Removal Efficiency[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2020, 11(5): 525

- Journal of Resources and Ecology
- Vol. 11, Issue 5, 525 (2020)
Abstract
1 Introduction
The World Health Organization (WHO) classifies fluoride as a contaminant of water for human consumption. Several industries commonly discharge wastewater containing high concentrations of fluoride, including aluminum smelters, semiconductor manufacturing, the production and use of fertilizers, glass, brick and ceramic production, and the combustion of fossil fuels (
Aquatic flora plays an important role in the phytoremediation of polluted surface waters. Pistia stratiotes, a free-floating aquatic macrophyte, has been studied recently due to its rapid growth in contaminated water bodies (
In addition to demonstrating the high removal efficiency of pollutants from aqueous solution, understanding the mechanisms of tolerance to those pollutants, especially the antioxidative defense mechanisms, is important for its use in practical application (
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Plants and chemicals
Individual P. stratiotes plants of similar sizes were obtained from outdoor ponds in the suburbs of Xichang City, China. The plants were thoroughly washed with tap water and cleaned with deionized water prior to their use in the experiments. They were then acclimatized in plastic basins with tap water indoors for seven days. Healthy P. stratiotes with abundant roots were chosen and transplanted into 18 plastic containers (diameter is 25.3 cm, height is 15.1 cm, and volume is 6.8 L) with each container including with about 100-110 g biomass. The indoor air temperature was maintained between 27 ℃ and 30 ℃ and the water temperature in the plastic containers was kept between 23 ℃ and 27 ℃. All chemicals used were of analytical grade.
2.2 Chemical analyses
F- concentrations in the aqueous solutions were measured using Fluorine reagents spectrophotometry (HJ 488–2009, China). Fluoride in plant leaves was determined by Micro-diffusion methods (
2.3 Experimental design
Plants in the treatment groups were exposed to initial F- concentrations of 5, 10, 20, 40 and 60 mg L-1 by adding the appropriate amounts of sodium fluoride (NaF) and thoroughly mixing, and these samples were labeled AI, AII, AIII, AIV and AV, respectively. One control group of plants was cultivated with tap water and marked BI. Five control aqueous solutions without plants were prepared with F- concentrations of 5, 10, 20, 40 and 60 mg L-1, and were designated CI, CII, CIII, CIV and CV, respectively. Aqueous F- concentrations, levels of F- in the plants and physiological properties of the plants (SOD, CAT and POD) were measured every two days. The testing period lasted for eight days. According to our previous study, some P. stratiotes withered or died within eight days under the stress of high fluoride concentrations, so eight days was chosen as the duration of this study.
2.4 Data processing
The F- uptake rate was determined using the Michaelis- Menten equation (
where v is the rate of uptake, mg L-1 h-1; Vmax is the maximum rate of uptake, mg L-1 h-1; Km is the Michaelis-Menten constant; C0 is the initial concentration, mg L-1; C is the concentration at time t and T1/2 was defined as the time to halve the F- concentration in the aqueous solution.
Total importance value of plant productivity (S) was calculated as (
where Q is the Influence value, which was assigned by the influencing power of the three indexes (wilting degree, stem growth, and lodging state) as values of 10, 10 and 5, respectively. Each influence value is divided into three ranks (Rx: 1, 1/2, and 1/5) according to severity level. A plant without any symptoms was ranked as 1, and the value was then decreased to 1/2 or 1/5 as symptoms became more severe.
3 Results and discussion
3.1 Removal efficiency of P. stratiotes for F- in aqueous solution
The F- removal efficiencies for the different initial concentrations are shown in
Figure 1.Fig. 1
The removal efficiency ranged from 27.79% to 56.32% for each of the different initial concentrations. The removal rate was highest (56.32%) in the highest initial concentration group. The F- concentrations in the control groups changed very little, only by-1.135% to -0.007% of the initial concentrations. The initial concentrations had only a minor effect on the removal efficiency of control groups, indicating that the plants played an important role in F- removal. The kinetic parameters of the modified Michaelis-Menten equation for F- removal are shown in
Group | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
AI | 5 | 0.2533 | -3.4237 | 0.9806 |
AII | 10 | 0.485 | -7.1748 | 0.9808 |
AIII | 20 | 1.1145 | -16.4028 | 0.9766 |
AIV | 40 | 2.96 | -43.6132 | 0.9895 |
AV | 60 | 5.427 | -77.0471 | 0.9898 |
Table 1.
