• Journal of Semiconductors
  • Vol. 45, Issue 12, 122701 (2024)
Kaiyue He1、†, Zhanqi Li1、†, Taotao Li, Yifu Sun, Shitong Zhu, Chao Wu, Huiping Zhu, Peng Lu, Xinran Wang, and Maguang Zhu*
Author Affiliations
  • School of Integrated Circuits, Nanjing University, Suzhou 215000, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/24090027 Cite this Article
    Kaiyue He, Zhanqi Li, Taotao Li, Yifu Sun, Shitong Zhu, Chao Wu, Huiping Zhu, Peng Lu, Xinran Wang, Maguang Zhu. Displacement damage effects in MoS2-based electronics[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2024, 45(12): 122701 Copy Citation Text show less

    Abstract

    Owing to the unique characteristics of ultra-thin body and nanoscale sensitivity volume, MoS2-based field-effect transistors (FETs) are regarded as optimal components for radiation-hardened integrated circuits (ICs), which is exponentially growing demanded especially in the fields of space exploration and the nuclear industry. Many researches on MoS2-based radiation tolerance electronics focused on the total ionizing dose (TID) effect, while few works concerned the displacement damage (DD) effects, which is more challenging to measure and more crucial for practical applications. We first conducted measurements to assess the DD effects of MoS2 FETs, and then presented the stopping and ranges of ions in matter (SRIM) simulation to analysis the DD degradation mechanism in MoS2 electronics. The monolayer MoS2-based FETs exhibit DD radiation tolerance up to 1.56 × 1013 MeV/g, which is at least two order of magnitude than that in conventional radiation hardened ICs. The exceptional DD radiation tolerance will significantly enhance the deployment of MoS2 integrated circuits in environments characterized by high-energy solar and cosmic radiation exposure.

    1. Introduction

    As scientific and technological advancements proceed, humanity's ambition to venture into the outer space expand continually: range from launching spacecraft to constructing space stations, and even extends to the exploration of distant celestial stars such as Moon or Mars. Whether traveling to Moon, Mars or beyond, the mission of exploring outer space has stringent and severe requirements for integrated circuits (ICs)[1, 2]. On the one hand, the complex electronic integrated circuits used in space need to be energy efficient, which are capable of completing the long-time space exploration with limited energy reserves. On the other hand, the complex electronic circuits used in space need to be resistant to cosmic radiation and high-energy solar, which ensures the reliability of ICs in deep space exploration[3, 4].

    To satisfy these requirements, a variety of advanced low-dimensional materials and devices are currently be explored, such as MoS2[5, 6], carbon nanotube (CNT)[711], black phosphorus[12] and so on. Among of them, MoS2 emerges as a prime contender for the next generation of energy-efficient ICs[1315]. Due to its high carrier mobility and outstanding scaling behavior characteristics, the scaled 10 nm-channel-length MoS2 field-effect transistors (FETs) exhibit higher intrinsic performance and lower power consumption than Si-based FETs with similar supply voltage (Vds) and gate length[16]. In addition, MoS2 exhibits ultra-thin body and nanoscale sensitivity volume, which give them strong radiation tolerance. Very recently, significant progress has been made in the field of radiation-hardened MoS2 ICs[5, 1719], but these studies have primarily concentrated on the total ionizing dose (TID) effects, which is not sufficient to characterize the radiation tolerance of an IC when exposed to the actual conditions of the space radiation environment.

    Compared to the TID effect, the displacement damage (DD) effect is equally crucial in practical applications. When high energy particles strike the MoS2 FETs, non-ionizing processes result in energy dissipation and the lattice defects, including interstitial atoms and vacancies within the material[20, 21], which can influence the electrical characteristics of the devices. Although various studies have confirmed the remarkable tolerance of MoS2 FETs to swift heavy ions[2224], all of these works failed to address the impact of MoS2 thickness on its DD effects, which is directly related to the radiation absorption cross-section of MoS2.

    In this study, the DD degradation mechanism in back-gated MoS2 FETs is systematically investigated using 30 keV proton irradiation with various fluences from 1012 to 1014 p/cm2. Both materials and devices showed notable DD radiation tolerance, demonstrated by stability in Raman spectra and slight degradation in electrical characterization. In addition, SRIM software toolkit was employed to simulate the DD effects of 30 keV proton irradiation on the exposed channel region. By combining simulation results with the electrical measurements, we proved that the higher tolerance to proton irradiation is attributed to the nanoscale cross-section in monolayer MoS2. These MoS2-based FETs exhibited high DD radiation tolerance up to 1.56 × 1013 MeV/g (1011 MeV/g for outer space exploration), which provides novel perspectives on the radiation-hardening technology of MoS2-based FETs.

