• Photonics Insights
  • Vol. 4, Issue 1, R02 (2025)
Shaohua Dong1,†, Heng Wei2, Zhipeng Li2, Guangtao Cao3..., Kun Xue1, Yang Chen4,* and Cheng-Wei Qiu2,*|Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1Peng Cheng Laboratory, Shenzhen, China
  • 2Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore
  • 3School of Physics and Electronic Sciences, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha, China
  • 4Chinese Academy of Sciences Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behavior and Design of Materials, Department of Precision Machinery and Precision Instrumentation, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/PI.2025.R02 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Shaohua Dong, Heng Wei, Zhipeng Li, Guangtao Cao, Kun Xue, Yang Chen, Cheng-Wei Qiu, "Exceptional-point optics with loss engineering," Photon. Insights 4, R02 (2025) Copy Citation Text show less

    Abstract

    Loss is usually considered a problem for photonics, which can seriously deteriorate the performance of most optical devices, and thus has to be suppressed. However, in non-Hermitian passive optical systems without gain, when both eigenvalues and eigenvectors coalesce to form exceptional points (EPs), the addition of loss may, counterintuitively, bring unique advantages, such as improved noise resistance and more stable operation. In this review, we first briefly introduce the underlying mechanisms leading to passive EPs and then examine several implementations based on different electromagnetic structures, including cavities, waveguides, and metasurfaces. We highlight the introduction of losses in each case and discuss their benefits. Finally, we also provide our thoughts on the current limits for those passive realizations as well as potential future projects.

    1 Introduction

    Gain and loss have always been the main themes of nature and our life. Generally speaking, loss brings negative impacts and thus has to be eliminated or compensated for. Particularly in optics and photonics, loss exists in almost every optical device and system, which deteriorates their performance, generates heating problems, accelerates their aging, and causes severe energy waste. Except in some specific application scenarios, including optical absorbers and attenuators, losses are always among the key challenges to be overcome. For example, optical sensors are fundamental in detecting various types of information, such as chemical[1,2], biological[3,4], refractive index[5,6], and even movements and rotations[7]. For decades, scientists have been working on new device configurations and manufacturing technologies to reduce the losses for higher sensitivity, lower power consumption, and improved overall performances[810]. In laser science and technology, optical losses have to be suppressed to achieve higher output power, smaller footprints, and faster operation speeds[1113]. Last but not least, in the emerging field of optical quantum computing, suppressing losses has been a long-term challenge. Having low-loss photon sources and detectors is critical for not only increasing accuracy but also promoting the scalability of the system[14,15].

    Losses can be classified into non-radiative losses associated with material absorptions and radiative losses. While the former can be effectively suppressed with advanced low-loss materials and better processing techniques, the latter is fundamentally inevitable for practical systems. Every device needs to interact with the external environment through leakage waves, either for the input and output of information or for the exchange of energies. Consequently, the systems have to be open and nonconservative, which can be described by non-Hermitian Hamiltonians with complex eigenvalues and non-orthogonal eigenstates[16]. To balance the energy reduction caused by those losses, gain materials are usually incorporated into the systems. If the distribution of gains and losses satisfies the commutative law H^P^T^=P^T^H^, where P^ is the parity operator reversing the physical coordinates and T^ is the time operator that works effectively as a complex conjugate operation, the system is said to be parity-time (PT)-symmetric. According to the first mathematical discussion by Bender and Boettcher[17], such systems would exhibit completely real eigenvalue spectra while being non-conservative. Moreover, with certain configurations, both the eigenvalues and the eigenstates of a non-Hermitian system can coalesce or degenerate at some points in the parameter space, which are referred to as exceptional points (EPs). The occurrence of EPs is a unique phenomenon in non-Hermitian systems, with no counterpart in Hermitian systems[18]. One significance of the EPs is that they are the transformation point between PT-symmetry and PT-symmetry-broken phases[19]. Within the proximity of these transition points, several intriguing phenomena may occur, including phase transitions, asymmetric mode switching, and eigenfrequency splitting under perturbations[20].

    Although the EP concept and PT-symmetry were first proposed in the context of quantum physics, it was soon observed in experiments in the microwave[21] and optical regimes[18,22]. The underlying reasons lie in the similarity between the Schrödinger wave equation and the paraxial electromagnetic wave equations[23], as well as the ease of implementing suitable gains and losses in those systems[24]. Nonetheless, practical implementations of this idea are inevitably limited by several fundamental physical nonidealities, including fabrication imperfections, instability, and noises[19]. To overcome those limitations, researchers have proposed various mechanisms, such as building exceptional surfaces and making use of non-reciprocity and/or nonlinearity[25,26]. Among all the methods, there is one counterintuitive proposal of deliberately adding losses into the system for better overall performance. By carefully arranging the locations and strengths of lossy components, intriguing phenomena can arise, such as improved light confinement in lasers[27], loss-induced transparency in optomechanics[28], and optical nonreciprocity[29]. Those judiciously engineered losses can also give rise to abnormal behaviors of light not achievable with traditional EP devices, such as extremely asymmetry retroreflections with high efficiency[30].

    In this review, we will focus on the development of loss-assisted EP devices, which outperform their ordinary EP counterparts in many cases by providing anomalous functionalities without the need for gain materials. We first briefly introduce the fundamental mechanism of EPs and elaborate on the reason why losses are desired in some cases. We then provide a comprehensive review of different lossy EP devices based on different structural platforms, including cavities, waveguides, and metasurfaces. In the final part, some outlooks are given regarding the potential developments and applications for lossy EP devices.

    2 Theory of Lossy Exceptional Points

    2.1 Basic Principles of EPs

    Assuming an electromagnetic system supporting two resonances with a certain amount of coupling between them, it can be described by an effective Hamiltonian according to the standard coupled-mode theory as[31]H^=(ω1iγ1κκω2iγ2),where ω1,2 are the resonance frequencies of the two modes, κ is the coupling coefficient, and γ1,2 are the gain or loss acting on the two resonances, respectively. A positive (negative) γ1,2 stands for a finite loss (gain). The eigenvalues of this Hamiltonian can be derived as E=ωaveiγave±(ωdiffiγdiff)2+κ2,where ωave=(ω1+ω2)/2, γave=(γ1+γ2)/2, ωdiff=(ω1ω2)/2, and γdiff=(γ1γ2)/2. When the system is PT-symmetric, the Hamiltonian will return to itself after a parity transformation P and a time-reversal transformation T. The former exchanges the spatial position of the two modes while the latter acts as a complex conjugate. Applying the commutation law, [H^,P^T^]=H^P^T^P^T^H^=0[19]. Consequently, P^T^H^(P^T^)1=(ω2+iγ2κκω1+iγ1).

    For the system to be PT-symmetric, ω1=ω2=ω and γ1=γ2=γ. Substituting these conditions into Eq. (2), we have E=ω±κ2γ2. When |κ|>|γ|, the system is said to be in the PT-symmetric phase, with separated real parts and degenerated imaginary parts (= 0) for the eigenvalues. When |κ|<|γ|, the system enters the PT-symmetry-broken phase. The eigenvalues will have the same real parts but different imaginary components. In the special case of |κ|=|γ|, the real and imaginary parts of the eigenvalue will coalesce at the same time, effectively showing only one distinct eigenvalue and one linearly independent eigenvector [1,i]T. Such a degeneracy point is referred to as an exceptional point. Several advantages can already be achieved by operating the system in the vicinity of an EP. For instance, compared with those conventional degeneracies in Hermitian systems, referred to as diabolic points (DPs), EPs will provide stronger responses of the eigenvalue splitting when subjected to small external perturbations[32]. In the following sections, we will analyze different works to prove that purely passive EPs with deliberately added losses can help us better utilize those advantages.

    2.2 All-Passive EP Systems

    A typical configuration of an active EP system is schematically shown in the upper panel of Fig. 1(a). It generally contains two parts, one providing active gain while the other is lossy. If we specify the resonant frequencies of the two components to be the same, the system will become PT-symmetric when the loss is exactly balanced by the gain, as it is invariant under simultaneous P and T transformations [see the upper panel of Fig. 1(a)]. Figure 1(b) indicates the EP as the transition point between PT-symmetric and PT-broken phase, as mentioned in the discussion of Eq. (3). However, incorporating gain into the system can sometimes bring great challenges. It has been shown that due to the existence of noise, an active EP system can be easily rendered to instability[33]. Besides, the device will become much more complex, especially in cases of metasurfaces and photonic crystals, where the active material has to be inserted into each unit cell. In the microwave and terahertz regime, this problem is of even greater concern as individual circuitry is needed for each unit cell[34]. Those circuits generally require transistors and external bias for active gain, which increases the difficulty when manufacturing a large-area device. To solve this problem, researchers have proposed the idea of removing gain elements and building the device with parts having different loss rates. Assuming that γ1,2>0 and γ1γ2 in Eq. (1), the Hamiltonian, when PT-symmetric, can be transformed into H^=(ωiγ1κκωiγ2)=(ω+iβκκωiβ)+(iχ00iχ),where χ=(γ1+γ2)/2 is the average loss rate and β=(γ2γ1)/2 is the difference in losses[22]. Consequently, the dynamics of this purely lossy system are equivalent to those of a balanced gain-loss system with a uniform exponential decay applied. This configuration is schematically illustrated in the lower panel of Fig. 1(a). The feasibility of such all-passive PT-symmetric devices has been demonstrated both theoretically and experimentally in various configurations[35,36]. In the following section, we will introduce several representative realizations of EPs in lossy systems of different dimensions including cavities, waveguides, and metasurfaces [see Fig. 1(c)].

