Evaluation of Infrared Deception Jamming Effectiveness of False Targets Based on GBVS

Yongjia Qiu; Zhengdong Cheng; Dapeng Zhao; Hua Yang; Bin Zhu; Qinyu Zhang

doi:10.3788/LOP221557

Journals >Laser & Optoelectronics Progress >Volume 60 >Issue 12 >Page 1210014 > Article

Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
Vol. 60, Issue 12, 1210014 (2023)

Evaluation of Infrared Deception Jamming Effectiveness of False Targets Based on GBVS

Yongjia Qiu^1,2,3, Zhengdong Cheng^1,2,3,*, Dapeng Zhao^1,2,3, Hua Yang^1,2,3..., Bin Zhu^1,2,3 and Qinyu Zhang^1,2,3|Show fewer author(s)

Author Affiliations

¹College of Electronic Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Hefei 230037, Anhui, China

²State Key Laboratory of Pulsed Power Laser Technology, Hefei 230037, Anhui, China

³Infrared and Low Temperature Plasma Key Laboratory of Anhui Province, Hefei 230037, Anhui, China

show less

DOI: 10.3788/LOP221557 Cite this Article Set citation alerts

Yongjia Qiu, Zhengdong Cheng, Dapeng Zhao, Hua Yang, Bin Zhu, Qinyu Zhang. Evaluation of Infrared Deception Jamming Effectiveness of False Targets Based on GBVS[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2023, 60(12): 1210014 Copy Citation Text

show less

Fig. 1. Steps of evaluation method of false target infrared deception jamming effectiveness

Download full size

Fig. 2. Basic flow of GBVS algorithm

Download full size

Fig. 3. Infrared images of targets. (a)

T_{t r u e}

; (b)

T_{f a l s e 1}

; (c)

T_{f a l s e 2}

; (d) three targets placed in parallel

Download full size

Fig. 4. Saliency maps of targets. (a)

T_{t r u e}

; (b)

T_{f a l s e 1}

; (c)

T_{f a l s e 2}

; (d) three targets placed in parallel

Download full size

Fig. 5. Significant value distribution of pixels. (a)

T_{t r u e}

; (b)

T_{f a l s e 1}

; (c)

T_{f a l s e 2}

; (d) three targets placed in parallel

Download full size

Fig. 6. Target infrared images with different postures and different shooting angles. (a) (b) (c) Target prone posture images taken at 0°, 45°, and 90°; (d) (e) (f) target standing posture images taken at 0°, 45°, and 90°

Download full size

Target posture	Shooting angle	Master saliency value			Infrared deception jamming effectiveness
Target posture	Shooting angle	$S_{t r u e}$	$S_{f a l s e 1}$	$S_{f a l s e 2}$	$A_{f a l s e 1}$	$A_{f a l s e 2}$
Prone posture	0°	0.8205	0.6557	0.5438	0.2008	0.3371
	45°	0.5637	0.3997	0.3766	0.2911	0.3318
	90°	0.5718	0.2743	0.2175	0.5203	0.6196
Standing posture	0°	0.8183	0.5841	0.4791	0.2862	0.4146
	45°	0.7020	0.4444	0.3098	0.3670	0.5588
	90°	0.7244	0.4903	0.4315	0.3232	0.4043

Table 1. Evaluation values of infrared deception jamming effectiveness

Download Citation

Set citation alerts for the article

Tools

Set citation alerts for the article

Save the article for my favorites

Paper Information

微信扫一扫：分享

微信扫一扫：分享