• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 60, Issue 16, 1633001 (2023)
Meng Wu1,*, Yining Gao1, and Jia Wang2
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Information and Control Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an 710055, Shaanxi, China
  • 2Shaanxi History Museum, Xi'an 710061, Shaanxi, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP222583 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Meng Wu, Yining Gao, Jia Wang. Mural Style Transfer with Feature Clustering and Deep Residual Shrinkage Network[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2023, 60(16): 1633001 Copy Citation Text show less
    Network framework
    Fig. 1. Network framework
    Algorithm flow
    Fig. 2. Algorithm flow
    Cluster graph comparison. (a) Input image; (b) VGG19 space; (c) RGB space
    Fig. 3. Cluster graph comparison. (a) Input image; (b) VGG19 space; (c) RGB space
    Algorithm flow
    Fig. 4. Algorithm flow
    Color space comparison. (a) Input image; (b) RGB space; (c) LAB space
    Fig. 5. Color space comparison. (a) Input image; (b) RGB space; (c) LAB space
    RSB structure
    Fig. 6. RSB structure
    Soft threshold function and its derivative. (a) Soft threshold function; (b) soft threshold function derivative
    Fig. 7. Soft threshold function and its derivative. (a) Soft threshold function; (b) soft threshold function derivative
    Image representation of different network levels. (a) Original image; (b) Conv_1_1; (c) Conv_2_1; (d) Conv_3_1; (e) Conv_4_1
    Fig. 8. Image representation of different network levels. (a) Original image; (b) Conv_1_1; (c) Conv_2_1; (d) Conv_3_1; (e) Conv_4_1
    RSB validity verification. (a) Content image; (b) without RSB; (c) with RSB
    Fig. 9. RSB validity verification. (a) Content image; (b) without RSB; (c) with RSB
    The effect of style transfer with different cluster numbers. (a) Input image; (b) K=1; (c) K=3; (d) K=5; (e) K=10
    Fig. 10. The effect of style transfer with different cluster numbers. (a) Input image; (b) K=1; (c) K=3; (d) K=5; (e) K=10
    The effect of style transfer with different fusion coefficients. (a) Input image; (b) αk= 0.2; (c) αk= 0.6; (d) αk=1.0
    Fig. 11. The effect of style transfer with different fusion coefficients. (a) Input image; (b) αk= 0.2; (c) αk= 0.6; (d) αk=1.0
    The effect of style transfer with different coverage ratios. (a) Input image; (b) coverage ratio is 0.25; (c) coverage ratio is 0.5; (d) coverage ratio is 1.0
    Fig. 12. The effect of style transfer with different coverage ratios. (a) Input image; (b) coverage ratio is 0.25; (c) coverage ratio is 0.5; (d) coverage ratio is 1.0
    Comparison of different style transfer methods. (a) Content images; (b) style images; (c) method of reference [5]; (d) AdaIN; (e) SANet; (f) MST; (g) proposed method
    Fig. 13. Comparison of different style transfer methods. (a) Content images; (b) style images; (c) method of reference [5]; (d) AdaIN; (e) SANet; (f) MST; (g) proposed method
    Comparison results of different data augmentation methods. (a) Original image; (b) flip horizontal; (c) rotate 90°; (d) rotate 180°; (e) rotate 270°; (f) contrast; (g) color enhancement; (h) brightness enhancement
    Fig. 14. Comparison results of different data augmentation methods. (a) Original image; (b) flip horizontal; (c) rotate 90°; (d) rotate 180°; (e) rotate 270°; (f) contrast; (g) color enhancement; (h) brightness enhancement
    Effect of different dataset generation. (a) Original murals; (b) masked images; (c) real; (d) real+s.a.; (e) synthetic; (f) real+synthetic
    Fig. 15. Effect of different dataset generation. (a) Original murals; (b) masked images; (c) real; (d) real+s.a.; (e) synthetic; (f) real+synthetic
    ImageMethodMSSIMRPSNREMSE /103
    picture1Method of reference[50.569.307.65
    AdaIN0.589.038.13
    SANet0.527.387.15
    MST0.459.207.82
    Proposed method0.6411.254.88
    picture2Method of reference[50.4812.813.40
    AdaIN0.5113.193.12
    SANet0.3711.884.21
    MST0.3911.624.48
    Proposed method0.5314.692.21
    picture3Method of reference[50.5315.641.76
    AdaIN0.4815.251.94
    SANet0.3414.362.38
    MST0.3413.672.79
    Proposed method0.5516.101.59
    picture4Method of reference[50.4315.781.24
    AdaIN0.3817.851.15
    SANet0.2816.451.47
    MST0.3416.711.38
    Proposed method0.4518.251.13
    Table 1. Quantitative statistical results of stylized test
    MethodRunning time /s
    AdaIN0.40
    SANet0.89
    MST4.77
    Proposed method1.65
    Table 2. Comparison of average generation time of different methods
    MethodMSSIMRPSNREMSE /103
    AdaIN0.4318.762.68
    SANet0.4118.222.94
    MST0.3817.783.52
    Proposed method0.4919.262.31
    Table 3. Mural digital generation results
    Meng Wu, Yining Gao, Jia Wang. Mural Style Transfer with Feature Clustering and Deep Residual Shrinkage Network[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2023, 60(16): 1633001
    Download Citation