    2. Experimental section

    2.1. Preparation of MoS2

    Monolayer MoS2 was grown on a two-inch c-sapphire substrate using a three-zone temperature-controlled chemical vapor deposition (CVD) system. Elemental sulfur (S) powder was positioned in a silica crucible and heated to 170 °C using a separate heating mantle, with Ar at a flow rate of 100 sccm facilitating its transport. Molybdenum (Mo) sheets, serving as the molybdenum sources, were introduced into the growth chamber in a separate stream, which consisted of a mixture of 5−10 sccm of O2 (to promote the oxidation of Mo) and 50 sccm of Ar, alongside the S vapor. Mo was heated at 650 °C and the growth temperature was 950 °C for the monolayer MoS2 growth.

    2.2. Transfer process of MoS2

    The MoS2 layer was transferred using a wet process assisted by polymer. Firstly, Poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA A4, 950K) was applied onto the MoS2/sapphire substrate by spinning at 2000 rpm and baked at 150 °C to enhance the adhesion between the PMMA and MoS2. Subsequently, the thermal release tape (TRT) was affixed onto PMMA and then immersed inside a 3 mol/L NaOH solution maintained at 40 °C. The TRT/PMMA/MoS2 stack separated from the sapphire substrate was transferred onto the target substrate and subjected to a baking process at 120 °C for 10 min to ensure the TRT was successfully removed. Finally, the PMMA was removed by acetone for 30 min.

    2.3. Fabrication and measurement of MoS2 FETs

    For FET fabrication, the Si substrate covered by 285 nm SiO2, with the transferred MoS2 layer above, was coated with bilayer photoresist (MMA EL9 and PMMA A4, 4000 rpm for 45 s) and baked at 150 °C for 3 and 7 min, respectively. Next, the channel regions were defined using electron-beam lithography (EBL) followed by etching processes utilizing SF6 and O2 plasma. Finally, EBL was again employed to pattern the source and drain, followed by e-beam evaporation deposition of 20 nm Sb and 30 nm Au, and finally the lift-off process. Fig. 1(d) shows the process flow of device fabrication. All electrical measurements were conducted using a Keysight B1500 semiconductor parameter analyzer within a vacuum probe station environment.

    (Color online) Characterization of a CVD-grown monolayer MoS2 film. (a) Schematic presentation of the seeding-promoted CVD with a customized inner reactor for the synthesis of monolayer MoS2. (b) and (c) Line scan of Raman spectra and PL spectra of the monolayer MoS2 film, performed in this study with a 488 nm laser. (d) A schematic diagram and process flow detailing the device structure are provided. A 285 nm SiO2 layer serves as the gate dielectric in this design. (e) Transfer characteristics of 20 MoS2 FETs with L = 3 μm and W = 4 μm, under Vds = 3 V. (f) Corresponding output characteristics of the MoS2 FET. Vgs is stepped up from −12 to 30 V by increments of 3 V.

    Figure 1.(Color online) Characterization of a CVD-grown monolayer MoS2 film. (a) Schematic presentation of the seeding-promoted CVD with a customized inner reactor for the synthesis of monolayer MoS2. (b) and (c) Line scan of Raman spectra and PL spectra of the monolayer MoS2 film, performed in this study with a 488 nm laser. (d) A schematic diagram and process flow detailing the device structure are provided. A 285 nm SiO2 layer serves as the gate dielectric in this design. (e) Transfer characteristics of 20 MoS2 FETs with L = 3 μm and W = 4 μm, under Vds = 3 V. (f) Corresponding output characteristics of the MoS2 FET. Vgs is stepped up from −12 to 30 V by increments of 3 V.

    2.4. Radiation exposure

    The 30 keV proton irradiation was carried out at low energy proton irradiator. The beam diameter was 20 to 150 mm with a high uniformity (fluence variation ≤(±5%)). The average flux was 8 × 108 p/cm2·s. The irradiation fluences were set to be 1012, 1013 and 1014 p/cm2, respectively.

