
- Opto-Electronic Advances
- Vol. 4, Issue 8, 210031-1 (2021)
Abstract
Introduction
Photoluminescence (PL), emission of light from materials, have been widely used for numerous applications ranging from imaging of biological specimen to lasers. Light emitters can take various forms in different material, e.g., fluorescent molecules, quantum dots (QDs), or nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond
In this review, we focus on the enhancement of PL by a class of metamaterials, named hyperbolic metamaterials (HMMs), which are also referred to as an indefinite media, and hyperbolic metasurfaces (HMSs)
A. Broadband hyperbolic region.
B. Tunability of hyperbolic region.
C. Directionality by highly anisotropic nature of HMM.
Regarding (A) point above, the hyperbolic region is extremely broad and extends from certain cut-off wavelength and beyond, starting from visible wavelengths to near-infrared
Apart from the underlined unique nature of HMMs, we discuss the control of PL in terms of (1) intensity enhancement, (2) lifetime reduction, (3) spectral region, (4) directivity, and (5) lasing. Different configurations of HMMs have been studied for the enhancement of photoluminescence from fluorescence dyes, quantum dots, perovskites and nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond. In order to describe these features, this review is organized as in the following. We start with introduction of hyperbolic metamaterials and describe their dispersion in wavevector space, which can be categorized as type I and II hyperbolic regions or HMMs. We also overview each type of HMM structures, such as metal-dielectric multilayers, trenches which is the vertical version of metal-dielectric multilayers, and nanowires. These are the basic building blocks of HMMs. Out-coupling of enhanced PL emission from metal-dielectric multilayer type HMM is difficult since emitted light is trapped within HMM. Therefore, often, grating out-couplers are integrated into HMM structures and we cover various types of grating out-couplers built on HMMs. As a special case of HMMs, we show PL enhancement by epsilon-near-zero (ENZ) materials. Finally, we discuss the active HMMs with gain media to compensate the absorptive loss of the structures. Throughout the article, we confine ourselves to the light wavelengths ranging from UV to near-infrared, λ = 290 – 1000 nm.
Hyperbolic metamaterials
In the case of uniaxial anisotropic medium, a relative permittivity tensor [ε] is expressed by
where εx = εy = εo, and εz = εe, εo and εe are ordinary and extraordinary permittivities, respectively. When εo = εe > 0, the medium is an isotropic dielectric, while when εo = εe < 0 – it is an isotropic plasmonic material, for example metal. A HMM or hyperbolic material is a medium when the permittivity components along the principle axes have opposite signs, namely εoεe < 0, and the iso-frequency surface of extraordinary waves given by equation
becomes a hyperboloid, where kx, ky, kz are the wavevector components, ω is the angular frequency and c is the speed of light in vacuum. There are two types of hyperboloid as shown in Fig. 1, which are conventionally classified as: 1) type I HMM: εo > 0 and εe < 0, and 2) type II HMM: εo < 0 and εe > 0.
Figure 1.
In the case of type I HMM, the dispersion band forms a two-fold hyperboloid in the wavevector space (k-space)
Materials with hyperbolic iso-frequency contours support propagation of lightwaves with large wavevectors (high-k waves) and correspondingly short effective wavelengths. However, for certain directions in the k-space, there are no any wavevectors available, and, therefore, propagation of light in such direction is prohibited. The high-k lightwaves within HMMs are called bulk plasmon polaritons, BPPs (sometimes also called as volume plasmon-polaritons), as well as hyperbolic surface waves (sometimes referred to as Dyakonov plasmons) that are supported on the top surface of HMMs
Metal-dielectric multilayers
Metal-dielectric multilayer HMMs have been studied and realized extensively due to the relative ease of fabrication. Their layer thicknesses should be sufficiently smaller than the wavelength of light that they can be characterized by effective parameters, i.e. effective permittivity tensor. By design of a metamaterial (i.e. choosing materials, thicknesses of each layer, filling fraction), the effective dielectric functions or permittivities can be tuned to hyperbolic iso-frequency surface in the wavelength region of interest (see Fig. 1). So, to characterize the optical properties of a HMM, the first step is to find its effective permittivities, and the simplest approach is based on the effective medium approximation (EMA)
where εm, εd, fm, and fd are the permittivities of the metal and dielectric, and filling factors of metal, and dielectric layers in the multilayer structure, respectively. The light emitters placed into the near-field of optical modes supported by HMMs release their energy predominantly via radiative emission and excitation of plasmonic modes and other non-radiative channels, where usually plasmonic modes dominate as the decay channel.
The first experimental evidence of fluorescence enhancement was demonstrated on a multilayer HMM that consist of 16 stacked layers of gold (Au, 19 nm) and alumina (Al2O3, 19 nm) with a 21-nm thick epoxy with dispersed rhodamine 800 (Rh800)
Apart from Ag layers, Au has been extensively used as the constituent of multilayer HMM structures. HMMs that consist of 16 stacked layers of gold (Au) and alumina (Al2O3) on a glass substrate with a 21-nm dye thin film of epoxy mixed with rhodamine 800 (Rh800) at a 100 µM concentration spin coated on top of the spacer layer were realized for fluorescence enhancement
Enhancement of photoluminescence from colloidal core-shell QDs of cadmium selenide and zinc sulfide (CdSe/ZnS) in proximity with a multilayer HMM was demonstrated
Figure 2.
Directional PL enhancement of dyes on multilayer HMMs was studied for the sample consisting of 20 alternating layers (10 periods) of Au (15 nm thick) and Al2O3 (28 nm thick)
Upper-excited state emission from molecules is not usually observed owing to strong competition with much faster nonradiative relaxation pathways. However, the radiative decay rate can be increased by modifying the PDOS. Zinc tetraphenylporphyrin (ZnTPP) molecules as emitters embedded in a HMM were shown to enable a 18-fold increase in fluorescence intensity from the second singlet excited state relative to that from the lowest singlet excited state
Spin-coated organic thin films based on the quinoidal oligothiophene derivative (QQT(CN)4) were demonstrated to exhibit hyperbolic dispersion over a wide spectral range from 670 to 920 nm
It is well-known that the effective medium theory applied for characterization of dielectric multilayer system and HMMs can experience a breakdown, depending on the thickness of each layer, number of periods, etc.
Unlike conventional planar multilayer HMMs, HMMs with a curved surface demonstrated an efficient out-coupling of nonradiative modes due to the gradual tapering of HMMs thickness down to few nm. Such outcoupling leads to enhanced spontaneous emission
In order to enhance emission to far-field, metallic cylinder patch antennas can be integrated with HMM structures
Optical cavities or resonators made of dielectric materials can trap photons and support strong electric fields, however, the smallest size of such cavities is limited to the order of effective wavelengths of light, λ/n, where n is the refractive index of the dielectric. In case of HMMs with high-k (large mode refractive index) BPPs, the effective wavelength can be small and hence the size of cavities made of HMMs can be deeply subwavelength, much smaller than conventional dielectric cavities. Such confinement leads to smaller mode volumes and, hence, more intense electric fields in the nanocavities, resulting in the enhancement of the emission rate. An HMM nanocavity was initially demonstrated for 2 to 4 periods multilayers HMMs curved into pyramid shape
Figure 3.
Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) is the nonradiative transfer of excited state energy from one fluorophore (donor) to another fluorophore (acceptor) via a dipole−dipole coupling process
Apart from fluorescence dye, quantum dots, and NVCs, nanocrystals of lead halide perovskite, namely CsPbI3, were used as emitters placed on top of HMMs to study the enhancement of the Purcell factor
Most of multilayer HMMs are fabricated on a rigid planar substrate which cannot be bent. However, recently multilayer HMMs on flexible rollable paper substrate have been demonstrated
Emission of quantum dots can be strongly enhanced via coupling to aperiodic metal-dielectric multilayers. Two such cases are reported in literature
Another periodic multilayer arranged in a Tue-Morse (TM) sequence (8 layers ABBABAAB, where A and B represent Au and SiO2 layers with thicknesses of 20 and 80 nm, respectively) was compared with a periodic HMM (4 periods, 8 layers) with the same filling fraction
The summary of the following chapter is presented in Table 1. From the table, one can see materials used for both metal and dielectric layers, emitters, and enhancement factors. The metallic layers are mostly made of either Ag or Au and a wide variety of materials are used for the dielectric layers, such as silica (SiO2), alumina (Al2O3), titania (TiO2), polymers. The number of periods is in the range of 4 to 10. From the data presented in the table it follows that depending on the structure the fluorescence can be enhance from 1.3 to 200-fold.
