
- Matter and Radiation at Extremes
- Vol. 7, Issue 3, 038404 (2022)
Abstract
I. INTRODUCTION
The recent discovery of superconductivity in LaH10 at high pressure with record-high superconducting transition temperatures Tc ∼ 260 K has fueled the search for room-temperature superconductivity in compressed superhydrides.1–3 The three-dimensional clathrate-like structure of H with La atoms filling the clathrate cavities has been described as an extended metallic hydrogen host structure stabilized by the La as a guest electron donor. The introduction of electrons into H2 molecules by the guest atom leads to a significant contribution of H to the electronic density of states at the Fermi level. As a result, substantial coupling of electrons on the Fermi surface with high-frequency phonons in response to the motion of the H atoms is crucial for promoting superconductivity.4–7 Actually, clathrate-like superhydrides with alkaline-earth or other rare-earth atoms have also been proposed as potential high-Tc superconductors.8,9 Following their theoretical prediction, experimental progress on the synthesis of these clathrate superhydrides has been remarkable: YH6,10,11 YH9,10,12 ThH9,13 ThH10,13 CeH9,14,15 CeH10,16 (LaY)H6,17 (LaY)H10,17,18 and CaH6,19 with high Tc values in the range of 146–253 K, have been synthesized. Thus, a new class of high-temperature superconductors with clathrate-like structure has been born.
The creation of a distinctive H clathrate structure incorporating metal inside the voids is the key to the unusually high-Tc superconductivity. Aside from hydrogen clathrate cages, the host–guest and interframework interactions are also significant in influencing superhydride superconductivity. Until now, the experimentally obtained high-temperature superconducting clathrate superhydrides have only existed above megabar pressures. The ultrahigh pressure required to synthesize and maintain these clathrate superhydrides impedes their experimental investigation. Alternatively, several clathrate or caged compounds exhibit a superconducting transition at ambient pressure, which provides a platform to examine the relationship between guest atom and cage unit under comparatively benign conditions.20–27 In this work, we utilize an in situ high-pressure method to systematically investigate the evolution of superconductivity for two Ba-filled cage compounds BaIr2Ge7 and Ba3Ir4Ge16. We discover that the first superconducting phase in both caged compounds is gradually suppressed under pressure. At a higher pressure, a pressure-induced superconducting phase dome emerges. No structural phase transition is revealed by high-pressure synchrotron x-ray diffraction (XRD). The pressure-induced reemergence of superconductivity in BaIr2Ge7 and Ba3Ir4Ge16 can be attributed to phonon softening, which is related to shrinkage of the cage.
II. EXPERIMENTAL
Polycrystalline BaIr2Ge7 and Ba3Ir4Ge16 were prepared from stoichiometric amounts of high-purity elements by argon arc melting and subsequent annealing in evacuated quartz capsules at 1000 °C for 20 h.23 The superconducting transition was confirmed by magnetization measurements using a Magnetic Property Measurement System (MPMS). In situ high-pressure resistivity measurements were conducted on a nonmagnetic diamond anvil cell (DAC) as described elsewhere.28–32 A piece of nonmagnetic BeCu was used as the gasket. A cubic boron nitride (BN)/epoxy mixture layer was inserted between the BeCu gasket and the electrical leads as an insulator layer. Four Pt foils were arranged according to the van der Pauw method. In situ high-pressure XRD measurements were performed at beamline BL15U of the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility with an x-ray wavelength λ = 0.6199 Å. A symmetric DAC with 200 µm culet was used with a rhenium gasket. Silicone oil was used as the pressure-transmitting medium (PTM), and the pressure was determined by the ruby luminescence method.33 Two-dimensional diffraction images were analyzed using FIT2D software.34 Rietveld refinements of crystal structures under high pressure were performed using the General Structure Analysis System (GSAS) and the graphical user interface EXPGUI.35,36 An in situ high-pressure Raman spectroscopy investigation of BaIr2Ge7 and Ba3Ir4Ge16 was performed using a Raman spectrometer (Renishaw in-Via, UK) with a laser excitation wavelength of 532 nm and a low-wavenumber filter.
For BaIr2Ge7, we carried out high-pressure in situ synchrotron XRD, Raman, and transport measurements. To confirm the emergence of a second superconducting state under high pressure, we repeated the measurements with new samples for a second run. For Ba3Ir4Ge16, we carried out high-pressure in situ Raman measurements and transport measurements in two runs.
