- Jun. 19, 2024
- Vol. 12, Issue 2 (2024)
- Dec. 12, 2023
- Vol. 11, Issue 4 (2023)
- Dec. 12, 2023
- Vol. 11, Issue 5 (2023)
- Aug. 07, 2023
- Vol. 11, Issue 3 (2023)
- May. 08, 2023
- Vol. 11, Issue 1 (2023)
- Mar. 14, 2023
- Vol. 10, Issue 5 (2023)
- Oct. 17, 2022
- Vol. 10, Issue 4 (2022)
- Sep. 28, 2022
- Vol. 10, Issue 3 (2022)
- Sep. 28, 2022
- Vol. 10, Issue 2 (2022)
- Jun. 03, 2022
- Vol. 10, Issue 1 (2022)
- Jun. 03, 2022
- Vol. 9, Issue 4 (2021)
- Mar. 03, 2022
- Vol. 9, Issue 3 (2021)
- Mar. 02, 2022
- Vol. 9, Issue 2 (2021)
- Oct. 27, 2021
- Vol. 9, Issue 1 (2021)
- Feb. 07, 2021
- Vol. 18, Issue 4 (2020)
- Dec. 18, 2020
- Vol. 8, Issue 3 (2020)
- Sep. 28, 2020
- Vol. 8, Issue 2 (2020)
- May. 22, 2020
- Vol. 8, Issue 1 (2020)
- Feb. 11, 2020
- Vol. 7, Issue 4 (2019)
- Feb. 11, 2020
- Vol. 7, Issue 3 (2019)
Due to the range of size, density, and resolution demands associated with industrial x-ray radiography, there is not a source that is “one-size fits all”. Compromises and optimisations must be made depending on the object of study. For example, the X-ray source required to image a small biological sample is significantly different in both spectral and spatial demands to that for an aircraft weld. Both examples, however, are readily achieved with laser driven systems. Altering the source characteristics to deliver what is needed requires continued study. This publication explores the X-ray emission from spatially constrained targets compared to standard foil targets. The research results are published in High Power Laser Science and Engineering, Volume 7, No. 2, 2019 (Armstrong, C. D. , et al. Bremsstrahlung emission from high power laser interactions with constrained targets for industrial radiography).
The data within this publication was measured during an experimental campaign using the Vulcan laser in Target Area West. We worked in conjunction with industrial partners to characterise and optimise the X-ray emission from solid target interactions with high intensity lasers. Changing the target from a foil configuration to a wire configuration was expected to improve the spatial profile of the X-ray source since there is a confined volume from which X-rays can be generated. The flux of X-ray sources is also investigated, a comparison between 25-100 μm wires and 25-600 μm thick foil is shown.
In thick targets, electrons are more likely to collide with the target material and emit bremsstrahlung prior to interacting with the sheath on the rear surface. When interacting with the sheath, electrons typically lose some energy and subsequently recirculate through the target. This recirculation causes an increase in the spatial extent of the source, as the electrons continue to travel laterally through the target. These recirculating electrons still have significant energy enough to readily generate X-rays as they continue to circulate the target.
Switching to a wire target geometry removes the flux produced from the substrate, in the transverse direction, as there is no material from which to generate X-rays. Experimentally, we show that changing from a foil target to a wire target constricts the electron expansion as the electric field on the rear-surface of the target builds rapidly and covers a high proportion of the available surface area. The change in the sheath field results in a higher population of cooler recirculating electrons, which in turn results in an increase in the measured X-ray flux. Simulations using EPOCH in 2D show the sheath field developing faster on the wire target geometry, and by using the recirculating population outputted from EPOCH in a GEANT4 simulation, the increase in x-ray emission is demonstrated by applying electric fields to the target surfaces.
This simple targetry change is readily applicable to X-ray generation with solid targets, demonstrating a significant improvement in both the spatial resolution and the overall flux of the source, without necessitating invasive or complex experimental set ups. Going forward this technique can be applied to improve the image quality without necessitating a higher energy laser driver, the simulations demonstrate a 3x improvement in the conversion efficiency from electrons to X-rays and the experimental data shows a 1.5-2x increase in the detected X-ray flux and a 2.6x increase in the spatial resolution for an industrial sample.
Comparison of wire and foil targets, a) spatial profile of X-ray emission area, b) electron density (red) and field generation (blue), c) X-ray source location from GEANT4 simulations, d) Schematic of multiple X-ray source characterisation, e) ESF from sample object for each target type.
- Aug. 15, 2019
- Vol. 7, Issue 2 (2019)
Intense THz radiation sources have attracted increasing research interest due to their applications in coherent and incoherent control of matter, light and electron beams. With terawatt and petawatt laser systems, THz radiation from intense laser-plasma interactions (ILPI) has been demonstrated as a novel intense THz source. The measurement of THz spectrum is very important to determine the generation mechanisms of the THz sources.
However, the existing THz spectrum measurement techniques do not work for ILPI-based THz sources. This is because the repetition rate of ILPI-based THz sources is quite low at present, typically below 1 Hz, even in single shot. As a result, multi-shot scanning methods, such as electro-optic sampling and autocorrelation measurement with a Michelson interferometer, are almost impossible to characterize the ILPI sources. Moreover, the bandwidth of ILPI THz sources can reach tens of THz, which also limits the application of electro-optic sampling techniques since the effective bandwidth is only several THz for common electrooptical crystals such as ZnTe and GaP.
New diagnosing methods or techniques, which can deliver single-shot and broad-band spectral measurements, should be developed. A research group from Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences developed a multichannel calorimeter system which was used in a single-shot way to characterize the spectrum of THz radiation in high-power picosecond laser-solid interaction experiment. THz radiation from target front surface propagates backward relative to the incident laser, which is referred as backward THz radiation (BTR). A number of mechanisms are proposed to be responsible for the BTR generation, such as coherent transition radiation, linear mode conversion, and surface fast electron currents. In the experiment, the dependence of the BTR energy and spectrum on laser energy, target thickness and pre-plasma scale length is studied. By comparing the experimental results with theoretical mechanisms, it is concluded that coherent transition radiation is responsible for the low frequency component (< 1 THz) of BTR. The Linear Mode Conversion mechanism starts to work when a large-scale pre-plasma is formed in the target front surface, which enhances the high frequency components (> 3 THz). The research results are published in High Power Laser Science and Engineering, Volume 7, Issue 1, 2019 (H. Liu, et al,Study of backward terahertz radiation from intense picosecond laser–solid interactions using a multichannel calorimeter system).
“The method of THz radiation spectrum measurement used in the article is not novel, but it provides a valid way to characterize the ILPL sources. And the spectrometer will play an important role in the studies and applications of ILPI THz sources based on large-scale laser facilities.” said Profess Yutong Li.
The multichannel calorimeter system developed in this work provides a convenient single-shot method to study the generation mechanism of the broad-band THz radiation generated in large laser facility-based experiments. The instrument should be updated in the future to improve its spectral resolution.
The schematic layout of the multichannel calorimeter system in the experiment
- May. 23, 2019
- Vol. 7, Issue 1 (2019)
With the dawn of new high-power laser and accelerator facilities, modern physics was able to reach extreme states of matter normally found only in the universe or deep inside the core of our planet. One of those extreme regimes is referred to as warm dense matter (WDM), which in fact is a type of state reaching moderately high temperatures ranging from 0.1 to 100 eV, and solid densities, which mostly corresponds to strongly coupled plasmas with fully or partially degenerate electron species. This is also a primary reason why WDM is poorly understood by theory.
Often, WDM exists at high pressures reaching above 1 M bar both in a laboratory as well as in astrophysical objects. WDM is common in astrophysical bodies such as brown dwarfs, crusts of old stars, white dwarf stars and high-pressure phenomena such as supernova explosions, collisions of celestial bodies and astrophysical jets. The study of structure, thermodynamic state, equation of state (EOS) and transport properties of WDM has become one of the key aspects of laboratory astrophysicsh as well as inertial confinement fusion (ICF), where the imploding capsule goes through the WDM regime on its way to ignition.
A review article published in High Power Laser Science and Engineering, Volume 6, Issue 4, 2018(Katerina Falk, Experimental methods for warm dense matter research) introduced some of the key research topics including phase separation of species within planetary mantles and phase transitions in elements under extreme pressures inside planetary cores or during asteroid impacts with examples of the most exciting recent experimental results.
The review article makes brief overview of major theoretical efforts to study the structure of WDM. A comprehensive introduction to the experimental methods in WDM research, including various types of generation of these states at different laboratory facilities as well as the diagnostic methods used, was provided. The primarily emphasized the novel methods to reach highly compressed states using high power lasers and free electron X-ray lasers that have generated a rapid development in this field over the past two decades, and also discussed for completeness.
Especially, the development of short-pulse optical and X-ray laser pulses meant a true revolution for laboratory astrophysics. Many new diagnostic methods based on these light sources have recently been developed to study WDM in its full complexity. Ultrafast nonequilibrium dynamics has been accessed for the first time thanks to sub-picosecond laser pulses achieved at new facilities.
Recent years saw a number of major discoveries with direct implications to astrophysics such as the formation of diamond at pressures relevant to interiors of frozen giant planets, metallic hydrogen under conditions such as those found inside Jupiter’s dynamo or formation of lonsdaleite crystals under extreme pressures during asteroid impacts. This article is the first and yet still relatively brief and approachable review that tackles all of the experimental techniques developed for experimental study of WDM and should serve as a good introduction to the field for students or experienced researchers interested to broaden their scope.
A snapshot of a DFT-MD simulation of isochoricaly heated warm dense beryllium at a temperature of 12 eV. Shown are the position of the nuclei (green spheres) and several isosurfaces of the electronic density ranging from core electrons to valence electrons.
- Mar. 14, 2019
- Vol. 6, Issue 4 (2018)
Accretion processes are among the most important phenomena in high-energy astrophysics as they are widely believed to provide the power supply in several astrophysical objects (from stellar objects to massive black holes), and are the main source of radiation in a large number of interactive binary systems. The release of gravitational energy in the form of radiation energy is a complex physical process but fundamental in interpreting astronomical observations.
