Fourier ptychography (FP) is an advanced computational imaging technique that offers high resolution and a large field of view for microscopy. By illuminating the sample at varied angles in a microscope setup, FP performs phase retrieval and synthetic aperture construction without the need for interferometry. Extending its utility, FP’s principles can be adeptly applied to far-field scenarios, enabling super-resolution remote sensing through camera scanning. However, a critical prerequisite for successful FP reconstruction is the need for data redundancy in the Fourier domain, which necessitates dozens or hundreds of raw images to achieve a converged solution. Here, we introduce a macroscopic Fourier ptychographic imaging system with high temporal resolution, termed illumination-multiplexed snapshot synthetic aperture imaging (IMSS-SAI). In IMSS-SAI, we employ a

- Advanced Imaging
- Vol. 1, Issue 1, 011005 (2024)
Abstract
Keywords
Author Presentation Playback
1. Introduction
The synthetic aperture (SA) technique is crucial for many far-field detection applications, such as Earth observation[1], remote sensing[2], and astronomical imaging[3,4]. By synthesizing a large virtual aperture, it overcomes the diffraction limit of finite-size apertures, enabling higher-resolution imaging. Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) has been particularly successful, directly measuring the complex field with high temporal resolution to effectively synthesize large virtual apertures and enhance resolution in microwave frequencies[5,6]. Over the past half-century, SAR has become an indispensable tool in various detection fields. Applying the SA technique in visible light promises even greater resolution enhancements compared with SAR due to shorter wavelengths[7–10]. However, challenges arise because light waves contain both amplitude and phase information, and the extremely high oscillation frequency of visible light (approximately
Fourier ptychographic microscopy (FPM) is a powerful phase retrieval method that iteratively combines real and reciprocal space information[13–15]. Based on Fourier optics and ptychography[16], FPM illuminates a sample from different angles using an light-emitting diode (LED) array[17,18]. This enables the capture of diverse spatial frequencies, facilitating simultaneous phase recovery and aperture synthesis[19,20]. Its simple hardware and superior imaging capabilities make FPM widely applicable in biomedical and pathological studies[21–23]. By replacing the LED array with aperture or camera scanning, Fourier ptychography (FP) can be extended to far-field detection as macroscopic FP[24–27]. This non-interferometric aperture synthesis method enhances resolution and corrects aberrations over long distances[28,29]. Importantly, macroscopic FP addresses the inherent trade-off between the imaging distance and field of view (FOV), making it highly practical for far-field applications[30,31].
Despite their physical differences, FPM and macroscopic FP face common challenges in phase retrieval techniques, including sub-aperture positioning errors[32], low signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs)[33,34], and slow reconstruction speeds[35]. Their mathematical similarities enable shared solutions, like simulated annealing algorithms[36], adaptive step-size strategy[37], and single-photon avalanche diode (SPAD) array cameras[38]. Both FPM and macroscopic FP rely on data redundancy for stable iterative convergence. This is achieved through dense illumination/scanning sampling, but at the cost of numerous image acquisitions and reduced efficiency. Multiplexing has proven effective in computational imaging by decoupling individual images for greater information extraction[39–45]. In FPM, illumination multiplexing reduces image acquisition without sacrificing data redundancy[46,47]. Color cameras enable direct R/G/B channel separation but face photon efficiency and filter-induced downsampling issues[48].
Sign up for Advanced Imaging TOC. Get the latest issue of Advanced Imaging delivered right to you!Sign up now
Unlike FPM, simultaneous multi-wavelength illumination in macroscopic FP does not improve temporal resolution because it relies on aperture scanning, not LED positioning, for spectral shifts. Camera arrays can potentially enhance temporal resolution, as seen in some FPM implementations[49,50]. However, the lack of physical overlap between camera array sub-apertures inhibits effective redundancy for macroscopic FP, where the overlap must exceed 40%[51,52]. Wu et al. demonstrated low-redundancy (25% overlap) aperture synthesis using a camera array and total variation (TV) regularization[53], but this has not yet been applied to practical macroscopic FP systems. Deep neural networks can extract spectral information from camera arrays for rapid reconstruction[54,55]. Our group achieved improved resolution and SNR in macroscopic FP using a nine-path convolutional neural network[56], though reconstruction quality remains somewhat dataset-dependent. To address far-field imaging of moving targets or dynamic scenes, methods for achieving high-temporal-resolution macroscopic FP are crucial.
