[1] LiWL,WangG,ZhangG,PangCTandYinZP2016A novel path generation method of onsite 5-axis surface inspection using the dual-cubic NURBS representation Meas. Sci. Technol. 27 095003

[2] Chen S H and Perng D B 2016 Automatic optical inspection system for IC molding surface J. Intell. Manuf. 27 915–26

[3] BiQZ,HuangND,ZhangSK,ShuaiCLandWangYH 2019 Adaptive machining for curved contour on deformed large skin based on on-machine measurement and isometric mapping Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 136 34–44

[4] Lee H, Kim M Y and Moon J I 2017 Three-dimensional sensing methodology combining stereo vision and phase-measuring profilometry based on dynamic programming Opt. Eng. 56 124107

[5] Wang J, Wang X J, Liu F, Gong Y, Wang H H and Qin Z 2014 Modeling of binocular stereo vision for remote coordinate measurement and fast calibration Opt. Lasers Eng. 54 269–74

[6] Schlarp J, Csencsics E and Schitter G 2018 Optical scanning of laser line sensors for 3D imaging Appl. Opt. 57 5242–8

[7] FengSJ,ZuoC,ZhangL,Tao TY, HuY, YinW, QianJM and Chen Q 2021 Calibration of fringe projection profilometry: a comparative review Opt. Lasers Eng. 143 106622

[8] FengSJ,ZhangL,ZuoC,Tao TY, ChenQandGuGH 2018 High dynamic range 3D measurements with fringe projection profilometry: a review Meas. Sci. Technol. 29 122001

[9] PeiXH,RenMJ,WangX,RenJJ,ZhuLMandJiangXQ 2022 Profile measurement of non-Lambertian surfaces by integrating fringe projection profilometry with near-field photometric stereo Measurement 187 110277

[10] Bastas A 2020 Comparing the probing systems of coordinate measurement machine: scanning probe versus touch-trigger probe Measurement 156 107604

[11] Echerfaoui Y, El Ouafi A and Chebak A 2018 Experimental investigation of dynamic errors in coordinate measuring machines for high speed measurement Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 19 1115–24

[12] Krajewski G and Wo′zniak A 2014 Simple master artefact for CMM dynamic error identification Precis. Eng. 38 64–70

[13] ISO 10360-1:2000 2022 Geometrical product specifications (GPS)—Acceptance and reverification tests for coordinate measuring machines (CMM)—Part 1: Vocabulary (available at: www.iso.org/standard/18418.html)

[14] ISO 10360-2:2009 2020 Geometrical product specifications (GPS)—Acceptance and reverification tests for coordinate measuring machines (CMM)—Part 2: CMMs used for measuring linear dimensions (available at: www.iso.org/ standard/40954.html)

[15] Fan K C, Fei Y T, Wang W, Chen Y and Chen Y C 2008 Micro-CMM Smart Devices and Machines for Advanced Manufacturing ed L H Wang and J Xi (London: Springer) pp 319–35

[16] Kurfess T R and Hodgson T J 2007 Metrology, sensors and control Micromanufacturing ed K F Ehmann, D Bourell, M L Culpepper, T J Hodgson, T R Kurfess, M Madou, K Rajurkar and R Devor (Dordrecht: Springer) pp 89–109

[17] Spaan H A M and Widdershoven I 2011 Isara 400 ultra-precision CMM Proc. SPIE 8169 81690T

[18] Schwenke H, W.ldele F, Weiskirch C and Kunzmann H 2001 Opto-tactile sensor for 2D and 3D measurement of small structures on coordinate measuring machines CIRP Ann. 50 361–4

[19] Küng A, Meli F and Thalmann R 2007 Ultraprecision micro-CMM using a low force 3D touch probe Meas. Sci. Technol. 18 319–27

[20] Claverley J D and Leach R K 2013 Development of a three-dimensional vibrating tactile probe for miniature CMMs Precis. Eng. 37 491–9

[21] Thalmann R, Meli F and Küng A 2016 State of the art of tactile micro coordinate metrology Appl. Sci. 6 150

[22] LiRJ,ChenC,LiDD,Fan KC,ChengZY,HuangQXand Dang X M 2017 Ball tips of micro/nano probing systems: a review Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 30 222–30

[23] Fang F Z, Zhang X D, Weckenmann A, Zhang G X and Evans C 2013 Manufacturing and measurement of freeform optics CIRP Ann. 62 823–46

[24] Leach R 2020 Advances in Optical Form and Coordinate Metrology (Bristol: IOP Publishing) pp 2053–563

[25] ISO 230-1:2012 2017 Test code for machine tools—Part 1: geometric accuracy of machines operating under no-load or quasi-static conditions (available at: www.iso.org/ standard/46449.html)

[26] Okafor A C and Ertekin Y M 2000 Derivation of machine tool error models and error compensation procedure for three axes vertical machining center using rigid body kinematics Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 40 1199–213

[27] LiuCS,PuYF, ChenYTandLuoYT2018Design of a measurement system for simultaneously measuring six-degree-of-freedom geometric errors of a long linear stage Sensors 18 3875

[28] Zhang Y, Yang J G and Zhang K 2013 Geometric error measurement and compensation for the rotary table of five-axis machine tool with double ballbar Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 65 275–81

[29] Ibaraki S, Nagai Y, Otsubo H, Sakai Y, Morimoto S and Miyazaki Y 2015 R-test analysis software for error calibration of five-axis machine tools—application to a five-axis machine tool with two rotary axes on the tool side Int. J. Autom. Technol. 9 387–95

