• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 56, Issue 13, 131501 (2019)
Jianguo Liang1,2, Maolin Chen3, and Hong Ma1,2,*
Author Affiliations
  • 1 Chongqing Survey Institute, Chongqing 401121, China
  • 2 Chongqing Engineering Research Center of Geographic National Condition Monitoring, Chongqing 401121, China
  • 3 School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP56.131501 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Jianguo Liang, Maolin Chen, Hong Ma. Registration of Terrestrial Laser Scanning Data Based on Projection Distribution Entropy[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2019, 56(13): 131501 Copy Citation Text show less
    Point cloud distributions corresponding to different rotation parameters. (a) Correct registration;(b) incorrect registration 1; (c) incorrect registration 2; (d) point cloud distribution of correct registration; (e) point cloud distribution of incorrect registration 1; (f) point cloud distribution of incorrect registration 2
    Fig. 1. Point cloud distributions corresponding to different rotation parameters. (a) Correct registration;(b) incorrect registration 1; (c) incorrect registration 2; (d) point cloud distribution of correct registration; (e) point cloud distribution of incorrect registration 1; (f) point cloud distribution of incorrect registration 2
    Relationship between entropy change and rotation angle around z axis. 0° corresponds to space distribution of correct registration
    Fig. 2. Relationship between entropy change and rotation angle around z axis. 0° corresponds to space distribution of correct registration
    Three groups of point clouds before and after registration. (a) Dataset 1 before registration; (b) dataset 2 before registration; (c) dataset 3 before registration; (d) dataset 1 after registration; (e) dataset 2 after registration; (f) dataset 3 after registration
    Fig. 3. Three groups of point clouds before and after registration. (a) Dataset 1 before registration; (b) dataset 2 before registration; (c) dataset 3 before registration; (d) dataset 1 after registration; (e) dataset 2 after registration; (f) dataset 3 after registration
    Registration errors caused by view change and structural similarity and symmetry. (a) Incorrect registration caused by view change and structural symmetry; (b) incorrect registration caused by structural similarity; (c) incorrect translation caused by structural similarity; (d) rotation error caused by structural symmetry
    Fig. 4. Registration errors caused by view change and structural similarity and symmetry. (a) Incorrect registration caused by view change and structural symmetry; (b) incorrect registration caused by structural similarity; (c) incorrect translation caused by structural similarity; (d) rotation error caused by structural symmetry
    Registration error and time in terms of different tG. (a)(b) S2-S3 of dataset 1; (c)(d) S2-S3 of dataset 2; (e)(f) S1-S2 of dataset 3
    Fig. 5. Registration error and time in terms of different tG. (a)(b) S2-S3 of dataset 1; (c)(d) S2-S3 of dataset 2; (e)(f) S1-S2 of dataset 3
    Density change experiments corresponding to different sampling ratios
    Fig. 6. Density change experiments corresponding to different sampling ratios
    ItemDataset 1Dataset 2Dataset 3
    ScannerReigl-VZ400Reigl-VZ400STONEX300
    Angularresolution /(°)0.040.040.08
    Point densityrange /cm0.1-60.1-70.5-13
    Averagepoint number4073886118210302081043
    Number of stations663
    Station positionacquisition methodTapemeasureMobileGPSRTK
    Table 1. Basic information of datasets
    SourceReferenceDataset 1Dataset 2Dataset 3
    Initialdistance /mReferencedistance /mInitialdistance /mReferencedistance /mInitialdistance /mReferencedistance /m
    S1S215.15015.12743.428.71231.51331.520
    S2S318.06018.32243.046.52937.76837.724
    S3S420.81320.79144.538.302--
    S5S417.90917.90854.447.843--
    S6S518.86417.17348.728.896--
    Table 2. Distances between adjacent station positions and registration order
    DatasetConversion parameter errorDistance error
    Δφ /(°)Δω /(°)Δκ /(°)Δx /cmΔy /cmΔz /cmRMSD /cmStation distance error /cm
    Dataset 10.120.150.064.34.21.53.12.2
    Dataset 20.200.220.096.55.53.92.34.9
    Dataset 30.300.240.118.07.02.52.98.5
    Table 3. Registration error
    SourceReferenceOverlap rate /%MethodNumber ofsuccessful/failed runsExecution time ofcoarse registration /s
    SIFT1/18.336
    S1S252.4FPFH27/30178.3±11.2
    Proposed method20/2643.6±12.2
    SIFT0/17.678
    S2S323.1FPFH1/30169.1±4.8
    Proposed method22/2641.6±10.4
    SIFT1/18.492
    S3S435.7FPFH17/30220.5±9.6
    Proposed method18/2655.4±13.3
    SIFT0/14.651
    S5S424.9FPFH6/30211.9±7.0
    Proposed method17/2647.3±11.2
    SIFT0/18.633
    S6S525.9FPFH1/3040.1±13.4
    Proposed method11/2622.0±7.0
    Table 4. Registration results of dataset 1
    SourceReferenceOverlap rate /%MethodNumber ofsuccessful/failed runsExecution time ofcoarse registration /s
    SIFT0/118.7
    S1S223.7FPFH1/301470.2±28.8
    Proposed method12/26100.2±47.8
    SIFT0/117.8
    S2S326.6FPFH2/30966.6±38.7
    Proposed method20/26162.2±27.0
    SIFT0/116.9
    S3S419.3FPFH0/302587.7±153.8
    Proposed method14/26194.5±52.9
    SIFT0/113.5
    S5S429.6FPFH1/302090.2±281.5
    Proposed method15/26139.5±103.3
    SIFT0/111.2
    S6S532.1FPFH1/301543.6
    Proposed method13/26158.2±29.6
    Table 5. Registration results of dataset 2
    SourceReferenceOverlap rate /%MethodNumber ofsuccessful/failed runsExecution time ofcoarse registration /s
    S1S217.6
    SIFT0/148.3FPFH1/302438.3±261.7
    Proposed method19/2699.5±74.8
    SIFT0/149.127
    S2S322.9FPFH2/303477.1±318.1
    Proposed method15/2688±75.2
    Table 6. Registration results of dataset 3
    Rotation angle /(°)12345678910
    Around X axis /cm4.04.14.14.14.34.3FailureFailureFailureFailure
    Around Y axis /cm4.14.04.24.14.24.3FailureFailureFailureFailure
    Table 7. Registration mean root errors corresponding to different tilted angles
    Jianguo Liang, Maolin Chen, Hong Ma. Registration of Terrestrial Laser Scanning Data Based on Projection Distribution Entropy[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2019, 56(13): 131501
    Download Citation