• Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves
  • Vol. 44, Issue 1, 16 (2025)
Hang GONG1,2, Fu-Gui ZHOU1,2, Ruize FENG1,2, Zhi-Yu FENG1,2..., Tong LIU1, Jing-Yuan SHI1,2, Yong-Bo SU1,2,* and Zhi JIN1,2,**|Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1High-Frequency High-Voltage Device and Integrated Circuits Center,Institute of Microelectronics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100029,China
  • 2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences(UCAS),Beijing 100049,China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.11972/j.issn.1001-9014.2025.01.003 Cite this Article
    Hang GONG, Fu-Gui ZHOU, Ruize FENG, Zhi-Yu FENG, Tong LIU, Jing-Yuan SHI, Yong-Bo SU, Zhi JIN. Correlation between the whole small recess offset and electrical performance of InP-based HEMTs[J]. Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves, 2025, 44(1): 16 Copy Citation Text show less

    Abstract

    In this work, we investigate the impact of the whole small recess offset on DC and RF characteristics of InP high electron mobility transistors (HEMTs). Lg = 80 nm HEMTs are fabricated with a double-recessed gate process. We focus on their DC and RF responses, including the maximum transconductance (gm_max), ON-resistance (RON), current-gain cutoff frequency (fT), and maximum oscillation frequency (fmax). The devices have almost same RON. The gm_max improves as the whole small recess moves toward the source. However, a small gate to source capacitance (Cgs) and a small drain output conductance (gds) lead to the largest fT, although the whole small gate recess moves toward the drain leads to the smaller gm_max. According to the small-signal modeling, the device with the whole small recess toward drain exhibits an excellent RF characteristics, such as fT = 372 GHz and fmax= 394 GHz. This result is achieved by paying attention to adjust resistive and capacitive parasitics, which play a key role in high-frequency response.

    Introduction

    III-V compound semiconductors,represented by InP,have recently emerged as a technology of choice for Tera-Hz(THz) applications due to their low noise,low power consumption and high gain performance1. Northrop Grumman Space Technology first implemented the device withmaximum oscillation frequency(fmaxexceeding 1THz in 20072. In addition,their group successfully pushed the InP HEMT amplifier technology to 850 GHz for the first time in 20143. Currently,the record for current-gain cutoff frequency(fT) is 750 GHz @ gate length(Lg) = 20 nm4 and fmax is 1.5 THz @ Lg = 25 nm5. Therefore,it is imperative to scale the physical gate length(Lg) to improve the frequency response of the device. However,the Lg cannot be reduced indefinitely. According to delay-time analysis6,as the Lg decreases,the transit time under the gate τtext decreases sharply,resulting in a sharp increase in the proportion of extrinsic channel-charging delay τtext. Therefore,reducing τtext is another means to improve the device performance.

    τtext is related to the parasitic resistance and parasitic capacitance. For the parasitic resistance,in addition to use multiple heavily doped cap layers78,it is to reduce the width of the gate recess to minimize parasitic series resistances,such as the source and drain resistance(RS and RD9. The extrinsic capacitance can be decreased by increasing the spacing of gate recess or making a cavity structure10.

    The gate recess process is the most critical process for InP HEMTs manufacturing,which has a significant impact on parasitic series resistances and capacitance. Dae-Hyun Kim et al. studied the effects of the side-recess spacing(Lside),reporting that increasing Lside has a large impact on the subthreshold characteristics of the device due to a significant reduction of the gate leakage current and an improvement in its electrostatic integrity11. Both M. Samnoun et al.12 and Keisuke Shinoharal et al.13 investigated the asymmetric gate recess technology,reporting that increase of the drain side recess(LRD) improves the fmax due to the reduction of output conductance gds and capacitance Cgd. In addition,Tetsuya Suemitsu et al.14 and Tae-Woo Kim et al.15 developed a two-step-recessed gate process that improves high-speed performance.

    However,seldom people have studied the impact of the asymmetric gate recess technology on two-step-recessed gate process. Therefore,it is imperative to carefully investigate the impact of the whole small recess offset in a double-recessed gate process on improving the high-frequency characteristics of InP HEMTs.

