Aerial Image Stitching Algorithm for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Based on Improved ORB and PROSAC

Zhenyu Li; Yuan Tian; Fangjie Chen; Jun Han

doi:10.3788/LOP56.231003

Journals >Laser & Optoelectronics Progress >Volume 56 >Issue 23 >Page 231003 > Article

Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
Vol. 56, Issue 23, 231003 (2019)

Aerial Image Stitching Algorithm for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Based on Improved ORB and PROSAC

Zhenyu Li^1,2, Yuan Tian³, Fangjie Chen^4,*, and Jun Han⁴

Author Affiliations

¹State Grid Power System Artificial Intelligence Joint Lab, State Grid Shandong Electric Power Company Electric Power Research Institute, Jinan, Shandong 250001, China

²Shandong Luneng Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd., Jinan, Shandong 250002, China

³State Grid Shandong Electric Power Company, Jinan, Shandong 250001, China

⁴School of Communication and Information Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China

show less

DOI: 10.3788/LOP56.231003 Cite this Article Set citation alerts

Zhenyu Li, Yuan Tian, Fangjie Chen, Jun Han. Aerial Image Stitching Algorithm for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Based on Improved ORB and PROSAC[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2019, 56(23): 231003 Copy Citation Text

show less

Fig. 1. Determination of feature point main direction

Download full size

Fig. 2. Gradual-in and gradual-out image fusion method

Download full size

Fig. 3. Oxford VGG dataset. (a) Bikes; (b) boat; (c) graffiti

Download full size

Fig. 4. UAV aerial test images. (a) Test image 1 (b) test image 2; (c) test image 3

Download full size

Fig. 5. Comparison of stitching results of three groups of test images. (a) Stitching image 1; (b) stitching image 2; (c) stitching image 3

Download full size

Algorithm	Time /ms
Algorithm	Fig. 3(a)	Fig. 3(b)	Fig. 3(c)	Fig. 4(a)	Fig. 4(b)	Fig. 4(c)
SIFTSURFORBProposed	1.8750.4860.0790.186	1.3960.3550.0580.137	0.9230.2410.0420.103	7.6642.2750.4220.821	8.3212.0310.3870.933	7.8532.1320.4380.877

Table 1. Average time of each algorithm for feature point extraction

Algorithm	R_CM /%
Algorithm	Fig. 3(a)	Fig. 3(b)	Fig. 3(c)	Fig. 4(a)	Fig. 4(b)	Fig. 4(c)
SIFT+RANSACSURF+RANSACORB+RANSACORB+PROSACProposed	97.3596.2592.3795.0396.58	96.7994.8390.3193.7696.27	95.2895.0490.2193.4495.53	98.1296.6791.7394.3997.53	97.2395.4892.4795.2996.79	96.4695.7989.8693.5396.21

Table 2. Matching accuracy of each algorithm

Algorithm	Time /ms
Algorithm	Fig. 3(a)	Fig. 3(b)	Fig. 3(c)	Fig. 4(a)	Fig. 4(b)	Fig. 4(c)
SIFT+RANSAC	112.88	115.34	120.74	133.55	154.79	125.56
SURF+RANSAC	102.53	97.64	104.27	115.57	123.26	99.74
ORB+RANSAC	93.79	90.56	93.85	92.49	117.38	103.19
ORB+PROSAC	51.69	50.73	51.22	58.35	64.28	55.86
Proposed	53.87	56.42	55.79	64.39	73.54	60.83

Table 3. Matching time of each algorithm

Algorithm	E_RMS
Algorithm	Fig. 4(a)	Fig. 4(b)	Fig. 4(c)
SIFT+RANSACSURF+RANSACORB+RANSACORB+PROSACProposed	0.4790.5450.7170.6130.529	0.5450.6830.7410.6620.567	0.5270.6030.6920.6440.586

Table 4. Root mean square error of each algorithm

Zhenyu Li, Yuan Tian, Fangjie Chen, Jun Han. Aerial Image Stitching Algorithm for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Based on Improved ORB and PROSAC[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2019, 56(23): 231003

Download Citation

Set citation alerts for the article

Tools

Set citation alerts for the article

Save the article for my favorites

Paper Information

微信扫一扫：分享

微信扫一扫：分享