HMM structures and materials | Emitters (emission peak wavelength) | Enhancement factor | References (year) |
Au(19 nm)/Al2O3(19 nm), 8 periods | Rhodamine 800 (715 nm) | 1.8-fold reduction of lifetime | ref. |
Ag(25 nm, 11 layers)/PMMA(30 nm, 10 layers); Ag(30 nm, 5 layers)/LiF(40 nm, 4 layers); Ag(30 nm)/LiF(40 nm) 8 periods, and Ag(20 nm)/MgF2(30 nm) 8 periods | IR-140 dye (850 nm) | 1.4 for Ag/LiF; 5.7 for Ag/PMMA | ref. |
Au(19 nm)/Al2O3(19 nm), 8 periods | Rhodamine 800 (720 nm) | 9.3 | ref. |
Ag(9 nm)/TiO2(22 nm), 10 periods | CdSe/ZnS colloidal QDs (630 nm) | 3 | ref. |
Au(15 nm)/Al2O3(28 nm), 10 periods | Coumarin 500 (480 nm) | 2 | ref. |
Au(19 nm)/Al2O3(19 nm), 8 periods | NVC (637 nm) | 2.57 | ref. |
Au nanoparticles (15 nm)/CdTe QDs (5.5 nm), separated by dielectric (PDDA/PPS) spacers with varied thickness (0–10 nm), 2–5 periods | CdTe QDs (590 nm) | 4.4 | ref. |
TiN(8.5 nm)/Al0.7Sc0.3N(6.3 nm),10 periods | NVC (600–800 nm) | 4.7 max Purcell factor | ref. |
TiN(15 nm)/SiO2(15 nm), 5 periods | 20 nm thick Si QDs (720 nm) | 1.6 | ref. |
Ag(25 nm) 7 layers /MgF2(35 nm) 6 layers | HITC dye-doped polymeric film
| 7 | ref. |
Ag(10 nm)/TiO2(30 nm), 10 periods | Rhodamine 6G (R6G, 540–600 nm) | 80-fold intensity enhancement | ref. |
Au(26.87–37.31%)/poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA), 4 periods | R6G dye (540–600 nm) | 1.55 for HMM1, 1.18 for HMM2 | ref. |
Ag(22 nm)/MoO3(10 nm) 6 periods, HMM;
| ZnO nanoparticles (395 nm) | Lasing threshold 20% less and 6 times emission intensity | ref. |
Al(20 nm)/MgF2(20 nm), 4 periods | 15-nm thick AlGaN MQWs (318 nm) | 160-fold emission rate | ref. |
Au(30 nm)/ZnS(30 nm) 5 periods, with cylindrical gold patch antenna | SiC (900 nm) | Purcell factor of 400 at 850 nm. (Theory) | ref. |
Ag(25 nm)/PMMA(30 nm), 5 periods | Zinc tetraphenylporphyrin (ZnTPP), S1 (580–670 nm), S2 (400–460 nm) | 18-fold increase in fluorescence intensity from S2 state to S1. | ref. |
320 nm thick HMM of Ag/ITO with unit cell thickness from 20 to 80 nm | CdSe/ZnS QDs (550 nm) | 40-fold intensity enhancement | ref. |
Quinoidal oligothiophene derivative
| Styryl9M dye (680–850 nm) | 1.3-1.4 Purcell factor | ref. |
Ag(24 nm)/TiO2(30 nm) 5, 9, 13, and 17 layers with cylindrical Ag antenna | CdSeS/ZnS QDs (660 nm) | 200-fold enhancement for 5-layered HMM | ref. |
Au(15 nm)/SiO2(25 nm) 3, 5, and 8 periods | Emitter (600–1600 nm) | 60–85 (Theory) | ref. |
Ag(16 nm)/Al2O3(24 nm), 3 periods | WS2 monolayer (615 nm) | 30-fold enhancement of the overall PL intensity | ref. |
Ag(25 nm)/LiF(35 nm) and Ag(40 nm)/LiF(40 nm), 6 or 8 periods | CsPbI3 Perovskite nanocrystals (520 nm) | 3-fold Purcell enhancement | ref. |
Au(10 nm)/ Al2O3(10 nm), 2–7 periods | BA2Cs3MA3Pb7Br2I20 Perovskite film (700 nm) | 1.6-3-fold Purcell enhancement depending on number of periods | ref. |
Ag(25 nm)/PMMA(40 nm) and Ag(25 nm)/PMMA(30 nm), 4 periods on paper | MAPbBr3 perovskite nanocrystals (520–550 nm) | 3.5-fold intensity enhancement | ref. |
Aperiodic Ag (20 nm, 6 layers)/SiO2(20 nm, 6 layers) in Fibonacci sequence | Colloidal CdSe/ZnS QDs (640 nm) | 1.6 than Ag layer, 1.35 than periodic material | ref. |
Aperiodic Ag(20 nm, 8 layers)/SiO2(80 nm, 8 layers) in Tue-Morse (TM) sequence | Colloidal CdSe/ZnS QDs (640 nm) | 1.45 than glass substrate | ref. |
Table 1. Summary of photoluminescence enhancement by multilayer HMM structures. Unless noted, emitters are located on the top surface of HMM structures and the works are experimental.
Plasmonic trench structures
Apart from a conventional configuration of horizontal metal and dielectric layers, a HMM can be realized with vertically standing layers (Fig. 4). Such deep subwavelength plasmonic gratings can be characterized as hyperbolic metasurfaces (HMS)
Figure 4.
Recently, a hyperbolic metasurface made of a metal-halide perovskite gain medium infiltrated between Au trenches was realized
Nanorod and nanowire structures
In the case of HMMs consisting of metal nanorods or nanowires with diameters and periods sufficiently smaller than that of operating wavelengths, the effective ordinary and extraordinary permittivities of the metamaterial are expressed by
where εm, εd and fm, fd are the permittivities and volume fractions of metal nanowires and dielectric matrix, respectively.
One of the earliest works on PL enhancement by a HMM was conducted with an array of Ag nanowires in Al2O3 matrix
Another approach to fabricate nanorod based HMMs was realized with using ion-etching of electrochemically grown Au nanorods, which provides closely packed structures with well-defined and smooth nanocones (cone base 40−60 nm, cone apex 2 nm, nanocone density 1010 cm−2)
Figure 5.
In the specific case of phosphorescence, which is a second-order quantum process, emitters typically exhibit lifetimes in the range of milliseconds to seconds, orders of magnitude longer than the common nanosecond lifetimes of fluorescent dyes. This comes from the forbidden nature of the transitions involved in the emission process, including transitions between states of different spin multiplicities such as singlet−triplet transitions. The decay rate enhancement of a singlet−triplet transition was investigated for a long lifetime phosphorescent ruthenium-based complex (Ru(dpp)) inside a gold-nanorod-based hyperbolic metamaterial
The summary of plasmonic nanowire-based HMM structures is given in Table 2. It has been demonstrated that these structures can be used to enhance photoluminescence by more than 30 times. Nanowires are made of either gold or silver with diameters of 38 to 60 nm, periods of 100 to 250 nm, and heights of 150 nm to 250 nm. The enhancement factors range from 40 to 105. In addition, nanorods HMMs improve the FRET effectiveness and allow forbidden transitions such as a singlet–triplet transitions in a long lifetime phosphorescent ruthenium-based complex.