    1 Process Technology

    Table 1 shows the Gas Source Molecular Beam Epitaxy(GSMBE)-grown epitaxial layer structure on 3 inch semi-insulating InP(100) substrates that is used in this paper. In order to suppress the kink effect,the channel features a lattice-matched InxGa1-xAs with an indium content of 53%. In addition,a multi-layer cap structure that combines a heavily Si-doped multi-layer cap(In0.65Ga0.35As/In0.53Ga0.47As/ln0.52Al0.48As) were used to minimize a tunneling resistance associated with the barrier layer between the cap and channel layer. The concentration of Si-doping to a multi-layer cap is 3.0×1019,1.0×1019,and 1.0×1019 cm-2 respectively. The 4-nm InP layer acts as an effective gate recess etch-stopper. Hall measurements were carried out at room temperature,showing the carrier mobility of over 10 000 cm2/(Vs) and the two-dimensional(2-DEG) sheet density of 3.26×1012 cm-2.

    N++ CapInGaAs,x = 0.6510 nm
    3 Inch Semi-insulating InP(100) Substrate
    N+ CapInAlAs,x = 0.5315 nm
    N+ CapInAlAs,x = 0.5215 nm
    StopperInP4 nm
    BarrierInAlAs,x = 0.528 nm
    δ-dopingSi-
    SpacingInAlAs,x = 0.523 nm
    ChannelInGaAs,x = 0.5315 nm
    BufferInAlAs,x = 0.52500 nm

    Table 1. Epitaxial layer structures of the InGaAs HEMTs that are fabricated in this paper.

    In order to avoid the degradation of the epitaxial structure by high temperature,the temperature of wafer in the whole fabrication process is lower than 300 ℃. Similar to our pervious work16,mesa isolation is achieved by using multiple acids to successively etch the epitaxial layer to the buffer layer. After device isolation,source-drain metal electrodes are formed by Ti/Pt/Au(15 nm/15 nm/50 nm) with thermal annealing. The distance between source and drain electrode was designed to be 2.4 μm. The double-recessed gate process used to fabricate the T-shaped gates was as follows. Firstly,a SiO2 thin film was deposited by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition(PECVD) to improve adherence of photoresist. And the opening size of the SiO2 mask was used to control the width of large gate recess. Next,the SiO2 mask was etched by reactive ion etching(RIE) using CF4 plasma after defining the gate-recess region by electronic beam lithography(EBL). After RIE,the InGaAs cap layer was removed by a mix solution of citric acid(C6H8O7) and hydrogen peroxide(H2O2) to form the large gate recess,where it was measured about 500 nm.

    To abtain a small gate recess,a e-beam gate process was developed,which is shown in Table. 1. The PMMA/Al/UVIII e-beam stack layers were used to define the gate and small gate recess. In order to avoid the miscible of the two photoresist layers,the metal Al layer is used for isolation,and it is easily soluble in alkaline developer. The top UVIII resist was exposed by a small dose and wide line. After that,the gate head was determined by TMAH development and rinsed in DI water. Subsequently,the gate foot was defined on a single layer of PMMA resist and was exposed by a big dose and narrow line. The InAlAs cap layers were etched by H3PO4-solution down to the InP layer acting as an etch-stopped layer,where the small recess was measured about 100 nm. After the formation of the small recess,Ti/Pt/Au(3 nm/25 nm/350 nm) metals were evaporated and lifted off to form the T-shaped gate. The length of gate foot was 80 nm,and the gate stem was adjusted to be 250 nm to alleviate parasitic capacitances.

    The whole small recess could be located at the large recess center,or with an offset toward source/drain,where the position of gate metals was in the middle of the small recess. The offsets from large recess center were 0.0 µm(type A),- 0.1 µm(type B),and + 0.1 µm(type C).

    Finally,these devices were covered with a 20-nm-thick Si3N4 dielectric film by PECVD(280 ℃). The SEM image of the cross section of the fabricated device is shown in Fig. 1,which is the whole small recess toward source.

