• Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves
  • Vol. 44, Issue 2, 170 (2025)
Zhi-Cheng LIU1,2, Jing-Tao ZHOU1, Jin MENG3, Hao-Miao WEI4..., Cheng-Yue YANG1, Yong-Bo SU1, Zhi JIN1,* and Rui JIA1,**|Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1Institute of Microelectronics of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100029,China
  • 2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China
  • 3Key Laboratory of Microwave Remote Sensing,National Space Science Center,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190,China
  • 4School of Electronic Science and Engineering,University of Electronic Science and Technology of China,Chengdu 611731,China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.11972/j.issn.1001-9014.2025.02.005 Cite this Article
    Zhi-Cheng LIU, Jing-Tao ZHOU, Jin MENG, Hao-Miao WEI, Cheng-Yue YANG, Yong-Bo SU, Zhi JIN, Rui JIA. A high output power 340 GHz balanced frequency doubler designed based on linear optimization method[J]. Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves, 2025, 44(2): 170 Copy Citation Text show less

    Abstract

    In this paper, a linear optimization method(LOM) for the design of terahertz circuits is presented, aimed at enhancing the simulation efficacy and reducing the time of the circuit design workflow. This method enables the rapid determination of optimal embedding impedance for diodes across a specific bandwidth to achieve maximum efficiency through harmonic balance simulations. By optimizing the linear matching circuit with the optimal embedding impedance, the method effectively segregates the simulation of the linear segments from the nonlinear segments in the frequency multiplier circuit, substantially improving the speed of simulations. The design of on-chip linear matching circuits adopts a modular circuit design strategy, incorporating fixed load resistors to simplify the matching challenge. Utilizing this approach, a 340 GHz frequency doubler was developed and measured. The results demonstrate that, across a bandwidth of 330 GHz to 342 GHz, the efficiency of the doubler remains above 10%, with an input power ranging from 98 mW to 141mW and an output power exceeding 13 mW. Notably, at an input power of 141 mW, a peak output power of 21.8 mW was achieved at 334 GHz, corresponding to an efficiency of 15.8%.

    Introduction

    In recent decades,the demand for millimeter-wave and submillimeter-wave power sources has surged,driven by the expanding application of terahertz technology in fields such as remote sensing,high-speed communication,and radio astronomy1-4. Currently,there are two primary methods for generating terahertz sources:optical solutions,including far-infrared lasers,femtosecond infrared lasers,photoconductors,and Quantum Cascade Lasers(QCLs)5-7,and electronic solutions,comprising vacuum electronic devices8-11and solid-state circuits1213. Due to the high quality,low cost,high reliability,and compact structure of frequency multiplier chains made from Schottky diodes,they have emerged as the leading choice for terahertz source solutions.

    As the mainstream technological solution for terahertz sources,research on Schottky diode frequency doublers has been increasing. The principle of frequency doubling with Schottky diodes primarily utilizes the diode's nonlinear characteristics,including varactor and varistor properties,to generate harmonic components at corresponding frequencies,which are then extracted and output through an E-plane waveguide probe structure. Varactor diodes excel in delivering higher power outputs with superior efficiency,whereas varistor diodes are distinguished by their ability to provide wider bandwidths. Balanced frequency doublers14-18 and balanced triplers 19-23 have become standard topological structures for frequency multiplication,as their inherent topologies suppress unneeded harmonics and reduce the need for filtering structures,thereby enhancing broadband characteristics and greatly improving frequency multiplication efficiency. To date,all-solid-state frequency multiplier chains utilizing Schottky diodes have reached operational frequencies of up to 2.7 THz 24. To ensure sufficient driving power for the final stage of the frequency multiplier chain,it is crucial that the driving power input by the preceding stages is adequately high. However,limitations due to the number of anode junctions and the power capacity of the materials impose an upper limit on the power capacity of individual circuits. Techniques such as in-phase power combining25-29and on-chip power combining30 have been proposed to solve this problem. However,this results in a considerable expansion of the circuit's scale,subsequently leading to a marked increase in the duration required for nonlinear simulations throughout the design process. Consequently,optimizing simulation design methods is crucial for enhancing the design efficiency.

