• Chinese Optics Letters
  • Vol. 15, Issue 2, 022801 (2017)
Jin Li1,2,3, Fengdeng Liu1,2,3, and Zilong Liu1,2,3,4,*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of precision instrument, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
  • 2State Key Laboratory of Precision Measurement Technology and Instruments, Beijing 100084, China
  • 3Collaborative Innovation Center for Micro/Nano Fabrication, Device and System, Beijing 100084, China
  • 4Optic Division, National Institute of Metrology, Beijing 100029, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/COL201715.022801 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Jin Li, Fengdeng Liu, Zilong Liu, "Efficient multi-bands image compression method for remote cameras," Chin. Opt. Lett. 15, 022801 (2017) Copy Citation Text show less
    Process of multi-spectral CCD imaging.
    Fig. 1. Process of multi-spectral CCD imaging.
    Spectral correlation testing of multi-spectral images.
    Fig. 2. Spectral correlation testing of multi-spectral images.
    Process of RSR. The spectral bands number is 4.
    Fig. 3. Process of RSR. The spectral bands number is 4.
    Spatial blocking.
    Fig. 4. Spatial blocking.
    Relation between compression performance and the size of the block, where (a) is the testing of the multi-spectral image, and (b) is the tested results.
    Fig. 5. Relation between compression performance and the size of the block, where (a) is the testing of the multi-spectral image, and (b) is the tested results.
    Whole construct of the compression algorithm for multi-spectral images.
    Fig. 6. Whole construct of the compression algorithm for multi-spectral images.
    Testing experiment scheme.
    Fig. 7. Testing experiment scheme.
    Compression performance comparison with CCSDS-IDC.
    Fig. 8. Compression performance comparison with CCSDS-IDC.
    MSSIM values at different compression ratios.
    Fig. 9. MSSIM values at different compression ratios.
    Bit rate (bpp)CCSDS-IDC (dB)H-PT (dB)Our method (dB)
    0.548.814649.025849.7822
    1.052.561953.089853.6402
    1.555.362056.028856.5707
    2.057.218957.832158.3466
    2.558.763658.855859.1888
    3.059.637959.685059.7778
    Table 1. PSNR of Three Different Methods
    MethodsData Throughput (MSPS)a
    KLT[13]9.77
    3D-SPIHT[14]16.04
    JPEG2000[15]5.52
    Our approach23.81
    Table 2. Data Throughput Comparison with Traditional Methods