    Conceptual illustrations of the combination of loss and exceptional point. (a) Schematic illustrations of traditional active EP systems (upper panel) and purely passive EP systems with losses (lower panel). By adding losses, the gain elements can be replaced. The passive system will also be invariant under PT transformation as long as a proper exponential decay is included. (b) The real and imaginary parts of the eigenvalue against the variation of relative loss difference (γdiff/κ) when the two modes have the same resonant frequency. The EP serves as the transition point between PT-symmetry (left) and PT-symmetry-broken (right) phases. (c) Examples of typical EP devices and several possible functionalities that can be achieved when loss is combined with the EP in traditional photonic systems: cavities, waveguides, and metasurfaces.

    Figure 1.Conceptual illustrations of the combination of loss and exceptional point. (a) Schematic illustrations of traditional active EP systems (upper panel) and purely passive EP systems with losses (lower panel). By adding losses, the gain elements can be replaced. The passive system will also be invariant under PT transformation as long as a proper exponential decay is included. (b) The real and imaginary parts of the eigenvalue against the variation of relative loss difference (γdiff/κ) when the two modes have the same resonant frequency. The EP serves as the transition point between PT-symmetry (left) and PT-symmetry-broken (right) phases. (c) Examples of typical EP devices and several possible functionalities that can be achieved when loss is combined with the EP in traditional photonic systems: cavities, waveguides, and metasurfaces.

    3 Configurations and Realizations

    3.1 Lossy Microcavity

    A microcavity provides an ideal platform for investigating EP photonics because it can support multiple resonances with decent quality factors, covering frequencies from radio-frequency and microwave[37] to terahertz[38] and optical[39]. By judiciously designing microcavity structures, many important functionalities can be achieved, such as coherent perfect absorption[4043], loss-induced transparency[28,4447], ultrasensitive detections[4851], and loss-induced nonreciprocity[52,53]. Among them, coherent perfect absorption (CPA) refers to the complete absorption of electromagnetic waves achieved by the interference of multiple incident waves[54]. This technique can be critical in promoting efficiencies in applications such as photodetectors and solar cells[55,56]. Through their equivalence with the time-inversed process of lasing, it is clear that most conventional CPA devices are subject to very sharp and narrow absorption characteristics. However, it was proven that an EP could widen the absorption line shape of the original optical loss if the latter was tuned to the vicinity of the EP. To demonstrate this effect, Ref. [40] used two coupled whispering gallery mode (WGM) resonators to build a purely passive EP-supporting device. According to the temporal coupled-mode theory (TCMT), the system shown in Fig. 2(a) could be described by a Hamiltonian similar to that in Eq. (4). In this case, the WGM cavities had fixed radiative loss rates γ1,2 and no gain elements. The overall dissipation rate of the system was tuned by adjusting the inter-cavity coupling strength κ. A generic CPA EP could be reached in the γc1κ parameter space, where γc1 is the coupling rate between the waveguide and cavity 1, when the following conditions were satisfied: γc1=γ1+γ2,κ=|γc1+γ2γ14|.

    Examples of cavity-based EP devices achieving coherent perfect absorption (CPA) and loss-induced transparency (LIT). (a) Schematic of a one-channel generic CPA EP. (b) Experimentally measured normalized output spectrum of the device in (a). Inset depicts a log-log plot of output versus frequency detuning, confirming the quartic dependence[40]. (c) Schematic diagram of the experimental setup for a CPA device utilizing the tunable unidirectional coupling between the clockwise (CW) and counterclockwise (CCW) modes in a microsphere resonator. (d) Measured transmission (green), reflection (red), and absorption (purple) of the device with CW input under critical coupling. (e) Reflection spectrum obtained for a fully reflective mirror, showing the quartic behavior of the lineshape[41]. (f) Schematic of the optomechanical hybrid system. (g) Transmission spectra under different loss rates γtip. (h) Enlarged transmission spectra around −3 MHz detuning, clearly showing the suppression and revival process of LIT[28].

    Figure 2.Examples of cavity-based EP devices achieving coherent perfect absorption (CPA) and loss-induced transparency (LIT). (a) Schematic of a one-channel generic CPA EP. (b) Experimentally measured normalized output spectrum of the device in (a). Inset depicts a log-log plot of output versus frequency detuning, confirming the quartic dependence[40]. (c) Schematic diagram of the experimental setup for a CPA device utilizing the tunable unidirectional coupling between the clockwise (CW) and counterclockwise (CCW) modes in a microsphere resonator. (d) Measured transmission (green), reflection (red), and absorption (purple) of the device with CW input under critical coupling. (e) Reflection spectrum obtained for a fully reflective mirror, showing the quartic behavior of the lineshape[41]. (f) Schematic of the optomechanical hybrid system. (g) Transmission spectra under different loss rates γtip. (h) Enlarged transmission spectra around 3  MHz detuning, clearly showing the suppression and revival process of LIT[28].

    The transmission spectrum at this state is shown in Fig. 2(b), which can be fitted by a quartic function instead of a Lorentzian one. This anomalous broadening of the absorption line shape was attributed to the coalescence of the S-matrix zeros at the real frequency axis, which resulted from the total intrinsic loss being balanced by the total radiative coupling loss. Similar broadening effects were also observed in Ref. [41], where a single microsphere was coupled with a tapered fiber. A tunable reflecting mirror was placed at one end of the fiber to facilitate a unidirectional coupling from the clockwise to counterclockwise modes inside the microsphere [Fig. 2(c)]. With the introduced asymmetrical coupling, the system had an effective Hamiltonian as H^ES=(ω0iΓ0κω0iΓ),where Γ=(γ0+γ1)/2, γ1 is the coupling loss between the waveguide and the cavity, and γ0 is the summation of all other resonator-related losses (scattering, material absorption, etc.). κ represents the CW-to-CCW coupling rate brought by the mirror. Although the diagonal elements were balanced as both the CW and CCW modes would experience the same loss rate, the unbalanced off-diagonal elements would create an EP in this purely passive system. Perfect absorption with a quartic lineshape would appear when the system was at the critical coupling state, i.e., γ0=γ1 [Figs. 2(d) and 2(e)]. Moreover, the EP would only be lifted when the CCW-to-CW coupling is nonzero, effectively forming an exceptional surface (ES) in the parameter spaces. As a result, the absorption feature was robust against manufacturing fluctuations, imperfections in materials, etc.

    Another intriguing behavior that can be achieved with EPs is loss-induced transparency. Traditional realizations usually require the breaking of reciprocity by employing magneto-optic materials[57] or nonlinear materials[58], which, however, are not compatible with on-chip integrated devices. Cavity-based passive systems supporting EPs provide ideal platforms to study electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT) and its potential applications as their resonance spectrum can be manipulated directly through optical states supported without introducing external noises and instabilities[46]. They can also be integrated with other physics, such as optomechanics, for even more flexible control of optical responses. As an example, Ref. [28] reported that by enhancing the optical loss using an external nanotip, optical transparency could emerge at the otherwise strongly absorptive regime in an optomechanically induced transparency (OMIT) setup. The system also consisted of WGM resonators, as illustrated in Fig. 2(f). The resonator on the left supports a mechanical mode of frequency ωm and an effective mass m. The additional optical loss applied on the right resonator could be precisely tuned by varying the size and distance of the nanotip. The spectrum in Fig. 2(g) shows that at certain frequency detunings (±11  MHz), the strong absorption regime became transparent with the increase of tip loss γtip. Meanwhile, in the vicinity of the EP, the transmission first dropped and then increased again for more tip loss, which aligned with the features of LIT in purely optical systems [Fig. 2(h)]. Another uncommon characteristic observed is the switching of slow-to-fast light with the tip loss at the EP. The group delay of the probe light varied drastically from negative to positive with a slight increase of γtip. It demonstrated another interesting application of this passive EP cavity device as a coherent group-velocity switch. Following a very similar mechanism, increased losses could lead to both suppression and revival of lasing action, as demonstrated by Ref. [47]. The proposed schematic shown in Fig. 3(a) also consisted of two WGM resonators coupled with fibers. An additional loss rate of γtip was introduced by placing a Cr nanotip absorber close to one of the resonators. When increasing the loss rate, the total field intensity in the cavities would first decrease and then increase, regardless of which of the cavities had a higher loss [Fig. 3(b)]. The researchers found that if γtip was increased from zero while fixing κ at the EP value, the lasing action would first be suppressed and then revived again. As indicated by the Raman spectra in Fig. 3(c), the recovered intensity could even exceed the original value, counterintuitively, when the loss rate increased. The experiments provide strong evidence for the practical application of purely lossy EP cavities and may lead to enhanced performance compared with active counterparts.

