• Chinese Journal of Quantum Electronics
  • Vol. 41, Issue 3, 437 (2024)
WANG Jinmei, LIU Xufeng, ZHENG Peichao*, CHEN Guanghui..., LIU Shaojian, LI Gang, YANG Zhi and SUN Zhicheng|Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • Chongqing Municipal Key Laboratory of Photoelectric Information Sensing and Transmission Technology, College of Optoelectronic Engineering, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing 400065, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5461.2024.03.005 Cite this Article
    Jinmei WANG, Xufeng LIU, Peichao ZHENG, Guanghui CHEN, Shaojian LIU, Gang LI, Zhi YANG, Zhicheng SUN. Design of compact laser⁃induced breakdown spectroscopy instrument[J]. Chinese Journal of Quantum Electronics, 2024, 41(3): 437 Copy Citation Text show less
    Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy detection system. (a) Schematic of the internal structure; (b) Physical diagram
    Fig. 1. Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy detection system. (a) Schematic of the internal structure; (b) Physical diagram
    Spectrum of standard sample. (a) 200-550 nm band; (b) 288.0-296.9 nm band
    Fig. 2. Spectrum of standard sample. (a) 200-550 nm band; (b) 288.0-296.9 nm band
    Effect of delay time on the spectral intensity and signal-to-background ratio. (a) Si(I) 288.158 nm; (b) C(II) 296.786 nm
    Fig. 3. Effect of delay time on the spectral intensity and signal-to-background ratio. (a) Si(I) 288.158 nm; (b) C(II) 296.786 nm
    Effect of defocus amount on the spectral intensity and signal-to-background ratio. (a) Si(I) 288.158 nm; (b) C(II) 296.786 nm
    Fig. 4. Effect of defocus amount on the spectral intensity and signal-to-background ratio. (a) Si(I) 288.158 nm; (b) C(II) 296.786 nm
    Effect of laser energy on the spectral intensity and signal-to-background ratio. (a) Si(I) 288.158 nm; (b) C(II) 296.786 nm
    Fig. 5. Effect of laser energy on the spectral intensity and signal-to-background ratio. (a) Si(I) 288.158 nm; (b) C(II) 296.786 nm
    Calibration curves obtained by internal standard method.(a) Si(I) 288.158 nm/ Fe(II) 274.932 nm; (b) C(II) 296.786 nm/ Fe(II) 288.076 nm
    Fig. 6. Calibration curves obtained by internal standard method.(a) Si(I) 288.158 nm/ Fe(II) 274.932 nm; (b) C(II) 296.786 nm/ Fe(II) 288.076 nm
    Element#1#2#3#4#5#6#7
    Content/%
    C0.0020.1340.0320.0960.2430.3870.498
    Si0.0540.0771.5501.0900.7690.4360.176
    Table 1. Element content of each sample
    SampleElementStandard value/%Predictive value/%Relative error/%
    #2Si(I)288.158 nm0.0770.0752.666
    C(II)296.786 nm0.1340.1393.597
    #6Si(I)288.158 nm0.4360.4441.801
    C(II)296.786 nm0.3870.3860.259
    Table 2. Prediction results of element content
    Jinmei WANG, Xufeng LIU, Peichao ZHENG, Guanghui CHEN, Shaojian LIU, Gang LI, Zhi YANG, Zhicheng SUN. Design of compact laser⁃induced breakdown spectroscopy instrument[J]. Chinese Journal of Quantum Electronics, 2024, 41(3): 437
    Download Citation