Among the numerous accretion systems, from young stellar objects to active galactic nuclei, the research group from Ecole Polytechnique of Paris is particularly interested in those where an accretion column is believed to be formed (polars). They are close binary systems containing a white dwarf (WD) that accretes matter from a late type Roche-lobe filling secondary star. In these systems, the magnetic field is strong enough to prevent the formation of an accretion disk, so matter piles up to the compact object’s magnetic poles, leading to the formation of an accretion column. These objects are potential embryos of thermonuclear supernovae, standard candles that allow us to measure the distance of distant galaxies, and their cosmological repercussions. Therefore, in studying polars the researchers can provide some answers to the cosmological challenges. The impact of the supersonic free-fall accreting matter on the WD photosphere leads to the formation of a radiative reverse shock and gives rise to strong emission from soft to hard x-rays. Astronomical observations showed unexplained luminosity oscillations, which could be related, for example, to unstable thermal oscillations of the shock front or magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) instabilities in the accretion column. As the reverse shock position in these systems is too close to the WD photosphere (~ 100-1000 km), the accretion region is unresolved by direct observations and structural parameters such as the shock height, temperature cannot be defined. The structure of this high-energy environment depends as well on multi-scale physics introducing issues for theoretical and numerical modeling. The members from research group have developed a new experimental platform that couples a strong external magnetic field (up to 15 T) with high-power lasers (∼kJ), enabling to collimate the flow without using a tube and to study the magnetized reverse-shock dynamics related to accretion processes with a particular emphasis on POLAR. Related results are published in High Power Laser Science and Engineering, Vol. 6, Issue 3, 2018 (B. Albertazzi, et al., Experimental platform for the investigation of magnetized-reverse-shock dynamics in the context of POLAR).
“The only way to study these systems in detail is to reproduce a scaled astrophysical experiment” said Dr. Bruno Albertazzi. Preliminary results show that an instability seems to develop in the accretion column and the structure of the magnetized reverse shock seems complex but needs to be confirmed in future work.
2D MHD radiative Flash simulation performed 75 ns after the beginning of the interaction.
- Mar. 14, 2019
- Vol. 6, Issue 3 (2018)
As laser facilities have grown in size and power, understanding how electromagnetic pulses (EMPs) are generated has become an issue of great practical importance. High intensity lasers can induce strong fields (MV•m-1) and massive currents (MA) in solid targets, producing EMP radiation that disrupts electrical measurements and damages electrical equipment. A number of different mechanisms have been proposed to explain the broad spectral profile of laser-driven EMP, ranging from direct current processes up to transition radiation at terahertz frequency. When high-power lasers interact with materials, they accelerate hot electrons that escape from and electrically polarize the target. If the target is grounded, a neutralization current is pulled out of the chamber through the target support. It is thought that this current is responsible for the emission of intense electromagnetic pulses at gigahertz frequency that are disruptive to electronics. Today, there is growing interest in the applications of directed EMPs and fast current generation, though with the advent of intense, high repetition-rate lasers like the Extreme Light Infrastructure, strategies to limit EMP emission remain of considerable importance.
The research group had two objectives in the study: first to characterize the energy of the EMP emission (to understand how it varied with laser and target parameters) and second to see if it could be reduced. The research group of professor N. C. Woolsey used the Vulcan West laser system at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory for our experiment, reaching a maximum intensity of ∼2×1019W•cm-2 at best focus. The laser beam was directed onto copper targets mounted on a variety of support stalks. To measure the energy of the EMP, the researchers installed three passive probes behind glass windows on opposite sides of the interaction chamber. A Bdot and Ddot probe were positioned facing the front of the laser target and a further Bdot probe was directed towards the target rear. Probe signals at megahertz and gigahertz frequency were then integrated by first author P. Bradford to produce a measure of the total EMP energy. The results have been published in High Power Laser Science and Engineering, Vol 6, 2018 (P. Bradford et al., EMP control and characterization on high-power laser systems).
The first phase of the experiment looked at how EMP energy scaled with different lasers and target parameters, in order to assess qualitative agreement with theoretical models. Varying the laser energy from 7-70 J, the researchers observed a linear relationship with EMP energy. They also looked at the variation of EMP energy with laser pulse duration, pre-pulse delay and defocus. These scans suggested that the higher the laser intensity, or the more energy coupled to the plasma, the greater the EMP emission. When the researchers examined the effect of target size on EMP, they found that smaller foils and wire targets produced drastically reduced EMP. Indeed, EMP energy was over an order of magnitude less for wire targets (Ø=25-100μm) than for 3 mm×8 mm rectangular foils.
Since the EMP is generated by a current discharge mechanism (which can be pictured as a radio-frequency radio frequency control (RLC) circuit), a key experimental objective was to see if the EMP energy could be modified by changing the resistance, R, inductance, L, and capacitance, C, of the target mount. The research group fielded three different geometrical designs: a cylindrical stalk, a mount with sinusoidal surface undulations and a spiral stalk (see Figure 1). First, the research group replaced Al cylindrical stalks with plastic and found that there was a very significant drop in EMP energy (over one third reduced). The researchers attribute this to increased stalk impedance that limits the size of the neutralization current. Then they replaced the cylindrical plastic stalk with a plastic spiral and plastic sinusoidal design. For the spiral stalk the effect was clear: the researchers found that the plastic spiral stalk reduced the EMP energy by over an order of magnitude compared with Al cylinders. The researchers also saw a significant reduction for the stalk with sinusoidal undulations, though the effect was less pronounced.
To verify whether the change in EMP was independent of the laser-target interaction, author Y. Zhang used an electron spectrometer to record the energy of emitted electrons emitted from the target rear surface. Her results showed that there was no significant reduction in electron emission for shots with the modified stalks.
To see if reduced EMP energy from the modified stalks was due to classical RLC effects, author F. Consoli ran a series of 3D particle-in-cell and electromagnetic simulations in which a cone of energetic electrons was emitted from a central target and the EMP energy measured at different points inside a virtual chamber. The simulations suggest that there will be a greater reduction in EMP than observed when using insulating versus conducting stalks and that geometry is a less important factor than stalk conductivity. It is therefore possible that other physical mechanisms may be required to explain our observations. For instance, charged particles and ionizing radiation from the laser-plasma interaction could be deposited along the length of plastic stalks, reducing the effectiveness of the insulator. This could also explain why the modified stalks were so successful, because their unusual geometry serves to partially shield the stalk surface against incoming particles/radiation and thereby guard against electrical breakdown. A second set of simulations were run with a stalk of half-length which showed much higher EMP energy and therefore provides us with tentative support for this theory. However, since the simulations did not take stalk ionization into account, more experiments are required before any definitive pronouncements can be made.
The experiment has demonstrated that a very significant reduction in EMP can be achieved by a simple modification of the target mount. In particular, a plastic spiral stalk has been shown to reduce the EMP energy by over an order of magnitude versus a metallic rod. The researchers are working on a complete explanation of why the stalks are effective using spectral analysis and by experimenting with other stalk designs. The researchers would also like to compare our laser and target parameter scans with leading theoretical models of EMP. Progress in this field depends on our ability to differentiate between the different mechanisms responsible for laser-driven EMP and, in understanding them, to tailor the emission according to our needs.
Three designs for the laser target mounts.
- Mar. 14, 2019
- Vol. 6, Issue 2 (2019)
“Rigorous cleanliness on the National Ignition Facility (NIF) is essential to assure that 99.5% optical efficiency is maintained on each of its 192 beam lines by minimizing obscuration and contamination-induced laser damage.” said James A. Pryatel and William H. Gourdin from Akima Infrastructure Services and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
In high power laser driving devices, it is essential to nullify the quality-reduction of the light beam caused by the deposition of contaminants on the optical elements and the laser damage caused by the contaminants to maintain optical efficiency of each of the multiple beam lines. The cleanliness of the cavity of the multisegment disk amplifier (MSA) has become one of the key factors that restrict the performance improvement of the MSA. Due to the presence of sealing materials, bonding materials, and metal parts in the MSA, large amounts of aerosols will be generated under the irradiation of high flux xenon lamps and high energy laser. Recent work has shown that xenon lamp radiation is the main reason for the damage of the components when the contaminant particles reach the surface of the optical element. Due to xenon lamp radiation, the elevated temperature of the surface contaminants is sufficient to melt or decompose most of the contaminant particles. This will generate local thermal gradients and thermal shocks on the surface of the optical element, causing hairline cracks on the surface of the optical element, which would expand further. Researchers have conducted extensive research on optical component cleaning procedures and steps, environmental requirements for the use of optical components, and the law of the settlement of contaminants.
Since NIF is one of the pioneers in building high power laser drivers, research on the cleanliness in the internal optical components of integrated chip amplifiers abroad was conducted earlier. Based on the accurate cleanliness identification system (SWIPE)and analytical chemistry techniques used for analysis of non-volatile residues and molecular contaminants while studying the antireflective coating of optical elements in the National Ignition Facility, S.C. Sommer et al. from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory found that the antireflective coating absorbs the airborne molecular contaminations (AMCs). Ghost images would be produced, and the performance of the antireflective coating would be further reduced after a step of loosening. At the same time, the small molecular weight is volatile, but the large molecular weight is volatile only near the vapor-pressure. As the pressure of the spatial filter is about 5-10 torr (1 torr≈133.322 Pa), just near the large molecular weight vapor pressure, this is one of the sources of the AMCs. The measures to ensure the cleanliness in the installation process include mobile clean room, quick connection technology (no other contamination induced activities in the connection process), and positive pressure assembly. The human factors in the installation process have great influence. Based on the idea of modularization and reducing human factor contamination sources, John Horvath from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory proposed that the installation of MSA should be carried out in the environment with a cleanliness level of class 100 with the maintenance structure of the amplifier being installed at the bottom of the amplifier, and the amplifier should be installed and replaced online by a sealed transport car. Wang Congyu from SIOM proposed a special technology of the combined MSA for Shenguang II laser driver system. Cheng Xiaofeng et al. from Chinese Academy of Engineering studied the design of the fan filter unit at the top of the combined MSA of the Shenguang-III laser driver system, and introduced some technical measures to ensure the effectiveness of the contamination control such as cleaning method, clean detection, and clean protection in detail.
Most of the studies above aim at the cleaning of the optical elements and cleaning control during installation. However, the cleanliness maintenance of the optical elements in operation is a dynamic process and effective flow field optimization is needed to remove the contaminants produced during the operation. There is no mature research report worldwide on the coupling of gas-solid two-phase flow between the contaminants and the clean gas, and the non-whirl flow of the internal amplifier in the MSA.