To address the above challenges, we present illumination-multiplexed snapshot synthetic aperture imaging (IMSS-SAI) for macroscopic Fourier ptychographic imaging. By employing a camera array for simultaneous data acquisition, we expand the Fourier coverage in reciprocal space without camera scanning. By employing a state-multiplexed ptychographic algorithm in IMSS-SAI, we effectively separate distinct coherent states from their incoherent summations, enhancing the Fourier spectrum overlap for ptychographic reconstruction. Simulations (USAF resolution chart and commemorative coin) and experiments with far-field targets demonstrate the effectiveness of IMSS-SAI. Our method delivers a fourfold increase in spatial resolution without sacrificing temporal efficiency. Furthermore, we successfully reconstructed a dynamic music box image with both high temporal and spatial resolutions. IMSS-SAI offers a practical and easily implemented solution for fast, long-range, and high-quality super-resolution far-field detection.
2. Principle and Method
In a standard macroscopic FP setup, a translation stage sequentially scans the aperture to obtain position-varied spectrum information, with images acquired by individual cameras. IMSS-SAI replaces the translation stage and individual cameras with a camera array, enabling simultaneous capture of spectrum information at multiple positions. Figure 1 illustrates the IMSS-SAI system. A fiber laser emits light simultaneously at three distinct wavelengths. After passing through a lens to satisfy the Fraunhofer diffraction condition, the light propagates toward the target. Upon reflection, the target’s optical field information is captured by a
Figure 1.Overview of the IMSS-SAI framework. The target is illuminated by a tri-wavelength fiber laser, and the Fourier spectrum is formed at the aperture plane of the camera array.
The target is positioned at the center of the captured frames by compact arrangement and slight directional adjustments among the cameras. This approach simplifies the reconstruction of high-resolution images without needing image registration. The camera array, by recording images from different sub-apertures, effectively obtains spectrum information from various positions, extending the spectrum range and achieving synthetic aperture imaging (See Visualization 1 for the whole video recording). To accurately quantify the overlapping ratio between each sub-aperture, the spectral shift components corresponding to the different wavelengths must be calculated. The aperture distribution, extending outward from the center, includes the central aperture, and the R/G/B channel apertures located on the inner ring and outer ring, respectively, as illustrated in Fig. S1(b1) in Supplement 1.
The primary distinguishing feature of IMSS-SAI lies in its capacity to “regenerate” information redundancy lost between camera arrays. Within an individual detector of IMSS-SAI, discernible variations in the size and positioning of the pupil functions are observed, a phenomenon attributed to the wavelength diversity: First, the cutoff frequency
We have refined the state-multiplexed FP algorithm to enhance its suitability for macroscopic Fourier ptychographic imaging with a camera array. The iterative reconstruction process is depicted in Fig. 2. We employ a cumulative averaging method on the sub-aperture images of diffuse targets, utilizing the resultant average as the initial image amplitude to facilitate an accelerated convergence. The initial complex amplitude is estimated as
Figure 2.Flow chart of the iteration reconstruction of IMSS-SAI.
