• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 56, Issue 10, 101002 (2019)
Peipei Jiang and Yan Yang*
Author Affiliations
  • School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Lanzhou Jiao Tong University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730070, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP56.101002 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Peipei Jiang, Yan Yang. Adaptive Linear Transformation Image Dehazing Algorithm Based on Gaussian Attenuation[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2019, 56(10): 101002 Copy Citation Text show less
    Flow chart of proposed algorithm
    Fig. 1. Flow chart of proposed algorithm
    Effect images of proposed algorithm. (a) Hazy image; (b) adaptive linear transformation; (c) local atmospheric optical value; (d) rough transmittivity; (e) optimal transmittivity; (f) restored image
    Fig. 2. Effect images of proposed algorithm. (a) Hazy image; (b) adaptive linear transformation; (c) local atmospheric optical value; (d) rough transmittivity; (e) optimal transmittivity; (f) restored image
    Curve of quadratic function
    Fig. 3. Curve of quadratic function
    Comparison of simulation experiments. (a) Hazy image; (b) μ=0.2; (c) μ=0.4; (d) μ=0.6; (e) μ=0.8; (f) μ=1.0
    Fig. 4. Comparison of simulation experiments. (a) Hazy image; (b) μ=0.2; (c) μ=0.4; (d) μ=0.6; (e) μ=0.8; (f) μ=1.0
    Comparison of transmittivity. (a) Hazy image; (b) method in Ref. [5]; (c) rough transmittivity; (d) optimal transmittivity
    Fig. 5. Comparison of transmittivity. (a) Hazy image; (b) method in Ref. [5]; (c) rough transmittivity; (d) optimal transmittivity
    Effect images based on local atmospheric optical value. (a) Hazy image; (b) map of maximum channel; (c) morphologically closed operation; (d) cross-bilateral filtering result
    Fig. 6. Effect images based on local atmospheric optical value. (a) Hazy image; (b) map of maximum channel; (c) morphologically closed operation; (d) cross-bilateral filtering result
    Comparison of experimental results. (a) Hazy image; (b) method in Ref. [5]; (c) method in Ref. [6]; (d) method in Ref. [7]; (e) method in Ref. [8]; (f) method in Ref. [9]; (g) proposed method
    Fig. 7. Comparison of experimental results. (a) Hazy image; (b) method in Ref. [5]; (c) method in Ref. [6]; (d) method in Ref. [7]; (e) method in Ref. [8]; (f) method in Ref. [9]; (g) proposed method
    Objective evaluation. (a) Number of visible edges; (b) normalized average gradient; (c) number of pixels in saturation point; (d) running time
    Fig. 8. Objective evaluation. (a) Number of visible edges; (b) normalized average gradient; (c) number of pixels in saturation point; (d) running time