
- Chinese Optics Letters
- Vol. 20, Issue 7, 071401 (2022)
Abstract
1. Introduction
Gas-filled microstructured hollow-core fibers (MS-HCFs) have demonstrated many advantages as a minimized gas cell and shown the promising potential of reforming the bulky gas laser[
The stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) of gas was first observed, to the best of our knowledge, in 1963[
In 2002[
Given the nature of SRS, the
In spite of continuous interest in the pulsed FGRL, continuous-operation FGRL was seldom reported. Lack of proper pump sources with spectral brightness comparable with the pulsed laser makes the CW SRS threshold a challenge to reach. In 2007[
In this Letter, we report the continuous Rot-SRS lasing in H2-filled AR-HCF in a single-pass configuration with a large-core diameter exceeding 35 µm for the first time, to the best of our knowledge. Up to 26 W of Rot-SRS output at 1135 nm was demonstrated, pumped by a circularly polarized single-frequency fiber laser at 1064 nm with 10 kHz linewidth. A maximum slope efficiency of 40.3% was obtained in a 50 m fiber length filled with 2.5 bar (1 bar = 105 Pa) H2 gas. The threshold of FRGL was measured as 31.5 W. We found that the emergence of backward Rot-SRS and the cascaded Rot-SRS would ultimately limit the FRGL output.
2. Experimental Setup
The homemade AR-HCF in this paper was fabricated by the stack-and-draw technique method, using Heraeus F300 fused silica tubes, as shown in the inset of Fig. 1. The cladding of AR-HCF consists of seven capillaries, with an average capillary diameter of about 17 µm and core wall thickness of around 335 nm. The fiber attenuation was measured by a cut back and around 0.11 dB/m and 0.13 dB/m at 1064 nm (pump wavelength) and 1135 nm (first Stokes of Rot-SRS) wavelengths, respectively. The core diameter of AR-HCF is about 35 µm, and the fundamental-like mode diameter at 1064 nm wavelength is simulated around 26 µm.
Figure 1.Measured attenuation of AR-HCF by a cut-back from 96.8 m to 22 m. Inset: SEM picture of AR-HCF. The core diameter is about 35 µm.
Figure 2 shows the schematic of the experiment setup. The pump source was a homemade single-frequency continuous fiber laser operating at the 1064 nm wavelength, with a linewidth of 10 kHz and a maximum output power above 70 W[
Figure 2.Schematic of the laser delivery setup. HWP is half wave plate; ISO is isolator; QWP is quarter wave plate; L1, L2, L3, L4 are coated aspherical lenses with f1 = 50 mm, f2 = 150 mm, f3 = 90 mm, f4 = 50 mm; M1 is a sampler to monitor the power of the laser source and backward Stokes light; M2 is another sampler used to monitor the output power and beam profile or wavelength at the same time; PM1, PM2 are power meters. At BM1 and BM2 positions, pump and Stokes laser beams were characterized by using a power meter, optical spectral analyzer, and pyroelectric array camera, respectively.
The single-pass FGRL consists of a 50 m AR-HCF, as shown in Fig. 2. The AR-HCF was loosely rewound on a steel plate in a circle with a radius of about 50 cm to avoid any notable bend loss[
Before the incident end of the AR-HCF, a sampler (M1) (9:1) was used to monitor the pump power and collect the possible backward laser beam with a long-pass filter (LPF) together. Coated sapphire glass plates were used as the windows of gas cells with transmission efficiencies of 99% and 98.5% at 1064 nm and 1135 nm, respectively.
