• Chinese Optics Letters
  • Vol. 17, Issue 10, 100008 (2019)
Daomin Chen, Jiemei Wang, Shangbin Li, and Zhengyuan Xu*
Author Affiliations
  • CAS Key Laboratory of Wireless-Optical Communications, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/COL201917.100008 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Daomin Chen, Jiemei Wang, Shangbin Li, Zhengyuan Xu, "Effects of air bubbles on underwater optical wireless communication [Invited]," Chin. Opt. Lett. 17, 100008 (2019) Copy Citation Text show less
    Experimental platform with controllable bubbles for UOWC: (a) transmitter, (b) water channel with controllable bubble generation, (c) receiver of high speed visible light camera/APD.
    Fig. 1. Experimental platform with controllable bubbles for UOWC: (a) transmitter, (b) water channel with controllable bubble generation, (c) receiver of high speed visible light camera/APD.
    Series of gray images as bubble density increases.
    Fig. 2. Series of gray images as bubble density increases.
    Series of gray images as bubble size increases.
    Fig. 3. Series of gray images as bubble size increases.
    Statistical distribution model fitting of received signal intensity under different bubble density.
    Fig. 4. Statistical distribution model fitting of received signal intensity under different bubble density.
    Statistical distribution model fitting of received signal intensity under different bubble size.
    Fig. 5. Statistical distribution model fitting of received signal intensity under different bubble size.
    BER performance versus bubble density.
    Fig. 6. BER performance versus bubble density.
    BER performance versus bubble size.
    Fig. 7. BER performance versus bubble size.
    BER performance versus bubble density under different PPM modulation orders.
    Fig. 8. BER performance versus bubble density under different PPM modulation orders.
    BER performance versus bubble size under different PPM modulation orders.
    Fig. 9. BER performance versus bubble size under different PPM modulation orders.
    12×15×
    Bubble Density PBubble09–1223–2727–3332–3835–38
    12×15×
    Bubble Size (mm) DBubble01.21.82.5>2.8>2.8
    Table 1. Bubble Density and Size in Different Grades of Air Flow Rate
    Bubble Density12×15×
    σI,m22.32e66.2e31.1e21.55e21.83e22.13e2
    LGoF (%)89.398.299.098.398.196.8
    μ6.6e73.0e35.5e37.8e38.9e310e3
    σ21.0e37.9e21.1e11.2e11.3e11.4e1
    GGoF (%)89.398.298.998.097.395.7
    k7.6e+516291655648
    θ1.3e66.2e31.1e21.5e21.8e22.1e2
    WGoF (%)89.189.289.789.484.782.9
    β1.001.041.051.061.061.06
    η115213.19.858.167.406.93
    Table 2. Fitting Accuracy and Distribution Parameters of the Statistical Models under Different Bubble Densities
    Bubble Size12×15×
    σI,m21.32e69.76e21.38e11.46e11.71e11.84e1
    LGoF (%)89.3
    μ6.6e7
    σ21.0e3
    GGoF (%)89.35
    k7.6e+56.4
    θ1.3e61.6e1
    WGoF (%)89.1282.7
    β1.001.101.11
    η11523.983.08
    GEVDGoF (%)91.689.586.775.467.6
    k1.00.90.80.80.8
    σ23.32e14.1e14.2e14.7e14.9e1
    μ1.000.980.970.950.95
    Table 3. Fitting Accuracy and Distribution Parameters of the Statistical Models under Different Bubble Sizes
    Daomin Chen, Jiemei Wang, Shangbin Li, Zhengyuan Xu, "Effects of air bubbles on underwater optical wireless communication [Invited]," Chin. Opt. Lett. 17, 100008 (2019)
    Download Citation