• Infrared and Laser Engineering
  • Vol. 53, Issue 1, 20230370 (2024)
Jingfa Lei1,2, Haoran Xie1,2, Yongling Li1,3,*, Dong Wu4..., Miao Zhang1,2 and Ruhai Zhao1,2|Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230601, China
  • 2Key Laboratory of Intelligent Manufacturing of Construction Machinery, Anhui Education Department, Hefei 230601, China
  • 3Sichuan Provincial Key Laboratory of Process Equipment and Control Engineering, Zigong 643000, China
  • 4Department of Precision Machinery and Precision Instruments, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/IRLA20230370 Cite this Article
    Jingfa Lei, Haoran Xie, Yongling Li, Dong Wu, Miao Zhang, Ruhai Zhao. High dynamic range surface measurement method based on adaptive multi-exposure fusion[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2024, 53(1): 20230370 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic diagram of stripe projection profilometry
    Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of stripe projection profilometry
    Example of I0 histogram
    Fig. 2. Example of I0 histogram
    Complementary Gray code and four step phase shift graph
    Fig. 3. Complementary Gray code and four step phase shift graph
    Schematic diagram of complementary Gray code
    Fig. 4. Schematic diagram of complementary Gray code
    Example of image histogram at 18 ms
    Fig. 5. Example of image histogram at 18 ms
    Fringe patterns fused with different exposure times. (a) First group exposure; (b) Second group exposure; (c) Adaptive exposure
    Fig. 6. Fringe patterns fused with different exposure times. (a) First group exposure; (b) Second group exposure; (c) Adaptive exposure
    Fringe image of U-card in different methods. (a) Projection phase method; (b) Methods of Ref.[11]; (c) Proposed method
    Fig. 7. Fringe image of U-card in different methods. (a) Projection phase method; (b) Methods of Ref.[11]; (c) Proposed method
    Fringe image of connection block in different methods. (a) Projection phase method; (b) Methods of Ref.[11]; (c) Proposed method
    Fig. 8. Fringe image of connection block in different methods. (a) Projection phase method; (b) Methods of Ref.[11]; (c) Proposed method
    Fringe image of disc in different methods. (a) Projection phase method; (b) Methods of Ref.[11]; (c) Proposed method
    Fig. 9. Fringe image of disc in different methods. (a) Projection phase method; (b) Methods of Ref.[11]; (c) Proposed method
    Point cloud image of U-card in different methods. (a) Projection phase method; (b) Methods of Ref.[11]; (c) Proposed method
    Fig. 10. Point cloud image of U-card in different methods. (a) Projection phase method; (b) Methods of Ref.[11]; (c) Proposed method
    Point cloud image of U-card in different methods. (a) Projection phase method; (b) Methods of Ref.[11]; (c) Proposed method
    Fig. 11. Point cloud image of U-card in different methods. (a) Projection phase method; (b) Methods of Ref.[11]; (c) Proposed method
    Point cloud image of disc in different methods. (a) Projection phase method; (b) Methods of Ref.[11]; (c) Proposed method
    Fig. 12. Point cloud image of disc in different methods. (a) Projection phase method; (b) Methods of Ref.[11]; (c) Proposed method
    The number and reconstruction rate of 3D point clouds measured using different methods. (a) U-card; (b) Connection block; (c) Disc
    Fig. 13. The number and reconstruction rate of 3D point clouds measured using different methods. (a) U-card; (b) Connection block; (c) Disc
    Standard block step height measurement. (a) Standard block ladder physical diagram; (b) Standard block ladder 3D point cloud encapsulation diagram; (c) Height difference measurement results
    Fig. 14. Standard block step height measurement. (a) Standard block ladder physical diagram; (b) Standard block ladder 3D point cloud encapsulation diagram; (c) Height difference measurement results
    Tasted objectOptimal exposure time/msThreshold processing percentageBrightness compression coefficient
    U-card18.43, 37.56, 68.40, 98.3395%0.6
    Connection block18.64, 34.46, 62.54, 81.2692%0.5
    Disc18.59, 42.36, 74.54, 96.4395%0.6
    Table 1. The parameter values of the tested object
    MethodHeight/mmAbsolute error/mmRelative error/mm
    Projection phase method8.8260.1741.93%
    Methods of Ref.[11]8.8760.1241.40%
    Proposed method8.9380.0620.69%
    Table 2. Comparative analysis of step error in measuring standard blocks using different methods
    Jingfa Lei, Haoran Xie, Yongling Li, Dong Wu, Miao Zhang, Ruhai Zhao. High dynamic range surface measurement method based on adaptive multi-exposure fusion[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2024, 53(1): 20230370
    Download Citation