    The EBL process for T-gate fabrication and small gate recess (The layers below the InP etch-stopped layer are not shown)

    Figure 1.The EBL process for T-gate fabrication and small gate recess (The layers below the InP etch-stopped layer are not shown)

    SEM image of the cross section of the fabricated device with the whole small recess toward source(type B),where the large gate recess was measured about 500 nm and the small recess was measured about 100 nm

    Figure 2.SEM image of the cross section of the fabricated device with the whole small recess toward source(type B),where the large gate recess was measured about 500 nm and the small recess was measured about 100 nm

    2 DC & Microwave Characteristics

    DC characteristics of devices were measured by an HP4142 semiconductor parameter analyzer. Figure 3(a) shows the typical output characteristics of the InP-based InGaAs/InAlAs HEMTs with 80-nm gate length and 50 μm × 2 gate width. These devices exhibit good pinchoff and excellent current saturation characteristics up to VDS = 1.2 V. The type A device exhibits a better drain current driving capability(ID_max). These devices exhibit the almost same ON-resistance(RON),which is about 0.70 Ω·mm. This is because the ohmic contact and access resistance components are the same during the whole small recess offset. The drain and source resistances(RD and RS) are estimated from dc-measurements(RS + RD ≈ 0.546 Ω·mm),it can be also extracted from small signal equivalent circuit(SSEC) using a cold FET method 16.

    Partial DC and RF characteristics of InP HEMT:(a) DC characteristics of the InGaAs/InAlAs HEMTs with the whole small recess offset, and (b) the measured transconductance (gm) of the devices as a function of IDS, for the value of VDS = 0.8 V (Lg = 80 nm, Wg = 50 µm × 2 )

    Figure 3.Partial DC and RF characteristics of InP HEMT:(a) DC characteristics of the InGaAs/InAlAs HEMTs with the whole small recess offset, and (b) the measured transconductance (gm) of the devices as a function of IDS, for the value of VDS = 0.8 V (Lg = 80 nm, Wg = 50 µm × 2 )

    SymbolType AType BType C
    VGS [V]-0.50-0.45-0.40
    Cgs [fF/mm]418432388
    Cgd [fF/mm]1039799
    RS [Ω·mm]0.1590.1490.169
    RD [Ω·mm]0.3870.3970.377
    gds [mS/mm]305.5304.5240
    gmi [mS/mm]151315661487
    fT_meas [GHz]356349372
    fmax_model [GHz]331336394

    Table 2. Small-signal model parameters of the Lg = 80 nm InGaAs/InAlAs HEMTs at VDS = 0.8 V, with different structures.

    Lg(nm)gm,max(mS/mm)fT(GHz)fmax(GHz)TimeRef
    751 950270910201719
    1001 700300700202220
    701 600310540201421
    751 331260800202112

    Table 3. Related device performance comparison

    Figure 3(b) shows the measured transconductance(gm) of the Lg = 80 nm devices as a function of IDS at a drain bias of 0.8 V. As the IDS increases,the gm increases firstly up to the gm_max and than decreases gradually. The type B device with the whole small recess toward source exhibits the largest gm_max,which is 1105 mS/mm. The best characteristic arises from the smaller RS.

    Figure 4 shows the dependence of the DC drain conductance(gds_dc) on appiled VDS. The VGS takes the voltage value corresponding to the gm_max. When VDS increases,the gds_dc of these devices decreases sharply at first and then decreases slowly. When VDS is greater than 0.6 V,the gds_dc of type C always keeps a trend of being less than that of type A and type B. Because gds_dc is obtained from ∂IDS/∂VDS and gds is obtained from Re(Y22) in the S-parameters,gds and gds_dc are related,which is consistent with the result of the parameters extraction below. From Equation(2),a smaller gds will contribute to improving the fmax.

    Dependence of DC drain conductance on applied VDS with different structures

    Figure 4.Dependence of DC drain conductance on applied VDS with different structures

    The microwave characteristics of our representative Lg = 80 nm In0.53Ga0.47As/In0.52Al0.48As HEMTs are characterized from 0.1 to 50 GHz,using an Agilent precision network analyzer(PNA) system with off-wafer calibration. Pad parasitics are subtracted from the measured S-parameters using on-wafer OPEN and SHORT pads with identical geometry to the device pads. Figure 5 shows measured(symbols) and small-signal modeled(solid lines) H21,MAG/MSG,and U versus frequency for these devices with the whole small recess offset. Using the de-embedded S-parameters,we build a conventional small-signal model,based on our previous research 17. The bias condition is at VDS = 0.8 V. And VGS takes the voltage value corresponding to the gm_max. From the de-embedded S-parameters,the values of fT could be obtain by extrapolating H21 with a slope of -20 dB/decade and the values of fmax are estimated from the small signal model. It is good that such a combination of fT = 372 GHz and fmax = 394 GHz is demonstrated from the type C device with the whole small recess toward drain,at a relatively small value of VDS = 0.8 V and VGS = - 0.4 V.