HMM structures and materials | Emitters (emission peak wavelength) | Enhancement factor | References (year) |
Ag nanowires, 35 nm diameter, 15% volume fraction in Al2O3 host | IR-140 laser dye (892 nm) | 6-fold reduction of lifetime | ref. |
Au nanorods, 38 nm diameter, 150 nm height, and 80 nm pitch. | LD700 dye (700 nm) | 50 | ref. |
Au nanorods, 40 and 25 nm diameter, 250 nm height, and surface densities of 35% and 14% | PVA embedded with R101 dye
| 4.6 | ref. |
Silver nanowire-alumina HMM (filling fractions f=0.15 and 0.2) | CdSe QDs of diameters 5 nm and 6.5 nm (580 and 670 nm) | 2−3 for thef = 0.15 against
| ref. |
Au nanorod, 50 nm diameter, 100 nm pitch, and 250 nm height | D1 (fluorescein, 514 nm), D2 (Alexa 514, 550 nm), D3 (ATTO 550, 575 nm) and D4 (ATTO 647N, 670 nm) | 30 | ref. |
Au nanorod, 50 nm diameter, 260 nm height, 100 nm inter-rod spacing | ATTO 550 and ATTO 647N dyes (554 nm) | 13 FRET rate | ref. |
Au nanorod, 50 nm diameter, 250 nm height, 100 nm inter-rod spacing | Ruthnium-based phosphorescent complex (Ru(dpp), 620 nm) | 2750 (Theory) | ref. |
Au nanorod (60 nm diameter and 110, 160, and 240 nm lengths), nanocone (cone base ~40–60 nm, cone apex < 2 nm), nanopenscil (60 nm base diameter and 10 nm at the top) | None | 40, 60 at 596 nm, and 105 at 660 nm of the field enhancement | ref. |
Table 2. Summary of photoluminescence enhancement by plasmonic nanowire HMM structures. Unless noted, emitters are located on the top surface of HMM structures and the works are experimental.
Grating out-coupler on HMM
There are various works on combining a grating on top or inside multilayer and nanowire HMMs. The role of the grating is to out-couple photoluminescence enhanced inside of HMM to far-field since there is a pronounced momentum mismatch between the HMM modes and lightwaves in ambient space, i.e. air superstrate and substrate. A line (1D) grating with pitch P provides the parallel wave vector of
where n is the refractive index of the ambient medium, usually air (n = 1) and φ is the incident angle. When Ng equals the effective mode index of BPP modes, emission is straightforwardly out-coupled from the HMMs. The gratings couplers studied here are 1D line grating, 2D gratings made of square lattice or hexagonal lattice of air hole arrays, and circular grating, also known as “bullseye” gratings.
1D (line) grating out-coupler
The spontaneous emission rate of a dye molecule embedded in a polymeric matrix can be greatly enhanced by a nanostructured HMM composed of alternating multilayers of Ag and Si
Figure 6.
To demonstrate the Purcell effect of a pristine and patterned HMMs, Fig. 7(a, b), time-resolved photoluminescence decay measurements of QDs on a Ag-SiO2 multilayer stack and glass substrate (control case) were conducted. Characterization of CdSe/ZnS QDs spontaneous emission rate was performed in a broad wavelength range from 570 to 680 nm. Such broad band was used to ensure probing the Purcell effect of QD emission in elliptical, ENZ, and hyperbolic regions of the multilayer metamaterial nanostructures
Figure 7.
In addition, one-dimensional HMMs lattices were actively used for so-called “trapped rainbow” as a storage of electromagnetic waves. By changing the parameters of the plasmonic grating, trapping could be achieved for different wavelengths in a wide spectral range
Square or hexagonal lattice grating out-coupler
By using a square lattice of air holes as a grating coupler on multilayer HMMs, the large spontaneous emission rate enhancement of an organic dye was demonstrated as illustrated in Fig. 7(c, d)
As a follow-up work to further enhance emission, dye molecules were not deposited on top of the HMM, but directly embedded inside its volume, so that the emitters can interact more effectively with the BPP modes
Broadband enhancement of spontaneous emission from two-dimensional semiconductors was demonstrated for molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) and tungsten disulfide (WS2) by placing the monolayers on a multilayer HMM with a grating coupler in hexagonal arrangement
A multilayer HMM with a hexagonal array of built-in air holes was realized in order to extract enhanced emission from quantum dots embedded in the HMM as shown in Fig. 7(e, f)
Circular (bullseye) grating out-coupler
A circular or bullseye grating is composed of concentric circular gratings with certain periods, so that the out-coupling of optical modes is achieved for every direction in the plane, where the grating is placed. The circular gratings have been employed for efficient out-coupling of enhanced photoluminescence from HMM structures too. The multilayer Ag/TiO2 structure with a bullseye grating on top was theoretically studied
In another study, bullseye gratings with various pitches were created on top of a multilayer HMM made of Al2O3 (20 nm) and Ag (12 nm) layers with a thin (1−2 nm) germanium (Ge) adhesion layer between them
A bullseye grating on a metal nanowire HMM was also studied theoretically
The summary of grating out-couplers performance is given in Table 3.
HMM structures and materials | Emitters (emission peak wavelength) | Enhancement factor | References (year) |
1D grating (P=200 nm) on Ag(9 nm)/Si (10 nm), 15 period | R6G dye (600 nm) | 80 | ref. |
1D grating (P=300 nm) on Ag(12 nm)/SiO2(83 nm), 4 period | CdSe/ZnS QDs
| 6 | ref. |
1D grating (P=200 nm) on Ag(10 nm, 10 layer)/
| Dipole emitters (582 nm) | 120 (Theory) | ref. |
Square lattice grating (P=500 nm) on Ag(12 nm)/Al2O3(23 nm),
| Coumarin 500 (510 nm) | 18 | ref. |
Dye molecules embedded grating-coupled HMM (GC-DEHMM) (P=500 nm and hole radius 100 nm) on
| DCM dye (580 nm) | 35 for the GC-DEHMM, 17 GC-DEHMM with respect to the DEHMM | ref. |
Hypercrystal, hexagonal lattice grating (P=280 nm and hole radius 100 nm) on Ag(20 nm)/Al2O3(20 nm) | MoS2 (660 nm) WS2 | 56 times enhancement for WS2, 60 times for MoS2 | ref. |
Hypercrystal, hexagonal lattice grating (P=280–300 nm) on Ag(15 nm)/Al2O3(15 nm) multilayer, 7 period | CdSe/ZnS QDs (630 nm) | 20 times | ref. |
Bullseye grating (P=400 nm) on multilayer HMM Ag
| Emitter (800 nm) | 6 far-field Purcel factor (Theory) | ref. |
Bullseye grating (P=250–600 nm) on Ag(12 nm)/Al2O3(20 nm) multilayer | CdSe/ZnS quantum dots (630 nm) | 20 | ref. |
Si bullseye grating (P=600 nm) on Au nanowire (44 nm pitch) in PMMA HMM (100 nm thickness) | Dye (850 nm) | 18 (Theory) | ref. |
Table 3. Summary of photoluminescence enhancement by grating out-coupler on HMM structures. Unless noted, emitters are located on the top surface of HMM structures and the works are experimental. Here P is the pitch or lattice constant of the grating out-coupler.
Epsilon-near-zero (ENZ) materials
An epsilon-near-zero (ENZ) material is an optical material whose relative permittivity (dielectric function) becomes near zero (ε ~ 0) for a certain wavelength range
Planar plasmonic multilayers as illustrated in Fig. 8(a, b) were designed to exhibit single ENZ (permittivity becomes near zero) and double ENZ behavior (both permittivity and permeability simultaneously become near zero)
Figure 8.
Active HMMs
As shown above, layered metal-dielectric HMMs support a wide variety of surface and BPP modes with high modal confinement inside the multilayer. Far-field radiation can excite only a subset of these polaritonic modes, typically with a limited energy and momentum range in respect to the wide set of large wave vectors (high-k modes) of BPP modes supported by hyperbolic dispersion media. Localization of light emitters (dye molecules, quantum dots, and nanodiamonds with color centers) in the HMMs’ bulk makes it possible to excite many BPP modes directly. The relaxation of the excitation of these modes, accompanied by radiation, provides tools for creating light sources with a controlled spectral composition determined by the resonance properties of the HMMs.