Since the clean environment of the MSA internal cavity has a great influence on the optical elements inside, it must be blown with nitrogen or air flow so as to reduce the contamination concentration after pumped by the xenon lamp. Therefore, reasonable and effective flow field of the MSA cavity is particularly important. The particles of contamination and clean gases belong to the category of gas-solid two-phase flow. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD), as a powerful tool for flow field analysis, can optimize the flow field with half effort. With the progress of industrial field, especially in the field of large-scale integrated circuits and biomedicine, the design of a clean room and the optimization of the flow field are important prerequisites for ensuring the quality of the products. Bing Wang from Tsinghua University provides a simplified mathematical method to evaluate the average air velocity and particle concentration by using a similar principle in the air pumping clean room for the wind bottom side. The flow distribution indoor is optimized by CFD technology. Se-Jin Yoo from Hanyang University uses Euler algorithm to simulate the settling velocity of particles. Li Yan from Tianjin University and Zhang Weigong from Harbin University of Civil Engineering and Architecture simulate the flow cleanroom and use air age to predict the flow field. The study on the maintenance of the cleanliness of the MSA revolves around the three factors, which are filter device, airflow rate, and flow pattern of gas flow. However, the research on vector flow of the cavity of the MSA remains to be established. The vector flow is not in just a single direction but can be in any direction. The dilution purification mechanism is not only different from the dilution-mixing effects with non-unidirectional cleaning technology, but also from the parallel streamline piston-effect with unidirectional flow. Although the streamlines of the vector flow are not parallel like the non-unidirectional flow cleanroom, they do not cross. The vector flow does not depend on the mixing effect, however, it relies on the oblique flow to discharge clean gas and contaminant particles.
The paper published in High Power Laser Science and Engineering, Vol.6, e1, 2018 (Ren Zhiyuan et al., Optimizing the cleanliness in multi-segment disk amplifiers based on vector flow schemes) studied the numerical model of the vector flow scheme for the MSA. The experiment confirmed the validity of the numerical model. The optimized vector flow scheme of MSA can more efficiently achieve and maintain its required cleanliness level.
In conclusion, with vector flow scheme, there is no obvious eddy flow in the cavity of the multisegment amplifier and on the surface of the optical elements. Therefore, vector flow can achieve a higher level of cleanliness for the amplifier more efficiently and quickly.
Streamlines for the flow field of the multisegment disk amplifier. Figure (a) and (b) are flow field on the surface of optical elements, Figure (c) and (d) are flow field inside the multisegment disk amplifier. In either circumstance, there is no obvious turbulence in the flow field distribution, and the flow field of the clean gas is very smooth.
- Mar. 14, 2019
- Vol. 6, Issue 1 (2018)
- Jan. 24, 2025
- Vol. , Issue (2025)
- Jan. 24, 2025
- Vol. , Issue (2025)
- Jan. 15, 2025
- Vol. , Issue (2025)
- Dec. 25, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Dec. 20, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Dec. 20, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Dec. 04, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Nov. 21, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Nov. 21, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Nov. 14, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Nov. 14, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Nov. 07, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Nov. 07, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Oct. 22, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Oct. 22, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Sep. 25, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Sep. 25, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Sep. 13, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Sep. 11, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Aug. 20, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Jul. 26, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Jul. 26, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Jul. 16, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Jul. 11, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Jul. 10, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Jul. 10, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Jul. 02, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Jul. 02, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Jun. 26, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Jun. 18, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Jun. 06, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- May. 28, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- May. 23, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- May. 15, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Apr. 28, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Apr. 24, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Apr. 18, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Apr. 11, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Apr. 11, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Apr. 02, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Mar. 28, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Mar. 19, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Mar. 06, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Mar. 06, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Mar. 06, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Feb. 26, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Feb. 26, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Feb. 22, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Feb. 19, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Jan. 31, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Jan. 25, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Jan. 19, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Jan. 15, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Jan. 03, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Dec. 28, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Dec. 27, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Dec. 22, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Dec. 22, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Dec. 14, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Dec. 11, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Dec. 11, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Dec. 07, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Dec. 04, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Nov. 27, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Nov. 27, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Nov. 21, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Nov. 06, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Nov. 06, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Oct. 30, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Oct. 26, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Oct. 26, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Sep. 27, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Sep. 21, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Sep. 08, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Aug. 28, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023-)
- Aug. 14, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Aug. 14, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Aug. 08, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Aug. 07, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Aug. 02, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Jul. 31, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Jul. 25, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Jul. 25, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Jul. 18, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Jun. 25, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Jun. 21, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Jun. 21, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Jun. 19, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Jun. 19, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Jun. 05, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Jun. 05, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Jun. 05, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Jun. 05, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Jun. 01, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- May. 29, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- May. 26, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- May. 23, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- May. 23, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- May. 23, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- May. 16, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- May. 16, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- May. 16, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Apr. 26, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Apr. 03, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Mar. 28, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Mar. 28, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Mar. 27, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Mar. 27, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Mar. 07, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Mar. 02, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Mar. 02, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Feb. 28, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Feb. 23, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Feb. 23, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Feb. 15, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Feb. 15, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Feb. 09, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Jan. 11, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Jan. 11, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Jan. 04, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Dec. 20, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- Dec. 14, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- Dec. 12, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- Nov. 29, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- Nov. 23, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- Nov. 14, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- Nov. 09, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- Nov. 03, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- Oct. 28, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- Oct. 20, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- Sep. 29, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- Sep. 16, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- Sep. 15, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- Sep. 09, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- Sep. 01, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- Aug. 25, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- Aug. 24, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- Aug. 15, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- Aug. 03, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- Jul. 28, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- Jul. 26, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- Jul. 14, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- Jul. 07, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- Jun. 07, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- Jun. 07, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- May. 30, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- May. 12, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- May. 12, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- Apr. 16, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- Mar. 22, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- Mar. 22, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- Mar. 22, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- Jan. 16, 2025