    Measured (symbols) and small-signal modeled (lines) RF gains [ |h21|, U and maximum available gain (MAG/MSG) ] versus frequency with the Lg = 80 nm InGaAs/InAlAs HEMTs . The offsets from large recess center were 0.0 µm (type A), - 0.1 µm (type B), and + 0.1 µm (type C). The bias conditions were near the gm peak gate voltage and at VDS = 0.8 V

    Figure 5.Measured (symbols) and small-signal modeled (lines) RF gains [ |h21|, U and maximum available gain (MAG/MSG) ] versus frequency with the Lg = 80 nm InGaAs/InAlAs HEMTs . The offsets from large recess center were 0.0 µm (type A), - 0.1 µm (type B), and + 0.1 µm (type C). The bias conditions were near the gm peak gate voltage and at VDS = 0.8 V

    Figure 6 plots the extracted fT as a function of IDS for these devices at VDS = 0.8 V,which consists with the gm against IDS in Fig. 3(b). The type C device have the largest fT of all fT - IDS characteristics. At an IDS of approximately 100 mA/mm which is a typical choice of the bias condition for most of the LNA designs,the type C device displays fT over 275 GHz.

    Extracted fT against IDS of Lg = 80 nm InGaAs/InAlAs HEMTs at VDS = 0.8 V with different structures

    Figure 6.Extracted fT against IDS of Lg = 80 nm InGaAs/InAlAs HEMTs at VDS = 0.8 V with different structures

    The fT and fmax can be expressed as:

    fT=gmi2π{ (Cgs+Cgd)[1+gds(Rs+Rd)]+Cgdgmi(Rs+Rd)}
    fmax=fT4gds(Rg+Ri+Rs)+2CgdCgs(CgdCgs+gmi(Ri+Rs)) .

    Table 2 shows the small-signal modeling parameters for different structures,including RSRDgmiCgsCgd,and gds. Compared with type A and type B,type C has the smallest capacitance Cgs. This is because the type C device with the whole small recess toward drain results in smaller extrinsic capacitance. At the same time,according to Table 2 and Fig. 4 shows that the type C has the smallest gds. Although the gmi of type C is the smallest,the parasitic resistance of the three devices is almost the same,and combined with the influence of other parameters,the type C finally obtains the largest fT. In terms of fmax,it depends on the combined infulence of several parameters. The type C device obtains the largest fmax due to the small gds and large fT. Therefore,it should be finally emphasized that the device with the whole small recess toward drain in a double-recessed gate process could improve the high-frequency characteristics.

    3 Conclusion

    In summary,we experimentally investigate the impact of the whole small recess offset on the lattice-matched InP-based HEMTs in a double-recessed gate process,where Lg = 80 nm. These devices exhibit the same RON,and the device with the whole small recess toward source has the largest gm_max due to a smaller Rs. For RF responses of these devices,the device with the whole small recess toward drain achieves an excellent characteristic of fT = 372 GHz,and fmax= 394 GHz. In the following research,the gm of the device will be further improved to increase the fT by using a channel with Indium-rich composition.

    4 Acknowledgement

    This work was supported by Development of Terahertz Multi-user RF Transceiver System(Grant No. Z211100004421012). The authors would like to thank Yan-kui Li for his assistance during the measurements. We thank Engineer Feng Yang for his discussion on the process and Professor Ding Peng for his guidance.

    References

    [1] D Kim, J Alamo. 30-nm InAs PHEMTs With fT = 644 GHz and fmax = 681 GHz. IEEE Electron Device Letters, 31, 806-808(2010).

    [2] R Lai, X B Mei, W R Deal et al. Sub 50 nm InP HEMT Device with fmax Greater than 1 THz, 609-611(2007).

    [3] W R Deal, K Leong, A. Zamora, V Radisic et al. Recent progress in scaling InP HEMT TMIC technology to 850 GHz, 2014, 1-3.