[30] Schwenke H, Knapp W, Haitjema H, Weckenmann A, Schmitt R and Delbressine F 2008 Geometric error measurement and compensation of machines—An update CIRP Ann. 57 660–75

[31] Geng Z C, Tong Z and Jiang X Q 2021 Review of geometric error measurement and compensation techniques of ultra-precision machine tools Light Adv. Manuf. 2 211–27

[32] Xiang S T and Altintas Y 2016 Modeling and compensation of volumetric errors for five-axis machine tools Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 101 65–78

[33] Ramesh R, Mannan M A and Poo A N 2000 Error compensation in machine tools—a review: part I: geometric, cutting-force induced and fixture-dependent errors Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 40 1235–56

[34] Lyu D, Liu Q, Liu H and Zhao W H 2020 Dynamic error of CNC machine tools: a state-of-the-art review Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 106 1869–91

[35] Tomizuka M 1987 Zero phase error tracking algorithm for digital control J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 109 65–68

[36] Lo C C 2002 A tool-path control scheme for five-axis machine tools Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 42 79–88

[37] Yang L, Zhang X, Wang L and Zhao W H 2021 Dynamic error of multiaxis machine tools considering position dependent structural dynamics and axis coupling inertial forces Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. B 236 281–95

[38] Chan T C, Hong Y P and Yu J H 2021 Effect of moving structure on the spatial accuracy and compensation of the coordinate measuring machine Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 22 1551–61

[39] Echerfaoui Y, El Ouafi A and Sattarpanah Karganroudi S 2022 Dynamic errors compensation of high-speed coordinate measuring machines using ANN-based predictive modeling Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 122 2745–59

[40] Zhao B H, Gao F and Li Y 2015 Study on pre-travel behaviour of touch trigger probe under actual measuring conditions Proc. CIRP 27 53–58

[41] Li Y M, Zeng L, Tang K and Li S M 2019 A dynamic pre-travel error prediction model for the kinematic touch trigger probe Measurement 146 689–704

[42] LiSM,ZengL,FengPF, LiYM,XuCandMaY2019 Accurate compensation method for probe pre-travel errors in on-machine inspections Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 103 2401–10

[43] Yang K Y, Zhang X, Li J B and Zhu L M 2020 An efficient calibration method for 3D nonlinear and nonorthogonal scanning probe in cylindrical CMM Proc. 13th Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robotics and Applications (Kuala Lumpur: Springer) pp 3–15

[44] ISO 10360-5:2020 2020 Geometrical product specifications (GPS)—Acceptance and reverification tests for coordinate measuring systems (CMS)—Part 5: coordinate measuring machines (CMMs) using single and multiple stylus contacting probing systems using discrete point and/or scanning measuring mode (available at: www.iso.org/ standard/73431.html)

[45] Ito S, Tsutsumi D, Kamiya K, Matsumoto K and Kawasegi N 2020 Measurement of form error of a probe tip ball for coordinate measuring machine (CMM) using a rotating reference sphere Precis. Eng. 61 41–47

[46] LiY, Yu ML,BaiYM,HouZYandWu WW2021A review of thermal error modeling methods for machine tools Appl. Sci. 11 5216

[47] LiuK,LiuHB,LiT, LiuYandWangYQ2019 Intelligentization of machine tools: comprehensive thermal error compensation of machine-workpiece system Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 102 3865–77

[48] Fan KC,FeiYT, Yu XF, WangWLandChenYJ2007 Study of a noncontact type micro-CMM with arch-bridge and nanopositioning stages Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 23 276–84

[49] Fan KC,LiuCL,Wu PT, ChenYCandWangWL2007 The structure design of a micro-precision CMM with Abbé principle Proc. 35th Int. MATADOR Conf. ed S Hinduja and K C Fan (London: Springer) pp 297–300

[50] Liu H W, Xiang H, Chen J H and Yang R 2018 Measurement and compensation of machine tool geometry error based on Abbe principle Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 98 2769–74

[51] RenJJ,RenMJ,SunLJ,ZhuLMandJiangXQ2021 Generative model-driven sampling strategy for the high-efficiency measurement of complex surfaces on coordinate measuring machines IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 70 1007911

[52] YiBW, QiaoF, HuangND,WangXS,Wu SJand Biermann D 2021 Adaptive sampling point planning for free-form surface inspection under multi-geometric constraints Precis. Eng. 72 95–101

[53] Pagani L and Scott P J 2018 Curvature based sampling of curves and surfaces Comput. Aided Geom. Des. 59 32–48

[54] SangYC,Yan YC,Yao CLandHeGY2021A new scanning lines distribution strategy for the form error evaluation of freeform surface on CMM Measurement 181 109578

[55] Li Z Y, Tang K, Hu P C and Huang L H 2022 Five-axis trochoidal sweep scanning path planning for free-form surface inspection IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 1–17

[56] ZhangY, ZhuLM,ZhaoPY, HuPCandZhaoXS2022 Skeleton curve-guided five-axis sweep scanning for surface with multiple holes IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 19 2471–86

[57] Fang K T, Wang S G and Wei G 2001 A stratified sampling model in spherical feature inspection using coordinate measuring machines Stat. Probab. Lett. 51 25–34

[58] Lee G, Mou J and Shen Y 1997 Sampling strategy design for dimensional measurement of geometric features using coordinate measuring machine Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 37 917–34

[59] Kim W S and Raman S 2000 On the selection of flatness measurement points in coordinate measuring machine inspection Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 40 427–43

[60] Ainsworth I, Ristic M and Brujic D 2000 CAD-based measurement path planning for free-form shapes using contact probes Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 16 23–31

