Yin JIANG, Jinfeng LIAO. Phase transitions of strong interaction matter in vorticity fields[J]. NUCLEAR TECHNIQUES, 2023, 46(4): 040011

Search by keywords or author
- NUCLEAR TECHNIQUES
- Vol. 46, Issue 4, 040011 (2023)
![Schematic phase diagram of QCD matter in temperature-baryon chemical potential-rotation axes[6]](/richHtml/hjs/2023/46/4/040011/040011-F001.jpg)
Fig. 1. Schematic phase diagram of QCD matter in temperature-baryon chemical potential-rotation axes[6]
![Phase diagram of the T-Ω plane[6]](/richHtml/hjs/2023/46/4/040011/040011-F002.jpg)
![Phase diagram of the ω-µI plane for QCD[28]](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
![Phase diagrams of (T, Ω) plane at the chiral MIT boundary condition for cylinder with radius R = 20/Λ[23]](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
Fig. 4. Phase diagrams of (T, Ω) plane at the chiral MIT boundary condition for cylinder with radius R = 20/Λ[23]
![Radial dependence of chiral condensate for different rotations of ω=0.5[exp(1.5r-r02)+1]-1 (a) andω =0.06[expr-10 + 1]-1 (b)[27]](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
![The dynamical mass as a function of Ω andeB corresponding to strong coupling (a) and weak coupling (b)[34]](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
Fig. 6. The dynamical mass as a function of and corresponding to strong coupling (a) and weak coupling (b)[34]
![Diagram showing energy-level splitting under the combined influence of external magnetic and vortex fields[25]](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
Fig. 7. Diagram showing energy-level splitting under the combined influence of external magnetic and vortex fields[25]
![Under the contribution of gluon polarization, the chiral phase transition temperature as a function of the angular velocity[82]](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
Fig. 8. Under the contribution of gluon polarization, the chiral phase transition temperature as a function of the angular velocity[82]
![Phase diagrams of T-ω plane for EMD model[83] (a) and two-flavor AdS/QCD model[31] (b)](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
![Global polarization difference between Λ and its antiparticle under different magnetic field lifetimes as a function of collision energy[58] (a), comparison between the AMPT model simulation and the STAR experiment of global polarization[53] (b)](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
Fig. 10. Global polarization difference between Λ and its antiparticle under different magnetic field lifetimes as a function of collision energy[58] (a), comparison between the AMPT model simulation and the STAR experiment of global polarization[53] (b)
![Rapidity-azimuth distribution of the local spin polarization of Λ andΛ¯ for Au+Au collisions at 20%~50% centrality range at 19.6 GeV and 200 GeV, respectively[59]](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
Fig. 11. Rapidity-azimuth distribution of the local spin polarization of and for Au+Au collisions at 20%~50% centrality range at 19.6 GeV and 200 GeV, respectively[59]
![Local polarizations as functions of azimuthal angles for different definitions of vorticity[83]](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
Fig. 12. Local polarizations as functions of azimuthal angles for different definitions of vorticity[83]

Set citation alerts for the article
Please enter your email address