At the output end, the laser beam was collimated by the lens (L4) and then characterized by the thermal power meter, optical fiber spectrometer (Ideaoptics NIR2500), and pyroelectric array camera (Pyrocam IIIHR), respectively. Another LPF was used to separate the Stokes laser from the residual pump, with an average 97% transmission efficiency at wavelengths longer than 1100 nm and
3. Result and Discussion
In our experiment, the dependence of SRS on hydrogen pressure is explored at 2.5, 5, 7.5, and 10 bar, respectively. Typical spectra of forward emission at 5 bar for different pump powers are shown in Fig. 3. Figure 4 are the corresponding far-field beam patterns at the pump and Rot-SRS wavelengths. We attribute the slightly degraded output beam profile to the stress applied on AR-HCF when mounted by V-grooves in the gas cell.
Figure 3.Measured output spectra in the forward direction under 5 bar gas pressure for different pump power. Pumped at 1064 nm, the first rotational Stokes laser (RS1) of H2 is at 1135 nm, and the second rotational Stokes (RS2) at 1216 nm.
Figure 4.Far-field patterns at (a) 1064 nm and (b) 1135 nm measured at the output end of AR-HCF at 5 bar gas pressure.
As shown in Fig. 3, the cascaded Rot-SRS (RS2) at 1216 nm could be measured by the spectrometer at high pump power over 60 W while it was too weak for the thermal meter to respond. Vib-SRS at 1907 nm failed to be found for any
Figure 5 summarizes the power of the Stokes and residual pumps as a function of coupled pump power measured by a power meter. In the experiment, an LPF was used to record the Stokes power, and the residual pump power was then calculated by subtracting the total power of the Stokes from the total output.
Figure 5.Measured powers of the residual pump and forward and backward Rot-SRS as a function of coupled pump power with a H2 pressure at (a) 2.5 bar, (b) 5 bar, (c) 7.5 bar, and (d) 10 bar. In Region (I), Rot-SRS in the forward and backward directions is measured only; (II) bi-directional first Rot-SRS and forward second Rot-SRS, (III) the pump laser failed to work because strong backward Rot-SRS is disturbed. The forward Rot-SRS power (black line) and residual power (red line) refer to the left axis, and the backward Rot-SRS power (blue line) refers to the right axis.
In Region I of Fig. 5, only the forward and backward Rot-SRS Stokes were measured at all pressures. At higher pump power, the cascaded second Rot-SRS started to appear in Region II but remained weak in the forward direction at 2.5 and 5 bar pressures. In Region III, the pump laser failed before the cascaded Rot-SRS because the quick rise of Rot-SRS in the backward direction strongly interfered with the pump laser operation. In Fig. 6, conversion efficiencies of bidirectional Rot-SRS are replotted from the data in Fig. 5.
Figure 6.Power (left axis) and quantum conversion efficiency (right axis) of (a) forward Rot-SRS and (b) backward Rot-SRS as a function of coupled pump power at different gas pressures.
The maximum output of forward Rot-SRS appeared at 2.5 bar pressure, with a conversion efficiency of 40.4%. At higher pressures, despite a reduced threshold from 50.6 W down to 31.5 W, the rising of backward Rot-SRS started to compete and exhausted the gain of the single pass. Moreover, the backward Rot-SRS resulting in the pump failure also stopped the potentially higher FRGL output.