Of particular practical interest is the creation of light sources characterized by a spectrally narrow emission, since the high spectral brightness realized in such sources is fundamentally important in molecular spectroscopy and related sensing with a sensitivity at the level of single molecules
Figure 9 shows two typical schemes for creating an active HMM: with dye molecules located on top of the HMM (Fig. 9(a)) and dye molecules located in each dielectric layer of the HMM (Fig. 9(b)). The first scheme is simpler in experimental implementation, while the second one provides the highest saturation of the BPP modes volume by dye molecules. The energy levels of the dye molecules that provide gain can be approximated by a four-level model as sketched in Fig. 9(c). Pumping of the dye and population inversion involves the excitation of electrons from the fundamental level to the excited state (blue arrow in Fig. 9(c)). The electrons relax through fast non-radiative processes (green arrows in Fig. 9(c)) and spontaneous and stimulated light emission occurs via the optically active transition from E3 to E4 providing gain (red arrow in Fig. 9(b)). The choice of the four-level system for active layer is important to get great population inversion (population of E3 energy level compared to E4 level) and hence high gain. To obtain a physical pattern of a system presented in Fig. 9, full quantum analysis of coupled electronic-vibronic system is required, involving understanding of the absorption, emission, and plasmon tunings, together with phonon and relaxation pathways, while also exploring the effect of the tight plasmonic confinement on the molecular relaxation. Although there have been some recent progress in developing models
Figure 9.
Arrangement of emitters in the field of an optical cavity can modify the spontaneous emission rate leading to the reduced lifetime and altered far-field emission pattern
To commit optical pumping and light-injection into hyperbolic modes the dye-molecules energy levels should match BPP bands. HMMs have distinct plasmonic bands, the lower ones providing the propagation of extremely high momentum waves and the upper ones lying partially inside the light cone. The absorption line of the dye should fall within the upper bands inside the light cone, while the emission line should reside in the lower bands. This particular arrangement allows for light emission into the hyperbolic modes, benefiting simultaneously from both strong field enhancement and large wavevectors. To describe weak and strong coupling scenarios in active HMMs, we will follow in the following discussion an analytical approach developed in an article
where Ωm and Ω12 are the complex frequencies of the selected optical mode and the excitonic transition (absorption or emission), whose negative imaginary parts are the modal damping rate γm and the linewidth of the transition (γa or γe), respectively. The off-diagonal coupling terms are determined as Am = ΩmΓ/2 and K12 = σ12/ε0, introducing the spatial overlap factor Γ of the plasmonic mode with the dielectric medium, and the cross-section σ12 of the excitonic transition under consideration.
Solving for the eigenfrequencies Ω± of the coupled system (8) defines the mode splitting within the semi-classical coupling model for two oscillators:
It is important to note that, with all other parameters determined, the only remaining parameters to fit are the frequency of the selected optical mode Ωm, and its spatial overlap factor Γ with the gain layers. Both parameters depend only on properties of the passive structure and are independent of the dye characteristics. The cross-section σ12 is related to the population levels via
where μ12 is the dipole matrix element, N1 and N2 are the density of atoms in the ground and excited states, respectively. For absorption transitions (where N2 < N1), Eq. (9) describes the usual transition from weak coupling to strong coupling, manifesting itself as vacuum Rabi splitting within the semi-classical framework. As the cross-section becomes negative for emission processes (N2 > N1), the term 4K12Am in the discriminant of Eq. (9) becomes negative, as well. For sufficiently large coupling, the sign flips, and the emission line produces a splitting behavior similar to the fork observed in PT - symmetry breaking scenarios. In the complete case of four-level dyes, coupling occurs simultaneously to both emission and absorption lines. Each line provides its own polarization that interacts with the amplitude of the optical mode. This results in a modified coupling model.
It is possible to distinguish two considered regimes (a weak coupling regime characterized by small distortions of the dispersion, and a strong coupling regime leading to Rabi splitting of modes) in light reflectance from a HMM sample. Note the weak or strong coupling regimes can be realized through the dye molecules – HMM modes overlapping factor Γ. Figure 10(a) shows the reflectance map of a finite structure presented at Fig. 9(b) formed by 10-unit cells (a single unit cell is marked by the orange dashed lines in the figure) via transfer-matrix calculations, with each reflectance maximum indicating a discrete plasmonic mode. For a small value of coupling a slight perturbation and smearing of the optical modes is observed around ωa = 0.313ωp (an indication of a weak coupling regime) when compared with the passive case.
Figure 10.
The dispersion is qualitatively changed in the strong coupling regime (Fig. 10(b)). In this case anti-crossings appear, and a gap opens in the reflectance map. This effect is particularly visible for the discrete system of modes in finite structures. In the figure, two such modes obtained with the use of the semiclassical model Eq. (9) are marked with the green and magenta curves. From Fig. 10(b) it is obvious that close to the crossing point of the optical mode and the excitonic line (ωm = ωa) the first term in the square root of Eq. (9) dominates. In the strong coupling regime the resonance linewidth of the optical mode and the exciton are smaller than the expected splitting, the square root becomes real and a gap opens. The width of this gap is the Rabi splitting energy
The full system presented by four-level dye molecules embedded in the dielectric medium of multilayer HMMs with impact of coupling on both absorption and emission was further studied in paper
Figure 11.
Recent studies show that the equal-frequency surface model suffers to describe the topology of entire bands for continuous HMMs. Better description can be found with use of a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian formed from Maxwell’s equations. Successful implementation of this approach helped to find two types of three-dimensional non-Hermitian triply degenerate points with complex linear dispersions and topological charges ±2 and 0 induced by chiral and gyromagnetic effects, paving the way for exploring topological phases in photonic continua and device implementations of topological HMMs
Only few experimental works are known in this field. The first observation of strong coupling of emitters with HMM was reported by Indukuri et al
Figure 12.
Stimulated emission of surface plasmons on top of metamaterials with hyperbolic dispersion as well as losses compensation were realized in a number of works. The very first experimental verification of stimulated emission of surface plasmons propagating on top of metal-dielectric multilayered HMMs coated with optically pumped dye-doped polymer for the wavelengths around 860 nm, as well as loss compensation was reported in ref.
The loss compensation and lasing action in metamaterials based on gold nanorod arrays coated with thin films of PVA embedded with R101 dye was demonstrated
The first successful attempt to demonstrate the integration of the HMM with random laser systems for enhancing stimulated emission and reducing lasing threshold was reported in ref.
In recent paper
This young direction of research is still in a rapid development. A number of successful results has been shown, however more research is anticipated in theory as well as in experiment. Deeper understanding the effect of light matter strong coupling for the case of HMMs cavities is of high demand, including the Raman scattering as well as statistics of corresponding emission
Conclusion
In this review, we have provided an overview of current progress in photoluminescence control on various types of HMMs and metasurfaces. Highly localized electric fields of high-k bulk plasmon polaritons enable large optical density of states and extreme anisotropy. The bandwidth of the hyperbolic region where high-k modes are supported is extremely broad for HMM, spreading from certain cut-off wavelength and beyond in contrast with Mie-resonance based dielectric nanostructures and metallic nanostructures whose resonance bandwidth is narrower. By the combination of constituent materials and structural parameters, HMMs can be designed to control PL in terms of enhancement, emission directivity, and statistics (single-photon emission, classical light, lasing) at any desired wavelength range in visible and near-infrared wavelength regions. Major building blocks of HMMs are metal-dielectric multilayer and metal nanowire structures that give two different types of hyperbolic region. Apart from these, more advanced structures with grating out-coupler embedded in HMM and cavity structures made out of HMM have been developed. While fabrication of HMM structures for visible to near-infrared wavelengths have been well-established, the control of light emission by HMMs can also be extended for other wavelength regime since HMM can be tailored for such longer wavelength region as mid-infrared wavelengths
References
[1] R Schirhagl, K Chang, M Loretz, CL Degen. Nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond: nanoscale sensors for physics and biology. Annu Rev Phys Chem, 65, 83-105(2014).
[2] A Kinkhabwala, ZF Yu, SH Fan, Y Avlasevich, K Müllen et al. Large single-molecule fluorescence enhancements produced by a bowtie nanoantenna. Nat Photonics, 3, 654-657(2009).
[3] M Bauch, K Toma, M Toma, QW Zhang, J Dostalek. Plasmon-enhanced fluorescence biosensors: a review. Plasmonics, 9, 781-799(2014).
[4] JF Li, CY Li, RF Aroca. Plasmon-enhanced fluorescence spectroscopy. Chem Soc Rev, 46, 3962-3979(2017).
[5] Y Jeong, YM Kook, K Lee, WG Koh. Metal enhanced fluorescence (MEF) for biosensors: general approaches and a review of recent developments. Biosens Bioelectron, 111, 102-116(2018).
[6] SL Zhang, LW Liu, S Ren, ZL Li, YH Zhao et al. Recent advances in nonlinear optics for bio-imaging applications. Opto-Electron Adv, 3, 200003(2020).