    The popular approach in terahertz circuit design combines three-dimensional electromagnetic field models with diode SPICE models through the coaxial probe method,enabling accurate prediction of the circuit performance. However,the specific implementation processes of different methods each have their own variations. The subdivision design method(SDM)3132divides the circuit into multiple independent unit structures,each optimized through 3D-EM simulations. The global design method(GDM)33 deconstructs the entire circuit into a series of variables that can be optimized,increasing the degree of freedom for optimization but also the computational load,requiring substantial system resources. The half-global design method(HGDM)34 merges these strategies,balancing computational load with optimization flexibility.

    However,regardless of how 3D-EM is segmented into units in these mentioned design methods,the final simulation optimization still occurs within harmonic balance simulation software,thus the simulation speed is constrained by the speed of harmonic balance simulations. Recently,some efforts have been made to separate linear and nonlinear circuits 3536 to increase simulation speed. However,these methods only separate the waveguide and circuit components,resulting in the inability to optimize the matching structures near the diode units within the linear circuit. This limitation,crucial for frequency doubling circuit performance,consequently increases the workload.

    This paper introduces an impedance matching method that distinctly separates linear circuits from nonlinear circuits. The principal concept isolates the nonlinear circuit from the impedance matching process,connecting the two through the diode's harmonic embedding impedance in the linear circuit as determined by nonlinear simulations. This approach significantly improves simulation speed. To validate the accuracy and practicality of this design concept,a 340 GHz balanced frequency doubler circuit was designed and fabricated.

    1 Linear impedance matching method

    The balanced frequency doubler consists of a pair of in-phase,parallel-connected diodes mounted on the E-plane of the input waveguide,with the output signal transmitted to the output waveguide by means of an E-plane probe. Its unique topological structure allows the currents generated by odd harmonics to circulate between the diodes and the ground provided by the cavity,effectively making the entire diode unit act like a dipole antenna that excites TE modes in the waveguide. Meanwhile,the currents from even harmonics can generate TEM modes along the direction of the transmission line. This configuration results in mode isolation between the input fundamental signal and the output second harmonic signal,as well as impedance isolation. Consequently,input and output matching can be designed independently without concern for their coupling effects.

    According to the principles,the design of a balanced frequency doubler circuit can be segmented into three parts:initially,individual harmonic balance simulations of the diodes are performed to determine their best operating harmonic embedding impedance;subsequently,the previously determined harmonic embedding impedance is utilized to design the input and output matching circuits separately;finally,the input and output matches are integrated into a complete circuit,and a comprehensive harmonic balance simulation is performed to predict the circuit's performance. The design process is illustrated in Fig. 1.

    Linear optimization method design flow diagram(HB:Harmonic Balance)

    Figure 1.Linear optimization method design flow diagram(HB:Harmonic Balance)

    1.1 Extraction of diode harmonic embedding impedance

    For frequency doublers based on Schottky diodes,the diode's parasitic and intrinsic parameters significantly impact the performance of the frequency doubler. To ensure the doubler operates optimally at 340 GHz,with the maximum output under a standardized 100 mW input,we optimized the intrinsic parameters of the diode based on measured data from a series of Schottky diodes with different diameters. The final intrinsic parameters of the diode are presented in Table 1.

    ParametersValue
    Diameter,d5 µm
    Reverse saturation current, Is22.8 fA
    Zero bias junction capacitance, Cj021.6 fF
    Ideal factor, η1.1
    Series resistance at DC measurement,Rs3.8 Ω
    Reverse breakdown voltage,Vb12 V
    Barrier voltage,Vj0.77 V
    Grading coefficient,M0.418

    Table 1. Intrinsic SPICE parameters of the diodes

    Subsequently,harmonic balance simulations are performed on the diode model to extract both the fundamental and second harmonic embedding impedances,as depicted in the HB simulation section of Fig. 1. Sampling of the optimal harmonic embedding impedances within the 155-185 GHz frequency range was carried out through harmonic balance simulations,targeting the desired output efficiency at these frequencies. This process ultimately yielded a series of embedding impedances,which represent the diode's optimal embedding impedances within this frequency band. Given the continuity of embedding impedances and their gradual variation with frequency,as illustrated on the Smith chart,larger steps can be taken between frequency points to reduce simulation time without compromising the accuracy of the results. The final normalized embedding impedances are shown in Fig. 2.