[61] Cho M W and Kim K 1995 New inspection planning strategy for sculptured surfaces using coordinate measuring machine Int. J. Prod. Res. 33 427–44

[62] Elkott D F, Elmaraghy H A and Elmaraghy W H 2002 Automatic sampling for CMM inspection planning of free-form surfaces Int. J. Prod. Res. 40 2653–76

[63] Rajamohan G, Shunmugam M S and Samuel G L 2011 Practical measurement strategies for verification of freeform surfaces using coordinate measuring machines Metrol. Meas. Syst. 18 209–22

[64] Zou Q and Zhao J B 2013 Iso-parametric tool-path planning for point clouds Comput. -Aided Des. 45 1459–68

[65] Yu M R, Zhang Y J, Li Y L and Zhang D 2013 Adaptive sampling method for inspection planning on CMM for free-form surfaces Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 67 1967–75

[66] Obeidat S M and Raman S 2009 An intelligent sampling method for inspecting free-form surfaces Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 40 1125–36

[67] HeGY, SangYC,PangKRandSunGM2018An improved adaptive sampling strategy for freeform surface inspection on CMM Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 96 1521–35

[68] Poniatowska M 2012 Deviation model based method of planning accuracy inspection of free-form surfaces using CMMs Measurement 45 927–37

[69] Petsiuk V, Das A and Saenko K 2018 RISE: randomized input sampling for explanation of black-box models Proc. British Machine Vision Conf. 2018 (Newcastle: BMVA Press) (https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1806.07421)

[70] Ghassemi M, Oakden-Rayner L and Beam A L 2021 The false hope of current approaches to explainable artificial intelligence in health care Lancet Digit. Health 3 e745–50

[71] Zhang W X and Xiao C X 2019 PCAN: 3D attention map learning using contextual information for point cloud based retrieval Proc. 2019 IEEE/CVF Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Long Beach, CA: IEEE) pp 12436–45

[72] Hafiz A M, Parah S A and Bhat R U A 2021 Attention mechanisms and deep learning for machine vision: a survey of the state of the art Preprint (https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-510910/v1)

[73] Reyes M, Meier R, Pereira S, Silva C A, Dahlweid F M, von Tengg-kobligk H, Summers R M and Wiest R 2020 On the interpretability of artificial intelligence in radiology: challenges and opportunities Radiol. Artif. Intell. 2 e190043

[74] Qi Charles R, Su H, Kaichun M and Guibas L J 2017 PointNet: deep learning on point sets for 3D classification and segmentation Proc. 2017 IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Honolulu, HI: IEEE) pp 652–60

[75] S.lj. R 1979 Learning about learning High. Educ. 8 443–51

[76] Lang I, Manor A and Avidan S 2020 SampleNet: differentiable point cloud sampling Proc. 2020 IEEE/CVF Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Seattle, WA: IEEE) pp 7578–88

[77] WillisKDD,PuYW, LuoJL,ChuH,DuT, Lambourne J G, Solar-Lezama A and Matusik W 2021 Fusion 360 gallery: a dataset and environment for programmatic CAD construction from human design sequences ACM Trans. Graph. 40 54

[78] Kim S, Chi H G, Hu X, Huang Q X and Ramani K 2020 A large-scale annotated mechanical components benchmark for classification and retrieval tasks with deep neural networks Proc. 16th European Conf. on Computer Vision (Glasgow: Springer) pp 175–91

[79] Zhang Z B, Jaiswal P and Rai R 2018 FeatureNet: machining feature recognition based on 3D convolution neural network Comput. Aided Des. 101 12–22

[80] Lu W L, Pagani L, Zhou L P, Liu X J, Wang J, Leach R and Jiang X Q 2019 Uncertainty-guided intelligent sampling strategy for high-efficiency surface measurement via free-knot B-spline regression modeling Precis. Eng. 56 38–52

[81] Yin Y H, Ren M J and Sun L J 2017 Dependant Gaussian processes regression for intelligent sampling of freeform and structured surfaces CIRP Ann. 66 511–4

[82] Ascione R, Moroni G, Petr`o S and Romano D 2013 Adaptive inspection in coordinate metrology based on kriging models Precis. Eng. 37 44–60

[83] YangCF, PengCY, ChenYH,LuoTTandChuJR2018 Space-filling scan paths and Gaussian process-aided adaptive sampling for efficient surface measurements Precis. Eng. 54 412–9

[84] ElKott D F and Veldhuis S C 2007 Cad-based sampling for CMM inspection of models with sculptured features Eng. Comput. 23 187–206

[85] Ren M J, Kong L B, Sun L J and Cheung C 2017 A curve network sampling strategy for measurement of freeform surfaces on coordinate measuring machines IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 66 3032–43

[86] Zhou Z, Zhang Y and Tang K 2016 Sweep scan path planning for efficient freeform surface inspection on five-axis CMM Comput. -Aided Des. 77 1–17

[87] Spyridi A J and Requicha A A G 1990 Accessibility analysis for the automatic inspection of mechanical parts by coordinate measuring machines Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (Cincinnati, OH: IEEE) pp 1284–9

[88] HuPC,ZhouHC,ChenJH,LeeC,TangK,YangJZand Shen S Y 2018 Automatic generation of efficient and interference-free five-axis scanning path for free-form surface inspection Comput. -Aided Des. 98 24–38

[89] Shen Y J, Zhang W Z, Zhu L M and Zhang Y 2021 An image-based algorithm for generating smooth and interference-free five-axis sweep scanning path Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 71 102159

