Qi Zhao, Chen Tang, Min Xu, Zhenkun Lei. Background Removal of Fringe Projection Patterns Based on Modified Fuzzy c-Means Clustering Algorithm[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2022, 59(24): 2411002

Search by keywords or author
- Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
- Vol. 59, Issue 24, 2411002 (2022)

Fig. 1. Results comparison of first simulated fringe projection pattern. (a) Original fringe projection pattern; (b)-(d) Fig.1(a) corresponding theoretical background, fringe, and unwrapped phase; (b1)-(d1)corresponding results of FT on background, fringe, and unwrapped phase; (b2)-(d2) corresponding results of MOBEMD on background, fringe, and unwrapped phase; (b3)-(d3) corresponding results of TV-Hilbert-L2 on background, fringe, and unwrapped phase; (b4)-(d4) corresponding results of proposed method on background, fringe, and unwrapped phase; (e)-(e4) enlarged details corresponding to Fig.1(d)-(d4)

Fig. 2. Results comparison of second simulated fringe projection pattern. (a) Original fringe projection pattern; (b)-(d) Fig.2(a) corresponding theoretical background, fringe, and unwrapped phase; (b1)-(d1) corresponding results of FT on background, fringe, and unwrapped phase; (b2)-(d2) corresponding results of MOBEMD on background, fringe, and unwrapped phase; (b3)-(d3) corresponding results of TV-Hilbert-L2 on background, fringe, and unwrapped phase; (b4)-(d4) corresponding results of proposed method on background, fringe, and unwrapped phase; (e)-(e4) enlarged details corresponding to Fig.2(d)-(d4)

Fig. 3. Results comparison of experimental fringe projection pattern. (a) Original fringe projection pattern; (b) corresponding theoretical unwrapped phase; (c1)-(e1) corresponding results of FT on background, fringe, and unwrapped phase; (c2)-(e2) corresponding results of MOBEMD on background, fringe, and unwrapped phase; (c3)-(e3) corresponding results of TV-Hilbert-L2 on background, fringe, and unwrapped phase; (c4)-(e4) corresponding results of proposed method on background, fringe, and unwrapped phase

Fig. 4. Results comparison of noise performance test. (a) Original fringe projection pattern; (b) corresponding theoretical fringe; (c)-(g) fringe patterns obtained by proposed method after adding 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, 1, 1.2 Gaussian random noise respectively
|
Table 1. Evaluation metrics on results for simulated fringe projection patterns
|
Table 2. Evaluation metrics on results for experimental fringe projection pattern

Set citation alerts for the article
Please enter your email address