    2.5. SRIM simulation setup

    The simulated proton fluence in the SRIM simulation was set to 1012, 1013, and 1014 p/cm2. In the simulated cross-section, the Au (30 nm, 19.32 g/cm3) and Sb (20 nm, 6.70 g/cm3) metal electrode, MoS2 (1.20 g/cm3) channel, and SiO2 (285 nm, 2.15 g/cm3) and /Si (725 μm, 2.33 g/cm3) substrate were included. The thickness of each layer of MoS2 is defined as 0.65 nm. The default material parameters of antimony (Sb), Au, and SiO2 were applied to the corresponding materials. The DD caused by non-ionization energy loss (NIEL) is the main factor leading to the failure of devices in space radiation environment[25, 26]. The NIEL is defined as:

    NIEL=EvacV100ρ.

    Here, Evac is the displacement threshold energy, and V is the number of vacancies per proton per Å, which can be extracted from TRIM simulation. The damage produced by different irradiation environments is defined using displacement per atom (dpa), which is the amount of displaced atoms divided by the total number of atoms[27]. This is a method for measuring the degree of radiation damage and dpa is defined as:

    dpa=(vacanciesp×Å)×(108(Åcm2)×fluence(pcm2)Atomdensity(atomscm3))=(#of vacanciesatom).

    Here, vacanciesp×Å is the data for TRIM simulation results, meaning the number of vacancies generated per incident ion within a unit target distance. Atom density (atomscm3) is the atomic density of the target material, and fluence (pcm2) is the incident particle dose in the experience.

    3. Results and discussion

    The growth of MoS2 was conducted using a CVD system, as illustrated in Fig. 1(a). The MoS2 was then transferred onto a 285-nm SiO2/highly doped Si substrate employing a wet transfer process. In the AFM measurement, the height of monolayer MoS2 on SiO2/Si substrate is about 0.65 nm (Fig. S1). More detailed information are available in the Experimental Section. To characterize the CVD-grown MoS2, Raman and photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy were employed, with all tests conducted using a 488 nm laser. Fig. 1(b) presents the Raman spectra line scan, which features two peaks that correspond to the out-of-plane vibrational mode of the S atoms (A1g mode at approximately 399.46 cm−1) and in-plane vibrational mode involving both Mo and S atoms (E2g1 mode at approximately 381.94 cm−1) within the MoS2 structure. The average difference of 17.53 ± 0.50 cm−1 between these two peaks effectively indicates the presence of a monolayer[28]. The PL spectrum, shown in Fig. 1(c), displays an averaged peak at 1.85 eV, which corresponds to the characteristic direct-bandgap emission for monolayer MoS2[29].

    Based on the CVD-grown monolayer MoS2, the back-gate MoS2-based FETs were fabricated. The process flow plans are provided in Fig. 1(d). Semi-metallic Sb contacts were used to overcome the inherent van der Waals gap and reduce contact resistance[13]. All FETs were designed with the same width (W = 4 µm) and length (L = 3 µm), as shown in the inset of Fig. 1(e). Fig. 1(e) plots the transfer characteristics of 20 MoS2 FETs at Vds = 3 V, with a highlighted curve representing the characteristics of a typical FET. All devices exhibited n-type transport behavior with an on/off ratio (Ion/Ioff) of approximately 10⁵, an off-state current (Ioff) of 30 pA, and ~10% subthreshold swing (SS) variation. The output characteristics of back-gate MoS2 FETs are shown in Fig. 1(f) presenting both Ohmic contacts (a linear IV at low bias) and an on-state current (Ion) of approximately 4 μA (at Vds = 3 V). These properties are attributed to the use of semi-metallic Sb contacts, which can overcome the inherent van der Waals gap and reduce contact resistance[13].

    Following the growth of the MoS2 and the fabrication of the FETs, the radiation tolerance of DD effect was measured. The MoS2 FETs were subsequently irradiated by protons with the energy of 30 keV at the National Space Science Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences for DD tests. The quality of the MoS2 in the channel region was evaluated before and after irradiation using Raman spectroscopy. Fig. 2(a) illustrates the variation of the Raman spectra corresponding to different levels of proton fluence, normalized by the maximum peak intensity of the monolayer MoS2. A minor shift in position can be observed for the two peaks, with the E2g1 peak at 0.95 cm−1 and the A1g peak at 1.98 cm−1. The changes in peak positions and their difference with the irradiation fluence were further compared (Fig. 2(b)). It was found that both E2g1 and A1g peaks displayed blueshift with a low fluence (1012 p/cm2). As the proton fluence increased up to 1013 p/cm2, the shift of both peaks switched their direction, exhibiting a redshift. As the irradiation dose increases, the distance between the peaks expands.