III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
At ambient pressure, both BaIr2Ge7 and Ba3Ir4Ge16 exhibit typically metallic behavior and show superconducting transitions at 2.7 and 5.9 K, respectively (Fig. S1,
Figure 1.(a) Electrical resistivity of BaIr2Ge7 as a function of temperature at various pressures in run I. (b) and (c) Temperature-dependent resistivity of BaIr2Ge7 in the vicinity of the superconducting transition. Temperature dependence of resistivity under different magnetic fields for BaIr2Ge7 at 3.8 (d) and 44.9 GPa (e), respectively. (f) Estimated upper critical field for BaIr2Ge7. Here,
Figure 2.(a) Electrical resistivity of Ba3Ir4Ge16 as a function of temperature at various pressures in run I. (b) Temperature-dependent resistivity of Ba3Ir4Ge16 in the vicinity of the superconducting transition. (c) Temperature dependence of resistivity under different magnetic fields for Ba3Ir4Ge16 at 2.0 GPa. (d) Pressure-dependent resistivity at 300 K and
Sample | Structure | Space group | State | Tcmax (K) | Hc2 (T) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BaIr2Ge7 | Orthorhombic | Ammm | SC-I | 2.7 at 0.6 GPa | 2.3 at 3.8 GPa |
SC-II | 4.4 at 39.7 GPa | 2.2 at 44.9 GPa | |||
Ba3Ir4Ge16 | Tetragonal | I4/mmm | SC-1 | 5.8 at 0.1 GPa | 2.0 at 2.0 GPa |
SC-II | 4.0 at 35.2 GPa | 1.7 at 60.5 GPa |
Table 1. Structure and superconducting properties of BaIr2Ge7 and Ba3Ir4Ge16.
To confirm whether the new resistance drop observed in BaIr2Ge7 is related to a superconducting transition, we applied a magnetic field to samples subjected to 3.8 and 44.9 GPa, respectively [Figs. 1(d) and 1(e)]. As can be seen in Fig. 1(e), this new drop in resistance shifts to a lower temperature with increasing magnetic field and is fully suppressed under a magnetic field of 2.25 T at 44.9 GPa. These results indicate that the sharp drop in resistance is a superconducting transition. We also measured the H-dependent superconducting transition under P = 3.8 GPa, and the curves are plotted in Fig. 1(d). We extract the field (H) dependence of Tc for BaIr2Ge7 at 3.8 and 44.9 GPa and plot H(Tc) in Fig. 1(f). The experimental data are fitted using the Ginzburg–Landau (G-L) formula44,45
To investigate whether the observed reemergence of superconductivity in pressurized BaIr2Ge7 and Ba3Ir4Ge16 is associated with a pressure-induced crystal structure phase transition, we performed in situ high-pressure XRD measurements. At ambient pressure, BaIr2Ge7 possesses an orthorhombic structure belonging to the space group, Ammm, while Ba3Ir4Ge16 crystallizes into a tetragonal lattice with space group I4/mmm [Fig. 3(a)]. Both compounds are composed of two-dimensional networks of cage units, where [Ir8Ge16]2− cages are connected by [Ir2Ge16]2− cages encapsulating barium atoms. The XRD patterns of BaIr2Ge7 collected at different pressures are shown in Fig. 3(b). A representative refinement at 0.3 GPa is displayed in Fig. S4 (
Figure 3.(a) Crystal structures of BaIr2Ge7 and Ba3Ir4Ge16. Polyhedra of different colors stand for distinct cages. (b) XRD patterns collected at various pressures for BaIr2Ge7 with an x-ray wavelength
We summarize the transport results for BaIr2Ge7 in a pressure–temperature phase diagram [Fig. 4(a)]. To confirm the emergence of a second superconducting state under high pressure, we repeated the measurements with new samples for a second run and proved that all the results are reproducible. The superconducting Tc shows a similar trend to the normal resistivity. The P–Tc phase diagram reveals two distinct superconducting regions: the initial superconducting state (SC-I) and the pressure-induced superconducting state (SC-II). In the SC-I region between 1 bar and 16 GPa, Tc is monotonically suppressed with external pressure, and Tc can be suppressed to 2 K at around 16 GPa. In the SC-II region, Tc increases with pressure and shows a dome shape with the maximum Tc ∼ 4.4 K at 40 GPa.