[7] A Sultangaziyev, R Bukasov. Review: applications of surface-enhanced fluorescence (SEF) spectroscopy in bio-detection and biosensing. Sens Bio-Sens Res, 30, 100382(2020).
[8] C Joyce, SM Fothergill, F Xie. Recent advances in gold-based metal enhanced fluorescence platforms for diagnosis and imaging in the near-infrared. Mater Today Adv, 7, 100073(2020).
[9] CJ Zhang, CY Zhang, ZL Zhang, T He, XH Mi et al. Self-suspended rare-earth doped up-conversion luminescent waveguide: propa-gating and directional radiation. Opto-Electron Adv, 3, 190045(2020).
[10] Lee Ui, C Posner, JX Zhao, J Zhang, ZW Liu. Imaging of cell morphology changes via metamaterial-assisted photobleaching microscopy. Nano Lett, 21, 1716-1721(2021).
[11] M Heo, H Cho, JW Jung, JR Jeong, S Park et al. High-performance organic optoelectronic devices enhanced by surface plasmon resonance. Adv Mater, 23, 5689-5693(2011).
[12] ST Kochuveedu, DH Kim. Surface plasmon resonance mediated photoluminescence properties of nanostructured multicomponent fluorophore systems. Nanoscale, 6, 4966-4984(2014).
[13] FC Chien, CY Lin, G Abrigo. Enhancing the blinking fluorescence of single-molecule localization imaging by using a surface-plasmon-polariton-enhanced substrate. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 20, 27245-27255(2018).
[14] AG Curto, G Volpe, TH Taminiau, MP Kreuzer, R Quidant et al. Unidirectional emission of a quantum dot coupled to a nanoantenna. Science, 329, 930-933(2010).
[15] TH Taminiau, FD Stefani, Hulst van. Enhanced directional excitation and emission of single emitters by a nano-optical Yagi-Uda antenna. Opt Express, 6, 10858-10866(2008).
[16] MA Badshah, NY Koh, AW Zia, N Abbas, Z Zahra et al. Recent developments in plasmonic nanostructures for metal enhanced fluorescence-based biosensing. Nanomaterials, 10, 1749(2020).
[17] B Miranda, KY Chu, PL Maffettone, AQ Shen, R Funari. Metal-enhanced fluorescence immunosensor based on plasmonic arrays of gold nanoislands on an etched glass substrate. ACS Appl Nano Mater, 3, 10470-10478(2020).
[18] U Stella, L Boarino, Leo De, P Munzert, E Descrovi. Enhanced directional light emission assisted by resonant bloch surface waves in circular cavities. ACS Photonics, 6, 2073-2082(2019).
[19] K Toma, E Descrovi, M Toma, M Ballarini, P Mandracci et al. Bloch surface wave-enhanced fluorescence biosensor. Biosens Bioelectron, 43, 108-114(2013).
[20] KA Prusakov, DV Bagrov, DV Basmanov, SA Romanov, DV Klinov. Fluorescence imaging of cells using long-range electromagnetic surface waves for excitation. Appl Opt, 59, 4833-4838(2020).
[21] A Pokhriyal, M Lu, CS Huang, S Schulz, BT Cunningham. Multicolor fluorescence enhancement from a photonics crystal surface. Appl Phys Lett, 97, 121108(2010).
[22] A Pokhriyal, M Lu, V Chaudhery, S George, BT Cunningham. Enhanced fluorescence emission using a photonic crystal coupled to an optical cavity. Appl Phys Lett, 102, 221114(2013).
[23] CLEO: 2011 - Laser Applications to Photonic Applications CThQ1 (Optical Society of America, 2011); http://doi.org/10.1364/cleo_si.2011.cthq1.
[24] W Chen, KD Long, H Yu, YF Tan, JS Choi et al. Enhanced live cell imaging
[25] SHG Menon, Krishna Lal, V Raghunathan. Silicon nitride based medium contrast gratings for doubly resonant fluorescence enhancement. IEEE Photonics J, 11, 4500711(2019).
[26] S Boonruang, N Srisuai, R Charlermroj, M Makornwattana, A Somboonkaew et al. Excitation of multi-order guided mode resonance for multiple color fluorescence enhancement. Opt Laser Technol, 106, 410-416(2018).
[27] JH Lin, HY Liou, CD Wang, CY Tseng, CT Lee et al. Giant enhancement of upconversion fluorescence of NaYF4:Yb3+,Tm3+ nanocrystals with resonant waveguide grating substrate. ACS Photonics, 2, 530-536(2015).
[28] NV Hoang, A Pereira, HS Nguyen, E Drouard, B Moine et al. Giant enhancement of luminescence down-shifting by a doubly resonant rare-earth-doped photonic metastructure. ACS Photonics, 4, 1705-1712(2017).
[29] S Sun, L Wu, P Bai, CE Png. Fluorescence enhancement in visible light: dielectric or noble metal?. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 18, 19324-19335(2016).
[30] T Bucher, A Vaskin, R Mupparapu, FJF; Löchner et al. Tailoring photoluminescence from MoS2 monolayers by mie-resonant metasurfaces. ACS Photonics, 6, 1002-1009(2019).
[31] HJ Lin, Oliveira de, P Gredin, M Mortier, L Billot et al. Fluorescence enhancement near single TiO2 nanodisks. Appl Phys Lett, 111, 251109(2017).
[32] CL Cortes, W Newman, S Molesky, Z Jacob. Quantum nanophotonics using hyperbolic metamaterials. J Opt, 14, 063001(2012).
[33] P Shekhar, J Atkinson, Z Jacob. Hyperbolic metamaterials: fundamentals and applications. Nano Converg, 1, 14(2014).
[34] O Takayama, AV Lavrinenko. Optics with hyperbolic materials [Invited]. J Opt Soc Am B, 36, F38-F48(2019).
[35] JB Sun, NM Litchinitser, J Zhou. Indefinite by nature: from ultraviolet to terahertz. ACS Photonics, 1, 293-303(2014).
[36] K Korzeb, M Gajc, DA Pawlak. Compendium of natural hyperbolic materials. Opt Express, 23, 25406-25424(2015).
[37] EE Narimanov, AV Kildishev. Naturally hyperbolic. Nat Photonics, 9, 214-216(2015).
[38] L Ferrari, C Wu, D Lepage, X Zhang, ZW Liu. Hyperbolic metamaterials and their applications. Prog Quantum Electron, 40, 1-40(2015).
[39] L Lu, RE Simpson, SK Valiyaveedu. Active hyperbolic metamaterials: progress, materials and design. J Opt, 20, 103001(2018).
[40] JST Smalley, F Vallini, X Zhang, Y Fainman. Dynamically tunable and active hyperbolic metamaterials. Adv Opt Photonics, 10, 354-408(2018).
[41] DC Adams, S Inampudi, T Ribaudo, D Slocum, S Vangala et al. Funneling light through a subwavelength aperture with epsilon-near-zero materials. Phys Rev Lett, 107, 133901(2011).
[42] A Poddubny, I Iorsh, P Belov, Y Kivshar. Hyperbolic metamaterials. Nat Photonics, 7, 948-957(2013).
[43] AV Kabashin, P Evans, S Pastkovsky, W Hendren, GA Wurtz et al. Plasmonic nanorod metamaterials for biosensing. Nat Mater, 8, 867-871(2009).
[44] KV Sreekanth, Y Alapan, M Elkabbash, E Ilker, M Hinczewski et al. Extreme sensitivity biosensing platform based on hyperbolic metamaterials. Nat Mater, 15, 621-627(2016).
[45] E Shkondin, T Repän, MEA Panah, AV Lavrinenko, O Takayama. High aspect ratio plasmonic nanotrench structures with large active surface area for label-free mid-infrared molecular absorption sensing. ACS Appl Nano Mater, 1, 1212-1218(2018).
[46] D Lu, ZW Liu. Hyperlenses and metalenses for far-field super-resolution imaging. Nat Commun, 3, 1205(2012).
[47] Z Jacob, EE Narimanov. Optical hyperspace for plasmons: dyakonov states in metamaterials. Appl Phys Lett, 93, 221109(2008).
[48] AV Kildishev, A Boltasseva, VM Shalaev. Planar photonics with metasurfaces. Science, 339, 1232009(2013).