- Vol. 12, Issue 6 (2025)
- Jan. 16, 2025
- Vol. 12, Issue 6 (2025)
- Nov. 12, 2024
- Vol. 12, Issue 4 (2024)
- Nov. 12, 2024
- Vol. 12, Issue 4 (2024)
- Nov. 12, 2024
- Vol. 12, Issue 4 (2024)
- Nov. 12, 2024
- Vol. 12, Issue 4 (2024)
- Jul. 04, 2024
- Vol. 12, Issue 2 (2024)
- Mar. 22, 2024
- Vol. 12, Issue 1 (2024)
- Mar. 22, 2024
- Vol. 12, Issue 1 (2024)
- Mar. 22, 2024
- Vol. 11, Issue 6 (2024)
- Dec. 14, 2023
- Vol. 11, Issue 6 (2023)
- Dec. 12, 2023
- Vol. 11, Issue 6 (2023)
- Nov. 24, 2023
- Vol. 11, Issue 5 (2023)
- Nov. 24, 2023
- Vol. 11, Issue 4 (2023)
- Nov. 24, 2023
- Vol. 11, Issue 4 (2023)
- Nov. 24, 2023
- Vol. 11, Issue 3 (2023)
- Nov. 24, 2023
- Vol. 11, Issue 3 (2023)
- Nov. 24, 2023
- Vol. 11, Issue 3 (2023)
- Aug. 07, 2023
- Vol. 11, Issue 3 (2023)
- Aug. 07, 2023
- Vol. 11, Issue 3 (2023)
- Aug. 07, 2023
- Vol. 11, Issue 2 (2023)
- Aug. 07, 2023
- Vol. 11, Issue 2 (2023)
- Aug. 07, 2023
- Vol. 11, Issue 2 (2023)
- Aug. 07, 2023
- Vol. 11, Issue 1 (2023)
- May. 22, 2023
- Vol. 11, Issue 1 (2023)
- May. 22, 2023
- Vol. 11, Issue 1 (2023)
- Mar. 14, 2023
- Vol. 10, Issue 5 (2023)
- Mar. 14, 2023
- Vol. 10, Issue 5 (2023)
- Mar. 14, 2023
- Vol. 10, Issue 4 (2023)
- Jul. 22, 2022
- Vol. 10, Issue 1 (2022)
- Dec. 13, 2021
- Vol. 9, Issue 3 (2021)
- Aug. 09, 2021
- Vol. 9, Issue 2 (2021)
- Aug. 09, 2021
- Vol. 9, Issue 2 (2021)
- Aug. 06, 2021
- Vol. 9, Issue 2 (2021)
- Aug. 06, 2021
- Vol. 9, Issue 2 (2021)
- Aug. 03, 2021
- Vol. 9, Issue 1 (2021)
- Jul. 08, 2021
- Vol. 9, Issue 2 (2021)
- Jun. 15, 2021
- Vol. 9, Issue 1 (2021)
- May. 14, 2021
- Vol. 9, Issue 1 (2021)
- Mar. 10, 2021
- Vol. 8, Issue 4 (2020)
- Jul. 17, 2020
- Vol. 8, Issue 2 (2020)
- Jun. 15, 2020
- Vol. 8, Issue 1 (2020)
- Apr. 10, 2020
- Vol. 8, Issue 1 (2020)
- Apr. 10, 2020
- Vol. 8, Issue 1 (2020)
- Apr. 10, 2020
- Vol. 8, Issue 1 (2020)
- Apr. 10, 2020
- Vol. 8, Issue 1 (2020)
- Dec. 24, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Dec. 04, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Dec. 04, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Nov. 21, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Oct. 22, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Sep. 25, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Sep. 13, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Sep. 05, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Sep. 05, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Aug. 30, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Aug. 30, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Aug. 20, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Aug. 07, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Aug. 07, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Jul. 30, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Jul. 26, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Jul. 26, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Jul. 16, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- May. 23, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- May. 15, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Apr. 16, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Apr. 08, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Mar. 27, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Feb. 19, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Jan. 16, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Dec. 07, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Dec. 04, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Nov. 21, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Nov. 21, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Oct. 27, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Aug. 28, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023-)
- Aug. 07, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Jul. 18, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Jul. 06, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Jun. 27, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Jun. 27, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Jun. 25, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Jun. 19, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Jun. 01, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- May. 26, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- May. 17, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- May. 08, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- May. 08, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Apr. 26, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Apr. 25, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Apr. 25, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Apr. 12, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Mar. 31, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Mar. 28, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Mar. 24, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Mar. 14, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Mar. 06, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Mar. 02, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Feb. 28, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Feb. 08, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Feb. 08, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Jan. 16, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Jan. 04, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Jan. 04, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Dec. 07, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- Oct. 13, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- Sep. 30, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- Sep. 22, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- Aug. 09, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- Aug. 08, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- Aug. 04, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- Jun. 27, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- Apr. 16, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- Apr. 16, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- Mar. 18, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- May. 21, 2024
- Vol. 12, Issue (2024)
- May. 10, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Mar. 30, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Jul. 28, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- Jun. 10, 2022
- Vol. 10, Issue (2022)
- Jan. 18, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- Oct. 18, 2021
- Vol. , Issue (2022)
- May. 17, 2021
- Vol. 8, Issue 2 (2021)
- Feb. 25, 2021
- Vol. , Issue (2021)
- Jan. 29, 2021
- Vol. 9, Issue 4 (2021)
- Aug. 10, 2020
- Vol. 9, Issue 1 (2020)
- Mar. 20, 2020
- Vol. 8, Issue 1 (2020)
Bright X-rays and applications
High power terahertz sources and applications
Laser driven electron and ion acceleration
Bright X-rays and applications
C. D. Armstrong, C. M. Brenner, C. Jones, D. R. Rusby, Z. E. Davidson, Y. Zhang, J. Wragg, S. Richards, C. Spindloe, P. Oliveira, M. Notley, R. Clarke, S. R. Mirfayzi, S. Kar, Y. Li, T. Scott, P. McKenna, D. Neely.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(2): 02000e24
X-ray computed tomography of adhesive wicking into carbon foam
Sav Chima.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2017, 5(4): 04000e28
High power terahertz sources and applications
H. Liu, G.-Q. Liao, Y.-H. Zhang, B.-J. Zhu, Z. Zhang, Y.-T. Li, G. G. Scott, D. Rusby, C. Armstrong, E. Zemaityte, P. Bradford, N. Woolsey, P. Huggard, P. McKenna, D. Neely.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(1): 010000e6
Laser driven electron and ion acceleration
Polarized proton beams from laser-induced plasmas
Anna Hützen, Johannes Thomas, Jürgen Böker, Ralf Engels, Ralf Gebel, Andreas Lehrach, Alexander Pukhov, T. Peter Rakitzis, Dimitris Sofikitis, Markus Büscher.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(1): 01000e16
Monoenergetic proton beam accelerated by single reflection mechanism only during hole-boring stage
Wenpeng Wang, Cheng Jiang, Shasha Li, Hao Dong, Baifei Shen, Yuxin Leng, Ruxin Li, Zhizhan Xu.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(3): 03000e55
D. R. Rusby, C. D. Armstrong, G. G. Scott, M. King, P. McKenna, D. Neely.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(3): 03000e45
All-optical acceleration in the laser wakefield
F. Zhang, Z. G. Deng, L. Q. Shan, Z. M. Zhang, B. Bi, D. X. Liu, W. W. Wang, Z. Q. Yuan, C. Tian, S. Q. Yang, B. Zhang, Y. Q. Gu.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(4): 04000e63
Femtosecond laser-induced damage threshold in snow micro-structured targets
O. Shavit, Y. Ferber, J. Papeer, E. Schleifer, M. Botton, A. Zigler, Z. Henis.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(1): 010000e7
L. Volpe, R. Fedosejevs, G. Gatti, J. A. Pérez-Hernández, C. Méndez, J. Apiñaniz, X. Vaisseau, C. Salgado, M. Huault, S. Malko, G. Zeraouli, V. Ospina, A. Longman, D. De Luis, K. Li, O. Varela, E. García, I. Hernández, J. D. Pisonero, J. García Ajates, J. M. Alvarez, C. García, M. Rico, D. Arana, J. Hernández-Toro, L. Roso.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(2): 02000e25
F. Bisesto, M. Galletti, M. P. Anania, M. Ferrario, R. Pompili, M. Botton, A. Zigler, F. Consoli, M. Salvadori, P. Andreoli, C. Verona.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(3): 03000e53