Figure 4.Pressure dependences of (a) the superconducting transition temperatures
The pressure dependence of volume is shown in Fig. 4(b). With increasing pressure, one can see that the volume decreases, but with different slopes below and above a critical pressure Pc ∼ 16 GPa. A Birch–Murnaghan equation of state was used to fit the measured pressure–volume (P–V) data for BaIr2Ge7.46 The obtained bulk modulus K0 is 116(2) GPa with V0 = 1545(1) Å3 and
Although pressure-induced reemergence of superconductivity has been reported in various materials, the origin of the second SC dome is still an enigma. A structural phase transition is usually responsible for two-dome superconductivity. However, since no structural transition was observed from our synchrotron XRD up to 60 GPa, this mechanism can be ruled out for BaIr2Ge7. Another explanation is associated with the competition or coexistence of some order parameters (e.g., charge-density waves, spin-density waves, or antiferromagnetic order) with superconductivity. Since no charge or magnetic orders have been reported in this caged family, charge or antiferromagnetic fluctuations turn out to be irrelevant to the two-dome superconductivity in BaIr2Ge7. Considering the caged structure, local vibration due to rattling of the Ba atom coupled with low-frequency phonons and conductive electrons may be responsible for superconductivity. Typically, the low-lying excitation state from the rattling guest atom in the cage can be systemically tuned by external pressure. To gain a more detailed understanding of reemergent superconducting behavior, we performed high-pressure in situ Raman spectroscopy measurements on BaIr2Ge7. With increasing pressure, the profile of the spectra remains similar to that at ambient pressure, and the observed modes exhibit a blue shift, which is typical behavior under high pressure [Fig. 3(c)]. Interestingly, some typical vibrational modes (e.g., 105.6 and 115.8 cm−1 under ambient condition) display the opposite trend and show redshift behavior when the pressure is raised to Pc. As summarized in Fig. 4, the suppression of superconductivity in SC-I is accompanied by blue shifting of the Raman peaks, reaching a minimum Tc and maximum Raman shifts at a turning point of 12 GPa. As the pressure is further increased, both modes of the Raman shift steadily decline with increasing Tc in SC-II. We call for theoretical investigations to determine the origin of these specific vibrational modes. Similar behavior is also observed in Ba3Ir4Ge16 (Fig. S6,
In conclusion, pressure-induced reemergence of superconductivity has been observed in the caged superconductors BaIr2Ge7 and Ba3Ir4Ge16. The SC-I state is initially suppressed by pressure, and then a second SC dome (SC-II) emerges, with maximum Tc ∼ 4.4 and 4.0 K for BaIr2Ge7 and Ba3Ir4Ge16, respectively. Synchrotron XRD measurements demonstrate that the reemergence of superconductivity is not associated with any crystal structure phase transition. In combination with in situ Raman measurements, our findings suggest that the development of the SC-II state in both caged compounds is a consequence of pressure-induced phonon softening caused by cage shrinkage.
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. U1932217, 11974246, and 12004252), the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFA0704300), the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (Grant No. 19ZR1477300), the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (Grant No. 19JC1413900), and the Shanghai Science and Technology Plan (Grant No. 21DZ2260400). The authors are grateful for support from the Analytical Instrumentation Center (Grant No. SPST-AIC10112914), SPST, ShanghaiTech University. The authors thank the staff from BL15U1 at the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility for assistance during data collection.
References
[1] F. F.Balakirev, L.Balicas, S. P.Besedin, A. P.Drozdov, M. I.Eremets, D. E.Graf, E.Greenberg, D. A.Knyazev, P. P.Kong, M. A.Kuzovnikov, V. S.Minkov, S.Mozaffari, V. B.Prakapenka, M.Tkacz. Superconductivity at 250 K in lanthanum hydride under high pressures. Nature, 569, 528(2019).
[2] M.Ahart, M.Baldini, Z. M.Geballe, R. J.Hemley, Y.Meng, A. K.Mishra, M.Somayazulu, V. V.Struzhkin. Evidence for superconductivity above 260 K in lanthanum superhydride at megabar pressures. Phys. Rev. Lett., 122, 027001(2019).