    [4] W Park, H Jo, H Kim et al. Terahertz In0.8Ga0.2As quantum-well HEMTs toward 6G applications, 11.4.1-11.4.4(2022).

    [5] X B Mei, W Yoshida, M Lange et al. First Demonstration of Amplification at 1 THz Using 25-nm InP High Electron Mobility Transistor Process. IEEE Electron Device Letters, 36, 327-329(2015).

    [6] H Jo, S Yun, J Kim et al. Sub-30-nm In0.8Ga0.2As Composite-Channel High-Electron-Mobility Transistors With Record High-Frequency Characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 68, 2010-2016(2021).

    [7] K J Chen, T Enoki, K Maezawa et al. High-performance InP-based enhancement-mode HEMTs using non-alloyed ohmic contacts and Pt-based buried-gate technologies. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 43, 252-257(1996).

    [8] K Shinohara, Y Yamashita, A Endoh et al. 547 GHz fT In0.7Ga0.3As-In0.52Al0.48As HEMTs with reduced source and drain resistance. IEEE Electron Device Letters, 25, 241-243(2004).

    [9] Ruize Feng, Bo Wang, Shurui Cao et al. Impact of symmetric gate-recess length on the DC and RF characteristics of InP HEMTs. Chinese Physics B, 31, 018505(2022).

    [10] T Takahashi, K Makiyama, N Hara et al. Improvement in high frequency and noise characteristics of InP-based HEMTs by reducing parasitic capacitance, 1-4(2008).

    [11] D Kim, J Alamo, J Lee et al. The Impact of Side-Recess Spacing on the Logic Performance of 50 nm InGaAs HEMTs, 177-180(2006).

    [12] M Samnouni, N Wichmann, X Wallart et al. 75 nm Gate Length PHEMT With fmax = 800 GHz Using Asymmetric Gate Recess: RF and Noise Investigation. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 68, 4289-4295(2021).

    [13] K Shinohara, P S Chen, J Bergman et al. Ultra-High-Speed Low-Noise InP-HEMT Technology, 337-340(2006).

    [14] T Suemitsu, H Yokoyama, Y Umeda et al. High-performance 0.1-µm-gate enhancement-mode InAlAs/InGaAs HEMT’s using two-step-recessed gate technology. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 46, 1074-1080(1999).

    [15] T Kim, D Kim, S Park et al. A Two-Step-Recess Process Based on Atomic-Layer Etching for High-Performance In0.52Al0.48As/In0.53Ga0.47As p-HEMTs. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 55, 1577-1584(2008).

    [16] Peng Ding, Chen Chen, Wuchang Ding et al. Ultra-thin 20 nm-PECVD-Si3N4 surface passivation in T-shaped gate InAlAs/InGaAs InP-based HEMTs and its impact on DC and RF performance. Solid-State Electronics, 123, 1-5(2016).

    [17] G Dambrine, A Cappy, F Heliodore et al. A new method for determining the FET small-signal equivalent circuit. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 36, 1151-1159(1988).

    [18] M Asif, D Peng, C Chen et al. Analysis of Passivation Techniques in InP HEMTs and Implementation of an Analytical Model of fT Based on the Small Signal Equivalent Circuit. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 19, 2537-2546(2019).

    [19] T Takahashi, Y Kawano, K Makiyama et al. Enhancement of fmax to 910 GHz by Adopting Asymmetric Gate Recess and Double-Side-Doped Structure in 75-nm-Gate InAlAs/InGaAs HEMTs. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 64, 89-95(2017).

    [20] Guo Zhou, Yingsheng Bi, Zhuo Chen et al. Preparation and Performances of InP HEMT Device with Cavity Gate Structure. Semiconductor Technology.

    [21] Lisen Zhang, Zhihong Feng, Dong Xing et al. 70 nm gate-length THz InP-based In0.7Ga0.3As/In0.52Al0.48As HEMT with fmax of 540 GHz, 1-4(2014).

    Hang GONG, Fu-Gui ZHOU, Ruize FENG, Zhi-Yu FENG, Tong LIU, Jing-Yuan SHI, Yong-Bo SU, Zhi JIN. Correlation between the whole small recess offset and electrical performance of InP-based HEMTs[J]. Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves, 2025, 44(1): 16
    Download Citation