• Chinese Optics Letters
  • Vol. 22, Issue 10, 100601 (2024)
Hao Zhou1, Wen Zuo1, Yaojun Qiao1,*, Yan Zhao2..., Bing Ye2, Chenglin Bai3 and Hengying Xu3|Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1State Key Laboratory of Information Photonics and Optical Communications, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China
  • 2State Key Laboratory of Mobile Network and Mobile Multimedia Technology, WDM System Department, ZTE Corporation, Beijing 100020, China
  • 3School of Physics Science and Information Engineering, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng 252000, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/COL202422.100601 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Hao Zhou, Wen Zuo, Yaojun Qiao, Yan Zhao, Bing Ye, Chenglin Bai, Hengying Xu, "Ultrasonic phase extraction method for co-cable identification in coherent optical transmission systems," Chin. Opt. Lett. 22, 100601 (2024) Copy Citation Text show less
    Diagram of ultrasound-assisted co-cable identification (ODF: optical distribution frame).
    Fig. 1. Diagram of ultrasound-assisted co-cable identification (ODF: optical distribution frame).
    DSP in ultrasound-assisted co-cable identification: (a) coherent DSP and (b) proposed FUA-UPE method.
    Fig. 2. DSP in ultrasound-assisted co-cable identification: (a) coherent DSP and (b) proposed FUA-UPE method.
    Signal spectrum with residual frequency offset: (a) with V–V FOE and (b) with V–V FOE and proposed F-RFOC. (Δf: frequency offset center; F: sampling rate; FORL: FO reloading; FORC: FO re-compensation.).
    Fig. 3. Signal spectrum with residual frequency offset: (a) with V–V FOE and (b) with V–V FOE and proposed F-RFOC. (Δf: frequency offset center; F: sampling rate; FORL: FO reloading; FORC: FO re-compensation.).
    Phase ambiguity between DSP blocks: (a) without and (b) with proposed UIB.
    Fig. 4. Phase ambiguity between DSP blocks: (a) without and (b) with proposed UIB.
    Result of simulation: (a) frequency offset, (b) estimation error of frequency offset, (c) extracted phase, and (d) PSD of extracted phase.
    Fig. 5. Result of simulation: (a) frequency offset, (b) estimation error of frequency offset, (c) extracted phase, and (d) PSD of extracted phase.
    Experimental setup for verifying proposed FUA-UPE method (AWG: arbitrary waveform generator; OMFT: optical multi-format transmitter; EDFA: erbium-doped fiber amplifier; VOA: variable optical attenuator; SSMF: standard single-mode fiber; PZT: piezoelectric transducer; OSA: optical spectrum analyzer; OMA: optical modulation analyzer).
    Fig. 6. Experimental setup for verifying proposed FUA-UPE method (AWG: arbitrary waveform generator; OMFT: optical multi-format transmitter; EDFA: erbium-doped fiber amplifier; VOA: variable optical attenuator; SSMF: standard single-mode fiber; PZT: piezoelectric transducer; OSA: optical spectrum analyzer; OMA: optical modulation analyzer).
    Result of experiment: (a) frequency offset and (b) PSD of extracted phase.
    Fig. 7. Result of experiment: (a) frequency offset and (b) PSD of extracted phase.
    MethodPolarizationBlock StorageSampling Rate
    FOE-modified2LBlock2 SPS
    FUA-UPE141 SPS
    Table 1. Storage Cost Comparison
    ParameterValue
    Modulation formatDP-QPSK
    Symbol rate64 GBaud
    Fiber length100 km
    OSNR16 dB
    Ultrasound frequency60 kHz
    Ultrasound amplitude1 rad
    Sampling window100 ms
    Average trace100
    PSD resolution1 kHz
    DSP block size (FUA-UPE/FOE-modified)64/16 kSymbols
    Phase sampling rate1 MSa/s
    Storage cost (FUA-UPE/FOE-modified)400 kpts/25.6 Gpts
    Table 2. Main Parameters of the Simulation
    SchemePerformanceCostEase of Integration
    OFS-basedHighMediumMedium
    FOE-modifiedHighLowLow
    FUA-UPEHighLowHigh
    Table 3. Comparison of Existing Co-Cable Identification Schemes
    Hao Zhou, Wen Zuo, Yaojun Qiao, Yan Zhao, Bing Ye, Chenglin Bai, Hengying Xu, "Ultrasonic phase extraction method for co-cable identification in coherent optical transmission systems," Chin. Opt. Lett. 22, 100601 (2024)
    Download Citation