    Optimal input and output embedding impedances for the diode

    Figure 2.Optimal input and output embedding impedances for the diode

    1.2 Input matching network

    As mentioned in Section 2.1,the input fundamental signal operates in the TE10 mode,while the output second harmonic signal travels in the TEM mode. Their mode orthogonality ignores the need for an additional filter,reducing the complexity of the matching process. Moreover,the isolation between input and output impedances minimizes their mutual influence,allowing for the independent optimization of the input matching network.

    As shown in Fig. 3,the initial step involves determining the parameters of the waveguide cavity where the diode cell is suspended. The width of the waveguide,a,is primarily determined by the input frequency,while the height of the waveguide,b,is influenced by the ease of impedance matching as well as the cutoff concerns of the TM11 mode at the output frequency. Other parameters that significantly affect the input impedance,such as the distance from the diode plane to the short-circuit plane of the input waveguide and the dimensions for the input matching waveguide,can be optimized in an S-parameter simulation after parameterization,as illustrated in the schematic in Fig. 4. Connecting the AC source to the diode’s port optimizes their average impedance. It is crucial to note that the source impedance here is conjugate to the impedance extracted from the previous harmonic balance simulations. Incorrect setting of this impedance may lead to discrepancies from expected results.

    Schematic of the waveguide cavity where the diode cell is suspended

    Figure 3.Schematic of the waveguide cavity where the diode cell is suspended

    Schematic for optimization of the input matching network circuit

    Figure 4.Schematic for optimization of the input matching network circuit

    Furthermore,the transmission structures in the output matching circuit might affect the field distribution of the TE10 mode,thereby influencing the transmission constants and characteristic impedance of the TE10 mode,as shown in Fig. 5(b). To prevent the transmission line structure of the output circuit from affecting the input impedance,two methods can be used:the first is to determine the maximum line width that does not affect the TE10 mode through simulation;the second is to incorporate this transmission line into the input matching circuit after obtaining the output matching circuit,and then iterate to eliminate this effect.

    Design of input matching network:(a)detailed dimensions of the input matching network;(b)comparison of PortZ0 and Epsilon for suspended and non-suspended microstrip lines with a width of 100 µm for the TE10 mode;(c)comparison of the diode's input embedding impedance with the impedance provided by the input matching network

    Figure 5.Design of input matching network:(a)detailed dimensions of the input matching network;(b)comparison of PortZ0 and Epsilon for suspended and non-suspended microstrip lines with a width of 100 µm for the TE10 mode;(c)comparison of the diode's input embedding impedance with the impedance provided by the input matching network

    Ultimately,the dimensions of the various parts of the input matching circuit obtained through simulations are shown in Fig. 5(a). It is worth noting that the transmission line in Fig. 5(a)is primarily used for output circuit matching. However,considering the effect on the input mode TE10,as shown in Fig. 5(b),this effect needs to be reflected in the input circuit to iterate the dimensions of the input matching waveguide,thereby eliminating the influence. Consequently,the dimensions are determined by the output matching circuit. Additionally,Fig. 5(c)illustrates the relationship between the impedance provided by the input matching network and the optimal input impedance of the diode. The blue line represents the impedance provided by the input matching network,while the red circle represents the optimal embedded impedance of the diode extracted through harmonic balance simulation.

    1.3 Output matching network

    The output matching circuit can be divided and designed in two parts:one from the diode to the suspended microstrip line in the channel,and the other encompassing the output probe transition,which includes a DC filter. These two parts are connected by introducing a fixed load impedance,ZL,in the middle to simplify the complexity of output matching. The load impedance is determined by the suspended microstrip line in the channel. Thus,when combining the two circuit parts,merely adjusting the length of the suspended microstrip line can minimize reflections between the two subcircuits. The specific principle is illustrated in Fig. 6. The principle of the matching circuit for the first section,from the diode to the suspended microstrip line in the channel,is shown in Fig. 6. The second part of the matching circuit,including the output probe transition,DC filter,and the output waveguide matching section,is illustrated in Fig. 7(a). The connecting part between them is represented by ZL.