[90] Balasubramaniam M, Laxmiprasad P, Sarma S and Shaikh Z 2000 Generating 5-axis NC roughing paths directly from a tessellated representation Comput. -Aided Des. 32 261–77

[91] Morishige K, Takeuchi Y and Kase K 1999 Tool path generation using C-space for 5-axis control machining J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 121 144–9

[92] Wang N and Tang K 2007 Automatic generation of gouge-free and angular-velocity-compliant five-axis toolpath Comput. -Aided Des. 39 841–52

[93] Lim C P and Menq C H 1994 CMM feature accessibility and path generation Int. J. Prod. Res. 32 597–618

[94] Wu Y Q, Liu S G and Zhang G X 2004 Improvement of coordinate measuring machine probing accessibility Precis. Eng. 28 89–94

[95] Li Y M, Zeng L, Tang K and Xie C 2020 Orientation-point relation based inspection path planning method for 5-axis OMI system Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 61 101827

[96] Spitz S N and Requicha A A G 2000 Accessibility analysis using computer graphics hardware IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 6 208–19

[97] Gao Y, Lin X J, Shi Y Y and Wang Z W 2019 Accessibility analysis in efficient inspection of closed blisk on 3-axis CMM with 2-axis probe head Precis. Eng. 57 104–12

[98] Chang H C and Lin A C 2010 Automatic inspection of turbine blades using 5-axis coordinate measurement machine Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 23 1071–81

[99] Bi Q Z, Wang Y H and Ding H 2010 A GPU-based algorithm for generating collision-free and orientation-smooth five-axis finishing tool paths of a ball-end cutter Int. J. Prod. Res. 48 1105–24

[100] LiWL,WangG,ZhangG,LiQDandYinZP2017 Interference-free inspection path generation for impeller blades using an on-machine probe IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 22 1218–26

[101] YiBW, QiaoF, HuaL,WangXS,Wu SJandHuangND 2022 Touch trigger probe-based interference-free inspection path planning for free-form surfaces by optimizing the probe posture IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 71 1002108

[102] Limaiem A and EiMaraghy H A 2000 Integrated accessibility analysis and measurement operations sequencing for CMMs J. Manuf. Syst. 19 83–93

[103] Vafaeesefat A and Elmaraghy H A 2000 Automated accessibility analysis and measurement clustering for CMMs Int. J. Prod. Res. 38 2215–31

[104] HeoEY, KimDW, LeeJYandKimKY2008 Computer-aided measurement plan for an impeller on a coordinate measurement machine with a rotating and tilting probe Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 24 788–95

[105] Mian S H and Al-Ahmari A 2014 Enhance performance of inspection process on coordinate measuring machine Measurement 47 78–91

[106] Salman R, Carlson J S, Ekstedt F, Spensieri D, Torstensson J and S.derberg R 2016 An industrially validated CMM inspection process with sequence constraints Proc. CIRP 44 138–43

[107] Zhang Y Q, Shen Y J, Zhang W Z, Zhang L, Zhu L M and Zhang Y 2022 Generation of efficient and interference-free scanning path for inspecting impeller on a cylindrical CMM Measurement 198 111352

[108] Shen Y J, Zhang W Z, Zhang Y Q, Huang N D, Zhang Y and Zhu L M 2022 Distributed particle swarm optimization for the planning of time-optimal and interference-free five-axis sweep scanning path IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 18 8703–13

[109] Zhang Y, Zhou Z and Tang K 2018 Sweep scan path planning for five-axis inspection of free-form surfaces Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 49 335–48

[110] Hu P C, Zhang R and Tang K 2017 Automatic generation of five-axis continuous inspection paths for free-form surfaces IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 14 83–97

[111] HuPC,ZhouHC,TangK,LeeC,ChenJH,YangJZ and Li L 2018 Spiral curve-based efficient five-axis sweep scanning of barrel-shaped surfaces J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 140 071001

[112] ChenLF, ZhangR,TangK,HuPC,ZhaoPY, LiZY and Han Z W 2020 A spiral-based inspection path generation algorithm for efficient five-axis sweep scanning of freeform surfaces Comput. -Aided Des. 124 102838

[113] Zhang Y, Shen Y J, Zhu L M, Huang N D and Hu P C 2022 Extracting skeletons of two-manifold triangular mesh surface for planning skeleton-guided five-axis surface inspection path J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 144 121005

[114] Zhang Y and Tang K 2019 Automatic sweep scan path planning for five-axis free-form surface inspection based on hybrid swept area potential field IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 16 261–77

[115] Wan N, Jiang R Z, Zhao H and Zhang S T 2019 An inspection path optimization of impeller for balancing efficiency and accuracy Measurement 141 472–85

[116] Chen Y P, Gao J, Deng H X, Zheng D T, Chen X and Kelly R 2013 Spatial statistical analysis and compensation of machining errors for complex surfaces Precis. Eng. 37 203–12

[117] Li S M, Zeng L, Feng P F and Yu D W 2020 An accurate probe pre-travel error compensation model for five-axis on-machine inspection system Precis. Eng. 62 256–64

[118] Liu C Q, Li Y G and Hao X Z 2017 An adaptive machining approach based on in-process inspection of interim machining states for large-scaled and thin-walled complex parts Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 90 3119–28

[119] BiQZ,WangXZ,Wu Q,ZhuLMandDingH2019 Fv-SVM-based wall-thickness error decomposition for adaptive machining of large skin parts IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 15 2426–34

[120] Zhao Z C, Xu T R and Fu Y C 2020 Profile and thickness constrained adaptive localization for manufacturing curved thin-walled parts based on on-machine measurement Int J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 110 113–23

