• Advanced Photonics Nexus
  • Vol. 3, Issue 4, 046013 (2024)
Huajun Tang1,†, Yitian Tong1,*, Mingsheng Li1, Najia Sharmin1..., Jiawei Shi1, Bingfeng Li2, Chandra Jinata1,3, Nikki Pui-Yue Lee2, Kevin K. Tsia1,3 and Kenneth K. Y. Wong1,3,*|Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1The University of Hong Kong, Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Hong Kong, China
  • 2The University of Hong Kong, Department of Surgery, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, Hong Kong, China
  • 3Advanced Biomedical Instrumentation Centre, Hong Kong, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1117/1.APN.3.4.046013 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Huajun Tang, Yitian Tong, Mingsheng Li, Najia Sharmin, Jiawei Shi, Bingfeng Li, Chandra Jinata, Nikki Pui-Yue Lee, Kevin K. Tsia, Kenneth K. Y. Wong, "Hybrid optical parametrically oscillating emitter-enabled photoacoustic imaging of water: enhanced contrast, dynamic range, and multifaceted applications," Adv. Photon. Nexus 3, 046013 (2024) Copy Citation Text show less
    (a) and (b) The basic theory of the new HOPE. The desired optical pulses are generated in an all-fiber filterless OPO. It includes an HNLF, which provides the parametric gain, a feedback fiber, and a short TDF for gain compensation. The cavity is driven by an optical pulsed pump. The two insets, respectively, represent the gain transformations of points a and b in the OPO, in which the dashed lines show that the indicated signal energy decreases and disappears. WDM, wavelength-division-multiplexer; HNLF, highly nonlinear fiber; TDF, thulium-doped fiber; and OC, optical coupler.
    Fig. 1. (a) and (b) The basic theory of the new HOPE. The desired optical pulses are generated in an all-fiber filterless OPO. It includes an HNLF, which provides the parametric gain, a feedback fiber, and a short TDF for gain compensation. The cavity is driven by an optical pulsed pump. The two insets, respectively, represent the gain transformations of points a and b in the OPO, in which the dashed lines show that the indicated signal energy decreases and disappears. WDM, wavelength-division-multiplexer; HNLF, highly nonlinear fiber; TDF, thulium-doped fiber; and OC, optical coupler.
    (a) and (b) Schematic representation of HOPE system and PA microscope. EML, electro-absorption modulated laser; WDM, wavelength-division-multiplexer; CIR, circulator; LT, light trap; PC, polarization controller; HNLF, highly nonlinear fiber; TDF, thulium-doped fiber; OC, optical coupler; VDL, variable delay line; PM coil, 1-km polarization-maintaining fiber core; TDFA, thulium-doped fiber amplifier; Col, collimator; L1, f=75 mm lens; L2, f=150 mm lens; M, mirror; Obj, microscope objective lens; and UST, ultrasound transducer.
    Fig. 2. (a) and (b) Schematic representation of HOPE system and PA microscope. EML, electro-absorption modulated laser; WDM, wavelength-division-multiplexer; CIR, circulator; LT, light trap; PC, polarization controller; HNLF, highly nonlinear fiber; TDF, thulium-doped fiber; OC, optical coupler; VDL, variable delay line; PM coil, 1-km polarization-maintaining fiber core; TDFA, thulium-doped fiber amplifier; Col, collimator; L1, f=75  mm lens; L2, f=150  mm lens; M, mirror; Obj, microscope objective lens; and UST, ultrasound transducer.
    Characterization of the new HOPE’s output. (a) Output spectrum of the new HOPE. (b) Time trace of the new HOPE’s output. (c) Zoomed-in single pulse of (b). (d) Pulse-to-pulse widths of the new HOPE’s output at the start and after 1 h. (e) Pulse intensity histogram. (f) The relationship between the output power of the new HOPE and the pump power of TDFA.
    Fig. 3. Characterization of the new HOPE’s output. (a) Output spectrum of the new HOPE. (b) Time trace of the new HOPE’s output. (c) Zoomed-in single pulse of (b). (d) Pulse-to-pulse widths of the new HOPE’s output at the start and after 1 h. (e) Pulse intensity histogram. (f) The relationship between the output power of the new HOPE and the pump power of TDFA.
    (a) PA signal of water obtained at 1930 nm and its frequency spectrum with Gaussian fitting. (b) FFT spectrum of PA signal and its Gaussian fitting result.
    Fig. 4. (a) PA signal of water obtained at 1930 nm and its frequency spectrum with Gaussian fitting. (b) FFT spectrum of PA signal and its Gaussian fitting result.
    (a) PA signal of water (red) and butter (black) obtained at 1930 nm. (b) Zoomed-in signal of butter in panel (a). (c) Photograph of the sample and the imaging region. The black dashed box encloses the area imaged in the experiment, in which the adipose tissue lies within the region bounded by the yellow dashed line (scale bar: 2 mm). (d) PAI of the water content at 1930 nm (scale bar: 1 mm; image acquisition time: ∼40 min). The region bound by the green dotted line denotes adipose tissue.