[49] AN Poddubny, PA Belov, YS Kivshar. Spontaneous radiation of a finite-size dipole emitter in hyperbolic media. Phys Rev A, 84, 023807(2011).
[50] O Kidwai, SV Zhukovsky, JE Sipe. Dipole radiation near hyperbolic metamaterials: applicability of effective-medium approximation. Opt Lett, 36, 2530-2532(2011).
[51] M Mahmoodi, SH Tavassoli, O Takayama, J Sukham, R Malureanu et al. Existence conditions of high-k modes in finite hyperbolic metamaterials. Laser Photonics Rev, 13, 1800253(2019).
[52] O Kidwai, SV Zhukovsky, JE Sipe. Effective-medium approach to planar multilayer hyperbolic metamaterials: strengths and limitations. Phys Rev A, 85, 053842(2012).
[53] J Sukham, O Takayama, M Mahmoodi, S Sychev, A Bogdanov et al. Investigation of effective media applicability for ultrathin multilayer structures. Nanoscale, 11, 12582-12588(2019).
[54] HNS Krishnamoorthy, Z Jacob, E Narimanov, I Kretzschmar, VM Menon. Topological transitions in metamaterials. Science, 336, 205-209(2012).
[55] O Takayama, E Shkondin, A Bodganov, MEA Panah, K Golenitskii et al. Midinfrared surface waves on a high aspect ratio nanotrench platform. ACS Photonics, 4, 2899-2907(2017).
[56] JST Smalley, F Vallini, SA Montoya, L Ferrari, S Shahin et al. Luminescent hyperbolic metasurfaces. Nat Commun, 8, 13793(2017).
[57] N Vasilantonakis, ME Nasir, W Dickson, GA Wurtz, AV Zayats. Bulk plasmon-polaritons in hyperbolic nanorod metamaterial waveguides. Laser Photonics Rev, 9, 345-353(2015).
[58] I Avrutsky, I Salakhutdinov, J Elser, V Podolskiy. Highly confined optical modes in nanoscale metal-dielectric multilayers. Phys Rev B, 75, 241402(2007).
[59] SV Zhukovsky, AA Orlov, VE Babicheva, AV Lavrinenko, JE Sipe. Photonic-band-gap engineering for volume plasmon polaritons in multiscale multilayer hyperbolic metamaterials. Phys Rev A, 90, 013801(2014).
[60] O Takayama, AA Bogdanov, AV Lavrinenko. Photonic surface waves on metamaterial interfaces. J Phys Condens Matter, 29, 463001(2017).
[61] M Higuchi, J Takahara. Plasmonic interpretation of bulk propagating waves in hyperbolic metamaterial optical waveguides. Opt Express, 26, 1918-1929(2018).
[62] SV Zhukovsky, O Kidwai, JE Sipe. Physical nature of volume plasmon polaritons in hyperbolic metamaterials. Opt Express, 21, 14982-14987(2013).
[63] AN Poddubny, PA Belov, P Ginzburg, AV Zayats, YS Kivshar. Microscopic model of purcell enhancement in hyperbolic metamaterials. Phys Rev B, 86, 035148(2012).
[64] AP Slobozhanyuk, P Ginzburg, DA Powell, I Iorsh, AS Shalin et al. Purcell effect in hyperbolic metamaterial resonators. Phys Rev B, 92, 195127(2015).
[65] SM Rytov. Electromagnetic properties of a finely stratified medium. Sov Phys JETP, 2, 466-475(1956).
[66] VM Agranovich. Dielectric permeability and influence of external fields on optical properties of superlattices. Solid State Commun, 78, 747-750(1991).
[67] Z Jacob, JY Kim, GV Naik, A Boltasseva, EE Narimanov et al. Engineering photonic density of states using metamaterials. Appl Phys B, 100, 215-218(2010).
[68] T Tumkur, G Zhu, P Black, YA Barnakov, CE Bonner et al. Control of spontaneous emission in a volume of functionalized hyperbolic metamaterial. Appl Phys Lett, 99, 151115(2011).
[69] J Kim, VP Drachev, Z Jacob, GV Naik, A Boltasseva et al. Improving the radiative decay rate for dye molecules with hyperbolic metamaterials. Opt Express, 20, 8100-8116(2012).
[70] KV Sreekanth, T Biaglow, G Strangi. Directional spontaneous emission enhancement in hyperbolic metamaterials. J Appl Phys, 114, 134306(2013).
[71] MY Shalaginov, S Ishii, J Liu, J Liu, J Irudayaraj et al. Broadband enhancement of spontaneous emission from nitrogen-vacancy centers in nanodiamonds by hyperbolic metamaterials. Appl Phys Lett, 102, 173114(2013).
[72] MY Shalaginov, VV Vorobyov, J Liu, M Ferrera, AV Akimov et al. Enhancement of single-photon emission from nitrogen-vacancy centers with TiN/(Al,Sc)N hyperbolic metamaterial. Laser Photonics Rev, 9, 120-127(2015).
[73] Y Wang, H Sugimoto, S Inampudi, A Capretti, M Fujii et al. Broadband enhancement of local density of states using silicon-compatible hyperbolic metamaterials. Appl Phys Lett, 106, 241105(2015).
[74] T Ozel, S Nizamoglu, MA Sefunc, O Samarskaya, IO Ozel et al. Anisotropic emission from multilayered plasmon resonator nanocomposites of isotropic semiconductor quantum dots. ACS Nano, 5, 1328-1334(2011).
[75] SV Zhukovsky, T Ozel, E Mutlugun, N Gaponik, A Eychmuller et al. Hyperbolic metamaterials based on quantum-dot plasmon-resonator nanocomposites. Opt Express, 22, 18290-18298(2014).
[76] HI Lin, KC Shen, YM Liao, YH Li, P Perumal et al. Integration of nanoscale light emitters and hyperbolic metamaterials: an efficient platform for the enhancement of random laser action. ACS Photonics, 5, 718-727(2018).
[77] KC Shen, C Hsieh, YJ Cheng, DP Tsai. Giant enhancement of emission efficiency and light directivity by using hyperbolic metacavity on deep-ultraviolet AlGaN emitter. Nano Energy, 45, 353-358(2018).
[78] JK Kitur, L Gu, T Tumkur, C Bonner, MA Noginov. Stimulated emission of surface plasmons on top of metamaterials with hyperbolic dispersion. ACS Photonics, 2, 1019-1024(2015).
[79] YF Shen, YX Yan, AN Brigeman, H Kim, NC Giebink. Efficient upper-excited state fluorescence in an organic hyperbolic metamaterial. Nano Lett, 18, 1693-1698(2018).
[80] Lee Ui, OPM Gaudin, KJ Lee, E Choi, V Placide et al. Organic monolithic natural hyperbolic material. ACS Photonics, 6, 1681-1689(2019).
[81] SV Zhukovsky, A Andryieuski, O Takayama, E Shkondin, R Malureanu et al. Experimental demonstration of effective medium approximation breakdown in deeply subwavelength all-dielectric multilayers. Phys Rev Lett, 115, 177402(2015).
[82] M Mahmoodi, SH Tavassoli, AV Lavrinenko. Mode-resolved directional enhancement of spontaneous emission inside/outside finite multilayer hyperbolic metamaterials. Mater Today Commun, 23, 100859(2020).
[83] Proceedings of SPIE 10719, Metamaterials, Metadevices, and Metasystems 2018 107192K (SPIE, 2018); http://doi.org/10.1117/12.2322085.
[84] L Li, ZY Zhou, CJ Min, XC Yuan. Few-layer metamaterials for spontaneous emission enhancement. Opt Lett, 46, 190-193(2021).
[85] L Wang, SL Li, BR Zhang, YZ Qin, Z Tian et al. Asymmetrically curved hyperbolic metamaterial structure with gradient thicknesses for enhanced directional spontaneous emission. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 10, 7704-7708(2018).
[86] HI Lin, KC Shen, SY Lin, G Haider, YH Li et al. Transient and flexible hyperbolic metamaterials on freeform surfaces. Sci Rep, 8, 9469(2018).
[87] FA Inam, N Ahmed, MJ Steel, S Castelletto. Hyperbolic metamaterial resonator-antenna scheme for large, broadband emission enhancement and single-photon collection. J Opt Soc Am B, 35, 2153-2162(2018).