    (Color online) Raman analysis of the MoS2 FETs before and after 30 keV proton irradiation. (a) Raman spectra of monolayer MoS2 analysis under different proton fluence. (b) Position of E2g1 and A1g in correlation with the proton fluence. The peak position's error bars represent the largest uncertainty present. (c) The peak-to-peak distance and (d) peak intensity ratio for the Raman spectra were measured at 30 different locations within a 5 μm by 6 μm area before irradiation. Insets in the upper right corner of the color maps show the mean (μ) and standard deviation (σ) for each parameter. (e) The peak-to-peak distance and (f) peak intensity ratio for the Raman spectra at the same points after irradiation with a fluence of 1014 p/cm2.

    Figure 2.(Color online) Raman analysis of the MoS2 FETs before and after 30 keV proton irradiation. (a) Raman spectra of monolayer MoS2 analysis under different proton fluence. (b) Position of E2g1 and A1g in correlation with the proton fluence. The peak position's error bars represent the largest uncertainty present. (c) The peak-to-peak distance and (d) peak intensity ratio for the Raman spectra were measured at 30 different locations within a 5 μm by 6 μm area before irradiation. Insets in the upper right corner of the color maps show the mean (μ) and standard deviation (σ) for each parameter. (e) The peak-to-peak distance and (f) peak intensity ratio for the Raman spectra at the same points after irradiation with a fluence of 1014 p/cm2.

    This phenomenon has been further verified by Raman mapping measurements. Figs. 2(c) and 2(d), respectively, show the spatial mappings of peak-to-peak separation and peak intensity ratio between the E2g1 and A1g active modes, measured at 30 distinct points on the MoS2 sample. The E2g1 and A1g peaks have an average peak distance of 17.53 cm−1 and an average peak intensity ratio of 1.10 before irradiation. The Raman spatial mappings of peak-to-peak distance and peak intensity ratio between the E2g1 and A1g active modes with fluence conditions of 1014 p/cm2 are shown in Figs. 2(e) and 2(f). A blueshift of 0.96 cm−1 was noted for the average peak distances, and a redshift of 0.30 cm−1 was noted for a mean peak intensity ratio.

    The observed Raman shifts indicate the presence of strain within the MoS2, which is due to the generation of vacancies, as reported in past studies[30, 31]. The formation of S vacancies is more readily facilitated than Mo vacancies, primarily due to the lower displacement threshold energy and atomic mass of S atoms[21, 32]. Initially, the fluence was maintained at a modest level of 1012 p/cm2, causing partial displacement of S atoms in MoS2. This preferentially creates S vacancies, leading to the creation of point and line defects that induce compressive strain, resulting in a blueshift in the Raman peak position. As the proton fluence increased, additional Mo vacancies were produced, leading to the dissociation of Mo−S bonds. This process results in confinement of phonons due to the localized stretching of bonds (tensile strain) in the vicinity of defect sites, consequently causing a redshift of the E2g1 and A1gpeaks.

    To further investigate the effects of DD on MoS2, we subsequently conducted a comparative analysis of the electrical properties of MoS2 FETs under different proton irradiation conditions, both before and after proton irradiation (Fig. 3(a)). The tested devices exhibited distinct DD responses at different irradiation fluences. Figs. 3(b)−3(d) present the transfer curves of 20 MoS2 field-effect transistors (FETs) subjected to proton irradiation at distinct fluences of 1012, 1013, and 1014 p/cm2, respectively. The typical MoS2 FET (highlighted in Fig. 1(e) and Figs. 3(b)−3(d)) was influenced noticeably following the proton irradiation fluence of 1012 p/cm2. For example, the Vth and SS of the device were measured as 14.6 V and 1.07 V/dec before proton irradiation, while after 1012 p/cm2 proton irradiation, the Vth and SS were measured as 15.9 V and 1.15 V/dec under identical testing conditions. However, following the proton fluence increased above 1013 p/cm2 (1013−1014 p/cm2), there was no significant change in the electrical properties of the MoS2 FET. For example, the Vth and SS of the device were measured as 15.7 V and 1.26 V/dec after 1013 p/cm2 proton irradiation, while after 1014 p/cm2 proton irradiation, the Vth and SS were measured as 13.2 V and 1.01 V/dec.

