• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 61, Issue 5, 0506001 (2024)
Yuzhao Ma1,*, Tingting Zhang1, Qingxiao Zhu1, and Meng Li2
Author Affiliations
  • 1College of Electronic Information and Automation, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China
  • 2College of Air Traffic Management, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP230695 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Yuzhao Ma, Tingting Zhang, Qingxiao Zhu, Meng Li. Optical Fiber Perimeter Intrusion Event Recognition Based on ISSA and Genetic Algorithm Optimized BiLSTM Neural Network[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2024, 61(5): 0506001 Copy Citation Text show less
    Fiber perimeter system based on dual Mach-Zehnder
    Fig. 1. Fiber perimeter system based on dual Mach-Zehnder
    Schematic diagram of ISSA method
    Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of ISSA method
    BiLSTM neural network structure diagram
    Fig. 3. BiLSTM neural network structure diagram
    Principle diagram of GA-BiLSTM neural network recognize intrusion events
    Fig. 4. Principle diagram of GA-BiLSTM neural network recognize intrusion events
    Fiber perimeter intrusion signal. (a) Climb; (b) run; (c) knock; (d) static; (e) wind; (f) rain
    Fig. 5. Fiber perimeter intrusion signal. (a) Climb; (b) run; (c) knock; (d) static; (e) wind; (f) rain
    Knock signal singular spectrum analysis. (a) Distribution of singular value; (b) distribution of contribution rate
    Fig. 6. Knock signal singular spectrum analysis. (a) Distribution of singular value; (b) distribution of contribution rate
    Time-frequency analysis of knock signal. (a) Time domain; (b) frequency domain
    Fig. 7. Time-frequency analysis of knock signal. (a) Time domain; (b) frequency domain
    Number of main signal frequencies
    Fig. 8. Number of main signal frequencies
    Time-frequency analysis of knock signal components after one SSA. (a) Time domain;(b) frequency domain
    Fig. 9. Time-frequency analysis of knock signal components after one SSA. (a) Time domain;(b) frequency domain
    Time-frequency analysis of knock signal components after twice SSAs. (a) Time domain; (b) frequency domain
    Fig. 10. Time-frequency analysis of knock signal components after twice SSAs. (a) Time domain; (b) frequency domain
    Time-frequency analysis of knock signal components after three SSAs. (a) Time domain;(b) frequency domain
    Fig. 11. Time-frequency analysis of knock signal components after three SSAs. (a) Time domain;(b) frequency domain
    Recognition accuracy of optimization algorithms under different evolutions. (a) 24 times; (b) 72 times; (c) 120 times; (d) 240 times
    Fig. 12. Recognition accuracy of optimization algorithms under different evolutions. (a) 24 times; (b) 72 times; (c) 120 times; (d) 240 times
    Fitness change curve
    Fig. 13. Fitness change curve
    RNN recognition effect diagram
    Fig. 14. RNN recognition effect diagram
    GA-RNN recognition effect diagram
    Fig. 15. GA-RNN recognition effect diagram
    BiLSTM neural network recognition effect diagram
    Fig. 16. BiLSTM neural network recognition effect diagram
    GA-BiLSTM neural network recognition effect diagram
    Fig. 17. GA-BiLSTM neural network recognition effect diagram
    Wavelength /nmPower /mWLine width /kHz
    15502010
    Table 1. Laser parameters
    Denoising methodSignal typeAverage signal-to-noise ratio /dBMean square error
    SSAClimb38.63040.00160
    Run36.26120.00190
    Knock30.11200.00210
    Static42.04670.00052
    Wind40.49720.00140
    Rain47.36700.00054
    ISSAClimb50.86020.00120
    Run47.16190.00160
    Knock38.81600.00230
    Static58.82850.00027
    Wind53.92440.00081
    Rain62.07100.00018
    Table 2. Comparison of denoising performance of SSA and ISSA
    Recognition methodEvolved 24 timesEvolved 72 timesEvolved 120 timesEvolved 240 times
    GA-RNN1.625.668.3715.83
    GA-BiLSTM1.384.145.6810.44
    Table 3. Neural networks recognition time for different evolutions
    Signal typeRNNGA-RNNBiLSTMGA-BiLSTM
    Climb78.384.389.496.9
    Run56.183.694.398.8
    Knock52.580.291.799.8
    Static76.089.692.199.2
    Wind65.681.793.898.3
    Rainy73.789.595.195.3
    Average recognition rate /%67.084.892.898.1
    Table 4. Comparison of recognition effect of different neural networks
    Yuzhao Ma, Tingting Zhang, Qingxiao Zhu, Meng Li. Optical Fiber Perimeter Intrusion Event Recognition Based on ISSA and Genetic Algorithm Optimized BiLSTM Neural Network[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2024, 61(5): 0506001
    Download Citation