    Cavity-based passive EP devices for lasing revival and sensing. (a) Schematic of the coupled WGM resonators with additional loss induced by a Cr nanotip. (b) Eigenfrequency surface in the parameter space formed by coupling rate κ and loss rate γ2′. (c) Raman lasing spectra of the resonators with different values of loss[47]. (d) Topological surfaces formed by a diabolic point degeneracy (top) and an exceptional point degeneracy (bottom) when subject to a perturbation ϵ, showing the enhanced splitting near the EP[48]. (e) Schematic of the experimental setup for the loss-enhanced magneto-optical (MO) effect as proposed in Ref. [51]. (f) Experimentally measured frequency splitting of the conventional and loss-enhanced MO effects, clearly indicating the square-root dependence brought by the EPs for the latter. (g) Sensitivity enhancement compared with Hermitian MO devices, showing a threefold improvement from EP2 data.

    Figure 3.Cavity-based passive EP devices for lasing revival and sensing. (a) Schematic of the coupled WGM resonators with additional loss induced by a Cr nanotip. (b) Eigenfrequency surface in the parameter space formed by coupling rate κ and loss rate γ2. (c) Raman lasing spectra of the resonators with different values of loss[47]. (d) Topological surfaces formed by a diabolic point degeneracy (top) and an exceptional point degeneracy (bottom) when subject to a perturbation ϵ, showing the enhanced splitting near the EP[48]. (e) Schematic of the experimental setup for the loss-enhanced magneto-optical (MO) effect as proposed in Ref. [51]. (f) Experimentally measured frequency splitting of the conventional and loss-enhanced MO effects, clearly indicating the square-root dependence brought by the EPs for the latter. (g) Sensitivity enhancement compared with Hermitian MO devices, showing a threefold improvement from EP2 data.

    Last but not least, EP-supporting lossy cavities can facilitate ultrasensitive sensing. As discussed in previous sections, the eigenfrequency splitting near a second-order EP follows a square-root dependence against the variation of external parameters. Referring to Fig. 3(d), for sufficiently small perturbations, the energy difference is much larger compared to the conventional diabolic case in Hermitian systems[48]. Based on this principle, EP sensors have been proposed for detecting various kinds of quantities, including particles[48,50,5961], rotation[7,6264], temperature[65], and so on. For instance, by combining polarization-dependent losses with magneto-optical (MO) effects, Ref. [51] successfully demonstrated the detection of subtle magnetic field variations in a strong background. Referring to the schematic in Fig. 3(e), the device was based on a Fabry-Pérot cavity that contained a kind of MO material, namely, terbium gallium garnet (TGG). The polarization-dependent losses were provided by liquid crystal (LC) cells, which could be electrically tuned according to various levels of background magnetic fields. Compared with conventional Hermitian counterparts, the addition of losses broke the parity symmetry, leading to a pair of non-orthogonal eigenmodes. When the real and imaginary parts of their frequencies coalesce, an EP would be reached. The dynamic response of the frequency split under a small perturbation ΔB would be amplified by a factor of approximately BEP/2ΔB. Experiments confirmed the square-root response near the EP, as indicated in Fig. 3(f). The sensitivity of the sensor was improved by three times compared to the conventional Hermitian counterparts, even after taking noises into account [Fig. 3(g)].

    Meanwhile, using a similar structure, recent works also demonstrated lossy EPs could boost the precision of nanometrology down to a 2-nm scale[66]. The intermodal coupling and losses were, in this configuration, provided by an electrically driven movable mirror and an Er3+-doped optical absorber. Instead of resolving eigenfrequencies and measuring splittings, the researchers directly evaluated the transmission peak shifts as the gauge of nanometric displacements. This method eliminated the need for reference signals and avoided any spectral fitting errors. Experiment results demonstrated an enhancement in sensitivity of more than 86 times. Since the device was not working on the exact spot of EP, the divergence of noise level due to deep mode non-orthogonality was avoided, leading to a five-fold enhancement of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).

    Apart from the abovementioned examples, cavity-based EP devices can also achieve different functionalities when combined with various technologies[67,68]. For instance, Mie scatterers could be used to break the rotational symmetry of microring resonators and tune the system to an EP. The devices can thus provide chiral optical transmission or chiral electro-optical modulation with high contrasts. In the quantum realm, researchers have discovered that single- or two-photon blockades may emerge when EP-induced asymmetric coupling is delicately combined with resonators with Kerr nonlinearity[69]. With proper loss engineering, EPs have also been configured in cavity magnomechanical systems to facilitate magnon-photon and magnon-phonon couplings. Those systems can offer flexible and powerful control of light, including transmission spectra, group velocity, nonreciprocity, and so on[7073].

    3.2 Lossy Waveguides

    Optical waveguides are another paradigmatic system for inducing photonic EPs. As compared to microcavities, which support only one system state at any fixed time point, waveguides can help observe the transition between two or more modes thanks to the added spatial degree of freedom. System parameters, such as shape, loss rates, and refractive indices, can now vary along the propagation path, corresponding to different points in the parameter space. For instance, they can be tuned to form loops and encircle the EPs[7476], which are conceptually illustrated in Fig. 4(a). One particularly intriguing feature of dynamically encircling EPs is its chiral response, where the final output state depends only on the encircling direction, regardless of the input state[19,20]. This phenomenon led to intensive studies regarding the development of devices with asymmetric mode-switching or mode-locking capabilities[20,74,7780].

    EP encircling using waveguides. (a) Conceptual illustration of encircling an EP in the parameter space, demonstrating the idea of mode locking[74]. (b) Schematic diagram of the designed L-shaped waveguide. The inset shows how the encircling path involving the infinite boundary of the parameter space is mapped onto a Riemann sphere. (c) Field distributions at different locations of the waveguide. Different input ports correspond to different encircling directions. The mode-locking phenomenon is observable at corresponding output ports. (d) The transmission spectra between different combinations of polarizations[77]. (e) Another encircling loop across the parameter space boundary for fast evolution. (f) Schematic diagram of the proposed double-coupled silicon waveguides on silicon-on-insulator (SOI) wafer. (g) Simulation (left) and experimental (right) transmission spectra between different modes[79].

    Figure 4.EP encircling using waveguides. (a) Conceptual illustration of encircling an EP in the parameter space, demonstrating the idea of mode locking[74]. (b) Schematic diagram of the designed L-shaped waveguide. The inset shows how the encircling path involving the infinite boundary of the parameter space is mapped onto a Riemann sphere. (c) Field distributions at different locations of the waveguide. Different input ports correspond to different encircling directions. The mode-locking phenomenon is observable at corresponding output ports. (d) The transmission spectra between different combinations of polarizations[77]. (e) Another encircling loop across the parameter space boundary for fast evolution. (f) Schematic diagram of the proposed double-coupled silicon waveguides on silicon-on-insulator (SOI) wafer. (g) Simulation (left) and experimental (right) transmission spectra between different modes[79].

