• Optics and Precision Engineering
  • Vol. 30, Issue 22, 2869 (2022)
Siying LING1,2,*, Ming LING1, Zhaoyao SHI3, Lin BO4, and Liding WANG1,2
Author Affiliations
  • 1Key Laboratory for Micro/ Nano Technology and System of Liaoning Province,Dalian University of Technology, Dalian6023, China
  • 2Key Laboratory for Precision & Non-traditional Machining of Ministry of Education,Dalian University of Technology, Dalian11603, China
  • 3Beijing Engineering Research Centre of Precision Measurement Technology and Instruments, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing100124, China
  • 4State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Transmission, Chongqing University, Chongqing000, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.37188/OPE.20223000.0392 Cite this Article
    Siying LING, Ming LING, Zhaoyao SHI, Lin BO, Liding WANG. Measurement comparison for class-1 gear involute artifact in China[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2022, 30(22): 2869 Copy Citation Text show less
    GIA for measurement comparison
    Fig. 1. GIA for measurement comparison
    Deference between measurement results of participating metrological laboratories and reference value of profile form deviation ffα
    Fig. 2. Deference between measurement results of participating metrological laboratories and reference value of profile form deviation f
    FlankDesigned base radius rb/mm

    Equivalent normal module

    mn/mm

    Equivalent number of teeth

    z

    Working transverse pressure angle αn/(°)

    Helix angle

    β/(°)

    Facewidth

    b/mm

    Roll path length

    ρ/mm

    15017.736 30620080~49
    210023.648 39920080~83
    310023.648 39920080~83
    413123.234 551220080~95
    Table 1. Design parameters of GIA
    计量室渐开线测量仪器测量温度/℃
    中国计量科学研究院Klingenberg P-10019.8
    东北国家计量测试中心Klingenberg P-4019.9
    重庆市计量质量检测研究院Klingenberg P-6519.7
    Table 2. Participating metrological laboratories, involute measuring instruments and measuring temperature
    Flank

    Evaluation range

    /mm

    Base radius

    rb/mm

    Measurement results of profile form deviation

    f/μm

    Reference value of profile form deviation f/μm(U95=±0.53 μm)

    a

    U95rb/Lα μm)

    b

    U95rb/Lα μm)

    c

    U95rb/Lα μm)

    a

    U95=±1.0 μm)

    b

    U95=±1.0 μm)

    c

    U95=±0.8 μm)

    13, 46]A50.009 250.008 450.008 70.40.40.40.40
    8, 46]B50.009 250.008 450.008 40.20.30.30.27
    25, 78]A99.993 799.994 999.993 50.40.40.30.36
    10, 78]B99.993 799.994 999.993 60.30.40.30.33
    35, 78]A99.994 799.996 599.994 20.30.60.40.43
    10, 78]B99.994 799.996 599.994 40.20.50.30.33
    45, 90]A131.015 9131.017 2131.014 70.30.30.40.34
    10, 90]B131.015 9131.017 2131.014 80.30.40.30.33
    Table 3. Measurement results, reference value and uncertainties U95 of profile form deviation f
    Flank

    Evaluation range

    / mm

    Normalized deviation En of profile form deviation f
    abc
    13, 46]A000
    8, 46]B-0.030.010.01
    25, 78]A0.020.02-0.03
    10, 78]B-0.010.03-0.01
    35, 78]A-0.060.08-0.01
    10, 78]B-0.060.08-0.01
    45, 90]A-0.02-0.020.03
    10, 90]B-0.010.03-0.01
    Table 4. Normalized deviation En of profile form deviation f

    Base radius

    rb/mm

    Rolling angle

    θ/(°)

    Evaluation range

    /mm

    Tolerance of profile form deviation

    ffαT/μm

    50443~351.0
    100405~651.0
    131385~821.4
    Table 5. Requirements for class-1 GIA in Chinese standard Gear Involute Artifact GB/T6467-2010
    Siying LING, Ming LING, Zhaoyao SHI, Lin BO, Liding WANG. Measurement comparison for class-1 gear involute artifact in China[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2022, 30(22): 2869
    Download Citation