In this context, the pre-update intensity distribution, denoted as
Unlike conventional microscopy, where thin phase objects are assumed to have similar responses across spectral channels, IMMS-SAI relies on a different assumption: for diffuse reflection targets, intensity distributions remain approximately consistent across wavelengths, despite variations in phase caused by illumination differences. IMSS-SAI is best suited for targets with minimal color variation, where intensities at different wavelengths are strongly correlated. Additional noise reduction algorithms, with adjusted parameters to mitigate errors induced by depth variation, are discussed in Supplement 1. We employ the standard phase retrieval iterative engine (PIE) algorithm instead of ePIE (extended PIE) due to inconsistent aberrations across both camera array apertures and different spectral channels[57,58]. These aberrations would hinder the convergence of a state-multiplexed FP algorithm. Speckle noise is a common issue in far-field detection with rough-surface diffuse reflection targets. Therefore, denoising techniques are essential for mitigating speckle noise’s influence on reconstruction results. Our previous work[30] examined speckle noise formation and its influence on coherent imaging of smooth versus diffuse objects. We enhance texture details and achieve high SNR by incorporating TV regularization and guided filtering in our reconstruction process. Unlike our previous use of total variation guided filtering (TVGF) during the iterative process, which disordered phase information in IMSS-SAI, we apply TVGF to the amplitude of the reconstructed image after 25 iterations (out of 30 total) across all apertures, ensuring both high resolution and superior SNR.
3. Simulation to Demonstrate the Resolution Enhancement of IMSS-SAI
We separately simulated the reconstruction results for a smooth target (USAF resolution chart, without speckle noise) and a rough target (coin exhibiting pronounced speckle noise) to validate the algorithm’s effectiveness. The results are shown in Fig. 3. Here, the imaging system is configured at a distance of 1.6 m from the target, with incident wavelengths as 653 nm, 515 nm, and 445 nm. The F-number of the sub-apertures is designated as 32 to acquire low-resolution images, with a pixel size set at 1.85 µm. We simulated low-resolution image acquisition using a
Figure 3.Reconstructions of the USAF resolution chart and the coin. (a1), (a2) The spectrum information and corresponding low-resolution image captured by a single camera. (b1), (b2) The expanded spectrum range and the reconstructed result by IMSS-SAI, with the corresponding line profile of group 0 shown at the bottom. (c1)–(c3) The low-resolution image of the coin and the regions of interest. (d1)–(d3) The averaging result and the regions of interest. (e1)–(e3) The recovery result and the regions of interest.
The spectrum information and low-resolution image captured by a single camera are illustrated in Figs. 3(a1) and 3(a2), respectively. The maximum coverage range of the spectrum in the sub-aperture reaches the cutoff frequency of blue light. Subsequently, we conducted reconstruction based on the optimal arrangement. The expanded spectrum range and the corresponding reconstructed result are depicted in Figs. 3(b1) and 3(b2). The resolvable line pairs increased from 0.4454 line pairs per millimeter (group -2, Element 6) to 1.7818 line pairs per millimeter (group 0, Element 6). The corresponding line profile of group -3 is shown at the bottom of Fig. 3(b1), demonstrating a fourfold enhancement in the resolution of the proposed IMSS-SAI. We introduced random phase values in the range of
4. Experiments to Demonstrate the Dynamic Imaging of IMSS-SAI
To assess the resolution enhancement of actual targets through illumination multiplexing, we constructed an experimental platform following the design shown in Fig. 1. The central wavelengths of the laser light source matched our simulated setting, used for illuminating two real targets located 2 m away. A configuration of 25 lenses with identical parameters (75 mm Fujinon lens) and sensors (DMK33UX226, Imaging Source, 2400 pixel × 2400 pixel, 1.85 µm pixel size) is arranged on the camera array. The detectable photons decay with increasing imaging distance, which can be avoided by utilizing quasi-plane wave illumination or a high-power pulsed laser to an extent[30]. The F-number of each aperture in the
Figure 4.Experimental results of IMSS-SAI on far-field targets. (a1)–(d1) The low-resolution images and the corresponding regions of interest. (a2)–(d2) The averaging results and corresponding regions of interest. (a3)–(d3) The recovery results and corresponding regions of interest.
It is worth noting that there are differences between the results obtained by IMSS-SAI and the averaging of independently reconstructed results from three channels. The improvement in SNR resulting from averaging is not based on speckles formed by different angles. Single-channel reconstruction under low redundancy conditions fails to reconstruct high-resolution images accurately, and even averaging the three channels only slightly suppresses speckle noise without improving resolution, as discussed in Supplement 1.