[121] Liu H B, Wang Y Q, Jia Z Y and Guo D M 2015 Integration strategy of on-machine measurement (OMM) and numerical control (NC) machining for the large thin-walled parts with surface correlative constraint Int J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 80 1721–31

[122] Huang N D, Bi Q Z, Wang Y H and Sun C 2014 5-Axis adaptive flank milling of flexible thin-walled parts based on the on-machine measurement Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 84 1–8

[123] Zhang Y, Chen Z T and Zhu Z Q 2020 Adaptive machining framework for the leading/trailing edge of near-net-shape integrated impeller Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 107 4221–9

[124] Zhao Z C, Ding D W, Fu Y C and Xu J H 2019 Measured data-driven shape-adaptive machining via spatial deformation of tool cutter positions Measurement 135 244–51

[125] HuangND,YinCH,LiangL,HuJCandWu SJ2018 Error compensation for machining of large thin-walled part with sculptured surface based on on-machine measurement Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 96 4345–52

[126] HaoXZ,LiYG,DengTC,LiuCQandXiangBF2019 Tool path transplantation method for adaptive machining of large-sized and thin-walled free form surface parts based on error distribution Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 56 222–32

[127] Liang S R and Lin A C 2002 Probe-radius compensation for 3D data points in reverse engineering Comput. Ind. 48 241–51

[128] Liu J F, He X M, Zhang L, Huang X and Wang Y Z 2022 High precision measurement of blade profile curve using iterative normal vector approximation Meas. Sci. Technol. 33 075015

[129] Park J J, Kwon K and Cho N 2006 Development of a coordinate measuring machine (CMM) touch probe using a multi-axis force sensor Meas. Sci. Technol. 17 2380–6

[130] Rak A and Wo′zniak A 2009 Probe radius correction methods—review and comparison of existing methods J. Autom. Mobile Rob. Intell. Syst. 3 169–71

[131] Lee R T and Shiou F J 2010 Calculation of the unit normal vector using the cross-curve moving mask method for probe radius compensation of a freeform surface measurement Measurement 43 469–78

[132] Shiou F J and Lin Y F 2002 Calculation of the normal vector using the 3 × 3 moving mask method for freeform surface measurement and its application Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 19 516–24

[133] Wójcik A, Niemczewska-Wójcik M and S.adek J 2017 Assessment of free-form surfaces’ reconstruction accuracy Metrol. Meas. Syst. 24 303–12

[134] Jiang R S, Wang W H, Zhang D H and Wang Z Q 2016 A practical sampling method for profile measurement of complex blades Measurement 81 57–65

[135] Kawalec A and Magdziak M 2017 The selection of radius correction method in the case of coordinate measurements applicable for turbine blades Precis. Eng. 49 243–52

[136] Wozniak A and Mayer J R R 2012 A robust method for probe tip radius correction in coordinate metrology Meas. Sci. Technol. 23 025001

[137] Wo′zniak A, Mayer J R R and Ba.azi′nski M 2009 Stylus tip envelop method: corrected measured point determination in high definition coordinate metrology Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 42 505–14

[138] Wang Z Y, Zhang X, Shen Y J, Zhu L M and Besse S 2020 A novel 3D radius compensation method of probe stylus tip in the free-form surface profile curve scanning measurement Meas. Sci. Technol. 31 085001

[139] Li Y Q and Ni J 2009 Constraints based nonrigid registration for 2D blade profile reconstruction in reverse engineering J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng. 9 031005

[140] Bae S H and Choi B K 2002 NURBS surface fitting using orthogonal coordinate transform for rapid product development Comput. Aided Des. 34 683–90

[141] GuTQ,LinHX,TangDW, LinSWandLuoTZ2021 Curve and surface reconstruction based on MTLS algorithm combined with k-means clustering Measurement 182 109737

[142] Zhu Z P, Zheng A Z, Iglesias A, Wang S B, Xia Y, Chaudhry E, You L H and Zhang J J 2022 PDE patch-based surface reconstruction from point clouds J. Comput. Sci. 61 101647

[143] Wang D S, Hassan O, Morgan K and Weatherill N 2006 Efficient surface reconstruction from contours based on two-dimensional Delaunay triangulation Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 65 734–51

[144] ZhaoZC,FuYC,LiuX,XuJH,WangJandMaoSJ2017 Measurement-based geometric reconstruction for milling turbine blade using free-form deformation Measurement 101 19–27

[145] Hoffmann M 2005 Numerical control of Kohonen neural network for scattered data approximation Numer. Algorithms 39 175–86

[146] Liu X Y and Feng F 2009 Constraint-based NURBS surfaces manipulation Proc. 2009 Int. Workshop on Intelligent Systems and Applications (Wuhan: IEEE) pp 1–4

[147] Lin F 2011 NURBS interpolation algorithm based on feedrate sensitive points identification Adv. Mater. Res. 383–390 2567–72

[148] Lin C T, Cheng W C and Liang S F 2005 Neural-network-based adaptive hybrid-reflectance model for 3D surface reconstruction IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 16 1601–15

[149] Lu K Q and Wang W 2015 A multi-sensor approach for rapid and precise digitization of free-form surface in reverse engineering Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 79 1983–94

[150] Hu S M, Li Y F, Ju T and Zhu X 2001 Modifying the shape of NURBS surfaces with geometric constraints Comput. -Aided Des. 33 903–12

[151] Pourazady M and Xu X 2006 Direct manipulations of NURBS surfaces subjected to geometric constraints Comput. Graph. 30 598–609

