• Chinese Journal of Ship Research
  • Vol. 17, Issue 6, 244 (2022)
Benting ZHU and Guomin WU
Author Affiliations
  • China Ship Development and Design Center, Wuhan 430064, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.02460 Cite this Article
    Benting ZHU, Guomin WU. Numerical simulation on truncated oval-nosed projectile penetrating into stiffened plate[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2022, 17(6): 244 Copy Citation Text show less
    [in Chinese]
    Fig. 1. [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    Fig. 2. [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    Fig. 3. [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    Fig. 4. [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    Fig. 5. [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    Fig. 6. [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    Fig. 7. [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    Fig. 8. [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    Fig. 9. [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    Fig. 10. [in Chinese]
    模型参数921A材料35CrMnSiNi2A材料
    密度$ \rho /(\mathrm{k}\mathrm{g}\cdot {\mathrm{m}}^{-3}) $78007850
    杨氏模量$ E/\mathrm{G}\mathrm{P}\mathrm{a} $206210
    泊松比0.280.28
    $ {T}_{\mathrm{r}}/\mathrm{K} $298
    $ {T}_{\mathrm{m}}/\mathrm{K} $1763.5
    A/MPa685
    B/MPa810.32
    n0.782
    c0.048 3
    mt1.05
    Table 1. Material parameters
    工况靶板形式着弹点(姿态)/mm初始速度/(m·s−1)剩余速度(仿真值)/(m·s−1)剩余速度(实验值)/(m·s−1)偏差e /%弹孔孔径/mm
    1均质板(垂向)607.0580.5584.90.75112
    2加筋板距垂向筋0,距水平筋31(垂向)617.7563.9574.91.9112
    Table 2. Comparison of numerical and experimental results
    初始速度/(m·s−1)剩余速度/(m·s−1)能量损失/kJ面板变形能/kJ板变形能占比/%垂向筋变形能/kJ垂向筋变形能占比/%水平筋变形能/kJ水平筋变形能占比/%
    300.0204.3379.1147.038.872.419.125.46.7
    400.0329.2408.9127.331.180.019.623.25.7
    500.0438.9455.8126.227.780.217.621.74.8
    617.7563.9508.9120.523.775.914.917.53.4
    700.0648.8552.0113.420.574.614.315.62.8
    800.0751.7600.7106.917.870.511.713.62.2
    900.0850.9685.098.114.367.39.812.21.8
    Table 3. Energy absorption of each part of stiffened plate at different initial velocities
    着弹点偏移距离/mm最大偏转角度/(°)最大偏转角飞行距离/mm侵彻后角速度/((°)·s−1)3 m后偏转角度(预测值)/(°)
    21.18367.21−2 994.84−13.08
    52.99389.71−3 931.76−15.69
    73.84390.42−3 791.18−14.12
    104.96391.40−2 730.89−7.94
    206.14373.33−6 510.17−24.57
    304.93376.04−5 808.89−22.25
    403.34355.79−4 658.91−18.32
    502.06357.70−1 945.1−6.76
    Table 4. Influence of rectangular stiffeners on projectile trajectory
    着弹点偏移距离/mm最大偏转角度/(°)最大偏转角飞行距离/mm侵彻后角速度/((°)·s−1)3 m后偏转角度(预测值)/(°)
    22.03379.71−3 583.53−14.73
    54.90402.15−2 859.96−9.14
    76.40403.03−1 812.54−2.47
    108.82446.8810.018.86
    209.51389.18−7 850.11−28.47
    308.10372.33−7 066.97−25.54
    405.84375.63−5 660.71−20.84
    503.69355.83−4 206.98−15.91
    Table 5. Influence of T-stiffeners on missile flight trajectory
    Benting ZHU, Guomin WU. Numerical simulation on truncated oval-nosed projectile penetrating into stiffened plate[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2022, 17(6): 244
    Download Citation