• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 56, Issue 10, 101004 (2019)
Liangfu Li and Min Hu*
Author Affiliations
  • School of Computer Science, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710119, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP56.101004 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Liangfu Li, Min Hu. Method for Small-Bridge-Crack Segmentation Based on Generative Adversarial Network[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2019, 56(10): 101004 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic of low-resolution subgraph segmentation. (a) Original image; (b) schematic of segmentation; (c) low-resolution subgraphs after segmentation
    Fig. 1. Schematic of low-resolution subgraph segmentation. (a) Original image; (b) schematic of segmentation; (c) low-resolution subgraphs after segmentation
    Structural diagram of discriminator
    Fig. 2. Structural diagram of discriminator
    Structural diagram of Discrimination branch
    Fig. 3. Structural diagram of Discrimination branch
    Structural diagram of segmentation branch
    Fig. 4. Structural diagram of segmentation branch
    Comparison chart of generated network structures
    Fig. 5. Comparison chart of generated network structures
    Bridge-crack image and manually labelled semantic segmentation image. (a) Bridge-crack image; (b) manually labelled segmentation image
    Fig. 6. Bridge-crack image and manually labelled semantic segmentation image. (a) Bridge-crack image; (b) manually labelled segmentation image
    Comparison of segmentation results using different algorithms. (a) Original images; (b) labelled images; (c) AdaptNet; (d) FC-DenseNet; (e) PSPNet; (f) SE-GAN
    Fig. 7. Comparison of segmentation results using different algorithms. (a) Original images; (b) labelled images; (c) AdaptNet; (d) FC-DenseNet; (e) PSPNet; (f) SE-GAN
    Comparison of small-bridge-crack segmentation results. (a) Original images; (b) labelled images; (c) AdaptNet; (d) FC-DenseNet; (e) PSPNet; (f) SE-GAN
    Fig. 8. Comparison of small-bridge-crack segmentation results. (a) Original images; (b) labelled images; (c) AdaptNet; (d) FC-DenseNet; (e) PSPNet; (f) SE-GAN
    Effect of loss on PSNR of generated image
    Fig. 9. Effect of loss on PSNR of generated image
    Comparison of effect of loss function. (a) Original images; (b) low-resolution images; (c) Ladv; (d) Ladv+Lp; (e) Ladv+Lp+Lseg
    Fig. 10. Comparison of effect of loss function. (a) Original images; (b) low-resolution images; (c) Ladv; (d) Ladv+Lp; (e) Ladv+Lp+Lseg
    Super-resolution images generated by different discriminators. (a) Original images; (b) low-resolution images; (c) traditional discriminator; (d) discrimination branch
    Fig. 11. Super-resolution images generated by different discriminators. (a) Original images; (b) low-resolution images; (c) traditional discriminator; (d) discrimination branch
    AlgorithmPrecisionRecallF1 scoreMean IOU
    Adapt Net82.650.963.070.5
    FC-DenseNet89.352.866.472.9
    PSPNet95.156.971.276.0
    SE-GAN95.570.481.182.2
    Table 1. Comparison of segmentation results using different algorithms%
    Loss function fortrainingPSRNMSESSIM
    Ladv25.0076165.29170.8210
    Ladv+Lp26.0750160.53800.8546
    Ladv+Lp+Lseg27.6830110.86010.8702
    Table 2. Effect of loss function on generated image
    DiscriminatorPSRNMSESSIM
    Low-resolution image22.2210389.90000.3152
    Traditional discriminator26.7781136.54040.8620
    Discrimination branch27.6830110.86010.8702
    Table 3. Quality of super-resolution images generated by different discriminators