    (Color online) Electrical performance of the MoS2 FETs before and after 30 keV proton irradiation. (a) A diagrammatic representation of the DD effect in the MoS2 FET caused by proton irradiation. Representative transfer characteristics obtained from 20 monolayer MoS2 FETs after proton irradiation with a total fluence of (b) 1012 p/cm2, (c) 1013 p/cm2, and (d) 1014 p/cm2. Statistical measurements of (e) SS, (f) Ion/Ioff, and (g) Vth change, with three different proton irradiation fluences of 1012, 1013, and 1014 p/cm2.

    Figure 3.(Color online) Electrical performance of the MoS2 FETs before and after 30 keV proton irradiation. (a) A diagrammatic representation of the DD effect in the MoS2 FET caused by proton irradiation. Representative transfer characteristics obtained from 20 monolayer MoS2 FETs after proton irradiation with a total fluence of (b) 1012 p/cm2, (c) 1013 p/cm2, and (d) 1014 p/cm2. Statistical measurements of (e) SS, (f) Ion/Ioff, and (g) Vth change, with three different proton irradiation fluences of 1012, 1013, and 1014 p/cm2.

    Figs. 3(e)−3(g) show the statistical results for Vth, SS, and Ion/Ioff extracted from the transfer curves of MoS2 FETs exposed to proton irradiation at three distinct fluence levels. The SS values of the MoS2 FETs do not experience significant changes at fluences of 1012 and 1013 p/cm2 (from ~1.10 V/dec in the pristine sample to ~1.16 V/dec at 1012 p/cm2 and ~1.20 V/dec at 1013 p/cm2), while exhibit a noticeable decline at 1014 p/cm2 influence (from ~1.20 V/dec at 1013 p/cm2 to ~0.98 V/dec at 1014 p/cm2). The Ion/Ioff values of irradiated MoS2 FETs change slightly at 1012 and 1013 p/cm2 and enlarge at 1014 p/cm2 compared with the pristine MoS2 FETs (from ~4.05 × 105 in the pristine sample to ~4.79 × 105 at 1012 p/cm2, ~4.64 × 105 at 1013 p/cm2 and ~2.18 × 106 at 1014 p/cm2). The Ion current shows no significant change before and after proton radiation, while primary reason for the enhanced Ion/Ioff values is attributed to the reduction in the Ioff current.

    Comparing with SS and Ion/Ioff, the Vth is an important metric describing the critical voltage at which the device turns on and its fluctuation will affect the power consumption of MoS2 FETs. As shown in Fig. 3(g), with a small fluence of 1012 p/cm2, the Vths of the MoS2 FETs shifted in the positive direction (from ~14.7 V in pristine sample to ~16.2 V at 1012 p/cm2). With the fluence of 1013 and 1014 p/cm2, the Vths of the FETs shifted in the negative direction (from ~14.8 V at 1013 p/cm2 to ~13.7 V at 1014 p/cm2). Combined with the characterization in Fig. 2, the modification in the electrical properties of MoS2 FET devices following proton irradiation is not inherently related to the MoS2 itself. Instead, it might be attributed to DD-irradiation-generated interface trap states at the SiO2/MoS2 interface or the oxide traps in the SiO2 layer.

    Compared to silicon-based radiation-hardened FETs, the MoS2 FETs fabricated in this study demonstrated smaller ΔSS (~ 45.8% at 2.7 × 1012 p/cm2 at silicon-based FETs[33], ~8.99% at 1013 p/cm2 in this work). To further investigate the mechanism, the SRIM Monte Carlo toolkit was utilized to model the penetration depth and displacement damage in the MoS2 FETs subsequent to 30 keV proton irradiation. The SRIM simulations consisted of the source/drain region (Sb/Au/MoS2/SiO2/Si, Fig. 4(a)) and the MoS2 channel region (MoS2/SiO2/Si, Fig. S2). The simulation model took into account the thickness and density of each layer, including Sb (20 nm, 6.70 g/cm3), Au (30 nm, 19.32 g/cm3) metal electrode, MoS2 (1.20 g/cm3) channel, SiO2 (285 nm, 2.15 g/cm3) and Si (725 μm, 2.33 g/cm3) substrate. The track distribution of 30 keV protons in monolayer MoS2 with a SiO2/Si substrate is shown in Fig. S3. To facilitate observation, only the top 350 nm depth of the device is displayed in Fig. 4(a). It can be seen from the enlarged view in Fig. 4(a) that fewer vacancies form in the MoS2 compared with metal and SiO2/Si substrate. In addition, a higher count of vacancies in the source/drain area compared to the channel area indicates that the DD effects to the metal-covered MoS2 is more pronounced.

