• Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves
  • Vol. 44, Issue 2, 212 (2025)
Zhen-Wu ZHANG1,2, Ning WANG1,*, Ling-Ling MA1, Bei-Bei ZHANG1..., Yong-Guang ZHAO1 and Wan LI1|Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1National Engineering Laboratory for Satellite Remote Sensing Applications,Aerospace Information Research Institute,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100094,China
  • 2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.11972/j.issn.1001-9014.2025.02.010 Cite this Article
    Zhen-Wu ZHANG, Ning WANG, Ling-Ling MA, Bei-Bei ZHANG, Yong-Guang ZHAO, Wan LI. Simulation and evaluation of mid-infrared sea surface sun glint directional radiation[J]. Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves, 2025, 44(2): 212 Copy Citation Text show less
    Geometric relationship between the sun,satellite sensor,and the ocean surface
    Fig. 1. Geometric relationship between the sun,satellite sensor,and the ocean surface
    Monthly average wind speed at heights above 10 meters over the study area in 2023
    Fig. 2. Monthly average wind speed at heights above 10 meters over the study area in 2023
    MODIS images and the filtered grid:(a) MOD021KM.A2023047.2230; (b) MOD021KM. A2023091.0000.061; (c) MOD021KM.A2023182.0130.061;(d) MOD021KM.A202327 5.0100.061;(i) is the MODIS 021KM product image, and (ii) is the filtered grid)
    Fig. 3. MODIS images and the filtered grid:(a) MOD021KM.A2023047.2230; (b) MOD021KM. A2023091.0000.061; (c) MOD021KM.A2023182.0130.061;(d) MOD021KM.A202327 5.0100.061;(i) is the MODIS 021KM product image, and (ii) is the filtered grid)
    The variation in the reflectance of sun glint on the sea surface under different observational geometric conditions: (a) observation zenith angle of 10º; (b) observation zenith angle of 20º; (c) observation zenith angle of 30º; (d) observation zenith angle of 40º
    Fig. 4. The variation in the reflectance of sun glint on the sea surface under different observational geometric conditions: (a) observation zenith angle of 10º; (b) observation zenith angle of 20º; (c) observation zenith angle of 30º; (d) observation zenith angle of 40º
    Reflectance at different observation zenith angles for three models: (a) observation zenith angle of 10º; (b) observation zenith angle of 20°; (c)observation zenith angle of 30º; (d) observation zenith angle of 40º
    Fig. 5. Reflectance at different observation zenith angles for three models: (a) observation zenith angle of 10º; (b) observation zenith angle of 20°; (c)observation zenith angle of 30º; (d) observation zenith angle of 40º
    Reflectance for different wind speeds according to three models: (a) Breon-Henriot model; (b) Ebuchi-Kizu model; (c) Wu model
    Fig. 6. Reflectance for different wind speeds according to three models: (a) Breon-Henriot model; (b) Ebuchi-Kizu model; (c) Wu model
    Reflectance for different wind directions according to two models: (a) Breon-Henriot model; (b) Ebuchi-Kizu model
    Fig. 7. Reflectance for different wind directions according to two models: (a) Breon-Henriot model; (b) Ebuchi-Kizu model
    Reflectance at different refractive indices for three models
    Fig. 8. Reflectance at different refractive indices for three models
    Comparison of simulated top-of-atmosphere radiance temperatures from three models with MODIS observed radiance temperatures: (a) February 16, 2023, 22:30 UTC; (b) April 1, 2023, 00:00 UTC; (c) July 1, 2023, 01:30 UTC; (d) October 2, 2023, 01:00 UTC
    Fig. 9. Comparison of simulated top-of-atmosphere radiance temperatures from three models with MODIS observed radiance temperatures: (a) February 16, 2023, 22:30 UTC; (b) April 1, 2023, 00:00 UTC; (c) July 1, 2023, 01:30 UTC; (d) October 2, 2023, 01:00 UTC
    Variation in observation zenith angles and solar zenith angles for four images: (a) February 16, 2023, 22:30 UTC; (b) April 1, 2023, 00:00 UTC; (c) July 1, 2023, 01:30 UTC; (d) October 2, 2023, 01:00 UTC
    Fig. 10. Variation in observation zenith angles and solar zenith angles for four images: (a) February 16, 2023, 22:30 UTC; (b) April 1, 2023, 00:00 UTC; (c) July 1, 2023, 01:30 UTC; (d) October 2, 2023, 01:00 UTC
    Variation in relative azimuth angles and wind speeds for four images: (a) February 16, 2023, 22:30 UTC; (b) April 1, 2023, 00:00 UTC; (c) July 1, 2023, 01:30 UTC; (d) October 2, 2023, 01:00 UTC
    Fig. 11. Variation in relative azimuth angles and wind speeds for four images: (a) February 16, 2023, 22:30 UTC; (b) April 1, 2023, 00:00 UTC; (c) July 1, 2023, 01:30 UTC; (d) October 2, 2023, 01:00 UTC
    影像精度指标Breon-Henriot模型Ebuchi-Kizu模型Wu模型
    MOD021KM.A2023047.2230.061.2023048191622R20.94790.94640.8842
    RMSE0.45683.12720.7718
    MOD021KM.A2023091.0000.061.2023091131723R20.97850.89030.9595
    RMSE0.45581.81620.6930
    MOD021KM.A2023182.0130.061.2023182131652R20.96790.91550.9606
    RMSE0.61482.84621.6674
    MOD021KM.A2023275.0100.061.2023275131502R20.97220.94760.9411
    RMSE0.67421.33142.0208
    Table 1. Accuracy results for the comparison between simulated top-of-atmosphere radiance temperatures from three models and MODIS observed radiance temperatures
    Zhen-Wu ZHANG, Ning WANG, Ling-Ling MA, Bei-Bei ZHANG, Yong-Guang ZHAO, Wan LI. Simulation and evaluation of mid-infrared sea surface sun glint directional radiation[J]. Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves, 2025, 44(2): 212
    Download Citation