According to the threshold formula[
The maximum power of backward Rot-SRS reached 1.16 W at 10 bar pressure, with quantum efficiency close to 3%. Our continuous backward SRS generated in the experiment is much more efficient than reported previously[
In Table 1, we summarize and compare the pump thresholds of H2-filled FRGLs in the continuous and typical pulsed operations[
Pump Source Type | Fiber Core Diameter (µm) | Loss (dB/m) | Gas Pressure (bar) | Threshold Power (W) | Normalized Pump Threshold (W·MHz−1·µm−2) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
This paper | CW | 30 | 0.11 dB/m at 1064 nm; 0.13 dB/m at 1135 nm | 10 | 31.5 | 5.93 |
F. Couny et al. in 2007[ | CW | 5 | 0.1 dB/m at 1064 nm; 0.14 dB/m at 1135 nm | 5 | 2.25 | 1.125 |
F. Couny et al. in 2010[ | CW | 6 | 0.1 dB/m at 1061 nm; 0.14 dB/m at 1131 nm | 15 | 37 | 13.09 |
W. Huang et al. in 2020[ | Pulse (10 ns) | 9 | 0.016 dB/m at 1550 nm; 0.03 dB/m at 1700 nm | 16 | 40 (peak power) | 24.8 |
H. Li et al. in 2020[ | Pulse (12 ns) | 9 | 0.04 dB/m at 1540 nm; 0.11 dB/m at 1700 nm | 16 | 50 (peak power) | 25.18 |
Table 1. Comparison of Pump Thresholds in H2-Filled FGRLs under Continuous and Pulsed Operation
4. Conclusion
In conclusion, we demonstrated a low threshold and efficient Rot-SRS in
References
[1] H. Bao, W. Jin, H. L. Ho. Tuning of group delay with stimulated Raman scattering-induced dispersion in gas-filled optical fiber. Chin. Opt. Lett., 18, 060601(2020).
[2] Z. Zhang, Y. Wang, M. Zhou, J. He, C. Liao, Y. Wang. Recent advance in hollow-core fiber high-temperature and high-pressure sensing technology [Invited]. Chin. Opt. Lett., 19, 070601(2021).
[3] F. Benabid, J. C. Knight, G. Antonopoulos, P. St.J. Russell. Stimulated Raman scattering in hydrogen-filled hollow-core photonic crystal fiber. Science, 298, 399(2002).
[4] H. Sakr, T. D. Bradley, G. T. Jasion, E. N. Fokoua, S. R. Sandoghchi, I. A. Davidson, A. Taranta, G. Guerra, W. Shere, Y. Chen, J. R. Hayes, D. J. Richardson, F. Poletti. Hollow core NANFs with five nested tubes and record low loss at 850, 1060, 1300 and 1625 nm. Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition, 1(2021).
[5] R. W. Minck, R. W. Terhune, W. G. Rado. Laser stimulated Raman effect and resonant four-photon interactions in gases H2, D2, and CH4. Appl. Phys. Lett., 3, 181(1963).
[6] D. J. Brink, D. Proch. Efficient tunable ultraviolet source based on stimulated Raman scattering. Opt. Lett., 7, 494(1982).
[7] A. D. Papayannis, G. N. Tsikrikas, A. A. Serafetinides. Generation of UV and VIS laser light by stimulated Raman scattering in H2, D2, and H2/He using a pulsed Nd:YAG laser at 355 nm. Appl. Phys. B, 67, 563(1998).
[8] P. Rabinowitz, A. Kaldor, R. Brickman, W. Schmidt. Waveguide H2 Raman laser. Appl. Opt., 15, 2005(1976).
[9] L. S. Meng, K. S. Repasky, P. A. Roos, J. L. Carlsten. Widely tunable continuous-wave Raman laser in diatomic hydrogen pumped by an external-cavity diode laser. Opt. Lett., 25, 472(2000).
[10] F. Benabid, G. Bouwmans, J. C. Knight, P. St.J. Russell, F. Couny. Ultrahigh efficiency laser wavelength conversion in a gas-filled hollow core photonic crystal fiber by pure stimulated rotational Raman scattering in molecular hydrogen. Phys. Rev. Lett., 93, 123903(2004).
[11] Z. Wang, F. Yu, W. J. Wadsworth, J. C. Knight. Efficient 1.9 µm emission in H2-filled hollow core fiber by pure stimulated vibrational Raman scattering. Laser Phys. Lett., 11, 105807(2014).
[12] M. S. Astapovich, A. V. Gladyshev, M. M. Khudyakov, A. F. Kosolapov, M. E. Likhachev, I. A. Bufetov. Watt-level nanosecond 4.42 µm Raman laser based on silica fiber. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett., 31, 78(2019).