    As an example, Ref. [77] mapped the encircling path to an L-shaped waveguide supporting two orthogonal eigenmodes. Compared with previous works, a novel encircling path crossing the infinite boundary of the parameter space was enabled after converting the detuning-loss parameter space into a Riemann sphere [inset box of Fig. 4(b)]. The loss was introduced by placing a second waveguide nearby so that energy exchange with the main waveguide could happen. The geometries of the waveguides were varied continuously to dynamically adjust detuning frequencies, loss rates, and coupling strengths to the two eigenmodes propagating along [see Figs. 4(b) and 4(c)]. A near-unity asymmetric conversion ratio was achieved with mode crosstalk below 20  dB at 1550 nm in silicon waveguides [Fig. 4(d)]. The device could be easily integrated with photonic chips and opened up the opportunity for mass application of gain-free, broadband asymmetric polarization conversion. Utilizing the same principle of EP encircling, Ref. [79] also demonstrated waveguide-based asymmetric mode converters experimentally. The designed encircling paths involved, likewise, the boundary of parameter spaces, which relaxed the constraint of adiabaticity and enabled fast parametric evolution [Fig. 4(e)]. The path was mapped to a double-coupled silicon waveguide (DSW) system, where the position-dependent loss rate was introduced using a layer of chromium [Fig. 4(f)]. As can be seen from Fig. 4(g), when TE0 mode was injected into the left port, the conversion efficiency to TE1 mode remained near unity within the wavelength range of 1520–1580 nm. The evolution process represented the clockwise (CW) encircling direction around the EP, with mode crosstalk lower than 15  dB. The inclusion of parameter space boundaries in the loop efficiently aided in shrinking the device length to 57 µm, with numerical results further supporting a device of 30 µm. The abovementioned demonstrations of waveguide-based asymmetric mode converters, where losses are added deliberately, significantly promoted the feasibility of applying the EP principle in practical scenarios, especially for on-chip integrations.

    Apart from mode locking, unidirectional reflectionless propagation is another innovation that can be readily achieved with lossy EP waveguides. A waveguide as a general two-port optical scattering system can be described by the following scattering matrix S[81]: (HRHL)=S(HL+HR+)=(trbrft)(HL+HR+).

    In the above equation, HL and HR are the complex magnetic field amplitudes of the modes injected from left and right ports, with the +(−) sign indicating the incoming (outgoing) direction [Fig. 5(a)]. Similar to the Hamiltonian mentioned earlier, the eigenvalues of the scattering matrix can be found as λS±=t±rfrb. Therefore, when the two eigenvalues coalesce, unidirectional reflectionlessness will appear as either rf or rb will become zero. This results from the destructive interference of the two branch solutions at the EP, suppressing the reflection in one direction but not the other[82]. Considering its importance in applications such as optical computation, communications, and on-chip photonic devices, unidirectional propagation has been studied in detail for a long time[8385]. Specifically, plasmonic devices involving active gain materials are proven to be effective and flexible platforms for such investigation[8689]. Nonetheless, purely passive meta-waveguides supporting EP-induced unidirectional reflectionlessness were also theoretically and experimentally demonstrated[82,90,91]. For instance, Ref. [77] used germanium and chrome to periodically modulate the effective refractive index of a silicon waveguide and successfully resembled a loss-shifted PT-symmetric system as described in the previous section [Fig. 5(b)]. The parity-time optical potentials were mimicked by the alternating arrangement of silicon and Ge/Cr structures on top of the waveguide, which introduced imaginary refractive indices that corresponded to energy dissipations [Figs. 5(c) and 5(d)]. The simulated field distribution and measured contrast ratio are depicted in Figs. 5(e) and 5(f), supporting the theoretical design with a maximum contrast ratio of 0.7 at the wavelength around 1550 nm.

    Unidirectional reflectionless propagation in passive waveguides based on EPs. (a) Two-port optical system modeling a waveguide. HL+(−) and HR+(−) are the complex magnetic field amplitudes of the incoming (outgoing) modes at the left and right ports, respectively[81]. (b) Schematic and photo of the designed passive unidirectional reflectionless parity-time waveguide. (c) Designed spatially modulated effective indices (red line) and experimental implementations using sinusoidal-shaped Si (blue dots). (d) The indices of the Ge/Cr combination. (e) Simulated electric field amplitude distributions for forward/backward incidence. (f) The contrast ratio was experimentally obtained and calculated from the Gaussian fits of transmission spectra[90].

    Figure 5.Unidirectional reflectionless propagation in passive waveguides based on EPs. (a) Two-port optical system modeling a waveguide. HL+() and HR+() are the complex magnetic field amplitudes of the incoming (outgoing) modes at the left and right ports, respectively[81]. (b) Schematic and photo of the designed passive unidirectional reflectionless parity-time waveguide. (c) Designed spatially modulated effective indices (red line) and experimental implementations using sinusoidal-shaped Si (blue dots). (d) The indices of the Ge/Cr combination. (e) Simulated electric field amplitude distributions for forward/backward incidence. (f) The contrast ratio was experimentally obtained and calculated from the Gaussian fits of transmission spectra[90].

    3.3 Lossy Metasurfaces

    Metasurfaces refer to sub-wavelength patterned layers that can interact strongly with electromagnetic waves and significantly alter their properties over a sub-wavelength thickness[92102]. Since the unit cells of metasurfaces, as well as their arrangement, can be designed arbitrarily, both the loss rate and coupling rate can be tailored at will along the metasurfaces, which offers large degrees of freedom for engineering EPs. Those devices may bring enhanced performance in many important applications, such as polarization control[103108], asymmetric reflection/transmission[30,109,110117], and sensing[4,118120]. Polarization, as a vital characteristic of electromagnetic waves, can determine the way light interacts with matter and attracts intense attention in various applications including optical communication and biomedical sensing[16,121]. By taking two different polarization states as the basis for the eigenvectors, the system can be described by a Hermitian similar to that in Eq. (1) as the loss rates and intermodal coupling are adjustable through engineering the unit cells. For instance, Ref. [103] configured an EP-supporting metasurface where the unit cells consisted of lossy coupled linear antennas [Fig. 6(a)]. Their EPs were associated with circularly polarized transmission eigenstates, which resulted from breaking the x- and y-mirror symmetries by displacement perturbations. The existence of EP in the parameter space formed by perturbations δx/δy and frequency was indicated by the asymmetric transmission rate of circularly polarized light, as drawn in Fig. 6(b). Figure 6(c) shows the relationship between the Stokes parameters and frequency, indicating a nearly perfect circularly polarized eigenstate associated with maximally asymmetric transmission at the EP. This simple yet efficient methodology presented in this paper could greatly promote the application of EPs in optical beam shaping. To further increase the applicability and flexibility, scientists delved into the possibility of dynamic reconfigurability. Reference [107] successfully demonstrated a reconfigurable metasurface with adjustable eigen-polarizations. It was built using a hybridized structure containing gold circular resonators, which could be treated as orthogonal dipoles when excited with external fields, and the type-II superconductor NbN [Fig. 6(d)]. This special material had a temperature-dependent conductivity, which translated to a tunable loss rate in the system Hermitian matrix. In this case, the loss rate enabled the dynamic reconfiguration of polarization states. Polarization plots and the Poincare sphere depicted in Fig. 6(e) show a continuous evolution of the eigenstates with the temperature varying from 7 to 12 K. Besides controlling these polarization states near EPs, Ref. [108] has demonstrated a plasmonic topological metasurface that exhibits 2π topological phase accumulation in a reflection regime by choosing nanoantenna designs distributed along any arbitrarily closed parameter loop encircling the EP. They decoupled left circularly polarized (LCP) and right circularly polarized (RCP) channels by exploiting a linear combination of exceptional topological phase and PB phase, which enables independent manipulation of the wavefronts of LCP and RCP beams, as shown in Fig. 6(f).

    Examples of passive EP metasurfaces realizing polarization control. (a) Unit cell design of a chiral EP metasurface. (b) Circular polarization transmission asymmetry factor Λ plotted in the parameter space of frequency f and structural displacements δx and δy. (c) Evolution of transmission eigenvalues |λ±| and Stokes parameters as the frequency is swept across an EP at f=210 THz[103]. (d) Unit cell design (top) and microscopy image (bottom) of the proposed reconfigurable EP metasurface. (e) Eigen-polarization states of the transmission matrix at different temperatures (①–⑤: experiments, ⑥–❿: fitting results). Corresponding locations are indicated on the Poincare sphere on the right[107]. (f) Schematics of the design implemented for combining the exceptional topological phase and PB phase control in the proposed plasmonic topological metasurface[108].

    Figure 6.Examples of passive EP metasurfaces realizing polarization control. (a) Unit cell design of a chiral EP metasurface. (b) Circular polarization transmission asymmetry factor Λ plotted in the parameter space of frequency f and structural displacements δx and δy. (c) Evolution of transmission eigenvalues |λ±| and Stokes parameters as the frequency is swept across an EP at f=210  THz[103]. (d) Unit cell design (top) and microscopy image (bottom) of the proposed reconfigurable EP metasurface. (e) Eigen-polarization states of the transmission matrix at different temperatures (①–⑤: experiments, ⑥–❿: fitting results). Corresponding locations are indicated on the Poincare sphere on the right[107]. (f) Schematics of the design implemented for combining the exceptional topological phase and PB phase control in the proposed plasmonic topological metasurface[108].

