Yiming Guo, Xiaoqing Wu, Changdong Su, Shitai Zhang, Cuicui Bi, Zhiwei Tao. Rapid Restoration of Turbulent Degraded Images Based on Bidirectional Multi-Scale Feature Fusion[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2022, 59(22): 2201001

Search by keywords or author
- Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
- Vol. 59, Issue 22, 2201001 (2022)

Fig. 1. Downloaded target celestial images from Hubble official website

Fig. 2. Degraded images of simulated target celestial bodies subjected to atmospheric turbulence with different intensities. (a) Degraded images when k=0.001; (b) degraded images when k=0.0025; (c) degraded images when k=0.005

Fig. 3. Generative adversarial network

Fig. 4. Multi-scale feature fusion

Fig. 5. Topology diagram of generated network architecture
![Topology structure diagram of BmffGAN overall network[19]](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
Fig. 6. Topology structure diagram of BmffGAN overall network[19]

Fig. 7. Process of BmffGAN training. (a) Curve of loss function changing with epoch; (b) curve of PSNR changing with epoch

Fig. 8. Comparison of restoration effects of different algorithms on simulated atmospheric turbulence images under k=0.005. (a) Degraded images when the additive noise mean is 0, and the variance is 0.001; (b) SGL algorithm; (c) CLEAR algorithm; (d) IBD algorithm; (e) DNCNN algorithm; (f) BmffGAN

Fig. 9. Comparison of restoration effects of different algorithms on simulated atmospheric turbulence images under k=0.0025. (a) Degraded images when the additive noise mean is 0, and the variance is 0.001; (b) SGL algorithm; (c) CLEAR algorithm; (d) IBD algorithm; (e) DNCNN algorithm; (f) BmffGAN

Fig. 10. Comparison of restoration effects of different algorithms on simulated atmospheric turbulence images under k=0.001. (a) Degraded images when the additive noise mean is 0, and the variance is 0.001; (b) SGL algorithm; (c) CLEAR algorithm; (d) IBD algorithm; (e) DNCNN algorithm; (f) BmffGAN

Fig. 11. Evaluation indexes of different algorithms for restoration of simulated atmospheric turbulence images with different intensities (average value). (a) PSNR; (b) SSIM; (c) GMSD; (d) recovery time

Fig. 12. Munin ground-based telescope and star chart software

Fig. 13. Comparison experiment for restoring the ISS images affected by real turbulence. (a) ISS images affected by real turbulence; (b) SGL algorithm; (c) CLEAR algorithm; (d) IBD algorithm; (e) DNCNN algorithm; (f) BmffGAN
|
Table 1. Objective evaluation of different networks(average value)

Set citation alerts for the article
Please enter your email address