    Schematic for optimization of the output matching network circuit

    Figure 6.Schematic for optimization of the output matching network circuit

    Design of the output matching network:(a)detailed dimensions of the output waveguide matching;(b)the detail of the 340 GHz frequency doubler chip;(c)comparison of the diode's output embedding impedance with the impedance provided by the output matching network

    Figure 7.Design of the output matching network:(a)detailed dimensions of the output waveguide matching;(b)the detail of the 340 GHz frequency doubler chip;(c)comparison of the diode's output embedding impedance with the impedance provided by the output matching network

    Diverging from traditional high-low impedance filters,this design employs a CMRC(Compact Microstrip Resonant Cell)filter for the DC filtering section,aiming to minimize the overall length of the chip while ensuring robust RF suppression capabilities to ease assembly challenges. The resulting integrated output circuit's waveguide matching section is displayed in Fig. 7(a),with details of the monolithic integrated circuit shown in Fig. 7(b). Additionally,the relationship between the impedance achieved by the output matching network and the diode's output impedance is illustrated in Fig. 7(c).

    2 Assembly and measurement

    After separately designing the input and output matching circuits,combining these two sections forms the complete frequency doubler circuit,which includes the monolithic circuit and the metal cavity. An E-plane split-waveguide block is produced through computer numerical control(CNC)milling technology and is further processed by electroplating. The diode chip is mounted on the split block and aligned through beam leads to ensure its correct placement. This step is critical,as the accuracy of alignment directly influences performance. Subsequently,the DC beam leads are connected to the chip capacitors and through capacitors to establish the DC pathway for the frequency doubler. Lacking thermo-compression bonding facilities,conductive adhesive is used to attach the beam leads to the cavity. However,this approach does not offer sufficient strength,making the chip prone to shifting during the disassembly of the cavity. This may also explain the significant discrepancies between our empirical results and the simulations. The fully assembled frequency doubler is illustrated in Fig. 8.

    Assembled frequency doubler

    Figure 8.Assembled frequency doubler

    The constructed test system is shown in Fig. 9. The driver source chains includes a synthesizer,followed by an 81-86 GHz sextupler module,which is then connected to a 170 GHz doubler. The output signal is amplified by a GaN-based HEMT amplifier with a gain of about 10dbm,allowing the chains to provide an output power of approximately 72-150 mW in the 162-175 GHz band. Both the source power calibration and the output power measurement are performed by an Erickson PM4 power meter. To achieve optimal performance of the doubler,we measured the output power and frequency characteristics of the frequency multiplier at a series of different bias points,and the final output curve represents the maximum output power recorded at each frequency point.

    Ref.Output Frequency(GHz)Pin(mW)Peak Pout(mW)Design Method
    38177-20250-9513SDM
    31200-24020-1205SDM
    39135-19030-17417.8GDM
    35210-23442-9716FHIMO
    36205-22510-5013FMWW
    23135-15010-703.5Quality factors scaling
    This work322-34235-14621.8LOM

    Table 2. Comparison with other doubler designs

    Diagram of the frequency doubler test setup

    Figure 9.Diagram of the frequency doubler test setup

    Figure 10(a)displays the actual input power versus the measured output power of the 340 GHz frequency doubler. Within the range of 330-342 GHz,the output power exceeds 13 mW,reaching a maximum output power of 21.8 mW at 334 GHz. Figure 10(b)shows a comparison between the measured efficiency and the simulated efficiency using different series resistances. It is known from Refs.[1937]that series resistance is crucial to circuit performance,and the resistance obtained from DC measurement is often underestimated for RF simulations. According to the comparison,we found that the simulation results using the adjusted series resistance align better with the test results. Moreover,the test results indicate a sharp decrease in output power above 344 GHz,while a slight increase in output efficiency is observed below 330 GHz.