Kinetic parameters of fluoride removal from treated water
Data from the Michaelis-Menten equation calculations showed high correlations for the treated groups, with all correlation coefficients (R2) greater than 0.97. This suggests that the transport of fluoride is an active process, requiring an energy supply and selective binding sites (
3.2 Plant characteristics and growth
The growth status of the plants influences their resistance to pollutants, which is one important factor for the selection of wetland plants to use in phytoremediation. During the early stage of the experiment, all plant biomass increased, root systems became stouter and leaf areas enlarged. However, during the experimental time period, withering and lodging appeared and were more obvious for plants exposed to high concentrations of F-. Plants in the control groups (BI) showed normal growth without any pathology. At the end of the 8-day experiment, the root systems appeared to be shorter and were clearly dying (see
Treatment groups | AI | AII | AIII | AIV | AV | BI | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fresh weight (g) | Initial | 101.4 | 101.8 | 101.9 | 101.5 | 103.0 | 102.8 |
Ending | 92.0 | 86.9 | 76.3 | 65.6 | 54.2 | 143.6 | |
SGR (% d-1) | -1.22 | -1.98 | -3.62 | -5.46 | -8.03 | 4.18 |
Table 2.
Effect of different concentrations of fluoride on the growth characteristics of P. stratiotes
Based on vegetative power and the overall importance values, the groups were ranked as follows: AI (100) >AII (97.5) >AIII (81.5) >AIV (78.5) >AV (69.5). Therefore, P. stratiotes growth was influenced by the initial concentrations of F-. The Specific Growth Rate (SGR) was calculated based on the initial and final biomass weights, and the SGR of treatment groups varied from -1.22% to 8.03%. The SGR of plants under F- stress decreased during the experimental period. Presumably, harmful oxygen species were activated which could not be detoxified, and they contributed to the occurrence of visible injuries (
3.3 Effect of F-concentration in the solution on fluoride concentrations in the plants
Fluoride concentrations in P. stratiotes leaves increased significantly in the high F- treatments (
Figure 2.Fig. 2
The F- concentration for control group BI was stable throughout the 8-day treatment. It has been hypothesized that when the F- ionic strength of a solution increases, it suppresses the negative charge of the Donnan free space which allows a higher activity of F- close to the root uptake sites, promoting F- uptake (
3.4 Effects of different concentrations of F- on the activities of SOD, CAT and POD in leaves of P. stratiotes
Plants possess several antioxidant systems that protect them from oxidative damage. These defense systems are composed of enzymatic scavengers of activated oxygen, such as SOD, CAT and POD (
Figure 3.Fig. 3
Figure 4.Fig. 4
SOD is a protective antioxidant enzyme located in various cell compartments which catalyzes excess O2- to H2O2 and O2 molecules (
Figure 5.Fig. 5
stress is increased or prolonged, the defense systems of plants will weaken as the tolerance limit is exceeded (
3.5 Partial correlation analysis between fluoride and the physiological indexes of the plant
In the multivariate correlation analysis, simple correlation coefficients may not be able to accurately reflect the correlations between the variables because such relationships are very complex and may be simultaneously influenced by more than one variable (
Treatment groups | AI | AII | AIII | AIV | AV | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variable Significance coefficient | 0.0057 | 0.0097 | 0.0095 | 0.0012 | 0.0167 | ||
PCCs | Control | F- in water / Fluoride in leaves | 0.999 | 1.000 | 0.804 | 0.989 | 0.999 |
Control | 0.982 | 0.967 | 0.995 | 0.995 | 1.000 | ||
Control | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.987 | 0.993 | 0.997 | ||
Control | F- in water / POD | 0.900 | 0.848 | 0.999 | 0.781 | 0.706 | |
Control | F- in water / CAT | 0.653 | 0.645 | 0.990 | 0.486 | 0.958 | |
Control | F- in water / SOD | 0.911 | 0.804 | 1.000 | 0.855 | 0.672 |
Table 3.
Significance and PCCs between fluoride and the physiological indexes of the plant
The results revealed highly significant differences (P<0.01) between the F- of treatment groups AI, AII, AIII, AIV; and a significant difference (0.01< P< 0.05) in the F- in water of treatment group AV. The linear correlation between F- in water and fluoride in leaves is high (PCCs> 0.804) for all antioxidant enzyme controls. This indicates that the removal of F- from water is mainly due to uptake by the plant, despite the initial F- concentration and the antioxidant enzymes. Concentrations of F- in water were highly linearly correlated with POD (PCCs> 0.7), which demonstrates that the main enzyme reaction in P. stratiotes leaves under F- stress was peroxidase.
4 Conclusions
High initial concentrations of F- in water lead to increased plant absorption. The presence of P. stratiotes significantly improved the water quality by removing F-. The rates for Fremoval from the water were described well by the Michaelis-Menten equation, with correlation coefficients greater than 0.97 in all cases. The enzyme activities of SOD and POD first increased and then decreased throughout the experiment. CAT varied little across the 8-day treatments. Partial correlation analysis between the fluoride index and SOD, POD and CAT showed that POD plays an important role in the stress-resistance system (PCCs> 0.7, P< 0.05).
