• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 60, Issue 17, 1701002 (2023)
Xiaoyong Li1,2 and Keyi Chen1,*
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Atmospheric Sciences, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu 610225, Sichuan , China
  • 2Network and Equipment Support Center, Taizhou Meteorological Bureau, Taizhou 318000, Zhejiang , China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP221036 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Xiaoyong Li, Keyi Chen. Retrieving Atmospheric Motion Vectors from Geostationary Satellite Images Using Generative Adversarial Networks[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2023, 60(17): 1701002 Copy Citation Text show less
    Weighting functions of water vapor channel and infrared channel of GOES satellite, quoted from http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu
    Fig. 1. Weighting functions of water vapor channel and infrared channel of GOES satellite, quoted from http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu
    U-net architecture used by generator of pix2pix. Dimensions of data are shown as (channels, width, height)
    Fig. 2. U-net architecture used by generator of pix2pix. Dimensions of data are shown as (channels, width, height)
    Test error for experiments using 1 h satellite image intervals, pix2pix architecture, high resolution data, and without visible channels. (a) 40000 iterations; (b) 500000 iterations
    Fig. 3. Test error for experiments using 1 h satellite image intervals, pix2pix architecture, high resolution data, and without visible channels. (a) 40000 iterations; (b) 500000 iterations
    Comparison of wind speed retrieved by neural network and wind speed of NCEP/NCAR reanalysis. (a) 850 hPa; (b) 200 hPa
    Fig. 4. Comparison of wind speed retrieved by neural network and wind speed of NCEP/NCAR reanalysis. (a) 850 hPa; (b) 200 hPa
    Spatial distribution of MVD of wind retrieved by neural network. (a) 850 hPa; (b) 200 hPa
    Fig. 5. Spatial distribution of MVD of wind retrieved by neural network. (a) 850 hPa; (b) 200 hPa
    Comparison of wind field retrieved by neural network and wind field of NCEP/NCAR reanalysis. (a) 850 hPa wind direction (streamline) and speed (shaded) retrieved by neural network at October 9, 2019 12:00 UTC; (b) same as (a), but with NCEP/NCAR reanalysis data; (c) 200 hPa wind direction (streamline) and speed (shaded) retrieved by neural network at October 9, 2019 12:00 UTC; (d) same as (c), but with NCEP/NCAR reanalysis data; (e)-(h) same as (a)-(d), but at January 26, 2018 18:00 UTC
    Fig. 6. Comparison of wind field retrieved by neural network and wind field of NCEP/NCAR reanalysis. (a) 850 hPa wind direction (streamline) and speed (shaded) retrieved by neural network at October 9, 2019 12:00 UTC; (b) same as (a), but with NCEP/NCAR reanalysis data; (c) 200 hPa wind direction (streamline) and speed (shaded) retrieved by neural network at October 9, 2019 12:00 UTC; (d) same as (c), but with NCEP/NCAR reanalysis data; (e)-(h) same as (a)-(d), but at January 26, 2018 18:00 UTC
    Image intervalVisible channelNetwork type

    850 hPa

    RMSE

    850 hPa

    MAE

    850 hPa

    Corr.

    200 hPa

    RMSE

    200 hPa

    MAE

    200 hPa

    Corr.

    6 hWithout visible channelpix2pix3.28112.51790.83916.00104.56300.9311
    6 hWithout visible channelU-net3.33762.54180.83155.96324.55570.9323
    1 hWithout visible channelpix2pix3.20872.42670.83805.87234.43690.9343
    1 hWith visible channelpix2pix3.29332.50440.83116.11424.65130.9272
    Table 1. Results of wind field retrieve with different input satellite image intervals, channels, and neural network types
    Data (resolution)

    850 hPa

    RMSE

    850 hPa

    MAE

    850 hPa

    Corr.

    200 hPa

    RMSE

    200 hPa

    MAE

    200 hPa

    Corr.

    NCEP/NCAR reanalysis (64×64)3.20872.42670.83805.87234.43690.9343
    ERA5 (512×512)10.70338.56500.441627.145822.08820.7435
    ERA5 (64×64)10.66008.53440.442627.192622.14280.7433
    Table 2. Results of wind field retrieve with different resolutions of data
    MVD /(m·s-1RMSVD /(m·s-1Bias /(m·s-1
    H8 AMV (100-400 hPa)4.865.77-0.20
    Neural network (200 hPa)4.865.77-1.11
    H8 AMV (700-1100 hPa)3.143.860.68
    Neural network (850 hPa)3.203.81-0.42
    Table 3. Comparison of results between neural network and H8 AMV product
    Xiaoyong Li, Keyi Chen. Retrieving Atmospheric Motion Vectors from Geostationary Satellite Images Using Generative Adversarial Networks[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2023, 60(17): 1701002
    Download Citation