[88] A Kala, FA Inam, SA Biehs, P Vaity, VG Achanta. Hyperbolic metamaterial with quantum dots for enhanced emission and collection efficiencies. Adv Opt Mater, 8, 2000368(2020).
[89] XD Yang, J Yao, J Rho, XB Yin, X Zhang. Experimental realization of three-dimensional indefinite cavities at the nanoscale with anomalous scaling laws. Nat Photonics, 6, 450-454(2012).
[90] SRKC Indukuri, C Frydendahl, J Bar-David, N Mazurski, U Levy. WS2 monolayers coupled to hyperbolic metamaterial nanoantennas: broad implications for light–matter-interaction applications. ACS Appl Nano Mater, 3, 10226-10233(2020).
[91] T Forster. Energiewanderung und fluoreszenz. Naturwissenschaften, 33, 166-175(1946).
[92] T Förster. Zwischenmolekulare energiewanderung und fluoreszenz. Ann Phys, 437, 55-75(1948).
[93] TU Tumkur, JK Kitur, CE Bonner, AN Poddubny, EE Narimanov et al. Control of Förster energy transfer in the vicinity of metallic surfaces and hyperbolic metamaterials. Faraday Discuss, 178, 395-412(2015).
[94] HP Adl, S Gorji, MK Habil, I Suárez, VS Chirvony et al. Purcell enhancement and wavelength shift of emitted light by CsPbI3 perovskite nanocrystals coupled to hyperbolic metamaterials. ACS Photonics, 7, 3152-3160(2020).
[95] P Tonkaev, S Anoshkin, A Pushkarev, R Malureanu, M Masharin et al. Acceleration of radiative recombination in quasi-2D perovskite films on hyperbolic metamaterials. Appl Phys Lett, 118, 091104(2021).
[96] HI Lin, CC Wang, KC Shen, MY Shalaginov, PK Roy et al. Enhanced laser action from smart fabrics made with rollable hyperbolic metamaterials. npj Flex Electron, 4, 20(2020).
[97] Y Moritake, K Nakayama, T Suzuki, H Kurosawa, T Kodama et al. Lifetime reduction of a quantum emitter with quasiperiodic metamaterials. Phys Rev B, 90, 075146(2014).
[98] L Li, CJ Mathai, S Gangopadhyay, XD Yang, J Gao. Spontaneous emission rate enhancement with aperiodic Thue-Morse multilayer. Sci Rep, 9, 8473(2019).
[99] AA High, RC Devlin, A Dibos, M Polking, DS Wild et al. Visible-frequency hyperbolic metasurface. Nature, 522, 192-196(2015).
[100] O Takayama, P Dmitriev, E Shkondin, O Yermakov, M Panah et al. Experimental observation of dyakonov plasmons in the mid-infrared. Semiconductors, 52, 442-446(2018).
[101] ZT Li, JST Smalley, R Haroldson, DY Lin, R Hawkins et al. Active perovskite hyperbolic metasurface. ACS Photonics, 7, 1754-1761(2020).
[102] MA Noginov, H Li, YA Barnakov, D Dryden, G Nataraj et al. Controlling spontaneous emission with metamaterials. Opt Lett, 35, 1863-1865(2010).
[103] DJ Roth, AV Krasavin, A Wade, W Dickson, A Murphy et al. Spontaneous emission inside a hyperbolic metamaterial waveguide. ACS Photonics, 4, 2513-2521(2017).
[104] P Ginzburg, DJ Roth, ME Nasir, P Segovia, AV Krasavin et al. Spontaneous emission in non-local materials. Light: Sci Appl, 6, e16273(2017).
[105] DJ Roth, ME Nasir, P Ginzburg, P Wang, Marois Le et al. Förster resonance energy transfer inside hyperbolic metamaterials. ACS Photonics, 5, 4594-4603(2018).
[106] RM Córdova-Castro, AV Krasavin, ME Nasir, AV Zayats, W Dickson. Nanocone-based plasmonic metamaterials. Nanotechnology, 30, 055301(2019).
[107] DJ Roth, P Ginzburg, LM Hirvonen, JA Levitt, ME Nasir et al. Singlet–triplet transition rate enhancement inside hyperbolic metamaterials. Laser Photonics Rev, 13, 1900101(2019).
[108] R Chandrasekar, ZX Wang, XG Meng, SI Azzam, MY Shalaginov et al. Lasing action with gold nanorod hyperbolic metamaterials. ACS Photonics, 4, 674-680(2017).
[109] C Indukuri, RK Yadav, JK Basu. Broadband room temperature strong coupling between quantum dots and metamaterials. Nanoscale, 9, 11418-11423(2017).
[110] D Lu, JJ Kan, EE Fullerton, ZW Liu. Enhancing spontaneous emission rates of molecules using nanopatterned multilayer hyperbolic metamaterials. Nat Nanotechnol, 9, 48-53(2014).
[111] D Lu, L Ferrari, JJ Kan, EE Fullerton, ZW Liu. Optimization of nanopatterned multilayer hyperbolic metamaterials for spontaneous light emission enhancement. Phys Status Solidi (A), 215, 1800263(2018).
[112] L Li, W Wang, TS Luk, XD Yang, J Gao. Enhanced quantum dot spontaneous emission with multilayer metamaterial nanostructures. ACS Photonics, 4, 501-508(2017).
[113] KV Sreekanth, KH Krishna, Luca De, G Strangi. Large spontaneous emission rate enhancement in grating coupled hyperbolic metamaterials. Sci Rep, 4, 6340(2014).
[114] T Galfsky, J Gu, EE Narimanov, VM Menon. Photonic hypercrystals for control of light-matter interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 114, 5125-5129(2017).
[115] QQ Gan, YK Gao, K Wagner, D Vezenov, YJ Ding et al. Experimental verification of the rainbow trapping effect in adiabatic plasmonic gratings. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 108, 5169-5173(2011).
[116] X Ni, Y Wu, ZG Chen, LY Zheng, YL Xu et al. Acoustic rainbow trapping by coiling up space. Sci Rep, 4, 7038(2014).
[117] HF Hu, DX Ji, X Zeng, K Liu, QQ Gan. Rainbow trapping in hyperbolic metamaterial waveguide. Sci Rep, 3, 1249(2013).
[118] J Zhou, AF Kaplan, L Chen, LJ Guo. Experiment and theory of the broadband absorption by a tapered hyperbolic metamaterial array. ACS Photonics, 1, 618-624(2014).
[119] KH Krishna, KV Sreekanth, G Strangi. Dye-embedded and nanopatterned hyperbolic metamaterials for spontaneous emission rate enhancement. J Opt Soc Am B, 33, 1038-1043(2016).
[120] T Galfsky, Z Sun, CR Considine, CT Chou, WC Ko et al. Broadband enhancement of spontaneous emission in two-dimensional semiconductors using photonic hypercrystals. Nano Lett, 16, 4940-4945(2016).
[121] WD Newman, CL Cortes, Z Jacob. Enhanced and directional single-photon emission in hyperbolic metamaterials. J Opt Soc Am B, 30, 766-775(2013).
[122] T Galfsky, HNS Krishnamoorthy, W Newman, EE Narimanov, Z Jacob et al. Active hyperbolic metamaterials: enhanced spontaneous emission and light extraction. Optica, 2, 62-65(2015).
[123] Y Cheng, CT Liao, ZH Xie, YC Hung, MC Lee. Study of cavity-enhanced dipole emission on a hyperbolic metamaterial slab. J Opt Soc Am B, 36, 426-434(2019).
[124] XX Niu, XY Hu, SS Chu, QH Gong. Epsilon-near-zero photonics: a new platform for integrated devices. Adv Opt Mater, 6, 1701292(2018).
[125] DI Vulis, O Reshef, P Camayd-Muñoz, E Mazur. Manipulating the flow of light using Dirac-cone zero-index metamaterials. Rep Prog Phys, 82, 012001(2019).
[126] S Campione, I Brener, F Marquier. Theory of epsilon-near-zero modes in ultrathin films. Phys Rev B, 91, 121408(2015).
[127] L Nordin, O Dominguez, CM Roberts, W Streyer, K Feng et al. Mid-infrared epsilon-near-zero modes in ultra-thin phononic films. Appl Phys Lett, 111, 091105(2017).
