• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 59, Issue 14, 1415027 (2022)
Chunshui Yu and Rongsheng Lu*
Author Affiliations
  • College of Instrument Science and Opto-Electronic Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, Anhui , China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202259.1415027 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Chunshui Yu, Rongsheng Lu. Performance Evaluation Method for Focusing Evaluation Operator in Superposed Large Depth Imaging[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2022, 59(14): 1415027 Copy Citation Text show less
    Ideal focusing evaluation curve
    Fig. 1. Ideal focusing evaluation curve
    Microscope images with different clarity
    Fig. 2. Microscope images with different clarity
    Fitting result of 2-peak Gaussian
    Fig. 3. Fitting result of 2-peak Gaussian
    Experimental system
    Fig. 4. Experimental system
    Sequence diagrams of bit surface imaging. (a) 1st picture; (b) 2nd picture; (c) 17th picture; (d) 18th picture; (e) 34th picture;(f) 35th picture
    Fig. 5. Sequence diagrams of bit surface imaging. (a) 1st picture; (b) 2nd picture; (c) 17th picture; (d) 18th picture; (e) 34th picture;(f) 35th picture
    Three sampling locations
    Fig. 6. Three sampling locations
    Fitting results of operators at point A; (a) Brenner; (b) Roberts; (c) Laplace; (d) GRA
    Fig. 7. Fitting results of operators at point A; (a) Brenner; (b) Roberts; (c) Laplace; (d) GRA
    Fitting results of operators at point B; (a) Brenner; (b) Roberts; (c) Laplace; (d) GRA
    Fig. 8. Fitting results of operators at point B; (a) Brenner; (b) Roberts; (c) Laplace; (d) GRA
    Fitting results of operators at point C; (a) Brenner; (b) Roberts; (c) Laplace; (d) GRA
    Fig. 9. Fitting results of operators at point C; (a) Brenner; (b) Roberts; (c) Laplace; (d) GRA
    GWIS operator fitting results at point C
    Fig. 10. GWIS operator fitting results at point C
    All focus image obtained by GWIS operator
    Fig. 11. All focus image obtained by GWIS operator
    Number of termsR2RMSE
    10.59300.4000
    20.98020.0895
    30.99790.0293
    40.96880.1162
    Table 1. Fitting effect of different peak number
    OperatorPoint APoint BPoint C
    c1c2c1c2c1c2
    Brenner2.59842.973.9834.912.46412.15
    Roberts3.614167.64.87237.953.313532.5
    Laplace3.177240.64.562653.12.71269.12
    GRA2.61347.374.08278.422.59315.61
    Table 2. Fitting parameters of operators in different positions
    Pointc1c2
    A5.7810147.8
    B0.30735.565
    C2.57224.77
    Table 3. Fitting results of different sampling points processed by GWIS operator
    OperatorBrennerRobertsLaplaceGRAGWIS
    Time /s1.45461.44311.44621.42961.4550
    Table 4. Time taken by different operators to process a picture
    OperatorSNRPSNRMSE /103
    Brenner13.855616.61821.4166
    Roberts13.876416.61821.4099
    Laplace14.053216.81581.3536
    GRA13.848616.61121.4189
    Tenengrad13.831016.59361.4247
    SMD13.912916.67551.3981
    Sobel13.177115.93971.6562
    STD13.791216.55381.4378
    GWIS13.956916.71951.3840
    Table 5. Experimental results with reference images
    Chunshui Yu, Rongsheng Lu. Performance Evaluation Method for Focusing Evaluation Operator in Superposed Large Depth Imaging[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2022, 59(14): 1415027
    Download Citation