    (Color online) The relationship between radiation absorption cross-section and radiation tolerance. (a) Simulation results of the vacancy number in the source/drain region (Sb/Au/MoS2/SiO2/Si) by SRIM. Inset illustrates the simulation domain, encompassing the source/drain contact region. (b) Simulation results of vacancies number in the monolayer, bilayer and trilayer by SRIM. Transfer characteristics of (c) bilayer and (d) trilayer MoS2 FETs after 1014 p/cm2 proton irradiation measured at different Vds. Benchmark of the change of (e) ΔSS and (f) ΔVth caused by DD in other radiation-hard FETs[11, 20, 21, 35−39].

    Figure 4.(Color online) The relationship between radiation absorption cross-section and radiation tolerance. (a) Simulation results of the vacancy number in the source/drain region (Sb/Au/MoS2/SiO2/Si) by SRIM. Inset illustrates the simulation domain, encompassing the source/drain contact region. (b) Simulation results of vacancies number in the monolayer, bilayer and trilayer by SRIM. Transfer characteristics of (c) bilayer and (d) trilayer MoS2 FETs after 1014 p/cm2 proton irradiation measured at different Vds. Benchmark of the change of (e) ΔSS and (f) ΔVth caused by DD in other radiation-hard FETs[11, 20, 21, 3539].

    The displacement per atom[7, 27, 34] (dpa, as detailed in the Experimental Section) indicates that under 30 keV proton irradiation, on average, only one vacancy is produced for every 244 atoms. This is attributed to the ultra-thin body and nanoscale sensitivity volume of MoS2. To confirm the relationship between the sensitivity volume and DD induced damage, the SRIM simulations of MoS2 with different thicknesses were performed. As shown in Fig. 4(b), with the thickness of the samples increasing, the number of vacancies induced by each proton gradually increases. Specifically, the number of vacancies per proton for monolayer, bilayer, and trilayer MoS2 are 0.0025, 0.0040, and 0.0068, respectively. To verify the simulation results, we subsequently fabricated bilayer and trilayer MoS2-based FETs which were procured via the mechanical exfoliation method and tested the electrical properties before and after proton irradiation (Fig. S4 and Figs. 4(c)−4(d)). After a 1014 p/cm2 proton irradiation, the trilayer samples exhibit larger ΔVth and ΔSS (3.19 V and 0.30 V/dec) than the monolayer MoS2 FETs (2.98 V and 0.17 V/dec), which is corresponded to the simulation results.

    The discussion above indicates that our MoS2-based devices can withstand proton radiation at a level of 1014 p/cm2, causing very minimal changes, which far exceeds the requirements for space applications. To benchmark the tolerance against the DD effect, the MoS2 FETs have been compared with reported radiation-hardened FETs, such as SiC-based FETs[35], CNT-based FETs[7, 11], graphene-based FETs[36] or other FETs based on metal−oxide semiconductors[3739]. Considering the different channel materials and irradiation conditions employed in previous works, the radiation’s nonionizing energy loss (NIEL) values[25, 40], which represent the rate of energy loss attributed to atomic displacements as particles pass through a material[11, 20, 21, 3539, 41] (shown in Table S1), were selected as metrics for a fair comparison. The details about computational method are discussed in the Experimental Section. In this work, the NIEL of monolayer MoS2 subjected to 30 keV proton bombardment was calculated as 0.156 MeV·cm2/g. The irradiation’s DD dose (Dd)[42] provides a unified quantitative standard for assessing the degree of damage in different materials under various radiation fluences and it can be calculated through the following equation:

    Dd=NIEL×fluence.

    Dd is utilized to evaluate the MoS2 FET DD tolerance[11, 20, 21, 3539], as summarized in Figs. 4(e) and 4(f). Figs. 4(e) and 4(f) illustrates the percentage change in SS and ΔVth at various Dd, respectively. It is clear that our MoS2 device located at the preferred level with low variation in SS (less than 20% in Fig. 4(e)) and small change in Vth (~1.50 V in Fig. 4(f)). It is noted that CNT-based FETs can withstand higher Dd (e.g., 150 keV protons with a higher Dd of 1.51 × 1015 MeV/g)[11], which is largely due to the strong carbon−carbon bonds. However, our devices exhibit a smaller variation in SS and Vth (11.5% of SS change rate and 0.98 V/dec of ΔVth) under similar Dd conditions range from 1013 to 1014 MeV/g. We attribute the high tolerance against proton irradiation of MoS2 to the smaller cross-section than CNTs, which should also be reproduced in two-dimensional materials-based devices. These results indicate the promising prospects of MoS2-based FETs for electronic applications in Earth's orbital regions and even in deep space.