[128] TG Folland, GY Lu, A Bruncz, JR Nolen, M Tadjer et al. Vibrational coupling to epsilon-near-zero waveguide modes. ACS Photonics, 7, 614-621(2020).
[129] N Engheta. Pursuing near-zero response. Science, 340, 286-287(2013).
[130] MH Javani, MI Stockman. Real and imaginary properties of epsilon-near-zero materials. Phys Rev Lett, 117, 107404(2106).
[131] R Fleury, A Alù. Enhanced superradiance in epsilon-near-zero plasmonic channels. Phys Rev B, 87, 201101(2013).
[132] KV Sreekanth, Luca De, G Strangi. Experimental demonstration of surface and bulk plasmon polaritons in hypergratings. Sci Rep, 3, 3291(2013).
[133] V Caligiuri, R Dhama, KV Sreekanth, G Strangi, Luca De. Dielectric singularity in hyperbolic metamaterials: the inversion point of coexisting anisotropies. Sci Rep, 6, 20002(2016).
[134] VP Drachev, VA Podolskiy, AV Kildishev. Hyperbolic metamaterials: new physics behind a classical problem. Opt Express, 21, 15048-15064(2013).
[135] V Caligiuri, M Palei, M Imran, L Manna, R Krahne. Planar double-epsilon-near-zero cavities for spontaneous emission and purcell effect enhancement. ACS Photonics, 5, 2287-2294(2018).
[136] DR Walt. Optical methods for single molecule detection and analysis. Anal Chem, 85, 1258-1263(2013).
[137] PN Melentiev, LV Son, DS Kudryavtsev, IE Kasheverov, VI Tsetlin et al. Ultrafast, ultrasensitive detection and imaging of single cardiac troponin-T molecules. ACS Sens, 5, 3576-3583(2020).
[138] N Engheta. Circuits with light at nanoscales: optical nanocircuits inspired by metamaterials. Science, 317, 1698-1702(2007).
[139] PN Melentiev, A Kalmykov, A Kuzin, D Negrov, V Klimov et al. Open-type SPP waveguide with ultrahigh bandwidth up to 3.5 THz. ACS Photonics, 6, 1425-1433(2019).
[140] C Argyropoulos, NM Estakhri, F Monticone, A Alù. Negative refraction, gain and nonlinear effects in hyperbolic metamaterials. Opt Express, 21, 15037-15047(2013).
[141] MJ Wan, P Gu, WY Liu, Z Chen, ZL Wang. Low threshold spaser based on deep-subwavelength spherical hyperbolic metamaterial cavities. Appl Phys Lett, 110, 031103(2017).
[142] B Janaszek, A Tyszka-Zawadzka, P Szczepański. Control of gain/absorption in tunable hyperbolic metamaterials. Opt Express, 25, 13153-13162(2017).
[143] DJ Bergman, MI Stockman. Surface plasmon amplification by stimulated emission of radiation: quantum generation of coherent surface plasmons in nanosystems. Phys Rev Lett, 90, 027402(2003).
[144] SI Bozhevolnyi, JB Khurgin. The case for quantum plasmonics. Nat Photonics, 11, 398-400(2017).
[145] Valle del, FP Laussy, C Tejedor. Luminescence spectra of quantum dots in microcavities. Phys Rev B,, 79, 235326(2009).
[146] TV Shahbazyan. Exciton-plasmon energy exchange drives the transition to a strong coupling regime. Nano Lett, 19, 3273-3279(2019).
[147] JB Khurgin. Exceptional points in polaritonic cavities and subthreshold fabry–perot lasers. Optica, 7, 1015-1023(2020).
[148] VN Pustovit, AM Urbas, DE Zelmon. Surface plasmon amplification by stimulated emission of radiation in hyperbolic metamaterials. Phys Rev B, 94, 235445(2016).
[149] F Vaianella, JM Hamm, O Hess, B Maes. Strong coupling and exceptional points in optically pumped active hyperbolic metamaterials. ACS Photonics, 5, 2486-2495(2018).
[150] X Ni, GV Naik, AV Kildishev, Y Barnakov, A Boltasseva et al. Effect of metallic and hyperbolic metamaterial surfaces on electric and magnetic dipole emission transitions. Appl Phys B, 103, 553-558(2011).
[151] P Michler, A Kiraz, C Becher, WV Schoenfeld, PM Petroff et al. A quantum dot single-photon turnstile device. Science, 290, 2282-2285(2000).
[152] M Pelton, C Santori, J Vučković, BY Zhang, GS Solomon et al. Efficient source of single photons: a single quantum dot in a micropost microcavity. Phys Rev Lett, 89, 233602(2002).
[153] P Lodahl, Driel van, IS Nikolaev, A Irman, K Overgaag et al. Controlling the dynamics of spontaneous emission from quantum dots by photonic crystals. Nature, 430, 654-657(2004).
[154] G Khitrova, HM Gibbs, M Kira, SW Koch, A Scherer. Vacuum Rabi splitting in semiconductors. Nat Phys, 2, 81-90(2006).
[155] AV Rogacheva, VA Fedotov, AS Schwanecke, NI Zheludev. Giant gyrotropy due to electromagnetic-field coupling in a bilayered chiral structure. Phys Rev Lett, 97, 177401(2006).
[156] R Ameling, D Dregely, H Giessen. Strong coupling of localized and surface plasmons to microcavity modes. Opt Lett, 36, 2218-2220(2011).
[157] T Goldzak, AA Mailybaev, N Moiseyev. Light stops at exceptional points. Phys Rev Lett, 120, 013901(2018).
[158] A Pick, B Zhen, OD Miller, CW Hsu, F Hernandez et al. General theory of spontaneous emission near exceptional points. Opt Express, 25, 12325-12348(2017).
[159] JP Hou, ZT Li, XW Luo, Q Gu, CW Zhang. Topological bands and triply degenerate points in non-hermitian hyperbolic metamaterials. Phys Rev Lett, 124, 073603(2020).
[160]
[161] TJ Antosiewicz, SP Apell, T Shegai. Plasmon-exciton interactions in a core-shell geometry: from enhanced absorption to strong coupling. ACS Photonics, 1, 454-463(2014).
[162] KC Shen, CT Ku, C Hsieh, HC Kuo, YJ Cheng et al. Deep-ultraviolet hyperbolic metacavity laser. Adv Mater, 30, 1706918(2018).
[163] VY Shishkov, ES Andrianov, AA Pukhov, AP Vinogradov. Enhancement of nonclassical raman light intensity by plasmonic nanoantenna. Phys Rev A, 103, 013725(2021).
[164] Pino del, J Feist, FJ Garcia-Vidal. Signatures of vibrational strong coupling in raman scattering. J. Phys Chem C, 119, 29132-29137(2015).
[165] E Waks, D Sridharan. Cavity QED treatment of interactions between a metal nanoparticle and a dipole emitter. Phys Rev A, 84, 043845(2010).
[166] AJ Hoffman, L Alekseyev, SS Howard, KJ Franz, D Wasserman et al. Negative refraction in semiconductor metamaterials. Nat Mater, 6, 946-950(2007).
[167] PN Li, I Dolado, FJ Alfaro-Mozaz, F Casanova, LE Hueso et al. Infrared hyperbolic metasurface based on nanostructured van der Waals materials. Science, 359, 892-896(2018).
[168] WL Ma, P Alonso-González, SJ Li, AY Nikitin, J Yuan et al. In-plane anisotropic and ultra-low-loss polaritons in a natural van der Waals crystal. Nature, 562, 557-562(2018).
[169] C Wang, SY Huang, QX Xing, YG Xie, CY Song et al. Van der Waals thin films of WTe2 for natural hyperbolic plasmonic surfaces. Nat Commun, 11, 1158(2020).
[170] H Gao, XM Zhang, WF Li, MW Zhao. Tunable broadband hyperbolic light dispersion in metal diborides. Opt Express, 27, 36911-36922(2019).
[171] H Gao, L Sun, MW Zhao. Low-loss hyperbolic dispersion and anisotropic plasmonic excitation in nodal-line semimetallic yttrium nitride. Opt Express, 28, 22076-22087(2020).
[172]

Set citation alerts for the article
Please enter your email address