    Test results of the 340 GHz doubler:(a)measured input power and output power versus frequencies;(b)comparison of measured efficiency and simulated efficiency with different series resistances(simulated input power Pin=150 mW)

    Figure 10.Test results of the 340 GHz doubler:(a)measured input power and output power versus frequencies;(b)comparison of measured efficiency and simulated efficiency with different series resistances(simulated input power Pin=150 mW)

    As shown in Fig. 8,the supporting beam lead is not aligned with the output waveguide but is instead shifted into the input waveguide,which may be the main cause of the sharp drop in output. Based on this issue,we conducted a simulation analysis of the impact of lateral assembly errors of the doubler chip on the performance of the frequency doubler,as shown in Fig. 11. It can be observed that when the lateral shift is around 10 µm,the output results do not change significantly. However,when the shift exceeds 10 µm,both the output efficiency and bandwidth of the doubler start to decline,especially in the case of forward shifting,where the beam lead moves toward the output waveguide. In this case,the decline in output efficiency and bandwidth becomes very noticeable,which aligns well with the situation shown in Fig. 8. Therefore,during the manufacturing process of the frequency doubler,it is crucial to control the assembly error tolerance within 10 µm as much as possible. Additionally,as shown in Fig. 12,there is a notch in the output waveguide of the machined lower half of the cavity,which could unpredictably affect the output.

    The effect of assembly errors on output:(a)schematic of the lateral assembly error;(b)impact of different offset values on the output efficiency,with Rs•Cj0 = 120 Ω•fF and Pin=150 mW

    Figure 11.The effect of assembly errors on output:(a)schematic of the lateral assembly error;(b)impact of different offset values on the output efficiency,with Rs•Cj0 = 120 Ω•fF and Pin=150 mW

    Defects on the surface of the output waveguide

    Figure 12.Defects on the surface of the output waveguide

    Table 2 presents a comparison between the frequency doubler proposed in this paper and those designed using other methods. Unlike approaches that optimize linear and nonlinear circuits together,the method of separating linear and nonlinear circuits adopted in this work ensures both efficiency and flexibility while achieving commendable performance.

    3 Conclusions

    In this paper,a strategy to boost the design efficiency of terahertz frequency multipliers is proposed. This method separates the circuit into linear and nonlinear parts for distinct simulations. By using the diode's nonlinear properties in the linear circuit's embedding impedance,it connects the two parts. This separation of harmonic balance from S-parameter simulations helps to reduce simulation time. Following this strategic framework,a 340 GHz frequency doubler was developed and subjected to empirical validation. Performance evaluations revealed that within a bandwidth of 330 GHz to 342 GHz,the efficiency of the device consistently surpasses 10%,with the input power oscillating between 98 mW and 141 mW,and the output power starting from 13 mW. Remarkably,with an input power set at 141 mW,the device achieved a peak output of 21.8 mW at 334 GHz,translating to an efficiency rate of 15.8%. The practical application of this frequency doubler effectively demonstrates the viability of the suggested approach. This technique promises adaptability for a wide range of applications in terahertz circuits,particularly for complex harmonic structures like mixers and compact modules.

    References

    [1] G Chattopadhyay. Technology, capabilities, and performance of low power Terahertz sources. IEEE Transactions on Terahertz Science and Technology, 1, 33-53(2011).

    [2] T Kleine-Ostmann, T Nagatsuma. A review on Terahertz communications research. Journal of Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves, 32, 143-171(2011).

    [3] I Mehdi, J V Siles, C Lee et al. THz diode technology: Status, prospects, and applications. Proceedings of the IEEE, 105, 990-1007(2017).

    [4] P H Siegel. THz for space: The golden age, 816-819(2010).

    [5] M Tonouchi. Cutting-edge terahertz technology. Nature Photon, 1, 97-105(2007).

    [6] B S Williams, S Kumar, H Callebaut et al. Terahertz quantum-cascade laser at λ≈100 μm using metal waveguide for mode confinement. Appl. Phys. Lett., 83, 2124-2126(2003).

    [7] B S Williams, H Callebaut, S Kumar et al. 3.4-THz quantum cascade laser based on longitudinal-optical-phonon scattering for depopulation. Appl. Phys. Lett., 82, 1015-1017(2003).

    [8] T Matsui. A brief review on metamaterial-based vacuum electronics for Terahertz and microwave science and technology. Journal of Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves, 38, 1140-1161(2017).

    [9] A Dobroiu, M Yamashita, Y N Ohshima et al. Terahertz imaging system based on a backward-wave oscillator. Appl. Opt., 43, 5637-5646(2004).