    4. Conclusion

    In this study, the DD degradation mechanism in MoS2-based devices is systematically investigated using a 30 keV with various fluences from 1012 to 1014 p/cm2. Using the SRIM software, we simulated the DD radiation effects on the exposed channel region, demonstrating that the enhanced proton irradiation tolerance is due to the nanoscale cross-section of monolayer MoS2. The monolayer MoS2-based FETs fabricated in this work showed high DD radiation tolerance up to 1.56 × 10¹³ MeV/g (compared to 10¹¹ MeV/g required for outer space exploration), demonstrated MoS2-based ICs as a prospective radiation-hardened technology for deployment in space exploration missions.

    References

    [1] M G Zhu, Z Zhang, L M Peng. High-performance and radiation-hard carbon nanotube complementary static random-access memory. Adv Electron Mater, 5, 1900313(2019).

    [2] J Prinzie, F M Simanjuntak, P Leroux et al. Low-power electronic technologies for harsh radiation environments. Nat Electron, 4, 243(2021).

    [3] M Meyyappan, J E Koehne, J W Han. Nanoelectronics and nanosensors for space exploration. MRS Bull, 40, 822(2015).

    [4] D M Fleetwood. Evolution of total ionizing dose effects in MOS devices with Moore’s law scaling. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci, 65, 1465(2018).

    [5] T F Schranghamer, A Pannone, H Ravichandran et al. Radiation resilient two-dimensional electronics. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 15, 26946(2023).

    [6] T Vogl, K Sripathy, A Sharma et al. Radiation tolerance of two-dimensional material-based devices for space applications. Nat Commun, 10, 1202(2019).

    [7] M G Zhu, P Lu, X Wang et al. Ultra-strong comprehensive radiation effect tolerance in carbon nanotube electronics. Small, 19, 2204537(2023).

    [8] M G Zhu, H S Xiao, G P Yan et al. Radiation-hardened and repairable integrated circuits based on carbon nanotube transistors with ion gel gates. Nat Electron, 3, 622(2020).

    [9] M G Zhu, J S Zhou, P K Sun et al. Analyzing gamma-ray irradiation effects on carbon nanotube top-gated field-effect transistors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 13, 47756(2021).

    [10] P Lu, M G Zhu, P X Zhao et al. Heavy ion displacement damage effect in carbon nanotube field effect transistors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 15, 10936(2023).

    [11] X R Zhang, H P Zhu, S A Peng et al. Radiation-hardened property of single-walled carbon nanotube film-based field-effect transistors under low-energy proton irradiation. J Semicond, 42, 112002(2021).

    [12] C Liang, R Ma, K Li et al. Laser-induced single-event transients in black phosphorus MOSFETs. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci, 66, 384(2019).

    [13] W S Li, X S Gong, Z H Yu et al. Approaching the quantum limit in two-dimensional semiconductor contacts. Nature, 613, 274(2023).

    [14] D X Fan, W S Li, H Qiu et al. Two-dimensional semiconductor integrated circuits operating at gigahertz frequencies. Nat Electron, 6, 879(2023).

    [15] H K Ning, Z H Yu, Q T Zhang et al. An in-memory computing architecture based on a duplex two-dimensional material structure for in situ machine learning. Nat Nanotechnol, 18, 493(2023).

    [16] J F Jiang, L Xu, L J Du et al. Yttrium-doping-induced metallization of molybdenum disulfide for ohmic contacts in two-dimensional transistors. Nat Electron, 7, 545(2024).

    [17] S Y Zheng, Y Zeng, Z J Chen. Investigation of total-ionizing dose effects on the two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide field-effect transistors. IEEE Access, 7, 79989(2019).

    [18] H Y Li, C M Liu, Y Q Zhang et al. Electron radiation effects on the structural and electrical properties of MoS2 field effect transistors. Nanotechnology, 30, 485201(2019).

    [19] P Wang, C J Perini, A O’Hara et al. Total ionizing dose effects and proton-induced displacement damage on MoS2-interlayer-MoS2 tunneling junctions. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci, 66, 420(2019).

    [20] T Y Kim, K Cho, W Park et al. Irradiation effects of high-energy proton beams on MoS2 field effect transistors. ACS Nano, 8, 2774(2014).