[3] J.Cheng, F.Hong, Z.Liu, P.Shan, J.Sun, L.Yang, P.Yang, Y.Yin, X.Yu, Z.Zhao. Superconductivity of lanthanum superhydride investigated using the standard four-probe configuration under high pressures. Chin. Phys. Lett., 37, 107401(2020).
[4] F.Li, G.Yang, X.Zhang, Y.Zhao. Pressure-induced hydride superconductors above 200 K. Matter Radiat. Extremes, 6, 068201(2021).
[5] X.-J.Chen, A.Gavriliuk, E.Greenberg, C.Ji, B.Li, H.-k.Mao, V.Prakapenka, V.Struzhkin, I.Troyan. Superconductivity in La and Y hydrides: Remaining questions to experiment and theory. Matter Radiat. Extremes, 5, 028201(2020).
[7] H.Liu, J.Lv, Y.Ma, Y.Sun. Theory-orientated discovery of high-temperature superconductors in superhydrides stabilized under high pressure. Matter Radiat. Extremes, 5, 068101(2020).
[8] R.Arita, L.Boeri, M.Eremets, J. A.Flores-Livas, G.Profeta, A.Sanna. A perspective on conventional high-temperature superconductors at high pressure: Methods and materials. Phys. Rep., 856, 1-78(2020).
[9] I. A.Kruglov, A. G.Kvashnin, A. R.Oganov, I. A.Savkin, D. V.Semenok. On distribution of superconductivity in metal hydrides. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci., 24, 100808(2020).
[10] F. F.Balakirev, L.Balicas, S. P.Besedin, S.Chariton, A. P.Drozdov, M. I.Eremets, E.Greenberg, D. A.Knyazev, P.Kong, M. A.Kuzovnikov, V. S.Minkov, S.Mozaffari, V. B.Prakapenka. Superconductivity up to 243 K in the yttrium-hydrogen system under high pressure. Nat. Commun., 12, 5075(2021).
[11] R.Akashi, A.Bergara, R.Bianco, M.Calandra, I.Errea, A. G.Gavriliuk, E.Greenberg, A. G.Ivanova, A. G.Kvashnin, I. S.Lyubutin, F.Mauri, L.Monacelli, A. R.Oganov, V. B.Prakapenka, V. M.Pudalov, A. V.Sadakov, D. V.Semenok, O. A.Sobolevskiy, V. V.Struzhkin, I. A.Troyan. Anomalous high-temperature superconductivity in YH6. Adv. Mater., 33, 2006832(2021).
[12] N.Dasenbrock-Gammon, R. P.Dias, K. V.Lawler, R.McBride, N.Meyers, A.Salamat, E.Snider, X.Wang, E.Zurek. Synthesis of yttrium superhydride superconductor with a transition temperature up to 262 K by catalytic hydrogenation at high pressures. Phys. Rev. Lett., 126, 117003(2021).
[13] V. Y.Fominski, A. G.Ivanova, A. G.Kvashnin, A. R.Oganov, V. M.Pudalov, A. V.Sadakov, D. V.Semenok, O. A.Sobolevskiy, V.Svitlyk, I. A.Troyan. Superconductivity at 161 K in thorium hydride ThH10: Synthesis and properties. Mater. Today, 33, 36-44(2020).
[14] T.Cui, D.Duan, X.Huang, Y.Huang, X.Li, B.Liu, C. J.Pickard, H.Xie, D.Zhou, Q.Zhou, Q.Zhuang. Polyhydride CeH9 with an atomic-like hydrogen clathrate structure. Nat. Commun., 10, 3461(2019).
[15] M. M.Davari Esfahani, E.Greenberg, I. A.Kruglov, J.-F.Lin, J.Liu, A. R.Oganov, V. B.Prakapenka, N. P.Salke, Y.Wang, Y.Zhang, J.Zhou. Synthesis of clathrate cerium superhydride CeH9 at 80-100 GPa with atomic hydrogen sublattice. Nat. Commun., 10, 4453(2019).
[16] W.Chen, T.Cui, D.Duan, X.Huang, X.Li, A. R.Oganov, D. V.Semenok, H.Shu. High-temperature superconducting phases in cerium superhydride with a
[17] R.Akashi, N.Giordano, K. V.Glazyrin, M.Hanfland, A. G.Ivanova, D. N.Karimov, I. A.Kruglov, A. G.Kvashnin, I. S.Lyubutin, A. R.Oganov, K. S.Pervakov, V. M.Pudalov, A. V.Sadakov, D. V.Semenok, O. A.Sobolevskiy, I. A.Troyan, A. L.Vasiliev. Superconductivity at 253 K in lanthanum–yttrium ternary hydrides. Mater. Today, 48, 18-28(2021).