    Another abnormal optical behavior enabled by EP metasurfaces is asymmetric transmission and/or reflection. For instance, unidirectional retro-reflection was realized by combining traditional phase-gradient metasurfaces with non-Hermiticity[30]. The tri-meta-atom supercells provided a retro-reflection response, while leaky losses were introduced through the slits with varying widths in the metal base [Fig. 7(a)]. Lossless and lossy regions were balanced precisely to resemble a purely passive PT-symmetry as described in previous sections, as indicated in Fig. 7(b). Both the reflectivity and the far-field response shown in Figs. 7(c) and 7(d) indicate a strong asymmetric retro-reflection behavior in the vicinity of EPs. Considering the polarization characteristics of electromagnetic waves, a fourth-order EP related to the collapsed EPs of a generalized 4×4 non-Hermitian scattering matrix under TM and TE polarization states was first demonstrated in a similar non-Hermitian metasurface system[109]. The device also consisted of tri-meta-atom supercells, where a polarization-insensitive unidirectional retroreflector was realized. Meanwhile, more peculiar behaviors can be achieved if the concept of EPs is combined with other optical singularities. One typical candidate is Fano resonances, which are generated when a narrowband resonant state interferes with a broadband continuum. Reference [112] provided such a design where the graphene was inserted between two layers of silver gratings as the lossy material [Fig. 7(e)]. Utilizing the tunable loss rate of the graphene layer, which could be changed by adjusting its chemical potential μc, the topological nature of EPs was revealed [Fig. 7(f)]. Unidirectional invisibility was successfully demonstrated at the EP integrated with Fano resonances [Fig. 7(g)].

    Passive EP metasurfaces realizing asymmetric reflection and transmission. (a) Fabricated metasurface with lossy and lossless regions indicated. The inset shows the supercell configuration consisting of three subunits with different gap opening angles. (b) Principle of realizing purely passive non-Hermitian metasurface, where the Hamiltonian is shifted by a nonzero base loss. (c) FEM-simulated reflectivities versus the length w of the slit on the back for different reflection orders. (d) FDTD-simulated far-field reflecting intensities for incident waves from left (top) to right (bottom)[30]. (e) Schematic of the Ag-graphene hybrid metasurface for asymmetric reflection. (f) Topological surfaces of the eigenvalues in the parameter space of wavelength λ and graphene chemical potential μc, with intersections indicated by the red curves. (g) Normalized electric field intensities with normal incident light when the system is at either of the two EPs indicated in (f)[112].

    Figure 7.Passive EP metasurfaces realizing asymmetric reflection and transmission. (a) Fabricated metasurface with lossy and lossless regions indicated. The inset shows the supercell configuration consisting of three subunits with different gap opening angles. (b) Principle of realizing purely passive non-Hermitian metasurface, where the Hamiltonian is shifted by a nonzero base loss. (c) FEM-simulated reflectivities versus the length w of the slit on the back for different reflection orders. (d) FDTD-simulated far-field reflecting intensities for incident waves from left (top) to right (bottom)[30]. (e) Schematic of the Ag-graphene hybrid metasurface for asymmetric reflection. (f) Topological surfaces of the eigenvalues in the parameter space of wavelength λ and graphene chemical potential μc, with intersections indicated by the red curves. (g) Normalized electric field intensities with normal incident light when the system is at either of the two EPs indicated in (f)[112].

    Like those cavity-based EP devices, EP metasurfaces can offer enhanced sensitivity and responsiveness with suitable designs. In Ref. [4], a novel kind of plasmonic EP was proposed and experimentally realized. The system was based on a multilayer plasmonic structure consisting of gold bars, which supported multiple plasmonic resonances with generally different loss rates. By hybridizing optically dissimilar resonators [Fig. 8(a)], the resonant frequencies and loss rates of several modes could become degenerate at the same spot in the parameter space, producing EPs [Fig. 8(b)]. At those states, this device would exhibit a square-root dependency in frequency splitting when subjected to external perturbations [Fig. 8(c)]. When the perturbation was caused by the change in the concentration of target molecules, e.g., anti-immunoglobulin G, this device could effectively work as a sensor with elevated sensitivity compared with conventional DP sensors, supported by the measurements shown in Fig. 8(d). Similarly, high-sensitivity sensing of temperature and refractive index was realized using a bilayer metasurface with two orthogonally oriented silver split-ring resonators (SRRs)[118]. VO2, an insulator-to-metal phase-changing material, was inserted into the gap of the SRRs on one side of the metasurface [Fig. 8(e)]. The conductivity of VO2 would change with the temperature, which would translate to a variable loss rate controlled by the temperature. Consequently, the exact location of the transmission EPs would be affected, and the temperature variation could be read out by monitoring the giant transmission phase jump within the vicinity of the EP [Fig. 8(f)]. Meanwhile, changes in the refractive index (RI) of the surrounding medium would proportionally induce a shift in the resonance frequency, which would then cause the splitting of eigenfrequencies. Thanks to the square-root dependence of the splitting on the RI change, the sensitivity for small perturbations was greatly enhanced [Fig. 8(g)]. Utilizing the variable loss rate of VO2 and the EP mechanism, this purely passive device achieved both temperature and RI sensing simultaneously with one single structure.

    Sensors utilizing exceptional sensitivity based on passive EP implementations. (a) Schematic illustrations of the symmetry-broken double-layer metasurface. (b) Real (left) and imaginary (right) parts of the eigenmodes of the device. (c) Simulation results of the frequency splitting Δω versus the index of the cladding surrounding the metal bar on the top. (d) Experimental results when the concentration of anti-IgG is varied from 100 to 1500 aM, where ϵ=(anti-IgG concentration aM)/(1100 aM)[4]. (e) Unit cell design of the bifunctional sensing EP metasurface. One of the SRRs has VO2 within its resonating gap (red). (f) Derivatives of the phase change when the temperature varies near an EP. (g) Eigenfrequency splitting ΔωE versus the resonance shift Δωy[118].

    Figure 8.Sensors utilizing exceptional sensitivity based on passive EP implementations. (a) Schematic illustrations of the symmetry-broken double-layer metasurface. (b) Real (left) and imaginary (right) parts of the eigenmodes of the device. (c) Simulation results of the frequency splitting Δω versus the index of the cladding surrounding the metal bar on the top. (d) Experimental results when the concentration of anti-IgG is varied from 100 to 1500 aM, where ϵ=(anti-IgG concentrationaM)/(1100aM)[4]. (e) Unit cell design of the bifunctional sensing EP metasurface. One of the SRRs has VO2 within its resonating gap (red). (f) Derivatives of the phase change when the temperature varies near an EP. (g) Eigenfrequency splitting ΔωE versus the resonance shift Δωy[118].

    Finally, apart from the abovementioned functionalities, EP-based passive metasurfaces can exhibit other interesting behaviors, which are useful in numerous applications such as imaging and holograms[122124], thermal emission[125], and diffraction control[115,126].

    4 Conclusion and Outlook

    In this review, we provided a comprehensive examination of the development of purely passive devices supporting exceptional points, including cavities, waveguides, and metasurfaces. We first introduced the theoretical fundamentals of the formation of exceptional points and their relationship with the parity-time symmetry. We then evaluated the reason why losses can be beneficial within the vicinity of EPs, contradicting generally accepted intuitions. Several representative examples are given for different application scenarios of those EP devices with deliberately added losses. Those applications spanned from perfect absorption to asymmetric reflection and/or transmission, asymmetric mode conversion/locking, and polarization control, to list a few. Engineered losses effectively added another degree of freedom for light manipulation. It is worth noting that there have been some novel non-Hermitian effects recently that can be implemented in passive optical systems of different dimensions, such as the skin effect[127,128], topology in quantum and photonics[129,130], and so on.

    We believe that passive EP devices will be especially advantageous when asymmetric responses, elevated sensitivities, or high-level operation stability are desired. So far, the debate on whether the EP mechanism can truly benefit applications such as lasing and sensing is still going on. Scientists have theoretically proved that for an active system, in the vicinity of EP, the non-orthogonality between the modes will bring excessive amounts of quantum and thermal noises[19,26]. They will increase the linewidth of the resonances, making the frequency splitting unresolvable[63,131] and bring no advantage for parameter sensing[132]. Meanwhile, passive EP sensors are also being questioned regarding whether the ϵ bifurcation of eigenfrequencies is experimentally observable or not[133,134]. Nonetheless, given all the existing demonstrations of passive EP sensors, such as those mentioned in earlier sections, we still believe that the combination of losses with EP is still worth investigating, with some of the reasons listed below. Firstly, optical nonreciprocity can be introduced within those lossy systems[29], which may be a vital solution to noise problems as nonreciprocity can help break the fundamental limits of any conventional reciprocal sensor in non-Hermitian systems[26]. Secondly, another significant benefit of loss-assisted EP systems over active counterparts is stability. Thermal noises and noises generated by external stabilization are completely unavoidable, especially in active systems with external biasing[135]. It was proven that those temporal noises could easily render instability of the system[33]. By adding dissipation, the instability can be compensated for. Hence, adding additional losses may be an essential step when building devices that are required to provide long-term stable operations.