Maser radiation from collisionless shocks: application to astrophysical jets
D. C. Speirs, K. Ronald, A. D. R. Phelps, M. E. Koepke, R. A. Cairns, A. Rigby, F. Cruz, R. M. G. M. Trines, R. Bamford, B. J. Kellett, B. Albertazzi, J. E. Cross, F. Fraschetti, P. Graham, P. M. Kozlowski, Y. Kuramitsu, F. Miniati, T. Morita, M. Oliver, B. Reville, Y. Sakawa, S. Sarkar, C. Spindloe, M. Koenig, L. O. Silva, D. Q. Lamb, P. Tzeferacos, S. Lebedev, G. Gregori, R. Bingham.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(1): 01000e17
Optical diagnostics for density measurement in high-quality laser-plasma electron accelerators
Fernando Brandi, Leonida Antonio Gizzi.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(2): 02000e26
M. King, N. M. H. Butler, R. Wilson, R. Capdessus, R. J. Gray, H. W. Powell, R. J. Dance, H. Padda, B. Gonzalez-Izquierdo, D. R. Rusby, N. P. Dover, G. S. Hicks, O. C. Ettlinger, C. Scullion, D. C. Carroll, Z. Najmudin, M. Borghesi, D. Neely, P. McKenna.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(1): 01000e14
Review on TNSA diagnostics and recent developments at SPARC_LAB
Fabrizio Bisesto, Mario Galletti, Maria Pia Anania, Massimo Ferrario, Riccardo Pompili, Mordechai Botton, Elad Schleifer, Arie Zigler.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(3): 03000e56
Laser-induced microstructures on silicon for laser-driven acceleration experiments
Tina Ebert, Nico W. Neumann, Torsten Abel, Gabriel Schaumann, Markus Roth.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2017, 5(2): 02000e13
Proton probing of laser-driven EM pulses travelling in helical coils
H. Ahmed, S. Kar, A.L. Giesecke, D. Doria, G. Nersisyan, O. Willi, C.L.S. Lewis, M. Borghesi.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2017, 5(1): 010000e4
- Apr. 01, 2020
- Vol. , Issue (2020)
Laser plasma interactions
Yao Zhao, Zhengming Sheng, Suming Weng, Shengzhe Ji, Jianqiang Zhu.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(1): 01000e20
L. Volpe, R. Fedosejevs, G. Gatti, J. A. Pérez-Hernández, C. Méndez, J. Apiñaniz, X. Vaisseau, C. Salgado, M. Huault, S. Malko, G. Zeraouli, V. Ospina, A. Longman, D. De Luis, K. Li, O. Varela, E. García, I. Hernández, J. D. Pisonero, J. García Ajates, J. M. Alvarez, C. García, M. Rico, D. Arana, J. Hernández-Toro, L. Roso.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(2): 02000e25
Collective absorption of laser radiation in plasma atsub-relativistic intensities
Y. J. Gu, O. Klimo, Ph. Nicolaï, S. Shekhanov, S. Weber, V. T. Tikhonchuk.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(3): 03000e39
K. Q. Pan, D. Yang, L. Guo, Z. C. Li, S. W. Li, C. Y. Zheng, S. E. Jiang, B. H. Zhang, X. T. He.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(2): 02000e36
Maximizing magnetic field generation in high power laser-solid interactions
L. G. Huang, H. Takabe, T. E. Cowan.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(2): 02000e22
M. King, N. M. H. Butler, R. Wilson, R. Capdessus, R. J. Gray, H. W. Powell, R. J. Dance, H. Padda, B. Gonzalez-Izquierdo, D. R. Rusby, N. P. Dover, G. S. Hicks, O. C. Ettlinger, C. Scullion, D. C. Carroll, Z. Najmudin, M. Borghesi, D. Neely, P. McKenna.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(1): 01000e14
Q. S. Feng, L. H. Cao, Z. J. Liu, C. Y. Zheng, X. T. He.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(4): 04000e58
Dynamic stabilization of plasma instability
S. Kawata, T. Karino, Y. J. Gu.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(1): 010000e3
Experimental methods for warm dense matter research
Katerina Falk.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(4): 04000e59
Laboratory study of astrophysical collisionless shock at SG-II laser facility
Dawei Yuan, Huigang Wei, Guiyun Liang, Feilu Wang, Yutong Li, Zhe Zhang, Baojun Zhu, Jiarui Zhao, Weiman Jiang, Bo Han, Xiaoxia Yuan, Jiayong Zhong, Xiaohui Yuan, Changbo Fu, Xiaopeng Zhang, Chen Wang, Guo Jia, Jun Xiong, Zhiheng Fang, Shaoen Jiang, Kai Du, Yongkun Ding, Neng Hua, Zhanfeng Qiao, Shenlei Zhou, Baoqiang Zhu, Jianqiang Zhu, Gang Zhao, Jie Zhang.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(3): 03000e45
D. Wu, X. T. He, W. Yu, S. Fritzsche.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(3): 03000e50
Conceptual design of an experiment to study dust destruction by astrophysical shock waves
M. J.-E. Manuel, T. Temim, E. Dwek, A. M. Angulo, P. X. Belancourt, R. P. Drake, C. C. Kuranz, M. J. MacDonald, B. A. Remington.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(3): 03000e39
Generation of strong magnetic fields with a laser-driven coil
Zhe Zhang, Baojun Zhu, Yutong Li, Weiman Jiang, Dawei Yuan, Huigang Wei, Guiyun Liang, Feilu Wang, Gang Zhao, Jiayong Zhong, Bo Han, Neng Hua, Baoqiang Zhu, Jianqiang Zhu, Chen Wang, Zhiheng Fang, Jie Zhang.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(3): 03000e38
R. Rodríguez, G. Espinosa, J. M. Gil, F. Suzuki-Vidal, T. Clayson, C. Stehlé, P. Graham.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(2): 02000e36
Laboratory radiative accretion shocks on GEKKO XII laser facility for POLAR project
L. Van Box Som, É. Falize, M. Koenig, Y. Sakawa, B. Albertazzi, P. Barroso, J.-M. Bonnet-Bidaud, C. Busschaert, A. Ciardi, Y. Hara, N. Katsuki, R. Kumar, F. Lefevre, C. Michaut, Th. Michel, T. Miura, T. Morita, M. Mouchet, G. Rigon, T. Sano, S. Shiiba, H. Shimogawara, S. Tomiya.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(2): 02000e35
Measurement and analysis of K-shell lines of silicon ions in laser plasmas
Bo Han, Feilu Wang, Jiayong Zhong, Guiyun Liang, Huigang Wei, Dawei Yuan, Baojun Zhu, Fang Li, Chang Liu, Yanfei Li, Jiarui Zhao, Zhe Zhang, Chen Wang, Jun Xiong, Guo Jia, Neng Hua, Jianqiang Zhu, Yutong Li, Gang Zhao, Jie Zhang.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(2): 02000e31
Analytical modelling of the expansion of a solid obstacle interacting with a radiative shock
Th. Michel, E. Falize, B. Albertazzi, G. Rigon, Y. Sakawa, T. Sano, H. Shimogawara, R. Kumar, T. Morita, C. Michaut, A. Casner, P. Barroso, P. Mabey, Y. Kuramitsu, S. Laffite, L. Van Box Som, G. Gregori, R. Kodama, N. Ozaki, P. Tzeferacos, D. Lamb, M. Koenig.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(2): 02000e30
EMP control and characterization on high-power laser systems
P. Bradford, N. C. Woolsey, G. G. Scott, G. Liao, H. Liu, Y. Zhang, B. Zhu, C. Armstrong, S. Astbury, C. Brenner, P. Brummitt, F. Consoli, I. East, R. Gray, D. Haddock, P. Huggard, P. J. R. Jones, E. Montgomery, I. Musgrave, P. Oliveira, D. R. Rusby, C. Spindloe, B. Summers, E. Zemaityte, Z. Zhang, Y. Li, P. McKenna, D. Neely.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(2): 02000e21
G. Cristoforetti, L. Antonelli, D. Mancelli, S. Atzeni, F. Baffigi, F. Barbato, D. Batani, G. Boutoux, F. D’Amato, J. Dostal, R. Dudzak, E. Filippov, Y. J. Gu, L. Juha, O. Klimo, M. Krus, S. Malko, A. S. Martynenko, Ph. Nicolai, V. Ospina, S. Pikuz, O. Renner, J. Santos, V. T. Tikhonchuk, J. Trela, S. Viciani, L. Volpe, S. Weber, L. A. Gizzi.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(3): 03000e51
Bao Du, Hong-Bo Cai, Wen-Shuai Zhang, Shi-Yang Zou, Jing Chen, Shao-Ping Zhu.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(3): 03000e40
J. Jarrett, M. King, R. J. Gray, N. Neumann, L. Döhl, C. D. Baird, T. Ebert, M. Hesse, A. Tebartz, D. R. Rusby, N. C. Woolsey, D. Neely, M. Roth, P. McKenna.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(1): 010000e2
Inertial confinement fusion
G. Cristoforetti, L. Antonelli, D. Mancelli, S. Atzeni, F. Baffigi, F. Barbato, D. Batani, G. Boutoux, F. D’Amato, J. Dostal, R. Dudzak, E. Filippov, Y. J. Gu, L. Juha, O. Klimo, M. Krus, S. Malko, A. S. Martynenko, Ph. Nicolai, V. Ospina, S. Pikuz, O. Renner, J. Santos, V. T. Tikhonchuk, J. Trela, S. Viciani, L. Volpe, S. Weber, L. A. Gizzi.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(3): 03000e51
The path to electrical energy using laser fusion
Stephen E. Bodner.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(4): 04000e63
Collective absorption of laser radiation in plasma atsub-relativistic intensities
Y. J. Gu, O. Klimo, Ph. Nicolaï, S. Shekhanov, S. Weber, V. T. Tikhonchuk.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(3): 03000e39
Dynamic stabilization of plasma instability
S. Kawata, T. Karino, Y. J. Gu.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(1): 010000e3
An investigation progress toward Be-based ablator materials for the inertial confinement fusion
Bingchi Luo, Jiqiang Zhang, Yudan He, Long Chen, Jiangshan Luo, Kai Li, Weidong Wu.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2017, 5(2): 02000e10
Laboratory astrophysics
Maser radiation from collisionless shocks: application to astrophysical jets
D. C. Speirs, K. Ronald, A. D. R. Phelps, M. E. Koepke, R. A. Cairns, A. Rigby, F. Cruz, R. M. G. M. Trines, R. Bamford, B. J. Kellett, B. Albertazzi, J. E. Cross, F. Fraschetti, P. Graham, P. M. Kozlowski, Y. Kuramitsu, F. Miniati, T. Morita, M. Oliver, B. Reville, Y. Sakawa, S. Sarkar, C. Spindloe, M. Koenig, L. O. Silva, D. Q. Lamb, P. Tzeferacos, S. Lebedev, G. Gregori, R. Bingham.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(1): 01000e17
Magnetic reconnection driven by intense lasers
Jiayong Zhong, Xiaoxia Yuan, Bo Han, Wei Sun, Yongli Ping.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(3): 03000e48
A. Casner, G. Rigon, B. Albertazzi, Th. Michel, T. Pikuz, A. Faenov, P. Mabey, N. Ozaki, Y. Sakawa, T. Sano, J. Ballet, P. Tzeferacos, D. Lamb, E. Falize, G. Gregori, M. Koenig.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(3): 03000e44
Physical parameter estimation with MCMC from observations of Vela X-1
Lan Zhang, Feilu Wang, Xiangxiang Xue, Dawei Yuan, Huigang Wei, Gang Zhao.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(2): 02000e37
A platform for high-repetition-rate laser experiments on the Large Plasma Device
D. B. Schaeffer, L. R. Hofer, E. N. Knall, P. V. Heuer, C. G. Constantin, C. Niemann.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(2): 02000e17
- Mar. 31, 2020
- Vol. , Issue (2020)
Target Fabrication
K. M. George, J. T. Morrison, S. Feister, G. K. Ngirmang, J. R. Smith, A. J. Klim, J. Snyder, D. Austin, W. Erbsen, K. D. Frische, J. Nees, C. Orban, E. A. Chowdhury, W. M. Roquemore.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(3): 03000e50
Advanced fuel layering in line-moving, high-gain direct-drive cryogenic targets
I. V. Aleksandrova, E. R. Koresheva.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(3): 03000e38
Assembly and metrology of NIF target subassemblies using robotic systems
K.-J. Boehm, N. Alexander, J. Anderson, L. Carlson, M. Farrell.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2017, 5(4): 04000e25
