• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 61, Issue 9, 0930004 (2024)
Lei Tao1,2, Guangyuan Cai1,2, Zhandong Cheng1,2, Lin Huang3..., Xiuwen He1, Jiang Xu1,2 and Mingyin Yao1,2,*|Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1College of Engineering, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, Jiangxi, China
  • 2Key Laboratory of Biological Optoelectronics and Application in Jiangxi Universities, Nanchang 330045, Jiangxi, China
  • 3College of Bioscience and Bioengineering, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, Jiangxi, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP231154 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Lei Tao, Guangyuan Cai, Zhandong Cheng, Lin Huang, Xiuwen He, Jiang Xu, Mingyin Yao. Using Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy and Machine Learning to Identify Jiangxi Spring Tea Harvesting Periods[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2024, 61(9): 0930004 Copy Citation Text show less
    Single experimental sample. (a) Tea leaves; (b) tea infusion enrichment
    Fig. 1. Single experimental sample. (a) Tea leaves; (b) tea infusion enrichment
    Schematic diagram of LIBS main installation
    Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of LIBS main installation
    LIBS average spectrogram of tea leaves. (a) The original spectrum of Mt. Lushan fog tea leaves; (b) the original spectrum of Dog bull head tea leaves
    Fig. 3. LIBS average spectrogram of tea leaves. (a) The original spectrum of Mt. Lushan fog tea leaves; (b) the original spectrum of Dog bull head tea leaves
    LIBS average spectrogram of tea infusion. (a) The original spectrum of Mt. Lushan fog tea infusion; (b) the original spectrum of Dog bull head tea infusion
    Fig. 4. LIBS average spectrogram of tea infusion. (a) The original spectrum of Mt. Lushan fog tea infusion; (b) the original spectrum of Dog bull head tea infusion
    Baseline corrected average spectrogram of Mt. Lushan fog tea leaves
    Fig. 5. Baseline corrected average spectrogram of Mt. Lushan fog tea leaves
    PCA three-dimensional scatter plot of Mt. Lushan fog tea.(a) Tea leaves; (b) tea infusion; (c) fusion data
    Fig. 6. PCA three-dimensional scatter plot of Mt. Lushan fog tea.(a) Tea leaves; (b) tea infusion; (c) fusion data
    PCA three-dimensional scatter plot of Dog bull head tea (a) Tea leaves; (b) tea infusion; (c) fusion data
    Fig. 7. PCA three-dimensional scatter plot of Dog bull head tea (a) Tea leaves; (b) tea infusion; (c) fusion data
    Comparison chart of the average recognition rate of one thousand times. (a) Mt. Lushan fog Spring tea; (b) Dog bull head Spring tea
    Fig. 8. Comparison chart of the average recognition rate of one thousand times. (a) Mt. Lushan fog Spring tea; (b) Dog bull head Spring tea
    No.Harvesting periodTea nameCNY/50 gSample source
    1before-brightnessMt.Lushan fog tea120

    Jiangxi Gonghehou Tea Industry Co. Ltd.

    (Jiujiang,China)

    2before-rainMt.Lushan fog tea70
    3before-brightnessDog bull head tea100Suichuan County Tanghu-guotou Tea Factory(Ji’an,China)
    4before-rainDog bull head tea50
    Table 1. Information of spring tea samples
    Characteristic elementC IMg IIMn ICa IINa IH IK I
    Wavelength /nm247.86279.55279.83393.37589.00656.29766.49
    280.27396.85589.59769.90
    Table 2. Preferred 11 spectrum peaks
    Mt.Lushan fog teaTea leavesTea infusionFusion dateTea leavesTea infusionFusion date
    ModelCross-validation sets /%Test sets /%
    LDA96.46(1.29)91.31(1.86)98.29(1.07)96.78(1.98)91.48(2.51)98.60(1.37)
    SVM96.56(1.65)89.30(2.30)97.64(1.30)97.23(2.02)90.39(2.98)98.05(1.52)
    KNN94.60(1.81)87.41(2.53)94.66(1.67)94.70(2.12)87.79(3.43)95.25(2.11)
    EML97.41(1.15)86.97(2.40)97.66(1.08)97.45(1.88)87.66(4.12)97.71(1.70)
    Table 3. Comparison of classification model results for the cross-validation sets and test sets of Mt. Lushan fog tea
    Dog bull head teaTea leavesTea infusionFusion dateTea leavesTea infusionFusion date
    ModelCross-validation sets /%Test sets /%
    LDA99.01(0.79)94.63(1.66)99.20(0.72)99.09(0.89)95.13(2.19)99.38(0.77)
    SVM96.52(1.18)95.20(1.58)98.50(0.94)96.81(1.92)95.43(2.05)98.70(1.13)
    KNN93.46(1.78)92.72(2.01)95.63(1.68)94.10(2.66)93.43(2.49)96.11(2.09)
    EML97.05(1.07)95.21(1.59)99.37(0.51)96.87(1.64)95.48(2.28)99.43(0.72)
    Table 4. Comparison of classification model results for the cross-validation sets and test sets of Dog bull head tea
    Lei Tao, Guangyuan Cai, Zhandong Cheng, Lin Huang, Xiuwen He, Jiang Xu, Mingyin Yao. Using Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy and Machine Learning to Identify Jiangxi Spring Tea Harvesting Periods[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2024, 61(9): 0930004
    Download Citation