Furthermore, we demonstrated the high temporal resolution of the IMSS-SAI by capturing super-resolved videography of dynamic scenarios containing isolated individual samples (see Visualization 2 for the whole video recording). We utilized the same parameters as for the experiments in the static scenario, with an F-number of sub-apertures of 22. The imaging scenario by sub-aperture and reconstruction is depicted in Fig. 5(a), featuring a Harry Potter music box with mostly stationary elements. The color of the music box tends to be a uniform dark green, so aperture synthesis can be performed using IMSS-SAI. A clockwise-moving train is a moving target captured by the camera array at 30 frame/s, the maximum frame rate set by the camera program. Figures 5(b) and 5(c) present a comparison of results for two stationary regions in the scene. It can be observed that the original low-resolution image is too coarse to discern meaningful details, while the result obtained through cumulative averaging of sub-images only displays partial contours. In contrast, the proposed IMSS-SAI yields optimal super-resolution reconstruction, and the imaging SNR is further enhanced through TVGF denoising processing. The reconstruction results for the moving target at different time points are illustrated in Fig. 5(d). Compared to the original images, the reconstruction method consistently produces high-resolution, high SNR images across 480 continuous frames. The eagle emblem on the train’s front, representing the most discernible target, is reconstructed and identified at each position. This experimental evidence substantiates that the proposed method enhances the capabilities of the synthetic aperture technique in detecting moving targets.
Figure 5.Constructed music box dynamic rotating imaging results. (a) Comparison of the recorded low-resolution image (under F-number 12) with the predicted super-resolved image. (b1)–(b4) Raw image, averaging result, recovery result, and denoising result of the region of interest 1, respectively. (c1)–(c4) Raw image, averaging result, recovery result, and denoising result of the region of the interest 2, respectively. (d1)–(d6) The instantaneous frames of the eagle emblem captured every 0.5 s (15 frames) with IMSS-SAI.
5. Conclusion and Discussion
In summary, we have proposed a camera-array-based single-shot synthetic aperture imaging, combining illumination multiplexing FP with a camera array to achieve single-shot far-field macroscopic FP imaging. Employing IMSS-SAI on platforms such as satellites and unmanned aerial vehicles enables precise target identification, intelligence gathering, and tracking with exceptional accuracy. Illumination multiplexing provides decoupled low-resolution images to achieve sufficient information redundancy. The parallel acquisition at different positions of the camera array offers scalable spectrum information. By refining the state-multiplexed FP algorithm, the 25 incoherently mixed sub-images of a
It should be emphasized that the current work is mainly focused on the construction of redundant information in macroscopic Fourier ptychographic imaging. The utilization of additional wavelengths for illumination increases the complexity of algorithmic decoupling, thereby failing to enhance the resolution of synthetic aperture imaging. Conversely, it impairs the efficiency and quality of the reconstruction process. By further enhancing the scale and performance of the camera array, it is expected to achieve higher resolution and more rapid synthetic aperture imaging. Considering that cameras farther from the array center introduce greater aberrations, we believe that navigating a graceful balance between the scale of the camera array and the enhanced resolution achievable through synthetic aperture should be more significant.
References
[2] A. B. Meinel. Aperture synthesis using independent telescopes. Appl. Opt., 9, 2501(1970).
[6] W. M. Brown. Synthetic aperture radar. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., AES-3, 217(1967).
[7] E. H. K. Stelzer. Beyond the diffraction limit?. Nature, 417, 806(2002).
[31] Q. Zhang, Y. Lu, Y. Guo et al. First realization of macroscopic Fourier ptychography for hundred-meter distance sub-diffraction imaging(2023).
[49] B. Wilburn, N. Joshi, V. Vaish et al. High performance imaging using large camera arrays, 765(2005).
[57] J. R. Fienup. Phase retrieval algorithms: a comparison. Appl. Opt., 21, 2758(1982).

Set citation alerts for the article
Please enter your email address