    Nonetheless, there are still several functionalities that are yet to be implemented in a purely passive way. As an example, active PT-symmetric devices can provide powerful and comprehensive control over light such as reconfigurable light steering[136]. Such functionalities have not been vastly observed with passive optical counterparts. Moreover, it was proven that if the order of the EP is n, the energy splitting will be further enhanced to be proportional to the n-th root of perturbation strength, bringing even further improvements for minuscule parameter changes[137]. This trend has been confirmed by many EP sensors involving active gain[137139]. They are also proven feasible in other regimes such as electromechanical[140], microwave[141], and very high-frequency range[119]. However, it remains a challenging task for EP systems without gain. There seem to be inadequate papers examining the configuration in a passive optical setting[142], and the discussion is still limited to theories. To begin with, high-order EP devices are difficult to obtain in conventional EP devices involving gain. For instance, in cavity-based devices, the resonant frequencies of every cavity should be precisely tuned to the same value[137,139], which naturally imposes more strict requirements for design and manufacturing. Another critical issue to be considered is, again, stability. An EP system with a higher order implies that it is even more vulnerable to parametric noises[33], which would easily render the system to instability. In a passive setting, the difficulties may, in addition, include precise engineering of loss distributions. As shown in Eq. (4), more discrete levels of loss rates are required if the order of Hamiltonian is to be increased. The differences between the loss rates should be sufficiently large to distinguish different eigenmodes and obtain practically approachable EPs. However, the average loss rate χ should be limited to prevent the energy from dissipating too fast. Multi-dimensional parameter optimization is required before conducting experiments. Nonetheless, more investigations are still expected as successful implementations will help overcome some fundamental drawbacks of EP devices with active gains, such as instability and quantum noises mentioned earlier[32,33,63,133]. One of the possible solutions may lie in the concept of exceptional surfaces, which has been proven feasible in second-order passive systems[25,143,144]. Forming exceptional surfaces could relax the precision requirements during sample manufacturing. Another possible way to improve sensitivity and/or minimum detection limit is by taking advantage of plasmonic systems. For instance, in the microwave regime, surface plasmon resonators have successfully promoted the detection range of non-Hermitian sensors down to deep subwavelength levels and even enabled reconfigurability[145148]. Similar methodologies may apply to optical sensors with proper device designs. Last but not least, the EP concept may bring additional benefits to the research of various quantum effects, such as the quantum Mpemba effect[149,150], and quantum coherence improvement[151]. Although these are emerging fields even with conventional active EPs, they are worth studying in passive settings considering their potential advantages.

    References

    [1] R. Bogue. Detecting gases with light: a review of optical gas sensor technologies. Sensor Rev., 35, 133(2015).

    [2] R. S. El Shamy, D. Khalil, M. A. Swillam. mid infrared optical gas sensor using plasmonic Mach-Zehnder interferometer. Sci. Rep., 10, 1293(2020).

    [3] N. Khansili, G. Rattu, P. M. Krishna. Label-free optical biosensors for food and biological sensor applications. Sens. Actuators B, 265, 35(2018).

    [4] J.-H. Park et al. Symmetry-breaking-induced plasmonic exceptional points and nanoscale sensing. Nat. Phys., 16, 462(2020).

    [5] Y. Xu et al. Optical refractive index sensors with plasmonic and photonic structures: promising and inconvenient truth. Adv. Opt. Mater., 7, 1801433(2019).

    [6] W. B. Ji et al. Ultrahigh sensitivity refractive index sensor based on optical microfiber. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett., 24, 1872(2012).

    [7] M. P. Hokmabadi et al. Non-Hermitian ring laser gyroscopes with enhanced Sagnac sensitivity. Nature, 576, 70(2019).

    [8] L. Tong. Micro/nanofibre optical sensors: challenges and prospects. Sensors, 18, 903(2018).

    [9] P. M. Tracey. Intrinsic fiber-optic sensors. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., 27, 96(1991).

    [10] Jun Yang, L. J. Guo. Optical sensors based on active microcavities. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 12, 143(2006).

    [11] B. J. Thibeault et al. Reduced optical scattering loss in vertical-cavity lasers using a thin (300/spl Aring/) oxide aperture. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett., 8, 593(1996).

    [12] N. A. Pikhtin et al. Internal optical loss in semiconductor lasers. Semiconductors, 38, 360(2004).

    [13] M. T. Hill, M. C. Gather. Advances in small lasers. Nat. Photon., 8, 908(2014).

    [14] J. L. O’Brien. Optical quantum computing. Science, 318, 1567(2007).

    [15] P. Kok et al. Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits. Rev. Mod. Phys., 79, 135(2007).

    [16] Z. Li et al. Non-Hermitian electromagnetic metasurfaces at exceptional points. Prog. Electromagn. Res., 171, 1(2021).

    [17] C. M. Bender, S. Boettcher. Real spectra in Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians having P T symmetry. Phys. Rev. Lett., 80, 5243(1998).

    [18] M.-A. Miri, A. Alù. Exceptional points in optics and photonics. Science, 363, eaar7709(2019).

    [19] A. Li et al. Exceptional points and non-Hermitian photonics at the nanoscale. Nat. Nanotechnol., 18, 706(2023).

    [20] X.-L. Zhang. Dynamically encircling an exceptional point in anti-parity-time symmetric systems: asymmetric mode switching for symmetry-broken modes. Light Sci. Appl., 8, 88(2019).

    [21] C. Dembowski et al. Experimental observation of the topological structure of exceptional points. Phys. Rev. Lett., 86, 787(2001).

    [22] Ş. K. Özdemir et al. Parity–time symmetry and exceptional points in photonics. Nat. Mater., 18, 783(2019).

    [23] H. Zhao, L. Feng. Parity–time symmetric photonics. Natl. Sci. Rev., 5, 183(2018).

    [24] C. E. Rüter et al. Observation of parity-time symmetry in optics. Nature Phys., 6, 192(2010).

    [25] Q. Zhong et al. Sensing with exceptional surfaces in order to combine sensitivity with robustness. Phys. Rev. Lett., 122, 153902(2019).

    [26] H.-K. Lau, A. A. Clerk. Fundamental limits and non-reciprocal approaches in non-Hermitian quantum sensing. Nat. Commun., 9, 4320(2018).

    [27] D. F. Siriani, P. O. Leisher, K. D. Choquette. Loss-induced confinement in photonic crystal vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers. IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 45, 762(2009).

    [28] H. Zhang et al. Loss-induced transparency in optomechanics. Opt. Express, 26, 25199(2018).

    [29] X. Huang et al. Loss-induced nonreciprocity. Light Sci. Appl., 10, 30(2021).

    [30] S. Dong et al. Loss-assisted metasurface at an exceptional point. ACS Photonics, 7, 3321(2020).

    [31] H. A. Haus, W. Huang. Coupled-mode theory. Proc. IEEE, 79, 1505(1991).

    [32] J. Wiersig. Review of exceptional point-based sensors. Photon. Res., 8, 1457(2020).

    [33] J. Wiersig. Robustness of exceptional-point-based sensors against parametric noise: The role of Hamiltonian and Liouvillian degeneracies. Phys. Rev. A, 101, 053846(2020).

    [34] S. Taravati, G. V. Eleftheriades. Full-duplex reflective beamsteering metasurface featuring magnetless nonreciprocal amplification. Nat. Commun., 12, 4414(2021).

    [35] A. Guo et al. Observation of P T -symmetry breaking in complex optical potentials. Phys. Rev. Lett., 103, 093902(2009).

    [36] M. Ornigotti, A. Szameit. Quasi PT-symmetry in passive photonic lattices. J. Opt., 16, 065501(2014).

    [37] X. Liu et al. High-Q tunable microwave cavity resonators and filters using SOI-based RF MEMS tuners. J. Microelectromech. Syst., 19, 774(2010).

    [38] S. Messelot et al. Tamm cavity in the terahertz spectral range. ACS Photonics, 7, 2906(2020).

    [39] A. K. Bhowmik. Polygonal optical cavities. Appl. Opt., 39, 3071(2000).

    [40] C. Wang et al. Coherent perfect absorption at an exceptional point. Science, 373, 1261(2021).

    [41] S. Soleymani et al. Chiral and degenerate perfect absorption on exceptional surfaces. Nat. Commun., 13, 599(2022).