[152] LaiJT, FuJZ,ShenHY, GanWFandChenZC2015 Machining error inspection of T-spline surface by on-machine measurement Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 16 433–9

[153] YiBW, LiangRB,WangXS,Wu SJandHuangND2022 Free-form surface form error evaluation based on smaller-scale sampling points in touch-trigger probing Precis. Eng. 76 255–60

[154] RenJJ,JianZX,WangX,RenMJ,ZhuLMandJiangXQ 2021 Complex surface reconstruction based on fusion of surface normals and sparse depth measurement IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 70 2506413

[155] Wen P Z, Wu X J, Zhu Y and Peng X W 2009 LS-RBF network based 3D surface reconstruction method Proc. 2009 Chinese Control and Decision Conf. (Guilin: IEEE) pp 5785–9

[156] Yoo D J 2010 Rapid surface reconstruction from a point cloud using the least-squares projection Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 11 273–83

[157] Zhu D Z and Smith W A P 2020 Least squares surface reconstruction on arbitrary domains Proc. 16th European Conf. on Computer Vision (Glasgow: Springer) pp 530–45

[158] Bae E and Weickert J 2010 Partial differential equations for interpolation and compression of surfaces Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on Mathematical Methods for Curves and Surfaces (T.nsberg: Springer) pp 1–14

[159] Zhao H K, Osher S and Fedkiw R 2001 Fast surface reconstruction using the level set method Proc. IEEE Workshop on Variational and Level Set Methods in Computer Vision (Vancouver, BC: IEEE) pp 194–201

[160] Zou Q 2020 A PDE model for smooth surface reconstruction from 2D parallel slices IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 27 1015–9

[161] Wang S B, Xia Y, You L H and Zhang J J 2023 PDE-based surface reconstruction in automotive styling design Multimedia Tools Appl. 82 1185–202

[162] LeCun Y, Bengio Y and Hinton G 2015 Deep learning Nature 521 436–44

[163] WangJJ,MaYL,ZhangLB,GaoRXandWu DZ2018 Deep learning for smart manufacturing: methods and applications J. Manuf. Syst. 48 144–56

[164] Dong C, Loy C C, He K M and Tang X O 2014 Learning a deep convolutional network for image super-resolution Proc. 13th European Conf. on Computer Vision (Zurich: Springer) pp 184–99

[165] Dong C, Loy C C and Tang X O 2016 Accelerating the super-resolution convolutional neural network Proc. 14th European Conf. on Computer Vision (Amsterdam: Springer) pp 391–407

[166] Shi W Z, Caballero J, Huszár F, Totz J, Aitken A P, Bishop R, Rueckert D and Wang Z H 2016. Real-time single image and video super-resolution using an efficient sub-pixel convolutional neural network Proc. 2016 IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Las Vegas, NV: IEEE) pp 1874–83

[167] Kim J, Lee J K and Lee K M 2016 Accurate image super-resolution using very deep convolutional networks Proc. 2016 IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Las Vegas, NV: IEEE) pp 1646–54

[168] Kim J, Lee J K and Lee K M 2016 Deeply-recursive convolutional network for image super-resolution Proc. 2016 IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Las Vegas, NV: IEEE) pp 1637–45

[169] Ledig C et al 2017 Photo-realistic single image super-resolution using a generative adversarial network Proc. 2017 IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Honolulu, HI: IEEE) pp 4681–90

[170] Tai Y, Yang J and Liu X M 2017 Image super-resolution via deep recursive residual network Proc. 2017 IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Honolulu, HI: IEEE) pp 3147–55

[171] Lim B, Son S, Kim H, Nah S and Lee K M 2017 Enhanced deep residual networks for single image super-resolution Proc. 2017 IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (Honolulu, HI: IEEE) pp 136–44

[172] Tong T, Li G, Liu X J and Gao Q Q 2017 Image super-resolution using dense skip connections Proc. 2017 IEEE Int. Conf. on Computer Vision (Venice: IEEE) pp 4799–807

[173] HuXC,MuHY, ZhangXY, WangZL,Tan TNandSunJ 2019 Meta-SR: a magnification-arbitrary network for super-resolution Proc. 2019 IEEE/CVF Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Long Beach, CA: IEEE) pp 1575–84

[174] Chen Y B, Liu S F and Wang X L 2021 Learning continuous image representation with local implicit image function Proc. 2021 IEEE/CVF Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Nashville, TN: IEEE) pp 8628–38

[175] Yu L Q, Li X Z, Fu C W, Cohen-Or D and Heng P A 2018 PU-Net: point cloud upsampling network Proc. 2018 IEEE/CVF Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Salt Lake City, UT: IEEE) pp 2790–9

[176] Yu L Q, Li X Z, Fu C W, Cohen-Or D and Heng P A 2018 EC-Net: an edge-aware point set consolidation network Proc. 15th European Conf. on Computer Vision (Munich: Springer) pp 398–414

[177] Wang Y F, Wu S H, Huang H, Cohen-Or D and Sorkine-Hornung O 2019 Patch-based progressive 3D point set upsampling Proc. 2019 IEEE/CVF Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Long Beach, CA: IEEE) pp 5958–67

[178] Li R H, Li X Z, Fu C W, Cohen-Or D and Heng P A 2019 PU-GAN: a point cloud upsampling adversarial network Proc. 2019 IEEE/CVF Int. Conf. on Computer Vision (Seoul: IEEE) pp 7203–12

