Fig. 1. Framework of proposed method

Fig. 2. Cost curves. (a) Cost curve of proposed method; (b) cost curve of conventional light field

Fig. 3. Schematic diagrams of subpixel resampling. (a) Subpixels at different shear values; (b) subpixel sampling method

Fig. 4. Multi-angle fusion. (a) Sampling schematic; (b) point cloud fusion

Fig. 5. Schematic diagrams of point cloud processing for overlapping parts.(a) Overlapping point clouds; (b) point cloud octree for voxelization; (c) overlapping points; (d) overlapping point processing effect

Fig. 6. Schematics of flying pixel. (a) Generation principle of flying pixels; (b) errors brought by flying pixels; (c) effect after removing flying pixels

Fig. 7. Experimental images. (a) Conventional light field single viewpoint light path; (b) phase-encoded light field single viewpoint light path; (c) 720° multi-view light path, both applicable to conventional light field and phase-encoded light field; (d) 360° horizontal circular light field light path

Fig. 8. Experimental data comparison of dog dataset. (a) MVS; (b) CMVS; (c) conventional light field method^[10]; (d) proposed method; (e) ground truth

Fig. 9. Experimental data comparison of head dataset. (a) MVS; (b) CMVS; (c) conventional light field method^[10]; (d) proposed method; (e) ground truth

Fig. 10. Experimental data comparison of stone dataset. (a) MVS; (b) CMVS; (c) conventional light field method^[10]; (d) proposed method; (e) ground truth

Fig. 11. Results from different angles of proposed method. (a) conventional light field method^[10]; (b) proposed method; (c) ground truth

Fig. 12. Comparison of reconstruction effect of dog dataset. (a) 7×7 phase-encoded light field; (b) 5×5 phase-encoded light field; (c) 3×3 phase-encoded light field; (d) 7×7 conventional light field; (e) 5×5 conventional light field; (f) 3×3 conventional light field

Fig. 13. Comparison of reconstruction effect of head dataset. (a) 7×7 phase-encoded light field; (b) 5×5 phase-encoded light field; (c) 3×3 phase-encoded light field; (d) 7×7 conventional light field; (e) 5×5 conventional light field; (f) 3×3 conventional light field

Fig. 14. Comparison of reconstruction effect of stone dataset. (a) 7×7 phase-encoded light field; (b) 5×5 phase-encoded light field; (c) 3×3 phase-encoded light field; (d) 7×7 conventional light field; (e) 5×5 conventional light field; (f) 3×3 conventional light field

Fig. 15. Reconstruction effect of dog dataset under different influencing factors

Table 1. Comparison of different datasets

Table 2. RMSE on different datasets with different angular resolutions

Table 3. RMSE on dog datasets with different influencing factors