera and side camera detection results.(a)‒(b) Original images; (a1)‒(b1) detection results of EfficientDet; (a2)‒(b2) detection results of PGDS-YOLOv8s; (a3)‒(b3) detection results of YOLOv8m; (a4)‒(b4) detection results of Fisheye-YOLOv8
    Fig. 9. Front camera and side camera detection results.(a)‒(b) Original images; (a1)‒(b1) detection results of EfficientDet; (a2)‒(b2) detection results of PGDS-YOLOv8s; (a3)‒(b3) detection results of YOLOv8m; (a4)‒(b4) detection results of Fisheye-YOLOv8
    Detection effects of LOAF dataset. (a)‒(d) Original images; (a1)‒(d1) detection results of YOLOv8m; (a2)‒(d2) detection results of Fisheye-YOLOv8
    Fig. 10. Detection effects of LOAF dataset. (a)‒(d) Original images; (a1)‒(d1) detection results of YOLOv8m; (a2)‒(d2) detection results of Fisheye-YOLOv8
    Detection effects of VisDrone2019 dataset. (a)‒(d) Original image; (a1)‒(d1) detection results of YOLOv8m; (a2)‒(d2) detection results of Fisheye-YOLOv8
    Fig. 11. Detection effects of VisDrone2019 dataset. (a)‒(d) Original image; (a1)‒(d1) detection results of YOLOv8m; (a2)‒(d2) detection results of Fisheye-YOLOv8
    MethodP /%R /%mAP /%Params /106GFLOPs /109FPS
    YOLOv8m79.834.658.325.878.789
    YOLOv8m+Faster-EMA79.534.458.320.468.295
    YOLOv8m+Faster-EMA+RFA-BiFPN79.935.859.912.261.2101
    YOLOv8m+Faster-EMA+RFA-BiFPN+G-LHead82.234.759.810.048.7109
    YOLOv8m+Faster-EMA+RFA-BiFPN+G-LHead+LAMP83.136.360.55.323.4118
    Table 1. The impact of each module on different indicators
    ModelmAP /%
    busbikecarpedestriantruck
    YOLOv8m69.558.369.736.544.9
    YOLOv8m+Faster-EMA68.157.970.537.145.5
    YOLOv8m+Faster-EMA+RFA-BiFPN67.858.871.141.859.6
    YOLOv8m+Faster-EMA+RFA-BiFPN+G-LHead66.359.171.243.159.2
    YOLOv8m+Faster-EMA+RFA-BiFPN+G-LHead+LAMP70.159.870.643.258.8
    Table 2. Influences of each module on different detection objects
    ModelP /%R /%mAP /%Params /106GFLOPs /109FPS
    Faster-RCNN65.227.124.8136.9370.227
    EfficientDet69.433.344.512.025.129
    SSD67.832.137.326.362.743
    YOLOv5s81.525.954.19.123.8123
    YOLOv778.941.539.936.5103.2129
    YOLOv8m79.834.658.325.878.789
    FisheyeDet78.233.555.316.344.2108
    PGDS-YOLOv8s82.335.760.210.828.5115
    Fisheye-YOLOv883.136.360.55.323.4118
    Table 3. Performance comparison of different algorithms on Fisheye8K data set
    ModelP /%R /%mAP /%
    Faster-RCNN63.725.323.1
    EfficientDet67.938.542.5
    SSD68.640.638.6
    YOLOv5s78.335.256.6
    YOLOv775.746.242.4
    YOLOv8m76.541.258.5
    FisheyeDet76.843.156.8
    PGDS-YOLOv8s78.242.359.2
    Fisheye-YOLOv878.544.259.7
    Table 4. Performance comparison of different algorithms on WoodScape datasets
    ModelP /%R /%mAP /%Params /106GFLOPs /109FPS
    YOLOv8m77.540.561.225.878.795
    Fisheye-YOLOv877.345.362.35.323.4127
    Table 5. Generalization studies on LOAF datasets
    ModelP /%R /%mAP /%Params /106GFLOPs /109FPS
    YOLOv8m51.240.541.125.878.798
    Fisheye-YOLOv853.441.042.65.323.4132
    Table 6. Generalization study on VisDrone2019 dataset
    Xinlei Wang, Chenxu Liao, Shuo Wang, Ruilin Xiao. Lightweight Network for Real-Time Object Detection in Fisheye Cameras[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2025, 62(2): 0237012
    Download Citation