• Chinese Physics B
  • Vol. 29, Issue 10, (2020)
Ji-Guo Wang1,2,†, Yue-Qing Li1,2, and Yu-Fei Dong1,2
Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Mathematics and Physics, Shijiazhuang TieDao University, Shijiazhuang 050043, China
  • 2Institute of Applied Physics, Shijiazhuang TieDao University, Shijiazhuang 050043, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/abab72 Cite this Article
    Ji-Guo Wang, Yue-Qing Li, Yu-Fei Dong. Lattice configurations in spin-1 Bose–Einstein condensates with the SU(3) spin–orbit coupling[J]. Chinese Physics B, 2020, 29(10): Copy Citation Text show less
    The ground-state density profiles of ferromagnetic spin-1 BECs with isotropic SU(3) SOC. The columns in every panel from left to right are the densities of the mF = –1 component |Ψ−1|2, the mF = 0 component |Ψ0|2, the mF = 1 component |Ψ1|2, and the total |Ψ|2 = |Ψ−1|2+|Ψ0|2+|Ψ1|2. The SOC strengths in (a)–(d) are γ = 0, 1, 3, and 5, respectively. The spin–spin interaction c2 = −50.
    Fig. 1. The ground-state density profiles of ferromagnetic spin-1 BECs with isotropic SU(3) SOC. The columns in every panel from left to right are the densities of the mF = –1 component |Ψ−1|2, the mF = 0 component |Ψ0|2, the mF = 1 component |Ψ1|2, and the total |Ψ|2 = |Ψ−1|2+|Ψ0|2+|Ψ1|2. The SOC strengths in (a)–(d) are γ = 0, 1, 3, and 5, respectively. The spin–spin interaction c2 = −50.
    The ground-state density profiles of antiferromagnetic spin-1 BECs with isotropic SU(3) SOC. The columns in every panel from left to right are the densities of the mF = –1 component |Ψ−1|2, the mF = 0 component |Ψ0|2, the mF = 1 component |Ψ1|2, and the total |Ψ|2 = |Ψ−1|2+|Ψ0|2+|Ψ1|2. The SOC strengths in (a)–(d) are γ = 0, 1, 2, and 4, respectively. The spin–spin interaction c2 = 100.
    Fig. 2. The ground-state density profiles of antiferromagnetic spin-1 BECs with isotropic SU(3) SOC. The columns in every panel from left to right are the densities of the mF = –1 component |Ψ−1|2, the mF = 0 component |Ψ0|2, the mF = 1 component |Ψ1|2, and the total |Ψ|2 = |Ψ−1|2+|Ψ0|2+|Ψ1|2. The SOC strengths in (a)–(d) are γ = 0, 1, 2, and 4, respectively. The spin–spin interaction c2 = 100.
    The ground-state density profiles of antiferromagnetic spin-1 BECs with isotropic SU(3) SOC. The columns in every panel from left to right are the densities of the mF = –1 component |Ψ−1|2, the mF = 0 component |Ψ0|2, the mF = 1 component |Ψ1|2, and the total |Ψ|2 = |Ψ−1|2+|Ψ0|2+|Ψ1|2. The SOC strengths in (a)–(e) are γ = 0.50, 0.75, 1.10, 1.65, and 1.75, respectively. The spin–spin interaction c2 = 2000.
    Fig. 3. The ground-state density profiles of antiferromagnetic spin-1 BECs with isotropic SU(3) SOC. The columns in every panel from left to right are the densities of the mF = –1 component |Ψ−1|2, the mF = 0 component |Ψ0|2, the mF = 1 component |Ψ1|2, and the total |Ψ|2 = |Ψ−1|2+|Ψ0|2+|Ψ1|2. The SOC strengths in (a)–(e) are γ = 0.50, 0.75, 1.10, 1.65, and 1.75, respectively. The spin–spin interaction c2 = 2000.
    The ground-state density profiles of antiferromagnetic spin-1 BECs with isotropic SU(3) SOC. The columns in every panel from left to right are the densities of mF = –1 component |Ψ−1|2, mF = 0 component |Ψ0|2, mF = 1 component |Ψ1|2, and the total |Ψ|2 = |Ψ−1|2+|Ψ0|2+|Ψ1|2. The SOC strengths in (a)-(e) are γ = 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4, and 4.4, respectively. The spin–spin interaction c2 = 2000.
    Fig. 4. The ground-state density profiles of antiferromagnetic spin-1 BECs with isotropic SU(3) SOC. The columns in every panel from left to right are the densities of mF = –1 component |Ψ−1|2, mF = 0 component |Ψ0|2, mF = 1 component |Ψ1|2, and the total |Ψ|2 = |Ψ−1|2+|Ψ0|2+|Ψ1|2. The SOC strengths in (a)-(e) are γ = 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4, and 4.4, respectively. The spin–spin interaction c2 = 2000.
    The parameters of (a)–(d) are the same as those of Figs. 2(d), 4(a), 4(b), and 4(e), respectively. The momentum distributions of (b1)–(d1) the mF = –1 component |Ψ−1(k)|2, (b2)–(d2) the mF = 0 component |Ψ0(k)|2, and (b3)–(d3) the mF = 1 component |Ψ1(k)|2.
    Fig. 5. The parameters of (a)–(d) are the same as those of Figs. 2(d), 4(a), 4(b), and 4(e), respectively. The momentum distributions of (b1)–(d1) the mF = –1 component |Ψ−1(k)|2, (b2)–(d2) the mF = 0 component |Ψ0(k)|2, and (b3)–(d3) the mF = 1 component |Ψ1(k)|2.
    The ground-state phase diagram spanned by the SU(3) SOC strength γ and the spin–spin interaction strength c2. Five ground-state phases can be identified on the phase diagram, including the PW phase, the ST phase, the KL phase, the SHL phase, and the HHL phase.
    Fig. 6. The ground-state phase diagram spanned by the SU(3) SOC strength γ and the spin–spin interaction strength c2. Five ground-state phases can be identified on the phase diagram, including the PW phase, the ST phase, the KL phase, the SHL phase, and the HHL phase.
    The ground-state density profiles of spin-1 antiferromagnetic BECs with anisotropic SU(3) SOC. The columns in every panel from left to right are the densities of mF = –1 component |Ψ−1|2, mF = 0 component |Ψ0|2, mF = 1 component |Ψ1|2, and the total |Ψ|2 = |Ψ−1|2+|Ψ0|2+|Ψ1|2. The SOC ratios in (a)–(c) are ζ = 0.90, 0.99 and 1.1, respectively. The spin–spin interaction c2 = 2000 and the SOC strength along the x direction γx = 5.
    Fig. 7. The ground-state density profiles of spin-1 antiferromagnetic BECs with anisotropic SU(3) SOC. The columns in every panel from left to right are the densities of mF = –1 component |Ψ−1|2, mF = 0 component |Ψ0|2, mF = 1 component |Ψ1|2, and the total |Ψ|2 = |Ψ−1|2+|Ψ0|2+|Ψ1|2. The SOC ratios in (a)–(c) are ζ = 0.90, 0.99 and 1.1, respectively. The spin–spin interaction c2 = 2000 and the SOC strength along the x direction γx = 5.
    Ji-Guo Wang, Yue-Qing Li, Yu-Fei Dong. Lattice configurations in spin-1 Bose–Einstein condensates with the SU(3) spin–orbit coupling[J]. Chinese Physics B, 2020, 29(10):
    Download Citation