Alberto Valls Arrufat, Magdalena Budziszewska, Clement Lopez, Aymeric Nguyen, Jakub Sitek, Paul Jones, Chris Shaw, Ian Hayes, Gareth Cairns, Glenn Leighton.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2017, 5(4): 04000e24
C. Spindloe, D. Wyatt, S. Astbury, G. F. Swadling, T. Clayson, C. Stehlé, J. M. Foster, E. Gumbrell, R. Charles, C. N. Danson, P. Brummitt, F. Suzuki-Vidal.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2017, 5(3): 03000e22
Surface characterization of ICF capsule by AFM-based profilometer
Jie Meng, Xuesen Zhao, Xing Tang, Yihao Xia, Xiaojun Ma, Dangzhong Gao.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2017, 5(3): 03000e21
Importance of limiting hohlraum leaks at cryogenic temperatures on NIF targets
Suhas Bhandarkar, Nick Teslich, Ben Haid, Evan Mapoles.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2017, 5(3): 03000e19
Targets for high repetition rate laser facilities: needs, challenges and perspectives
I. Prencipe, J. Fuchs, S. Pascarelli, D. W. Schumacher, R. B. Stephens, N. B. Alexander, R. Briggs, M. Büscher, M. O. Cernaianu, A. Choukourov, M. De Marco, A. Erbe, J. Fassbender, G. Fiquet, P. Fitzsimmons, C. Gheorghiu, J. Hund, L. G. Huang, M. Harmand, N. J. Hartley, A. Irman, T. Kluge, Z. Konopkova, S. Kraft, D. Kraus, V. Leca, D. Margarone, J. Metzkes, K. Nagai, W. Nazarov, P. Lutoslawski, D. Papp, M. Passoni, A. Pelka, J. P. Perin, J. Schulz, M. Smid, C. Spindloe, S. Steinke, R. Torchio, C. Vass, T. Wiste, R. Zaffino, K. Zeil, T. Tschentscher, U. Schramm, T. E. Cowan.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2017, 5(3): 03000e17
Developing targets for radiation transport experiments at the Omega laser facility
D. Capelli, C.A. Charsley-Groffman, R.B. Randolph, D.W. Schmidt, T. Cardenas, F. Fierro, G. Rivera, C. Hamilton, J.D. Hager, H. M. Johns, N. E. Lanier, J.L. Kline.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2017, 5(3): 03000e15
Exploring novel target structures for manipulating relativistic laser-plasma interaction
Liangliang Ji, Sheng Jiang, Alexander Pukhov, Richard Freeman, Kramer Akli.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2017, 5(2): 02000e14
An automated, 0.5Hz nano-foil target positioning system for intense laser plasma experiments
Ying Gao, Jianhui Bin, Daniel Haffa, Christian Kreuzer, Jens Hartmann, Martin Speicher, Florian H. Lindner, Tobias M. Ostermayr, Peter Hilz, Thomas F. Rösch, Sebastian Lehrack, Franz Englbrecht, Sebastian Seuferling, Max Gilljohann, Hao Ding, Wenjun Ma, Katia Parodi, Jörg Schreiber.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2017, 5(2): 02000e12
Review on high repetition rate and mass production of the cryogenic targets for laser IFE
I.V. Aleksandrova, E.R. Koresheva.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2017, 5(2): 02000e11
A new spatial angle assembly method of the ICF target
Wenrong Wu, Lie Bi, Kai Du, Juan Zhang, Honggang Yang, Honglian Wang.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2017, 5(2): 020000e9
Efficient offline production of freestanding thin plastic foils for laser-driven ion sources
Sebastian Seuferling, Matthias Alexander Otto Haug, Peter Hilz, Daniel Haffa, Christian Kreuzer, Jörg Schreiber.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2017, 5(2): 020000e8
Permeation fill-tube design for inertial confinement fusion target capsules
B.S. Rice, J. Ulreich, C. Fella, J. Crippen, P. Fitzsimmons, A. Nikroo.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2017, 5(1): 010000e6
Tao Wang, Kai Du , Zhibing He, Xiaoshan He.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2017, 5(1): 010000e5
Laser and plasma diagnostics
Yao Zhao, Zhengming Sheng, Suming Weng, Shengzhe Ji, Jianqiang Zhu.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(1): 01000e20
L. Volpe, R. Fedosejevs, G. Gatti, J. A. Pérez-Hernández, C. Méndez, J. Apiñaniz, X. Vaisseau, C. Salgado, M. Huault, S. Malko, G. Zeraouli, V. Ospina, A. Longman, D. De Luis, K. Li, O. Varela, E. García, I. Hernández, J. D. Pisonero, J. García Ajates, J. M. Alvarez, C. García, M. Rico, D. Arana, J. Hernández-Toro, L. Roso.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(2): 02000e2
Collective absorption of laser radiation in plasma atsub-relativistic intensities
Y. J. Gu, O. Klimo, Ph. Nicolaï, S. Shekhanov, S. Weber, V. T. Tikhonchuk.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(3): 03000e39
K. Q. Pan, D. Yang, L. Guo, Z. C. Li, S. W. Li, C. Y. Zheng, S. E. Jiang, B. H. Zhang, X. T. He.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(2): 02000e36
Maximizing magnetic field generation in high power laser-solid interactions
L. G. Huang, H. Takabe, T. E. Cowan.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(2): 02000e22
M. King, N. M. H. Butler, R. Wilson, R. Capdessus, R. J. Gray, H. W. Powell, R. J. Dance, H. Padda, B. Gonzalez-Izquierdo, D. R. Rusby, N. P. Dover, G. S. Hicks, O. C. Ettlinger, C. Scullion, D. C. Carroll, Z. Najmudin, M. Borghesi, D. Neely, P. McKenna.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(1): 01000e14
Q. S. Feng, L. H. Cao, Z. J. Liu, C. Y. Zheng, X. T. He.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(4): 04000e58
Dynamic stabilization of plasma instability
S. Kawata, T. Karino, Y. J. Gu.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(1): 010000e3
Experimental methods for warm dense matter research
Katerina Falk.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(4): 04000e59
Laboratory study of astrophysical collisionless shock at SG-II laser facility
Dawei Yuan, Huigang Wei, Guiyun Liang, Feilu Wang, Yutong Li, Zhe Zhang, Baojun Zhu, Jiarui Zhao, Weiman Jiang, Bo Han, Xiaoxia Yuan, Jiayong Zhong, Xiaohui Yuan, Changbo Fu, Xiaopeng Zhang, Chen Wang, Guo Jia, Jun Xiong, Zhiheng Fang, Shaoen Jiang, Kai Du, Yongkun Ding, Neng Hua, Zhanfeng Qiao, Shenlei Zhou, Baoqiang Zhu, Jianqiang Zhu, Gang Zhao, Jie Zhang.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(3): 03000e45
D. Wu, X. T. He, W. Yu, S. Fritzsche.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(3): 03000e50
Conceptual design of an experiment to study dust destruction by astrophysical shock waves
M. J.-E. Manuel, T. Temim, E. Dwek, A. M. Angulo, P. X. Belancourt, R. P. Drake, C. C. Kuranz, M. J. MacDonald, B. A. Remington.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(3): 03000e39
Generation of strong magnetic fields with a laser-driven coil
Zhe Zhang, Baojun Zhu, Yutong Li, Weiman Jiang, Dawei Yuan, Huigang Wei, Guiyun Liang, Feilu Wang, Gang Zhao, Jiayong Zhong, Bo Han, Neng Hua, Baoqiang Zhu, Jianqiang Zhu, Chen Wang, Zhiheng Fang, Jie Zhang.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(3): 03000e38
R. Rodríguez, G. Espinosa, J. M. Gil, F. Suzuki-Vidal, T. Clayson, C. Stehlé, P. Graham.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(2): 02000e36
Laboratory radiative accretion shocks on GEKKO XII laser facility for POLAR project
L. Van Box Som, É. Falize, M. Koenig, Y. Sakawa, B. Albertazzi, P. Barroso, J.-M. Bonnet-Bidaud, C. Busschaert, A. Ciardi, Y. Hara, N. Katsuki, R. Kumar, F. Lefevre, C. Michaut, Th. Michel, T. Miura, T. Morita, M. Mouchet, G. Rigon, T. Sano, S. Shiiba, H. Shimogawara, S. Tomiya.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(2): 02000e35
Measurement and analysis of K-shell lines of silicon ions in laser plasmas
Bo Han, Feilu Wang, Jiayong Zhong, Guiyun Liang, Huigang Wei, Dawei Yuan, Baojun Zhu, Fang Li, Chang Liu, Yanfei Li, Jiarui Zhao, Zhe Zhang, Chen Wang, Jun Xiong, Guo Jia, Neng Hua, Jianqiang Zhu, Yutong Li, Gang Zhao, Jie Zhang.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(2): 02000e31
Analytical modelling of the expansion of a solid obstacle interacting with a radiative shock
Th. Michel, E. Falize, B. Albertazzi, G. Rigon, Y. Sakawa, T. Sano, H. Shimogawara, R. Kumar, T. Morita, C. Michaut, A. Casner, P. Barroso, P. Mabey, Y. Kuramitsu, S. Laffite, L. Van Box Som, G. Gregori, R. Kodama, N. Ozaki, P. Tzeferacos, D. Lamb, M. Koenig.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(2): 02000e30
EMP control and characterization on high-power laser systems
P. Bradford, N. C. Woolsey, G. G. Scott, G. Liao, H. Liu, Y. Zhang, B. Zhu, C. Armstrong, S. Astbury, C. Brenner, P. Brummitt, F. Consoli, I. East, R. Gray, D. Haddock, P. Huggard, P. J. R. Jones, E. Montgomery, I. Musgrave, P. Oliveira, D. R. Rusby, C. Spindloe, B. Summers, E. Zemaityte, Z. Zhang, Y. Li, P. McKenna, D. Neely.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(2): 02000e21
G. Cristoforetti, L. Antonelli, D. Mancelli, S. Atzeni, F. Baffigi, F. Barbato, D. Batani, G. Boutoux, F. D’Amato, J. Dostal, R. Dudzak, E. Filippov, Y. J. Gu, L. Juha, O. Klimo, M. Krus, S. Malko, A. S. Martynenko, Ph. Nicolai, V. Ospina, S. Pikuz, O. Renner, J. Santos, V. T. Tikhonchuk, J. Trela, S. Viciani, L. Volpe, S. Weber, L. A. Gizzi.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(3): 03000e51
Bao Du, Hong-Bo Cai, Wen-Shuai Zhang, Shi-Yang Zou, Jing Chen, Shao-Ping Zhu.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(3): 03000e40
J. Jarrett, M. King, R. J. Gray, N. Neumann, L. Döhl, C. D. Baird, T. Ebert, M. Hesse, A. Tebartz, D. R. Rusby, N. C. Woolsey, D. Neely, M. Roth, P. McKenna.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(1): 010000e2
Others
Yi Cai, Zhenkuan Chen, Shuiqin Zheng, Qinggang Lin, Xuanke Zeng, Ying Li, Jingzhen Li, Shixiang Xu.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(1): 01000e13
Zhiyu He, Guo Jia, Fan Zhang, Xiuguang Huang, Zhiheng Fang, Jiaqing Dong, Hua Shu, Junjian Ye, Zhiyong Xie, Yuchun Tu, Qili Zhang, Erfu Guo, Wenbing Pei, Sizu Fu.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(3): 03000e49
Performance of an elliptical crystal spectrometer for SGII X-ray opacity experiments
Ruirong Wang, Honghai An, Zhiyong Xie, Wei Wang.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(1): 010000e3
Optimizing the cleanliness in multi-segment disk amplifiers based on vector flow schemes
Zhiyuan Ren, Jianqiang Zhu, Zhigang Liu, Xiaowei Yang.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(1): 010000e1
- Mar. 31, 2020
- Vol. , Issue (2020)
Laser facility and engineering
Diode pumped solid state lasers
Laser facility and engineering
Technology development for ultraintense all-OPCPA systems
J. Bromage, S.-W. Bahk, I. A. Begishev, C. Dorrer, M. J. Guardalben, B. N. Hoffman, J. B. Oliver, R. G. Roides, E. M. Schiesser, M. J. Shoup, M. Spilatro, B. Webb, D. Weiner, J. D. Zuegel.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(1): 010000e4
Petawatt and exawatt class lasers worldwide
Colin N. Danson, Constantin Haefner, Jake Bromage, Thomas Butcher, Jean-Christophe F. Chanteloup, Enam A. Chowdhury, Almantas Galvanauskas, Leonida A. Gizzi, Joachim Hein, David I. Hillier, Nicholas W. Hopps, Yoshiaki Kato, Efim A. Khazanov, Ryosuke Kodama, Georg Korn, Ruxin Li, Yutong Li, Jens Limpert, Jingui Ma, Chang Hee Nam, David Neely, Dimitrios Papadopoulos, Rory R. Penman, Liejia Qian, Jorge J. Rocca, Andrey A. Shaykin, Craig W. Siders, Christopher Spindloe, Sándor Szatmári, Raoul M. G. M. Trines, Jianqiang Zhu, Ping Zhu, Jonathan D. Zuegel.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(3): 03000e54
