• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 61, Issue 5, 0500003 (2024)
Shaohua Yang1 and Xia Hou1,2,*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Optics and Optical Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, Anhui , China
  • 2Aerospace Laser Engineering Department, Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP230591 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Shaohua Yang, Xia Hou. Research Progress in Laser Warning Technologies[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2024, 61(5): 0500003 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic of conical lens laser detection structure[5]
    Fig. 1. Schematic of conical lens laser detection structure[5]
    AN/AAR-59 missile warning system[7]
    Fig. 2. AN/AAR-59 missile warning system[7]
    2D laser warning system[16]
    Fig. 3. 2D laser warning system[16]
    Schematic of system scheme configuration[24]
    Fig. 4. Schematic of system scheme configuration[24]
    Technology typeResearcher(year)Spectral range /μmAngular resolution /(°)Wavelength resolution /nmDetectorFOVSensitivity
    Coherent recognitionMarie Zandi(2021)50.35‒1.1510BPD360°1 μW/cm2
    Spectral recognitionAN/AAR-59(2015)70.5‒1.7/3‒572360°×360°
    Li Bing(2014)81‒40.2IRFPA10°×10°
    Zheng Wei(2017)10.4‒1.10.06PSD2°×2°
    Wojtancowski(2020)220.11D array120°
    Wu Chunhong(2021)120.7‒1.114‒QD80°×80°0.25 mW/cm2
    Grating diffractionShi Jin(2022)160.4‒1.70.56CCD90°×75°
    Zhang R(2022)150.4‒1.70.57CCD120°
    ImagingHALWR(2020)180.4‒1.10.05CCD30°×20°0.28 mW/cm2
    Orth A(2022)230.6580.05CCD180°×180°2.4 nW/cm2
    Table 1. Performance comparison of different laser warning technologies