    [21] Y F Zhang, X F Chen, H S Wang et al. Electronic properties of multilayer MoS2 field effect transistor with unique irradiation resistance. J Phys Chem C, 125, 2089(2021).

    [22] O Ochedowski, K Marinov, G Wilbs et al. Radiation hardness of graphene and MoS2 field effect devices against swift heavy ion irradiation. J Appl Phys, 113, 153005(2013).

    [23] Z Y He, R Zhao, X F Chen et al. Defect engineering in single-layer MoS2 using heavy ion irradiation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 10, 42524(2018).

    [24] L Madauß, O Ochedowski, H Lebius et al. Defect engineering of single- and few-layer MoS2 by swift heavy ion irradiation. 2D Mater, 4, 015034(2016).

    [25] I Jun, M A Xapsos, S R Messenger et al. Proton nonionizing energy loss (NIEL) for device applications. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci, 50, 1924(2003).

    [26] M Huhtinen. Simulation of non-ionising energy loss and defect formation in silicon. Nucl Instrum Meth Phys Res Sect A Accel Spectrometers Detect Assoc Equip, 491, 194(2002).

    [27] X R Lu, X Y Shu, L Wang et al. Heavy-ion irradiation effects on Gd2Zr2O7 ceramics bearing complex nuclear waste. J Alloys Compd, 771, 973(2019).

    [28] C G Lee, H G Yan, L E Brus et al. Anomalous lattice vibrations of single-and few-layer MoS2. ACS Nano, 4, 2695(2010).

    [29] T T Li, W Guo, L Ma et al. Epitaxial growth of wafer-scale molybdenum disulfide semiconductor single crystals on sapphire. Nat Nanotechnol, 16, 1201(2021).

    [30] Y Y Hui, X F Liu, W J Jie et al. Exceptional tunability of band energy in a compressively strained trilayer MoS2 sheet. ACS Nano, 7, 7126(2013).

    [31] W M Parkin, A Balan, L B Liang et al. Raman shifts in electron-irradiated monolayer MoS2. ACS Nano, 10, 4134(2016).

    [32] J H Hong, Z X Hu, M Probert et al. Exploring atomic defects in molybdenum disulphide monolayers. Nat Commun, 6, 6293(2015).

    [33] E Simoen, J M Rafi, A Mercha et al. Degradation of deep submicron partially depleted SOI CMOS transistors under MeV proton irradiation. Proceedings of the 18th Symposium on Microelectronics Technology and Devices-SBMICRO, 1, 1(2003).

    [34] M G Esposito, J E Manuel, A Privat et al. Investigating heavy-ion effects on 14-nm process FinFETs: displacement damage versus total ionizing dose. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci, 68, 724(2021).

    [35] S Bonaldo, C Martinella, S Race et al. Radiation-induced effects in SiC vertical power MOSFETs irradiated at ultrahigh doses. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci, 71, 418(2024).

    [36] J Zeng, P C Ma, S X Zhang et al. Unrecovered ion-irradiated damage after thermal annealing in graphene field effect transistors. Appl Surf Sci, 588, 153005(2022).

    [37] M G Shin, S H Hwang, H S Cha et al. Effects of proton beam irradiation on the physical and chemical properties of IGTO thin films with different thicknesses for thin-film transistor applications. Surf Interfaces, 23, 100990(2021).

    [38] H Y Jeong, S H Kwon, H J Joo et al. Radiation-tolerant p-type SnO thin-film transistors. IEEE Electron Device Lett, 40, 1124(2019).

    [39] B Park, D Ho, G Kwon et al. Solution-processed rad-hard amorphous metal-oxide thin-film transistors. Adv Funct Mater, 28, 1802717(2018).

    [40] G P Summers, E A Burke, P Shapiro et al. Damage correlations in semiconductors exposed to gamma, electron and proton radiations. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci, 40, 1372(1993).

    [41] X N Huang, J Y Shi, Y Yao et al. Layer thickness influenced irradiation effects of proton beam on MoS2 field effect transistors. Nanotechnology, 32, 135204(2021).

    [42] J R Srour, J W Palko. Displacement damage effects in irradiated semiconductor devices. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci, 60, 1740(2013).

    Kaiyue He, Zhanqi Li, Taotao Li, Yifu Sun, Shitong Zhu, Chao Wu, Huiping Zhu, Peng Lu, Xinran Wang, Maguang Zhu. Displacement damage effects in MoS2-based electronics[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2024, 45(12): 122701
    Download Citation