ARCTURUS laser: a versatile high-contrast, high-power multi-beam laser system
M. Cerchez, R. Prasad, B. Aurand, A. L. Giesecke, S. Spickermann, S. Brauckmann, E. Aktan, M. Swantusch, M. Toncian, T. Toncian, O. Willi.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(3): 03000e37
Performance demonstration of the PENELOPE main amplifier HEPA I using broadband nanosecond pulses
D. Albach, M. Loeser, M. Siebold, U. Schramm.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(1): 010000e1
V. Bagnoud, J. Hornung, M. Afshari, U. Eisenbarth, C. Brabetz, Z. Major, B. Zielbauer.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(4): 04000e62
Xiao Liang, Xinglong Xie, Jun Kang, Qingwei Yang, Hui Wei, Meizhi Sun, Jianqiang Zhu.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(4): 04000e58
Status and development of high-power laser facilities at the NLHPLP
Jianqiang Zhu, Jian Zhu, Xuechun Li, Baoqiang Zhu, Weixin Ma, Xingqiang Lu, Wei Fan, Zhigang Liu, Shenlei Zhou, Guang Xu, Guowen Zhang, Xinglong Xie, Lin Yang, Jiangfeng Wang, Xiaoping Ouyang, Li Wang, Dawei Li, Pengqian Yang, Quantang Fan, Mingying Sun, Chong Liu, Dean Liu, Yanli Zhang, Hua Tao, Meizhi Sun, Ping Zhu, Bingyan Wang, Zhaoyang Jiao, Lei Ren, Daizhong Liu, Xiang Jiao, Hongbiao Huang, Zunqi Lin.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(4): 04000e55
400TW operation of Orion at ultra-high contrast
Stefan Parker, Colin Danson, David Egan, Stephen Elsmere, Mark Girling, Ewan Harvey, David Hillier, Dianne Hussey, Stephen Masoero, James McLoughlin, Rory Penman, Paul Treadwell, David Winter, Nicholas Hopps.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(3): 03000e47
B. Albertazzi, E. Falize, A. Pelka, F. Brack, F. Kroll, R. Yurchak, E. Brambrink, P. Mabey, N. Ozaki, S. Pikuz, L. Van Box Som, J. M. Bonnet-Bidaud, J. E. Cross, E. Filippov, G. Gregori, R. Kodama, M. Mouchet, T. Morita, Y. Sakawa, R. P. Drake, C. C. Kuranz, M. J.-E. Manuel, C. Li, P. Tzeferacos, D. Lamb, U. Schramm, M. Koenig.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(3): 03000e43
Progress of the injection laser system of SG-II
Wei Fan, Youen Jiang, Jiangfeng Wang, Xiaochao Wang, Dajie Huang, Xinghua Lu, Hui Wei, Guoyang Li, Xue Pan, Zhi Qiao, Chao Wang, He Cheng, Peng Zhang, Wenfa Huang, Zhuli Xiao, Shengjia Zhang, Xuechun Li, Jianqiang Zhu, Zunqi Lin.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(2): 02000e34
Analysis and construction status of SG-II 5PW laser facility
Jianqiang Zhu, Xinglong Xie, Meizhi Sun, Jun Kang, Qingwei Yang, Ailin Guo, Haidong Zhu, Ping Zhu, Qi Gao, Xiao Liang, Ziruo Cui, Shunhua Yang, Cheng Zhang, Zunqi Lin.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(2): 02000e29
Design and performance of final optics assembly in SG-II Upgrade laser facility
Zhaoyang Jiao, Ping Shao, Dongfeng Zhao, Rong Wu, Lailin Ji, Li Wang, Lan Xia, Dong Liu, Yang Zhou, Lingjie Ju, Zhijian Cai, Qiang Ye, Zhanfeng Qiao, Neng Hua, Qiang Li, Wei Pan, Lei Ren, Mingying Sun, Jianqiang Zhu, Zunqi Lin.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(2): 02000e14
Target alignment in the Shen-Guang II Upgrade laser facility
Lei Ren, Ping Shao, Dongfeng Zhao, Yang Zhou, Zhijian Cai, Neng Hua, Zhaoyang Jiao, Lan Xia, Zhanfeng Qiao, Rong Wu, Lailin Ji, Dong Liu, Lingjie Ju, Wei Pan, Qiang Li, Qiang Ye, Mingying Sun, Jianqiang Zhu, Zunqi Lin.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(1): 01000e10
Ultrashort pulse capability at the L2I high intensity laser facility
Gonçalo Figueira, Joana Alves, João M. Dias, Marta Fajardo, Nuno Gomes, Victor Hariton, Tayyab Imran, Celso P. João, Jayanath Koliyadu, Swen Künzel, Nelson C. Lopes, Hugo Pires, Filipe Ruão, Gareth Williams.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2017, 5(1): 010000e2
Free electron lasers
Dispersion effects on performance of free-electron laser based on laser wakefield accelerator
Ke Feng, Changhai Yu, Jiansheng Liu, Wentao Wang, Zhijun Zhang, Rong Qi, Ming Fang, Jiaqi Liu, Zhiyong Qin, Ying Wu, Yu Chen, Lintong Ke, Cheng Wang, Ruxin Li.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(4): 04000e64
Laser system design for table-top X-ray light source
Anne-Laure Calendron, Joachim Meier, Michael Hemmer, Luis E. Zapata, Fabian Reichert, Huseyin Cankaya, Damian N. Schimpf, Yi Hua, Guoqing Chang, Aram Kalaydzhyan, Arya Fallahi, Nicholas H. Matlis, Franz X. Kärtner.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(1): 01000e12
Maximizing magnetic field generation in high power laser-solid interactions
L. G. Huang, H. Takabe, T. E. Cowan.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(2): 02000e22
Fluid sample injectors for x-ray free electron laser at SACLA
Kensuke Tono.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2017, 5(2): 020000e7
Diode pumped solid state lasers
Jiangtao Guo, Jiangfeng Wang, Hui Wei, Wenfa Huang, Tingrui Huang, Gang Xia, Wei Fan, Zunqi Lin.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(1): 010000e8
Modeling of the 3D spatio-temporal thermal profile of joule-class -based laser amplifiers
Issa Tamer, Sebastian Keppler, Jörg Körner, Marco Hornung, Marco Hellwing, Frank Schorcht, Joachim Hein, Malte C. Kaluza.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(3): 03000e42
Jie Guo, Wei Wang, Hua Lin, Xiaoyan Liang.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(2): 02000e35
Pengfei Wang, Beijie Shao, Hongpeng Su, Xinlin Lv, Yanyan Li, Yujie Peng, Yuxin Leng.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(2): 02000e32
Paul Mason, Saumyabrata Banerjee, Jodie Smith, Thomas Butcher, Jonathan Phillips, Hauke Höppner, Dominik Möller, Klaus Ertel, Mariastefania De Vido, Ian Hollingham, Andrew Norton, Stephanie Tomlinson, Tinesimba Zata, Jorge Suarez Merchan, Chris Hooker, Mike Tyldesley, Toma Toncian, Cristina Hernandez-Gomez, Chris Edwards, John Collier.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(4): 04000e65
LD-pumped gas-cooled multislab Nd:glass laser amplification to joule level
Wenfa Huang, Jiangfeng Wang, Xinghua Lu, Tingrui Huang, Jiangtao Guo, Wei Fan, Xuechun Li.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(2): 02000e15
Scaling diode-pumped, high energy picosecond lasers to kilowatt average powers
Brendan A. Reagan, Cory Baumgarten, Elzbieta Jankowska, Han Chi, Herman Bravo, Kristian Dehne, Michael Pedicone, Liang Yin, Hanchen Wang, Carmen S. Menoni, Jorge J. Rocca.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(1): 01000e11
Yang Bai, Bing Bai, Diao Li, Yanxiao Sun, Jianlin Li, Lei Hou, Mingxuan Hu, Jintao Bai.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(1): 010000e4
Performance demonstration of the PENELOPE main amplifier HEPA I using broadband nanosecond pulses
D. Albach, M. Loeser, M. Siebold, U. Schramm.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(1): 010000e1
High-extraction-efficiency, nanosecond bidirectional ring amplifier with twin pulses
Tiancheng Yu, Jiangtao Guo, Gang Xia, Xiang Zhang, Fan Gao, Jiangfeng Wang, Wei Fan, Xiao Yuan.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(2): 02000e30
Fiber and fiber lasers
Yue Tao, Sheng-Ping Chen.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(2): 02000e28
High-brightness all-fiber Raman lasers directly pumped by multimode laser diodes
S. A. Babin.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(1): 01000e15
Dual-wavelength bidirectional pumped high-power Raman fiber laser
Zehui Wang, Qirong Xiao, Yusheng Huang, Jiading Tian, Dan Li, Ping Yan, Mali Gong.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(1): 010000e5
Peng Qin, Sijia Wang, Minglie Hu, Youjian Song.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(3): 03000e52
Zhengru Guo, Qiang Hao, Junsong Peng, Heping Zeng.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(3): 03000e47
Selective generation of individual Raman Stokes lines using dissipative soliton resonance pulses
He Xu, Sheng-Ping Chen, Zong-Fu Jiang.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(3): 03000e43
Kerong Jiao, Jian Shu, Hua Shen, Zhiwen Guan, Feiyan Yang, Rihong Zhu.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(2): 02000e31
High-peak-power temporally shaped nanosecond fiber laser immune to SPM-induced spectral broadening
Rongtao Su, Pengfei Ma, Pu Zhou, Zilun Chen, Xiaolin Wang, Yanxing Ma, Jian Wu, Xiaojun Xu.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(2): 02000e27
Meng Wang, Le Liu, Zefeng Wang, Xiaoming Xi, Xiaojun Xu.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(1): 01000e18
Deep-learning-based phase control method for tiled aperture coherent beam combining systems
Tianyue Hou, Yi An, Qi Chang, Pengfei Ma, Jun Li, Dong Zhi, Liangjin Huang, Rongtao Su, Jian Wu, Yanxing Ma, Pu Zhou.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(4): 04000e59
Jiaji Zhang, Duanduan Wu, Ruwei Zhao, Rongping Wang, Shixun Dai.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(4): 04000e65
Loss mechanism of all-fiber cascaded side pumping combiner
Chengmin Lei, Zilun Chen, Yanran Gu, Hu Xiao, Jing Hou.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(4): 04000e56
Pengfei Ma, Hu Xiao, Daren Meng, Wei Liu, Rumao Tao, Jinyong Leng, Yanxing Ma, Rongtao Su, Pu Zhou, Zejin Liu.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(4): 04000e57
Toward high-power nonlinear fiber amplifier
Hanwei Zhang, Pu Zhou, Hu Xiao, Jinyong Leng, Rumao Tao, Xiaolin Wang, Jiangming Xu, Xiaojun Xu, Zejin Liu.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(3): 03000e51
Jiangming Xu, Jun Ye, Hu Xiao, Jinyong Leng, Wei Liu, Pu Zhou.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(3): 03000e46
Long Huang, Pengfei Ma, Daren Meng, Lei Li, Rumao Tao, Rongtao Su, Yanxing Ma, Pu Zhou.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(3): 03000e42
Development and prospect of high-power Yb3+ doped fibers
Yibo Wang, Gui Chen, Jinyan Li.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(3): 03000e40
10 watt-level tunable narrow linewidth all-fiber amplifier
Ni Tang, Zhiyue Zhou, Zhixian Li, Zefeng Wang.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(2): 02000e33
Han Chi, Bowen Liu, Youjian Song, Minglie Hu, Lu Chai, Weidong Shen, Xu Liu, Chingyue Wang.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(2): 02000e27
Investigation on extreme frequency shift in silica fiber-based high-power Raman fiber laser
Jiaxin Song, Hanshuo Wu, Jun Ye, Hanwei Zhang, Jiangming Xu, Pu Zhou, Zejin Liu.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(2): 02000e28
Lingchao Kong, Jinyong Leng, Pu Zhou, Zongfu Jiang.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(2): 02000e25
Power scaling on tellurite glass Raman fibre lasers for mid-infrared applications
Tianfu Yao, Liangjin Huang, Pu Zhou, Bing Lei, Jinyong Leng, Jinbao Chen.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(2): 02000e24
