
- Chinese Optics Letters
- Vol. 20, Issue 5, 051602 (2022)
Abstract
1. Introduction
Polarized prisms have been widely used in laser modulation, optical information processing, imaging systems, and so on[
The
Laser damage threshold is an important parameter of the optical crystals and devices. High laser damage threshold is beneficial to high-power applications. The energy band and thermal stability of the crystal would affect its laser damage threshold. In addition, defects and impurities of the crystal could lower the laser damage threshold. Since the laser damage threshold is measured by a well-polished crystal plate, the processing quality of the crystal surface would affect this index. The surface absorption of the crystal is generally much larger than the body absorption; thus, the crystal surface damage threshold is usually much lower than the body damage threshold[
In this paper, the laser damage threshold of the
2. Experimental Section and Result
In this work, a well-polished
The refractive indices dispersion of the
Figure 1.Design of the two prisms.
Figure 2.Refractive index dispersion curves for the LiNa5Mo9O30 crystal.
With the incident light along the Y axis of the biaxial crystal, the light will separate into components polarized along the X and Z axes, respectively. Then, the largest birefringence at certain wavelengths is obtained as
Wavelength (µm) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.435 | 1.8807412 | 32.12075 | 2.1430628 | 27.815238 | 0.262322 |
0.480 | 1.8606013 | 32.51094 | 2.1047378 | 28.367070 | 0.244137 |
0.546 | 1.8414265 | 32.89200 | 2.0689064 | 28.904238 | 0.22748 |
0.587 | 1.8332104 | 33.05823 | 2.0537403 | 29.138112 | 0.220530 |
0.643 | 1.8248497 | 33.22925 | 2.0384182 | 29.378478 | 0.213569 |
0.706 | 1.8180732 | 33.36927 | 2.0260654 | 29.575333 | 0.207992 |
0.768 | 1.8131116 | 33.47259 | 2.0170307 | 29.721084 | 0.203919 |
0.852 | 1.8080104 | 33.57955 | 2.0077730 | 29.872016 | 0.199763 |
1.014 | 1.8051898 | 33.63900 | 1.9983893 | 30.026666 | 0.193200 |
1.529 | 1.7947450 | 33.86115 | 1.9800734 | 30.333462 | 0.185328 |
1.970 | 1.7894868 | 33.97419 | 1.9703647 | 30.498796 | 0.180878 |
2.325 | 1.7858615 | 34.05261 | 1.9633567 | 30.619331 | 0.177495 |
3 | 1.7788370 | 34.20566 | 1.9491655 | 30.866540 | 0.170329 |
3.5 | 1.7727272 | 34.34000 | 1.9370040 | 31.081793 | 0.164277 |
4 | 1.7658269 | 34.49310 | 1.9232193 | 31.329669 | 0.157392 |
4.5 | 1.7580749 | 34.66686 | 1.9076748 | 31.614292 | 0.149600 |
5 | 1.7494329 | 34.86284 | 1.8902735 | 31.939532 | 0.140841 |
Table 1. Refractive Index of Polarized Light in LiNa5Mo9O30 Crystal and Total Internal Reflection Angles (
According to the measured data and Sellmeier equations, the total internal reflection angles (
As shown in Fig. 3(a), when the crystal wedge plates of
Figure 3.(a) Illustration of light propagation in the LiNa5Mo9O30 prism; (b) and (c) prisms of the LiNa5Mo9O30 crystal.
As shown in Fig. 4, the extinction ratio was measured. A Nd:YAG laser operating at 1064 nm was used as laser resources. A polarizer was used to modulate the light polarization direction. The silicon photocell was used to transfer the light into current, and then the signal was detected by a galvanometer. When the direction of light propagated through the polarizer is perpendicular to the Z direction, the weakest polarized light was detected. On the contrary, the strongest polarized light was obtained with the light polarization along the X direction. The extinction ratio of the prism was measured as larger than 15,000:1, which can satisfy the experiment requirements.
Figure 4.Schematic of the extinction ratio measurement.
3. Discussion
The properties of the widely used polarization optical crystals are listed in Table 2. The birefringence of
Crystal | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Space group | Fdd2 | R-3c | R3c | ||
Cleavage | No | No | Yes | No | No |
Deliquescence | No | No | No | No | Yes |
Birefringence | 0.2305@532 nm0.1852@1550 nm | 0.24605@532 nm0.2000@1550 nm | 0.1744@532 nm0.1564@1550 nm | 0.2331@532 nm0.2039@1550 nm | 0.1241@532 nm0.1202@1550 nm |
Transmission range for prism | 0.31–5.35 µm | 0.4–5 µm | 0.35–2.3 µm | 0.5–4.0 µm | 0.19–3.5 µm |
Laser damage threshold |
Table 2. Properties of Widely Used Crystals for Prisms
The
4. Conclusion
In this paper, the laser damage threshold of the
References
[1] V. Sankaran, M. J. Everett, D. J. Maitland, J. T. Walsh. Comparison of polarized-light propagation in biological tissue and phantoms. Opt. Lett., 24, 1044(1999).