    [42] G.-Q. Zhang, Y. Wang, W. Xiong. Detection sensitivity enhancement of magnon Kerr nonlinearity in cavity magnonics induced by coherent perfect absorption. Phys. Rev. B, 107, 064417(2023).

    [43] W. R. Sweeney et al. Perfectly absorbing exceptional points and chiral absorbers. Phys. Rev. Lett., 122, 093901(2019).

    [44] C. Ferise et al. Exceptional points of P T -symmetric reflectionless states in complex scattering systems. Phys. Rev. Lett., 128, 203904(2022).

    [45] Y. Zuo et al. Loss-induced suppression, revival, and switch of photon blockade. Phys. Rev. A, 106, 043715(2022).

    [46] C. Wang et al. Electromagnetically induced transparency at a chiral exceptional point. Nat. Phys., 16, 334(2020).

    [47] B. Peng et al. Loss-induced suppression and revival of lasing. Science, 346, 328(2014).

    [48] W. Chen et al. Exceptional points enhance sensing in an optical microcavity. Nature, 548, 192(2017).

    [49] M. De Carlo et al. Non-Hermitian sensing in photonics and electronics: a review. Sensors, 22, 3977(2022).

    [50] J. Wiersig. Sensors operating at exceptional points: general theory. Phys. Rev. A, 93, 033809(2016).

    [51] Y. P. Ruan et al. Observation of loss-enhanced magneto-optical effect. Nat. Photonics, 19, 109(2024).

    [52] A. Metelmann, A. A. Clerk. Nonreciprocal photon transmission and amplification via reservoir engineering. Phys. Rev. X, 5, 021025(2015).

    [53] B. Li et al. Loss-induced quantum nonreciprocity. npj Quantum Inf., 10, 75(2024).

    [54] D. G. Baranov et al. Coherent perfect absorbers: linear control of light with light. Nat. Rev. Mater., 2, 17064(2017).

    [55] L. Baldacci, S. Zanotto, A. Tredicucci. Coherent perfect absorption in photonic structures. Rend. Fis. Acc. Lincei, 26, 219(2015).

    [56] Z. Yu, A. Raman, S. Fan. Thermodynamic upper bound on broadband light coupling with photonic structures. Phys. Rev. Lett., 109, 173901(2012).

    [57] Z. Wang et al. Observation of unidirectional backscattering-immune topological electromagnetic states. Nature, 461, 772(2009).

    [58] Y.-L. Xu et al. Unidirectional transmission based on a passive PT symmetric grating with a nonlinear silicon distributed Bragg reflector cavity. IEEE Photon. J., 6, 1(2014).

    [59] J. Wiersig. Enhancing the sensitivity of frequency and energy splitting detection by using exceptional points: application to microcavity sensors for single-particle detection. Phys. Rev. Lett., 112, 203901(2014).

    [60] H. Zhang et al. Breaking anti-PT symmetry by spinning a resonator. Nano Lett., 20, 7594(2020).

    [61] W. Li et al. Real frequency splitting indirectly coupled anti-parity-time symmetric nanoparticle sensor. J. Appl. Phys., 128, 134503(2020).

    [62] M. D. Carlo et al. Design rules of a microscale PT-symmetric optical gyroscope using group IV platform. J. Lightw. Technol., 36, 3261(2018).

    [63] H. Wang et al. Petermann-factor sensitivity limit near an exceptional point in a Brillouin ring laser gyroscope. Nat. Commun., 11, 1610(2020).

    [64] Y.-H. Lai et al. Observation of the exceptional-point-enhanced Sagnac effect. Nature, 576, 65(2019).

    [65] H. Zhao et al. Exceptional point engineered glass slide for microscopic thermal mapping. Nat. Commun., 9, 1764(2018).

    [66] J. Xu et al. Single-cavity loss-enabled nanometrology. Nat. Nanotechnol., 19, 1472(2024).

    [67] H. Lee et al. Chiral exceptional point and coherent suppression of backscattering in silicon microring with low loss Mie scatterer. eLight, 3, 20(2023).

    [68] H. Lee et al. Chiral exceptional point enhanced active tuning and nonreciprocity in micro-resonators. Light Sci. Appl., 14, 45(2025).

    [69] R. Huang et al. Exceptional photon blockade: engineering photon blockade with chiral exceptional points. Laser Photonics Rev., 16, 2100430(2022).

    [70] Y.-P. Wang et al. Nonreciprocity and unidirectional invisibility in cavity magnonics. Phys. Rev. Lett., 123, 127202(2019).

    [71] T.-X. Lu et al. Exceptional-point-engineered cavity magnomechanics. Phys. Rev. A, 103, 063708(2021).

    [72] D. Zhang et al. Observation of the exceptional point in cavity magnon-polaritons. Nat. Commun., 8, 1368(2017).

    [73] J. Zhao et al. Phase-controlled pathway interferences and switchable fast-slow light in a cavity-magnon polariton system. Phys. Rev. Appl., 15, 024056(2021).

    [74] J. Doppler et al. Dynamically encircling an exceptional point for asymmetric mode switching. Nature, 537, 76(2016).

    [75] J. W. Yoon et al. Time-asymmetric loop around an exceptional point over the full optical communications band. Nature, 562, 86(2018).

    [76] F. Yu et al. General rules governing the dynamical encircling of an arbitrary number of exceptional points. Phys. Rev. Lett., 127, 253901(2021).

    [77] A. Li et al. Riemann-encircling exceptional points for efficient asymmetric polarization-locked devices. Phys. Rev. Lett., 129, 127401(2022).

    [78] S. N. Ghosh, Y. D. Chong. Exceptional points and asymmetric mode conversion in quasi-guided dual-mode optical waveguides. Sci. Rep., 6, 19837(2016).

    [79] X. Shu et al. Fast encirclement of an exceptional point for highly efficient and compact chiral mode converters. Nat. Commun., 13, 2123(2022).

    [80] X. Shu et al. Chiral transmission by an open evolution trajectory in a non-Hermitian system. Light Sci. Appl., 13, 65(2024).

    [81] Y. Huang et al. Unidirectional reflectionless light propagation at exceptional points. Nanophotonics, 6, 977(2017).

    [82] X. Yin, X. Zhang. Unidirectional light propagation at exceptional points. Nat. Mater., 12, 175(2013).

    [83] Y. Fu et al. Zero index metamaterials with PT symmetry in a waveguide system. Opt. Express, 24, 1648(2016).

    [84] Z. Lin et al. Unidirectional invisibility induced by PT -symmetric periodic structures. Phys. Rev. Lett., 106, 213901(2011).

    [85] N. X. A. Rivolta, B. Maes. Side-coupled resonators with parity-time symmetry for broadband unidirectional invisibility. Phys. Rev. A, 94, 053854(2016).

    [86] C. Hahn et al. Single-mode lasers and parity-time symmetry broken gratings based on active dielectric-loaded long-range surface plasmon polariton waveguides. Opt. Express, 23, 19922(2015).

    [87] H. Alaeian, J. A. Dionne. Non-Hermitian nanophotonic and plasmonic waveguides. Phys. Rev. B, 89, 075136(2014).

    [88] H. Alaeian et al. Towards nanoscale multiplexing with parity-time-symmetric plasmonic coaxial waveguides. Phys. Rev. B, 93, 205439(2016).

    [89] W. Wang et al. Unidirectional excitation of radiative-loss-free surface plasmon polaritons in P T -symmetric systems. Phys. Rev. Lett., 119, 077401(2017).

    [90] L. Feng et al. Experimental demonstration of a unidirectional reflectionless parity-time metamaterial at optical frequencies. Nat. Mater., 12, 108(2013).

    [91] Y. Xu et al. Subwavelength control of light transport at the exceptional point by non-Hermitian metagratings. Sci. Adv., 9, eadf3510(2023).

    [92] D. Neshev, I. Aharonovich. Optical metasurfaces: new generation building blocks for multi-functional optics. Light Sci. Appl., 7, 58(2018).

    [93] S. Sun et al. Gradient-index meta-surfaces as a bridge linking propagating waves and surface waves. Nat. Mater., 11, 426(2012).

    [94] M. Khorasaninejad et al. Metalenses at visible wavelengths: diffraction-limited focusing and subwavelength resolution imaging. Science, 352, 1190(2016).

    [95] S. Dong et al. Highly efficient wave-front reshaping of surface waves with dielectric metawalls. Phys. Rev. Appl., 9, 014032(2018).

    [96] S. Dong et al. On-chip trans-dimensional plasmonic router. Nanophotonics, 9, 3357(2020).

    [97] S. Li et al. Helicity-delinked manipulations on surface waves and propagating waves by metasurfaces. Nanophotonics, 9, 3473(2020).