[179] Qian Y, Hou J H, Kwong S and He Y 2020 PUGeo-Net: a geometry-centric network for 3D point cloud upsampling Proc. 16th European Conf. on Computer Vision (Glasgow: Springer) pp 752–69

[180] Yuan W T, Khot T, Held D, Mertz C and Hebert M 2018 PCN: point completion network Proc. 2018 Int. Conf. on 3D Vision (Verona: IEEE) pp 728–37

[181] Qian G C, Abualshour A, Li G H, Thabet A and Ghanem B 2021 PU-GCN: point cloud upsampling using graph convolutional networks Proc. 2021 IEEE/CVF Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Nashville, TN: IEEE) pp 11683–92

[182] Li R H, Li X Z, Heng P A and Fu C W 2021 Point cloud upsampling via disentangled refinement Proc. 2021 IEEE/CVF Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Nashville, TN: IEEE) pp 344–53

[183] Qian Y, Hou J H, Kwong S and He Y 2021 Deep magnification-flexible upsampling over 3D point clouds IEEE Trans. Image Process. 30 8354–67

[184] Zhao W B, Liu X M, Zhong Z W, Jiang J J, Gao W, Li G and Ji X Y 2022. Self-supervised arbitrary-scale point clouds upsampling via implicit neural representation Proc. 2022 IEEE/CVF Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (New Orleans, LA: IEEE) pp 1989–97

[185] Ye SQ,ChenDD,HanSF, Wan ZYandLiaoJ2022 Meta-PU: an arbitrary-scale upsampling network for point cloud IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 28 3206–18

[186] ISO 1101:2017 2017 Geometrical product specifications (GPS)—geometrical tolerancing—tolerances of form, orientation, location and run-out (available at: www.iso. org/standard/66777.html)

[187] Wen X L and Song A G 2003 An improved genetic algorithm for planar and spatial straightness error evaluation Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 43 1157–62

[188] Pathak V K and Singh A K 2017 Form error evaluation of noncontact scan data using constriction factor particle swarm optimization J. Adv. Manuf. Syst. 16 205–26

[189] Zhu L M, Xiong Z H, Ding H and Xiong Y L 2004 A distance function based approach for localization and profile error evaluation of complex surface J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 126 542–54

[190] He G Y, Zhang M and Song Z J 2015 Error evaluation of free-form surface based on distance function of measured point to surface Comput. -Aided Des. 65 11–17

[191] Lang A L, Song Z J, He G Y and Sang Y C 2017 Profile error evaluation of free-form surface using sequential quadratic programming algorithm Precis. Eng. 47 344–52

[192] Gu P and Chan K 1996 Generative inspection process and probe path planning for coordinate measuring machines J. Manuf. Syst. 15 240–55

[193] Li Y D and Gu P H 2004 Free-form surface inspection techniques state of the art review Comput. -Aided Des. 36 1395–417

[194] Vrba I, Palencar R, Hadzistevic M, Strbac B, Spasic-Jokic V and Hodolic J 2015 Different approaches in uncertainty evaluation for measurement of complex surfaces using coordinate measuring machine Meas. Sci. Rev. 15 111–8

[195] Forbes A B, Mengot A and Jonas K 2015 Uncertainty associated with coordinate measurement in comparator mode Proc. Laser Metrology and Machine Performance XI (Huddersfield: University of Huddersfield) pp 150–9

[196] FengCXJ,SaalAL,SalsburyJG,NessARandLinGCS 2007 Design and analysis of experiments in CMM measurement uncertainty study Precis. Eng. 31 94–101

[197] Wilhelm R G, Hocken R and Schwenke H 2001 Task specific uncertainty in coordinate measurement CIRP Ann. 50 553–63

[198] Hocken R J and Pereira P H 2012 Coordinate Measuring Machines and Systems 2nd edn (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press) (https://doi.org/10.1201/b11022)

[199] Sato O, Takatsuji T and Balsamo A 2022 Practical experimental design of task-specific uncertainty evaluation for coordinate metrology Advanced Mathematical and Computational Tools in Metrology and Testing XII ed F Pavese, A B Forbes, N F Zhang and A G Chunovkina (Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific) (https://doi.org/ 10.1142/9789811242380_0023)

[200] Valdez M O and Morse E P 2017 The role of extrinsic factors in industrial task-specific uncertainty Precis. Eng. 49 78–84

[201] Valdez M O 2015 Task-specific uncertainty for industrial measurements Doctoral Dissertation Thesis The University of North Carolina

[202] Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology 2008 JCGM 100 Evaluation of Measurement Data—Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (JCGM) pp 1–116

[203] Papananias M 2018 Combined numerical and statistical modelling for in-depth uncertainty evaluation of comparative coordinate measurement Doctoral Thesis University of Portsmouth

[204] Mussatayev M, Huang M F and Beshleyev S 2020 Thermal influences as an uncertainty contributor of the coordinate measuring machine (CMM) Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 111 537–47

[205] Barini E M, Tosello G and De Chiffre L 2010 Uncertainty analysis of point-by-point sampling complex surfaces using touch probe CMMs: DOE for complex surfaces verification with CMM Precis. Eng. 34 16–21

[206] ko B, Havrli c B and Strbac B, Ac san S, Matin I, Savkovi′ Hadzistevi′c M 2020 Investigation of the effect of temperature and other significant factors on systematic error and measurement uncertainty in CMM measurements by applying design of experiments Measurement 158 107692

[207] ISO/TS 15530-3:2004 2004 Geometrical product specifications (GPS)—Coordinate measuring machines (CMM): technique for determining the uncertainty of measurement—Part 3: use of calibrated workpieces or standards (available at: www.iso.org/standard/38695. html)