[13] W. Huang, Z. Li, Y. Cui, Z. Zhou, Z. Wang. Efficient, watt-level, tunable 1.7 µm fiber Raman laser in H2-filled hollow-core fibers. Opt. Lett., 45, 475(2020).
[14] Y. Cui, W. Huang, Z. Li, Z. Zhou, Z. Wang. High-efficiency laser wavelength conversion in deuterium-filled hollow-core photonic crystal fiber by rotational stimulated Raman scattering. Opt. Express, 27, 30396(2019).
[15] F. Benabid, G. Antonopoulos, J. C. Knight, P. St.J. Russell. Stokes amplification regimes in quasi-cw pumped hydrogen-filled hollow-core photonic crystal fiber. Phys. Rev. Lett., 95, 213903(2005).
[16] F. Benabid, F. Couny, J. C. Knight, T. A. Birks, P. St.J. Russell. Compact, stable and efficient all-fiber gas cells using hollow-core photonic crystal fibers. Nature, 434, 488(2005).
[17] F. Couny, F. Benabid, P. S. Light. Subwatt threshold CW Raman fiber-gas laser based on H2-filled hollow-core photonic crystal fiber. Phys. Rev. Lett., 99, 143903(2007).
[18] F. Couny, B. J. Mangan, A. V. Sokolov, F. Benabid. High power 55 watts CW Raman fiber-gas-laser. CLEO and QELS 2010 Conference(2010).
[19] Y. Cui, Z. Zhou, W. Huang, Z. Li, Z. Wang. Quasi-all-fiber structure CW mid-infrared laser emission from gas-filled hollow-core silica fibers. Opt. Laser Technol., 121, 105794(2020).
[20] Z. Wang, F. Yu, W. J. Wadsworth, J. C. Knight. Efficient 1.9 µm emission in H2-filled hollow core fiber by pure stimulated vibrational Raman scattering. Laser Phy. Lett., 11, 105807(2014).
[21] Y. Chen, Z. Wang, B. Gu, F. Yu, Q. Lu. Achieving a 1.5 µm fiber gas Raman laser source with about 400 kW of peak power and a 6.3 GHz linewidth. Opt. Lett., 41, 5118(2016).
[22] S. Edelstein, A. A. Ishaaya. High-efficiency Raman conversion in SF6- and CF4-filled hollow-core photonic bandgap fibers. Opt. Lett., 44, 5856(2019).
[23] S. Gao, Y. Wang, W. Ding, P. Wang. Hollow-core negative-curvature fiber for UV guidance. Opt. Lett., 43, 1347(2018).
[24] F. Yu, M. Xu, J. C. Knight. Experimental study of low-loss single-mode performance in anti-resonant hollow-core fibers. Opt. Express, 24, 12969(2016).
[25] X. Zeng, S. Cui, J. Qian, X. Cheng, J. Dong, J. Zhou. 10 W low-noise green laser generation by the single-pass frequency doubling of a single-frequency fiber amplifier. Laser Phys., 30, 075001(2020).
[26] R. M. Carter, F. Yu, W. J. Wadsworth, J. D. Shephard, T. Birks, J. C. Knight, D. P. Hand. Measurement of resonant bend loss in anti-resonant hollow core optical fiber. Opt. Express, 25, 20612(2017).
[27] M. R. Perrone, G. D. Nunzio, C. Panzera. Competition between vibrational and rotational Raman scattering in H2. Opt. Commun., 145, 128(1998).
[28] M. K. Mridha, D. Novoa, P. St.J. Russell. Dominance of backward stimulated Raman scattering in gas-filled hollow-core photonic crystal fibers. Optica, 5, 570(2018).
[29] H. Li, W. Huang, Y. Cui, Z. Zhou, Z. Wang. Pure rotational stimulated Raman scattering in H2-filled hollow-core photonic crystal fibers. Opt. Express, 28, 23881(2020).

Set citation alerts for the article
Please enter your email address