    [98] S. Sun et al. Electromagnetic metasurfaces: physics and applications. Adv. Opt. Photonics, 11, 380(2019).

    [99] L. Li et al. Intelligent metasurfaces: control, communication and computing. Elight, 2, 1(2022).

    [100] F. Guan et al. Overcoming losses in superlenses with synthetic waves of complex frequency. Science, 381, 6659(2023).

    [101] S. Dong et al. Optically transparent meta-window for satellite signal reception. Opt. Laser Technol., 176, 110949(2024).

    [102] K. Xue et al. Transmissive reconfigurable metasurface enabling independent control of active and passive modules through weak coupling. Photon. Res., 7, 1449(2024).

    [103] M. Kang, J. Chen, Y. D. Chong. Chiral exceptional points in metasurfaces. Phys. Rev. A, 94, 033834(2016).

    [104] J. Yang et al. Conceptual radar trap model realized via polarization conversion metasurface. Opt. Express, 30, 1936(2022).

    [105] M. Lawrence et al. Manifestation of P T Symmetry breaking in polarization space with Terahertz metasurfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett., 113, 093901(2014).

    [106] S. H. Park et al. Observation of an exceptional point in a non-Hermitian metasurface. Nanophotonics, 9, 1031(2020).

    [107] D. Wang et al. Superconductive PT-symmetry phase transition in metasurfaces. Appl. Phys. Lett., 110, 021104(2017).

    [108] Q. Song et al. Plasmonic topological metasurface by encircling an exceptional point. Science, 373, 1133(2021).

    [109] G. Cao et al. Polarization-insensitive unidirectional meta-retroreflector. Opt. Laser Technol., 156, 108497(2022).

    [110] J. Mai et al. Double exceptional points in grating coupled metal-insulator-metal heterostructure. Opt. Express, 30, 40053(2022).

    [111] S. Li et al. Exceptional point in a metal-graphene hybrid metasurface with tunable asymmetric loss. Opt. Express, 28, 20083(2020).

    [112] Q. Liu et al. Exceptional points in Fano-resonant graphene metamaterials. Opt. Express, 25, 7203(2017).

    [113] M. Kang, W. Zhu, I. D. Rukhlenko. Experimental observation of the topological structure of exceptional points in an ultrathin hybridized metamaterial. Phys. Rev. A, 96, 063823(2017).

    [114] X. Wang et al. Extreme asymmetry in metasurfaces via evanescent fields engineering: angular-asymmetric absorption. Phys. Rev. Lett., 121, 256802(2018).

    [115] N. S. Nye et al. Flexible PT -symmetric optical metasurfaces. Phys. Rev. Appl., 13, 064005(2020).

    [116] Z. Li et al. Parity-time symmetry transition and exceptional points in terahertz metal–graphene hybrid metasurface with switchable transmission and reflection characteristics. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 25, 6510(2023).

    [117] X. Gu et al. Unidirectional reflectionless propagation in a non-ideal parity-time metasurface based on far field coupling. Opt. Express, 25, 11778(2017).

    [118] Y. Li et al. Bifunctional sensing based on an exceptional point with bilayer metasurfaces. Opt. Express, 31, 492(2023).

    [119] C. Zeng et al. Enhanced sensitivity at high-order exceptional points in a passive wireless sensing system. Opt. Express, 27, 27562(2019).

    [120] B. Jin et al. High-performance Terahertz sensing at exceptional points in a bilayer structure. Adv. Theory Simul., 1, 1800070(2018).

    [121] Y. Zhao, A. Alù. Manipulating light polarization with ultrathin plasmonic metasurfaces. Phys. Rev. B, 84, 205428(2011).

    [122] X. Wu et al. Study of a high-index dielectric non-hermitian metasurface and its application in holograms. ACS Omega, 7, 44743(2022).

    [123] C. A. Valagiannopoulos, F. Monticone, A. Alù. PT-symmetric planar devices for field transformation and imaging. J. Opt., 18, 044028(2016).

    [124] R. Fleury, D. L. Sounas, A. Alù. Negative refraction and planar focusing based on parity-time symmetric metasurfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett., 113, 023903(2014).

    [125] C. F. Doiron, G. V. Naik. Non-Hermitian selective thermal emitters using metal–semiconductor hybrid resonators. Adv. Mater., 31, 1904154(2019).

    [126] B. Zhao, L.-S. Sun, J. Chen. Hybrid parity-time modulation phase and geometric phase in metasurfaces. Opt. Express, 28, 28896(2020).

    [127] X. Huang et al. Non-Hermitian skin effect and nonreciprocity induced by dissipative couplings. Phys. Rev. A, 109, L021503(2024).

    [128] X. Zhang et al. A review on non-Hermitian skin effect. Adv. Phys. X, 7, 2109431(2022).

    [129] E. L. Pereira et al. Non-Hermitian topology and criticality in photonic arrays with engineered losses. Phys. Rev. Res., 6, 023004(2024).

    [130] K. Ding, C. Fang, G. Ma. Non-Hermitian topology and exceptional-point geometries. Nat. Rev. Phys., 4, 745(2022).

    [131] C. Chen, L. Jin, R.-B. Liu. Sensitivity of parameter estimation near the exceptional point of a non-Hermitian system. New J. Phys., 21, 083002(2019).

    [132] H. Loughlin, V. Sudhir. Exceptional-point sensors offer no fundamental signal-to-noise ratio enhancement. Phys. Rev. Lett., 132, 243601(2024).

    [133] W. Langbein. No exceptional precision of exceptional-point sensors. Phys. Rev. A, 98, 023805(2018).

    [134] J. Naikoo, R. W. Chhajlany, J. Kołodyński. multiparameter estimation perspective on Non-Hermitian singularity-enhanced sensing. Phys. Rev. Lett., 131, 220801(2023).

    [135] C. Wolff, C. Tserkezis, N. A. Mortensen. On the time evolution at a fluctuating exceptional point. Nanophotonics, 8, 1319(2019).

    [136] H. Zhao et al. Non-Hermitian topological light steering. Science, 365, 1163(2019).

    [137] H. Hodaei et al. Enhanced sensitivity at higher-order exceptional points. Nature, 548, 187(2017).

    [138] M. Y. Nada, M. A. K. Othman, F. Capolino. Theory of coupled resonator optical waveguides exhibiting high-order exceptional points of degeneracy. Phys. Rev. B, 96, 184304(2017).

    [139] Y. Wu et al. High-order exceptional point based optical sensor. Opt. Express, 29, 6080(2021).

    [140] X. Zhou et al. Higher-order singularities in phase-tracked electromechanical oscillators. Nat. Commun., 14, 7944(2023).

    [141] C. Zeng et al. Ultra-sensitive passive wireless sensor exploiting high-order exceptional point for weakly coupling detection. New J. Phys., 23, 063008(2021).

    [142] H. Yang et al. Scalable higher-order exceptional surface with passive resonators. Opt. Lett., 46, 4025(2021).

    [143] S. Jiang et al. Experimental realization of exceptional surfaces enhanced displacement sensing with robustness. Appl. Phys. Lett., 123, 201106(2023).

    [144] M. De Carlo et al. Design of a trap-assisted exceptional-surface- enhanced silicon-on-insulator particle sensor. J. Lightw. Technol., 40, 6021(2022).

    [145] D. D. Smith et al. Beyond the Petermann limit: can exceptional points increase sensor precision?(2021).

    [146] Y. Zhang et al. Reconfigurable exceptional point-based sensing with 0.001λ sensitivity using spoof localized surface plasmons. Adv. Photon. Nexus, 3, 056004(2024).

    [147] Z. Liao et al. Microwave plasmonic exceptional points for enhanced sensing. Laser Photonics Rev., 17, 2300276(2023).

    [148] T. S. Bai et al. Exceptional point in a microwave plasmonic dipole resonator for sub-microliter solution sensing. Adv. Funct. Mater., 34, 2312170(2024).

    [149] A. K. Chatterjee, S. Takada, H. Hayakawa. Multiple quantum Mpemba effect: exceptional points and oscillations. Phys. Rev. A, 110, 022213(2024).

    [150] J. Zhang et al. Observation of quantum strong Mpemba effect. Nat. Commun., 16, 301(2025).

    [151] W.-C. Wang et al. Observation of PT-symmetric quantum coherence in a single ion system. Phys. Rev. A, 103, L020201(2021).

    Shaohua Dong, Heng Wei, Zhipeng Li, Guangtao Cao, Kun Xue, Yang Chen, Cheng-Wei Qiu, "Exceptional-point optics with loss engineering," Photon. Insights 4, R02 (2025)
    Download Citation