[18] N. W.Ashcroft, R. J.Hemley, R.Hoffmann, H.Liu, I. I.Naumov. Potential high-
[19] G.Liu, H.Liu, L.Ma, Y.Ma, H.Wang, K.Wang, Y.Wang, Y.Xie, X.Yang, X.Yu, Y.Zhao, M.Zhou. High-temperature superconducting phase in clathrate calcium hydride CaH6 up to 215 K at a pressure of 172 GPa. Phys. Rev. Lett., 128, 167001(2022).
[20] C.Felser, J.Guo, H.Hosono, H.Lei, Y.Qi, W.Shi, B.Yan. Superconductivity in alkaline earth metal-filled skutterudites Ba
[21] O.Gunnarson. Superconductivity in fullerides. Rev. Mod. Phys., 69, 575(1997).
[22] A.Cantaluppi, A.Cavalleri, S. R.Clark, P.Di Pietro, D.Jaksch, S.Kaiser, S.Lupi, M.Mitrano, D.Nicoletti, A.Perucchi, D.Pontiroli, M.Riccò. Possible light-induced superconductivity in K3C60 at high temperature. Nature, 530, 461-464(2016).
[23] J.Guo, H.Hosono, H.Lei, S.Matsuishi, Y.Qi, J.-i.Yamaura. Superconductivity in Ba
[24] H.Eisaki, H.Fujihisa, Y.Gotoh, I.Hase, S.Ishida, A.Iyo, K.Kataoka, H.Kito, K.Oka, Y.Yanagi, Y.Yoshida. Crystal structure and superconductivity of BaIr2Ge7 and Ba3Ir4Ge16 with two-dimensional Ba-Ge networks. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 136, 5245-5248(2014).
[25] M.Baitinger, B.B?hme, H.Duong Nguyen, Y.Grin, S.Paschen, Y.Prots, W.Schnelle. Preparation, crystal structure and physical properties of the superconducting cage compound Ba3Ge16Ir4. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem., 640, 760-767(2014).
[26] D. T.Adroja, A.Bhattacharyya, P. K.Biswas, W.Cao, J.Deng, L.Gao, H.Hosono, C.Li, C.Pei, Y.Qi, T.Ying, Y.Zhao. Superconductivity in the layered cage compound Ba3Rh4Ge16. Chin. Phys. Lett., 38, 127402(2021).
[27] W.Cao, X.Chen, L.Gao, L.Gu, H.Hosono, C.Li, C.Pei, Y.Qi, A. P.Schnyder, X.Wu, T.Ying, T.Yu, Q.Zhang, Q.Zhang, Y.Zhao. Caging-pnictogen-induced superconductivity in skutterudites IrX3 (X = As, P). J. Am. Chem. Soc., 144, 6208(2022).
[28] W.Cao, Y.Chen, L.Gao, P.Huang, S.Jin, C.Li, G.Li, H.Liu, P.Nemes-Incze, C.Pei, Y.Qi, A.Vymazalova, Y.Zhao. Pressure-induced superconductivity and structure phase transition in Pt2HgSe3. Npj Quantum Mater., 6, 98(2021).
[29] W.Cao, Y.Chen, C.Felser, J.Gao, L.Gao, C.Li, Y.Li, Z.Liu, S. A.Medvedev, C.Pei, Y.Qi, W.Shi, Z.Wang, B.Yan, N.Yu, Q.Zhang, Y.Zhao, H.Zhu. Pressure-induced a partial disorder and superconductivity in quasi-one-dimensional Weyl semimetal (NbSe4)2I. Mater. Today Phys., 21, 100509(2021).
[30] Y.Chen, L.Gao, P.Kong, H.Lei, G.Li, J.Li, C.Pei, Y.Qi, W.Shi, Q.Wang, C.Wen, Y.Wu, S.Yan, Q.Yin, Y.Zhao. Charge density wave orders and enhanced superconductivity under pressure in the kagome metal CsV3Sb5. Adv. Mater., 33, 2102813(2021).