[208] Forbes A B, Papananias M, Longstaff A P, Fletcher S, Mengot A and Jonas K 2016 Developments in automated flexible gauging and the uncertainty associated with comparative coordinate measurement Proc. 16th Int. Conf. of the European Society for Precision Engineering and Nanotechnology (Nottingham: European society for precision engineering and nanotechnology) (availabel at: www.euspen.eu/events/ 16th-international-conference-exhibition/)

[209] Papananias M, Fletcher S, Longstaff A P, Mengot A, Jonas K and Forbes A B 2017 Modelling uncertainty associated with comparative coordinate measurement through analysis of variance techniques Proc. 17th Int. Conf. European Society for Precision Engineering and Nanotechnology (Hannover, Germany) (available at: www.euspen.eu/events/17th-international-conference-exhibition/)

[210] Kruth J P, Van Gestel N, Bleys P and Welkenhuyzen F 2009 Uncertainty determination for CMMs by Monte Carlo simulation integrating feature form deviations CIRP Ann. 58 463–6

[211] Peggs G 2003 Virtual technologies for advanced manufacturing and metrology Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 16 485–90

[212] Haitjema H, van Dorp B W, Morel M and Schellekens P H J 2001 Uncertainty estimation by the concept of virtual instruments Proc. SPIE 4401 147–57

[213] Ga.ska P, Ga.ska A, S.adek J and Je.drzejewski J 2019 Simulation model for uncertainty estimation of measurements performed on five-axis measuring systems Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 104 4685–96

[214] Mian S H and Al-Ahmari A 2014 New developments in coordinate measuring machines for manufacturing industries Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng. 5 101

[215] S.adek J, Ga.ska A, Olszewska M, Kupiec R and Krawczyk M 2013 Virtual coordinate measuring machine built using lasertracer system and spherical standard Metrol. Meas. Syst. 20 77–86

[216] Ga.ska A, Ga.ska P and Gruza M 2016 Simulation model for correction and modeling of probe head errors in five-axis coordinate systems Appl. Sci. 6 144

[217] Ga.ska A, Harmatys W, Ga.ska P, Gruza M, Gromczak K and Ostrowska K 2017 Virtual CMM-based model for uncertainty estimation of coordinate measurements performed in industrial conditions Measurement 98 361–71

[218] ISO/TS 15530-4:2008 2008 Geometrical product specifications (GPS)—Coordinate measuring machines (CMM): Technique for determining the uncertainty of measurement—Part 4: evaluating task-specific measurement uncertainty using simulation (available at: www.iso.org/standard/38696.html)

[219] Gawlikowski J et al 2021 A survey of uncertainty in deep neural networks (arXiv:2107.03342)

[220] Kendall A G 2019 Geometry and Uncertainty in Deep Learning for Computer Vision (Cambridge: University of Cambridge)

[221] Gal Y 2016 Uncertainty in Deep Learning (Cambridge: University of Cambridge)

[222] Kendall A and Gal Y 2017 What uncertainties do we need in Bayesian deep learning for computer vision? Proc. 31st Int. Conf. on Neural Information Processing Systems (Long Beach, CA: Curran Associates Inc.) pp 5580–90 (available at: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/ paper/2017/file/2650d6089a6d640c5e85b2b88265dc2b-Paper.pdf)

[223] Lee J, Bahri Y, Novak R, Schoenholz S S, Pennington J and Sohl-Dickstein J 2018 Deep neural networks as Gaussian processes Proc. 6th Int. Conf. on Learning Representations (Vancouver, BC: OpenReview.net) (https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1711.00165)

[224] Garnelo M, Schwarz J, Rosenbaum D, Viola F, Rezende D J, Eslami S M A and Teh Y W 2018 Neural processes (arXiv:1807.01622)

[225] Garnelo M, Rosenbaum D, Maddison C, Ramalho T, Saxton D, Shanahan M, Teh Y W, Rezende D J and Eslami S M A 2018 Conditional neural processes Proc. 35th Int. Conf. on Machine Learning (Stockholm: PMLR, Stockholmsm.ssan) pp 1690–9 (available at: https://proceedings.mlr.press/v80/garnelo 18a.html)

[226] Kim H, Mnih A, Schwarz J, Garnelo M, Eslami S M A, Rosenbaum D, Vinyals O and Teh Y W 2019 Attentive neural processes Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on Learning Representations (New Orleans, LA: OpenReview.net) (https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1901.05761)

[227] Li J Z, Ren J J, Ren M J, Zheng Y and Le X Y 2022 Neural process enhanced machining error evaluation for coordinate measuring machines IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 71 2514512

[228] Papananias M, Fletcher S, Longstaff A P and Mengot A 2016 A novel method based on Bayesian regularized artificial neural networks for measurement uncertainty evaluation Proc. 16th Int. Conf. European Society for Precision Engineering and Nanotechnology (Nottingham, UK) (https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1773.7840)

[229] Gao W, Haitjema H, Fang F Z, Leach R K, Cheung C F, Savio E and Linares J M 2019 On-machine and in-process surface metrology for precision manufacturing CIRP Ann. 68 843–66

[230] Huang N D, Zhang S K, Bi Q Z and Wang Y H 2016 Identification of geometric errors of rotary axes on 5-axis machine tools by on-machine measurement Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 84 505–12

[231] Ibaraki S, Inui H, Hong C F, Nishikawa S and Shimoike M 2019 On-machine identification of rotary axis location errors under thermal influence by spindle rotation Precis. Eng. 55 42–47