    Fig. 5. (a) PA signal of water (red) and butter (black) obtained at 1930 nm. (b) Zoomed-in signal of butter in panel (a). (c) Photograph of the sample and the imaging region. The black dashed box encloses the area imaged in the experiment, in which the adipose tissue lies within the region bounded by the yellow dashed line (scale bar: 2 mm). (d) PAI of the water content at 1930 nm (scale bar: 1 mm; image acquisition time: 40  min). The region bound by the green dotted line denotes adipose tissue.
    (a) Photograph of the sample and indication of the illuminating direction. (b) 3D PA image of muscle surface with image acquisition time: ∼40 min. (c) B-mode image of (b). (Scale bar: 1 mm.)
    Fig. 6. (a) Photograph of the sample and indication of the illuminating direction. (b) 3D PA image of muscle surface with image acquisition time: 40  min. (c) B-mode image of (b). (Scale bar: 1 mm.)
    (a) Photograph of the zebrafish embryos, where region R1 is the yolk sac and R2 is the tail. (b) The water PAI of the zebrafish embryos with image acquisition time: ∼30 min. (c) The water PAI of the zebrafish embryos after 24 h. (d) The water PAI of the zebrafish embryos after 48 h with image acquisition time: ∼30 min. (Scale bar: 500 μm.)
    Fig. 7. (a) Photograph of the zebrafish embryos, where region R1 is the yolk sac and R2 is the tail. (b) The water PAI of the zebrafish embryos with image acquisition time: 30  min. (c) The water PAI of the zebrafish embryos after 24 h. (d) The water PAI of the zebrafish embryos after 48 h with image acquisition time: 30  min. (Scale bar: 500  μm.)
    (a) Orthotopic mouse liver tumor xenograft sample in which the green dashed line box represents the imaging region (scale bar: 2 mm, region R1: tumor tissue; and region R2: healthy tissue). (b) PA water image of liver cancer sample with image acquisition time: ∼30 min. (Scale bar: 1 mm.)
    Fig. 8. (a) Orthotopic mouse liver tumor xenograft sample in which the green dashed line box represents the imaging region (scale bar: 2 mm, region R1: tumor tissue; and region R2: healthy tissue). (b) PA water image of liver cancer sample with image acquisition time: 30  min. (Scale bar: 1 mm.)
    PAI of water distribution in the ear with normalized intensities with image acquisition time: ∼40 min. (a) The water PAI for a mouse normal ear. (b) The water PAI for the ear of a mouse with edema, where the presence of cartilage is marked R1 and R2. (c) PA amplitude values corresponding to the axial yellow lines passing through approximately the same structures in the left and right ears in (a) and (b), respectively. (d) and (e) Depth-encoded maximum amplitude projection images corresponding to (a) and (b), respectively. (Scale bar: 1 mm.)
    Fig. 9. PAI of water distribution in the ear with normalized intensities with image acquisition time: 40  min. (a) The water PAI for a mouse normal ear. (b) The water PAI for the ear of a mouse with edema, where the presence of cartilage is marked R1 and R2. (c) PA amplitude values corresponding to the axial yellow lines passing through approximately the same structures in the left and right ears in (a) and (b), respectively. (d) and (e) Depth-encoded maximum amplitude projection images corresponding to (a) and (b), respectively. (Scale bar: 1 mm.)
    (a) PAI of water content acquired at 1930 nm with image acquisition time: ∼40 min. (b) PAI of lipid acquired at 1750 nm with image acquisition time: ∼55 min. (c) Photograph of the sample, where the yellow dashed line box represents the imaging region. (d) The merged image of (a) and (b). (e) The subtraction image of (a) and (b). (f) and (g) The amplitude profile plots of lines I and II in panel (d). (red, PAI for water; green, PAI for lipid). (Scale bar: 1 mm.)
    Fig. 10. (a) PAI of water content acquired at 1930 nm with image acquisition time: 40  min. (b) PAI of lipid acquired at 1750 nm with image acquisition time: 55  min. (c) Photograph of the sample, where the yellow dashed line box represents the imaging region. (d) The merged image of (a) and (b). (e) The subtraction image of (a) and (b). (f) and (g) The amplitude profile plots of lines I and II in panel (d). (red, PAI for water; green, PAI for lipid). (Scale bar: 1 mm.)
    Huajun Tang, Yitian Tong, Mingsheng Li, Najia Sharmin, Jiawei Shi, Bingfeng Li, Chandra Jinata, Nikki Pui-Yue Lee, Kevin K. Tsia, Kenneth K. Y. Wong, "Hybrid optical parametrically oscillating emitter-enabled photoacoustic imaging of water: enhanced contrast, dynamic range, and multifaceted applications," Adv. Photon. Nexus 3, 046013 (2024)
    Download Citation