[31] Y.Chen, B.Gao, L.Gao, H.Gou, H.Hosono, G.Li, N.Li, C.Pei, Y.Qi, J.Wu, Y.Xia, W.Yang, T.Ying, D.Zhang, Y.Zhao. Pressure-induced topological and structural phase transitions in an antiferromagnetic topological insulator. Chin. Phys. Lett., 37, 066401(2020).
[32] C.Pei, L.Wang. Recent progress on high-pressure and high-temperature studies of fullerenes and related materials. Matter Radiat. Extremes, 4, 028201(2019).
[33] P. M.Bell, H. K.Mao, J.Xu. Calibration of the ruby pressure gauge to 800 kbar under quasi-hydrostatic conditions. J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth, 91, 4673-4676(1986).
[34] A. N.Fitch, A. P.Hammersley, M.Hanfland, D.Hausermann, S. O.Svensson. Two-dimensional detector software: From real detector to idealised image or two-theta scan. High Pressure Res., 14, 235(1996).
[35] R. B. V.Dreele, A. C.Larson. General structure analysis system (GSAS)(2004).
[36] B. H.Toby.
[37] G.Chen, X.Chen, X.-J.Chen, X.Dai, X.Dong, M.Fang, P.Gao, D.Gu, J.Guo, Q.-Z.Huang, A.Li, H.-k.Mao, L.Sun, H.Wang, L.Wang, Q.Wu, K.Yang, C.Zhang, Z.Zhao. Re-emerging superconductivity at 48 kelvin in iron chalcogenides. Nature, 483, 67-69(2012).
[38] K. Y.Chen, J.-G.Cheng, X. L.Dong, Y. L.Huang, K.Jin, N. N.Li, S. L.Ni, P.Shahi, D. J.Singh, J.Sun, J. P.Sun, Y.Uwatoko, B. S.Wang, G.Xing, W. G.Yang, G. M.Zhang, K.Zhang, Z. X.Zhao, F.Zhou, H. X.Zhou. Reemergence of high-
[39] S.Cai, F.Cui, J.Guo, J.Hu, C.Huang, A.Li, S.Long, Q.Mu, S.Qin, Z.Ren, L.Sun, Q.Wu, C.Yang, K.Yang, K.Zhao, Y.Zhou. Reemergence of superconductivity in pressurized quasi-one-dimensional superconductor K2Mo3As3. Phys. Rev. Mater., 5, L021801(2021).
[40] C.An, X.Chen, C.Park, L.Pi, J.Shao, W.Tong, X.Wang, Z.Yang, C.Zhang, R.Zhang, Y.Zhang, Y.Zhou, Y.Zhou. Pressure-induced reemergence of superconductivity in topological insulator Sr0.065Bi2Se3. Phys. Rev. B, 93, 144514(2016).
[41] D. Z.Dai, C. S.Gong, Y. F.Guo, H. C.Lei, S. Y.Li, B. Q.Song, Z. C.Tao, C. P.Tu, Z. J.Tu, L. S.Wang, W.Xia, X. F.Yang, Q. W.Yin, C. C.Zhao, C. C.Zhu. Double-dome superconductivity under pressure in the V-based Kagome metals AV3Sb5 (A = Rb and K). Phys. Rev. B, 105, 094507(2022).
[42] X.Chen, X.Chen, X.Chen, J.Deng, J.-G.Guo, X.-B.Liu, X.Wang, X.Zhan. Highly robust reentrant superconductivity in CsV3Sb5 under pressure. Chin. Phys. Lett., 38, 057402(2021).
[43] C.An, X.Chen, Z.Chen, J.Wang, S.Wang, H.Yang, Z.Yang, Y.Yuan, L.Zhang, Z.Zhang, J.Zhou, Y.Zhou, Y.Zhou, X.Zhu. Pressure-induced reemergence of superconductivity in the topological kagome metal CsV3Sb5. Phys. Rev. B, 103, 224513(2021).
[44] B. S.Chandrasekhar, J. K.Hulm, C. K.Jones. Upper critical field of solid solution alloys of the transition elements. Rev. Mod. Phys., 36, 74-76(1964).
[45] P.O’Connor, R. B.Somoano, J. A.Woollam. Positive curvature of the
[46] F.Birch. Finite elastic strain of cubic crystals. Phys. Rev., 71, 809-824(1947).

Set citation alerts for the article
Please enter your email address