[2] G. Le Tolguenec, F. Devaux, E. Lantz. Two-dimensional time-resolved direct imaging through thick biological tissues: a new step toward noninvasive medical imaging. Opt. Lett., 24, 1047(1999).
[3] J. M. Schmitt, A. H. Gandjbakhche, R. F. Bonner. Use of polarized light to discriminate short-path photons in a multiply scattering medium. Appl. Opt., 31, 6535(1992).
[4] Z. Gao, X. Yin, W. Zhang, S. Wang, M. Jiang, X. Tao. Electro-optic properties of BaTeMo2O9 single crystal. Appl. Phys. Lett., 95, 151107(2009).
[5] P. Kumar, A. I. Maydykovskiy, M. Levy, N. V. Dubrovin, O. A. Aktsipetrov. Second harmonic generation study of internally-generated strain in bismuth-substituted iron garnet films. Opt. Express, 18, 1076(2010).
[6] Z. L. Gao, Q. Wu, X. T. Liu, Y. X. Sun, X. T. Tao. Biaxial crystal alpha-BaTeMo2O9: theory study of large birefringence and wide-band polarized prisms design. Opt. Express, 23, 3851(2015).
[7] S. B. Mehta, M. Shribak, R. Oldenbourg. Polarized light imaging of birefringence and diattenuation at high resolution and high sensitivity. J. Opt., 15, 094007(2013).
[8] R. Appel, C. D. Dyer, J. N. Lockwood. Design of a broadband UV-visible alpha-barium borate polarizer. Appl. Opt., 41, 2470(2002).
[9] F. Wu, G. Li, J. Huang, D. Yu. Calcite/barium fluoride ultraviolet polarizing prism. Appl. Opt., 34, 3668(1995).
[10] C. H. Huang, G. Zhang, M. Wei, L. X. Huang, X. J. Huang, H. Y. Shen. Investigation of several parameters in the design of YVO4 polarizing prism. Opt. Commun., 224, 1(2003).
[11] I. C. Olson, R. A. Metzler, N. Tamura, M. Kunz, C. E. Killian, P. U. Gilbert. Crystal lattice tilting in prismatic calcite. J. Struct. Biol., 183, 180(2013).
[12] W. Zhang, H. Yu, J. Cantwell, H. Wu, K. R. Poeppelmeier, P. S. Halasyamani. LiNa5Mo9O30: crystal growth, linear, and nonlinear optical properties. Chem. Mater., 28, 4483(2016).
[13] V. A. Sukharev, A. P. Sadovskiy, E. A. Sukhanova, A. D. Dovnarovich, D. A. Spassky, K. M. Podurec, A. A. Kaloyan, V. Nagirnyi, S. I. Omelkov, I. C. Avetissov. Crystal growth and luminescent properties of LiNa5Mo9O30. J. Cryst. Growth, 519, 35(2019).
[14] X. L. Du, Z. L. Gao, F. A. Liu, X. J. Guo, X. M. Wang, Y. X. Sun, X. T. Tao. Anisotropic properties and Raman spectra of a LiNa5Mo9O30 single crystal grown by the TSSG method. Crystengcomm, 22, 7716(2020).
[15] G. Ghosh. Dispersion-equation coefficients for the refractive index and birefringence of calcite and quartz crystals. Opt. Commun., 163, 95(1999).
[16] S. Papernov, G. J. Exarhos, A. W. Schmid, D. Ristau, M. J. Soileau, C. J. Stolz. Laser-induced surface damage of optical materials: absorption sources, initiation, growth, and mitigation. Proc. SPIE, 7132, 71321J(2008).
[17] S. Gangopadhyay. Study of nonlinear optical phenomenon in BaB2O4. Nonlinear Opt. Quantum Opt., 48, 177(2017).
[18] J. A. Piper, H. M. Pask. Crystalline Raman lasers. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 13, 692(2007).
[19] G. C. Bhar, A. K. Chaudhary, P. Kumbhakar, A. M. Rudra, S. C. Sabarwal. A comparative study of laser-induced surface damage thresholds in BBO crystals and effect of impurities. Opt. Mater., 27, 119(2004).
[20] V. L. Borodin, I. V. Nefedova. Growth and characteristics of calcite single crystals. J. Cryst. Growth, 275, e633(2005).

Set citation alerts for the article
Please enter your email address