Wei Chen, Bowen Liu, Youjian Song, Lu Chai, Qianjin Cui, Qingjing Liu, Chingyue Wang, Minglie Hu.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(2): 02000e18
kW-class high power fiber laser enabled by active long tapered fiber
Chen Shi, Hanwei Zhang, Xiaolin Wang, Pu Zhou, Xiaojun Xu.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(2): 02000e16
Sub-40-fs high-power Yb:CALYO laser pumped by single-mode fiber laser
Wenlong Tian, Geyang Wang, Dacheng Zhang, Jiangfeng Zhu, Zhaohua Wang, Xiaodong Xu, Jun Xu, Zhiyi Wei.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(4): 04000e64
302 W triple-frequency, single-mode, linearly polarized Yb-doped all-fiber amplifier
Xiang Zhao, Yifeng Yang, Hui Shen, Xiaolong Chen, Gang Bai, Jingpu Zhang, Yunfeng Qi, Bing He, Jun Zhou.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2017, 5(4): 04000e31
Man Jiang, Pengfei Ma, Long Huang, Jiangming Xu, Pu Zhou, Xijia Gu.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2017, 5(4): 04000e30
- Mar. 31, 2020
- Vol. , Issue (2020)
Optical materials and components
Ultrafast and attosecond optics
Extreme nonlinearity and relativistic optics
Ultrahigh power laser technologies
Optical materials and components
Rapid growth and properties of large-aperture 98%-deuterated DKDP crystals
Xumin Cai, Xiuqing Lin, Guohui Li, Junye Lu, Ziyu Hu, Guozong Zheng.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(3): 03000e46
High damage threshold liquid crystal binary mask for laser beam shaping
Gang Xia, Wei Fan, Dajie Huang, He Cheng, Jiangtao Guo, Xiaoqin Wang.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(1): 010000e9
Band-stop angular filtering with hump volume Bragg gratings
Fan Gao, Xin Wang, Tiancheng Yu, Xiang Zhang, Xiao Yuan.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(2): 02000e29
Cumulative material damage from train of ultrafast infrared laser pulses
A. Hanuka, K. P. Wootton, Z. Wu, K. Soong, I. V. Makasyuk, R. J. England, L. Schächter.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(1): 010000e7
Detection of laser-induced optical defects based on image segmentation
Xinkun Chu, Hao Zhang, Zhiyu Tian, Qing Zhang, Fang Wang, Jing Chen, Yuanchao Geng.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(4): 04000e66
Overview of ytterbium based transparent ceramics for diode pumped high energy solid-state lasers
Samuel Paul David, Venkatesan Jambunathan, Antonio Lucianetti, Tomas Mocek.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(4): 04000e62
Variation of the band structure in DKDP crystal excited by intense sub-picosecond laser pulses
Xiaocong Peng, Yuanan Zhao, Yueliang Wang, Zhen Cao, Guohang Hu, Jianda Shao.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(3): 03000e41
Jing Wang, Chunhong Li, Wenjie Hu, Wei Han, Qihua Zhu, Yao Xu.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(2): 02000e26
Corrosion behaviors of the copper alloy electrodes in ArF excimer laser operation process
Xin Guo, Jinbin Ding, Yi Zhou, Yu Wang.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(1): 010000e9
Faraday effect measurements of holmium oxide (Ho2O3) ceramics-based magneto-optical materials
David Vojna, Ryo Yasuhara, Hiroaki Furuse, Ondrej Slezak, Simon Hutchinson, Antonio Lucianetti, Tomas Mocek, Miroslav Cech.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(1): 010000e2
Kerong Jiao, Jian Shu, Hua Shen, Zhiwen Guan, Feiyan Yang, Rihong Zhu.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(2): 02000e31
Huai Xiong, Bin Shen, Zhiya Chen, Xu Zhang, Haiyuan Li, Yongxing Tang, Lili Hu.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2017, 5(4): 04000e29
Modeling the mechanical properties of ultra-thin polymer films
Francisco Espinosa-Loza, Michael Stadermann, Chantel Aracne-Ruddle, Rebecca Casey, Philip Miller, Russel Whitesides.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2017, 5(4): 04000e27
Research and development of new neodymium laser glasses
Dongbing He, Shuai Kang, Liyan Zhang, Lin Chen, Yajun Ding, Qianwen Yin, LiLi Hu.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2017, 5(1): 010000e1
Ultrafast and attosecond optics
Jinsheng Liu, Jingui Ma, Jing Wang, Peng Yuan, Guoqiang Xie, Liejia Qian.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(4): 04000e61
Directly writing binary multi-sector phase plates on fused silica using femtosecond laser
Li Zhou, Youen Jiang, Peng Zhang, Wei Fan, Xuechun Li.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(1): 010000e6
Technology development for ultraintense all-OPCPA systems
J. Bromage, S.-W. Bahk, I. A. Begishev, C. Dorrer, M. J. Guardalben, B. N. Hoffman, J. B. Oliver, R. G. Roides, E. M. Schiesser, M. J. Shoup, M. Spilatro, B. Webb, D. Weiner, J. D. Zuegel.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(1): 010000e4
Pengfei Wang, Beijie Shao, Hongpeng Su, Xinlin Lv, Yanyan Li, Yujie Peng, Yuxin Leng.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(2): 02000e32
Attosecond twisted beams from high-order harmonic generation driven by optical vortices
Carlos Hernández-García, Laura Rego, Julio San Román, Antonio Picón, Luis Plaja.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2017, 5(1): 010000e3
Extreme nonlinearity and relativistic optics
Quantum electrodynamics experiments with colliding petawatt laser pulses
I. C. E. Turcu, B. Shen, D. Neely, G. Sarri, K. A. Tanaka, P. McKenna, S. P. D. Mangles, T.-P. Yu, W. Luo, X.-L. Zhu, Y. Yin.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(1): 01000e10
Mario Galletti, Hugo Pires, Victor Hariton, Celso Paiva João, Swen Künzel, Marco Galimberti, Gonçalo Figueira.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(1): 01000e11
Zhigang Zhao, Akira Ozawa, Makoto Kuwata-Gonokami, Yohei Kobayashi.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(2): 02000e19
K. Q. Pan, D. Yang, L. Guo, Z. C. Li, S. W. Li, C. Y. Zheng, S. E. Jiang, B. H. Zhang, X. T. He.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(2): 02000e36
Guihua Li, Hongqiang Xie, Ziting Li, Jinping Yao, Wei Chu, Ya Cheng.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2017, 5(4): 04000e26
Ultrahigh power laser technologies
Performance demonstration of the PENELOPE main amplifier HEPA I using broadband nanosecond pulses
D. Albach, M. Loeser, M. Siebold, U. Schramm.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(1): 010000e1
Optimization of the pulse width and injection time in a double-pass laser amplifier
Daewoong Park, Jihoon Jeong, Tae Jun Yu.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(4): 04000e60
Rao Li, Youen Jiang, Zhi Qiao, Canhong Huang, Wei Fan, Xuechun Li, Zunqi Lin.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(4): 04000e53
Intra-cycle depolarization of ultraintense laser pulses focused by off-axis parabolic mirrors
Luca Labate, Gianluca Vantaggiato, Leonida A. Gizzi.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(2): 02000e32
Linear angular dispersion compensation of cleaned self-diffraction light with a single prism
Xiong Shen, Peng Wang, Jun Liu, Ruxin Li.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(2): 02000e23
Wavefront control of laser beam using optically addressed liquid crystal modulator
Dajie Huang, Wei Fan, He Cheng, Gang Xia, Lili Pei, Xuechun Li, Zunqi Lin.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(2): 02000e20
Improvements in long-term output energy performance of Nd:glass regenerative amplifiers
Peng Zhang, Youen Jiang, Jiangfeng Wang, Wei Fan, Xuechun Li, Jianqiang Zhu.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2017, 5(4): 04000e23
The special shaped laser spot for driving indirect-drive hohlraum with multi-beam incidence
Ping Li, Sai Jin, Runchang Zhao, Wei Wang, Fuquan Li, Mingzhong Li, Jingqin Su, Xiaofeng Wei.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2017, 5(3): 03000e20
Others
Xue Dong, Xingchen Pan, Cheng Liu, Jianqiang Zhu.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(3): 03000e48
Dong Zhi, Tianyue Hou, Pengfei Ma, Yanxing Ma, Pu Zhou, Rumao Tao, Xiaolin Wang, Lei Si.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(2): 02000e33
Simulation and analysis of the time evolution of laser power and temperature in static pulsed XPALs
Chenyi Su, Binglin Shen, Xingqi Xu, Chunsheng Xia, Bailiang Pan.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(3): 03000e44
Hang Yuan, Yulei Wang, Qiang Yuan, Dongxia Hu, Can Cui, Zhaohong Liu, Sensen Li, Yi Chen, Feng Jing, Zhiwei Lü.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(3): 03000e41
FM-to-AM conversion in angular filtering based on transmitted volume Bragg gratings
Fan Gao, Baoxing Xiong, Xiang Zhang, Xiao Yuan.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(2): 02000e34
High-extraction-efficiency, nanosecond bidirectional ring amplifier with twin pulses
Tiancheng Yu, Jiangtao Guo, Gang Xia, Xiang Zhang, Fan Gao, Jiangfeng Wang, Wei Fan, Xiao Yuan.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(2): 02000e30
Analysis on FM-to-AM conversion of SSD beam induced by etalon effect in a high-power laser system
Ping Li, Wei Wang, Jingqin Su, Xiaofeng Wei.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(2): 02000e21
Sub-40-fs high-power Yb:CALYO laser pumped by single-mode fiber laser
Wenlong Tian, Geyang Wang, Dacheng Zhang, Jiangfeng Zhu, Zhaohua Wang, Xiaodong Xu, Jun Xu, Zhiyi Wei.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(4): 04000e64
Cheng Xi, Peng Wang, Xiao Li, Zejin Liu.
High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2019, 7(4): 04000e67
- Mar. 31, 2020
- Vol. , Issue (2020)
- Mar. 22, 2024
- Vol. 11, Issue 6 (2024)
- Nov. 24, 2023
- Vol. 11, Issue 3 (2023)
- Nov. 07, 2023
- Vol. 11, Issue 5 (2023)
- Dec. 14, 2022
- Vol. 10, Issue 2 (2022)
- Dec. 12, 2022
- Vol. 10, Issue 2 (2022)
- Dec. 12, 2022
- Vol. 10, Issue 1 (2022)
- Nov. 03, 2021
- Vol. 9, Issue 2 (2021)
- May. 21, 2024
- Vol. , Issue (2024)
- Jun. 10, 2022
- Vol. 10, Issue (2022-2024)
- Jan. 18, 2022
- Vol. , Issue (2022-2023)
- Oct. 18, 2021
- Vol. 10, Issue 3 (2021-2023)
- Mar. 30, 2023
- Vol. , Issue (2023)
- Feb. 25, 2021
- Vol. , Issue (2021-2022)
- Jan. 29, 2021
- Vol. 9, Issue 4 (2021-2022)
- Dec. 17, 2020
- Vol. 8, Issue (2020)
- Aug. 10, 2020
- Vol. 9, Issue 1 (2021)
- Jul. 12, 2019
- Vol. 6,7, Issue (2018-2019)
- Jul. 12, 2019
- Vol. 6,7, Issue (2018-2019)
- Jul. 12, 2019
- Vol. 6, Issue (2018)
- Jul. 12, 2019
- Vol. 5,6,7, Issue (2017-2019)
- Jul. 12, 2019
- Vol. 5,6, Issue (2017-2018)
- Jul. 12, 2019
- Vol. 4, Issue (2016)
- Jul. 12, 2019
- Vol. 4,5, Issue (2016-2017)
- Jul. 12, 2019
- Vol. 4,5, Issue (2016-2017)
- Jul. 12, 2019
- Vol. 4, Issue (2016)
- Jul. 12, 2019
- Vol. 3,4, Issue (2015-2016)
- Jul. 12, 2019
- Vol. 3,4, Issue (2015-2016)
- Jul. 12, 2019
- Vol. 2,3, Issue (2014-2015)
- Jul. 12, 2019
- Vol. 2,6, Issue (2014-2018)
- Jul. 12, 2019
- Vol. 2,4,5, Issue (2014-2017)
- Jul. 12, 2019
- Vol. 2,3, Issue (2014-2015)
- Jul. 12, 2019
- Vol. 2,3, Issue (2014-2015)