Since P. stratiotes is an invasive species, it is important to note that it grows easily in diverse tropical aquatic ecosystems and wastewater. As such, its growth should be strictly confined to remediation systems to avoid any unnecessary damage to native ecosystems. Further research should explore the changes in plant characteristics under high initial concentrations and longer treatment times to clarify the mechanism of F- removal by P. stratiotes. The effect of initial planting density on the growth of P. stratiotes may be another important point for further study. The stability in aqueous media and the reusability of P. stratiotes need to be characterized before this system can be applied to wastewater treatment.
References
[1] H Aebi. Methods of enzymatic analysis (second edition)., 673-680(1974).
[2] M Baunthiyal, V Sharma. Response of fluoride stress on plasma membrane H +- ATPase and vacuolar H +- ATPase activity in semi-arid plants. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology, 19, 210-214(2014).
[4] A Bhatnagar, E Kumar, M Sillanpää. Fluoride removal from water by adsorption—A review. Chemical Engineering Journal, 171, 811-840(2011).
[5] B Carolina, L Raúl S. Soybean as affected by high concentrations of arsenic and fluoride in irrigation water in controlled conditions. Agricultural Water Management, 144, 134-139(2014).
[6] B Fornasiero R. Phytotoxic effects of fluorides. Plant Science, 161, 979-985(2001).
[7] S Gill S, N Tuteja. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 48, 909-930(2010).
[8] H Guo Q, J Tian. Removal of fluoride and arsenate from aqueous solution by hydrocalumite via precipitation and anion exchange. Chemical Engineering Journal, 231, 121-131(2013).
[9] H Guo Z, X Cao H, X Qu S. Partial correlations in multipartite quantum systems. Information Sciences, 289, 262-272(2014).
[10] C Harrison P T. Fluoride in water: A UK perspective. Journal of Fluorine Chemistry, 126, 1448-1456(2005).
[11] J Huang C, C Liu J. Precipitate flotation of fluoride-containing wastewater from a semiconductor manufacturer. Water Research, 33, 3403-3412(1999).
[13] K Jha S, K Nayak A, K Sharma Y et al. Assessing seasonal variation of fluoride in groundwater for irrigation uses through hydro-geochemical and multivariate statistical approach. Toxicological & Environmental Chemistry, 97, 868-887(2015).
[15] Y Li, S Zhang S, S Jiang W. Cadmium accumulation, activities of antioxidant enzymes and malondialdehyde (MDA) content in
[17] N Ma A. Study on screening of dominant wetland plant species and purification by constructed wetland in Beijing. Ms.thesis, Beijing, China: Capital Normal University(2007).
[18] S Mahua, M Prasenjit, C Parames. Aqueous extract of the bark of Terminalia arjuna plays a protective role against sodium-fluoride-induced hepatic and renal oxidative stress. Nature Medicine, 61, 251-260(2007).
[19] A Medellin-Castilloa N, R Leyva-Ramos, E Padilla-Ortega et al. Adsorption capacity of bone char for removing fluoride from water solution: Role of hydroxyapatite content, adsorption mechanism and competing anions. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 20, 4014-4021(2014).
[22] R Muppala P, K Meenakshj. Sodium fluoride induced growth and metabolic changes in Salicornia brachiata Roxb. Water Air and Soil Pollution, 188, 171-179(2008).
[23] I Owamah H, A Enaboifo M, C Izinyon O. Treatment of wastewater from raw rubber processing industry using water lettuce macrophyte pond and the reuse of its effluent as biofertilized. Agricultural Water Management, 146, 262-269(2014).
[24] S Santos-Diaz M, C Zamora-Prdraza. Fluoride removal from water by plant species that are tolerant and highly tolerant tohydrogen fluoride. Fluoride, 43, 150-156(2010).
[25] G Sánchez-Galván, O Mercad F J, J Olguín E. Leaves and roots of
[27] S Sinha, A Basant, A Malik et al. Multivariate modeling of chromium-induced oxidative stress and biochemical changes in plants of
[28] F Song W, M Yan, Y Li et al. Study on the adsorption and oxidation of As (III) by
[29] P Stevens D, J Mclaughlin M, J Randall P. Effect of fluoride supply on fluoride concentrations in five pasture species: Levels required to reach phytotoxic or potentially zootoxic concentrations in plant tissue. Plant Soil, 227, 223-233(2010).
[30] K Tewari R, K Praveen, N Sharma P. Magnesium deficiency induced oxidative stress and antioxidant responses in mulberry plants. Scientia horticulturae, 108, 7-14(2006).
[31] R Trikha, K Sharma B. Studies on factors affecting fluoride removal from water using passive system. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2, 172-176(2014).
[33] H Xiang W, F Gao R. Determination of micro-amount of fluoride of plant materials I: A simple method by micro-diffusion. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 28, 61-67(1980).

Removal Efficiency[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2020, 11(5): 525
Set citation alerts for the article
Please enter your email address