• Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis
  • Vol. 44, Issue 10, 2890 (2024)
FAN Jie-jie1,2, QIU Chun-xia1, FAN Yi-guang2, CHEN Ri-qiang2..., LIU Yang2, BIAN Ming-bo2, MA Yan-peng2, YANG Fu-qin3 and FENG Hai-kuan2,4,*|Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Surveying and Mapping Science and Technology, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
  • 2Key Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing in Agriculture of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Information Technology Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China
  • 3College of Civil Engineering, Henan University of Engineering, Zhengzhou 451191, China
  • 4National Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2024)10-2890-10 Cite this Article
    FAN Jie-jie, QIU Chun-xia, FAN Yi-guang, CHEN Ri-qiang, LIU Yang, BIAN Ming-bo, MA Yan-peng, YANG Fu-qin, FENG Hai-kuan. Wheat Yield Prediction Based on Continuous Wavelet Transform and Machine Learning[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2024, 44(10): 2890 Copy Citation Text show less

    Abstract

    Timely and accurate crop yield estimation is crucial for making informed decisions regarding crop management and assessing food security. This study aims to develop a method that combines continuous wavelet transform (CWT) with machine learning to predict wheat yield accurately. This research is based on the spectral data of canopy height and yield data obtained from two-year field trials conducted during wheat growth’s flowering and filling stages in 2020—2021. Initially, CWT is employed to extract three wavelet features (WFs), namely Bortua-WFs based on the Bortua method, 1% R2-WFs representing WFs along with the top 1% determination coefficient for wheat yield, and SS-WFs encompassing all WFs under a single decomposition scale. Subsequently, three machine learning algorithms Random Forest (RF), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), and extreme gradient Lift (XGBoost) are utilized to construct the yield prediction model. Finally, optimal spectral features are selected using the same methodology for modeling and comparison purposes. The results demonstrate that: (1) all three WFs models combined with machine learning methods perform well, with higher accuracy and stability observed in the model built based on Boruta-WFs. (2) Compared to the spectral characteristic model, improved accuracy was achieved by utilizing Bortua-WFs at each growth stage; specifically, an increase in R2 accuracy by 17.5%, 4%, and 39.6% during flowering stage, as well as an increase by 8.4%, 5.6%, and 16.9% during filling stage respectively were observed across different models.(3) The estimation model at the grouting stage outperformed that at the flowering stage; particularly noteworthy was the performance of XGBoost when combined with Bortua-WFs, which yielded an R2 value of 0.83 accompanied by an RMSE value of 0.78 t·ha-1. This study compared the performance of different characteristics and methods. It determined the best model accuracy under different schemes, which can provide technical references for the accurate wheat yield prediction by spectral technology.
    FAN Jie-jie, QIU Chun-xia, FAN Yi-guang, CHEN Ri-qiang, LIU Yang, BIAN Ming-bo, MA Yan-peng, YANG Fu-qin, FENG Hai-kuan. Wheat Yield Prediction Based on Continuous Wavelet Transform and Machine Learning[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2024, 44(10): 2890
    Download Citation