    [10] N Kumar, U Singh, A Bera et al. A review on the sub-THz/THz gyrotrons. Infrared Physics & Technology, 76, 38-51(2016).

    [11] G Caryotakis. The klystron: A microwave source of surprising range and endurance. Physics of Plasmas, 5, 1590-1598(1998).

    [12] T W Crowe, W L Bishop, D W Porterfield et al. Opening the terahertz window with integrated diode circuits. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 40, 2104-2110(2005).

    [13] LA Samoska. An Overview of Solid-State Integrated Circuit Amplifiers in the Submillimeter-Wave and THz Regime. IEEE Transactions on Terahertz Science and Technology, 1, 9-24(2011).

    [14] G Chattopadhyay, E Schlecht, J Gill et al. A broadband 800 GHz Schottky balanced doubler. IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, 12, 117-118(2002).

    [15] G Chattopadhyay, E Schlecht, J S Ward et al. An all-solid-state broad-band frequency multiplier chain at 1 500 GHz. IEEE Trans Microwave Theory Techn, 52, 1538-1547(2004).

    [16] J Ding, A Maestrini, L Gatilova et al. High efficiency and wideband 300 GHz frequency doubler based on six Schottky diodes. J. Infrared Milli. Terahz Waves, 38, 1331-1341(2017).

    [17] N R Erickson, B J Rizzi, T W Crowe. A high power doubler for 174 GHz using a planar diode array, 287-296(1993).

    [18] H Liu, J Powell, C Viegas et al. A 332GHz frequency doubler using flip-chip mounted planar schottky diodes, 2, 1-3(2015).

    [19] A Maestrini, J S Ward, J J Gill et al. A 540-640-GHz high-efficiency four-anode frequency tripler. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 53, 2835-2843(2005).

    [20] A Maestrini, C Tripon-Canseliet, J S Ward et al. A high efficiency multiple-anode 260-340 GHz frequency tripler(2006).

    [21] A Maestrini, C Tripon-Canseliet, I Mehdi. Design of a wideband 6-anode frequency tripler at 300 GHz with optimum balance, 203.

    [22] C Guo, X Wen, Z Wu et al. A 135–150 GHz high-power frequency tripler with filtering matching network. IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, 32, 1327-1330(2022).

    [23] C Guo, X Shang, M J Lancaster et al. A 135–150-GHz frequency tripler with waveguide filter matching. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 66, 4608-4616(2018).

    [24] A Maestrini, I Mehdi, J V Siles et al. Design and characterization of a room temperature all-solid-state electronic source tunable from 2.48 to 2.75 THz. IEEE Transactions on Terahertz Science and Technology, 2, 177-185(2012).

    [25] JV Siles, K Cooper, C Lee et al. A compact room-temperature 510–560 GHz frequency tripler with 30-mW output power, 1353-1356(2018).

    [26] J V Siles, A Maestrini, B Alderman et al. A single-waveguide in-phase power-combined frequency doubler at 190 GHz. IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, 21, 332-334(2011).

    [27] A Maestrini, J S Ward, C Tripon-Canseliet et al. In-phase power-combined frequency triplers at 300 GHz. IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, 18, 218-220(2008).

    [28] C Viegas, H Liu, J Powell et al. A 180-GHz Schottky diode drequency doubler with counter-rotated E -fields to provide in-phase power-combining. IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, 28, 518-520(2018).

    [29] J V Siles, C Lee, R Lin et al. A high-power 105–120 GHz broadband on-chip power-combined frequency tripler. IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, 25, 157-159(2015).

    [30] J V Siles. Design of a high-power 1.6 THz Schottky tripler Using 'On-chip' Power-Combining and Silicon Micromachining, 26-28(2011).

    [31] Y Zhang, W Zhong, T Ren et al. A 220 GHz frequency tripler based on 3D electromagnetic model of the schottky diode and the field-circuit co-simulation method. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, 58, 1647-1651(2016).

    [32] G J Liu, J Li, H Xu et al. Design of a 220GHz subharmonic mixer based on plannar schottky diode, 418-421(2017).

    [33] J Cui, Y Zhang, X Liu et al. Design of 199 to 238 GHz broadband subharmonic mixer combining two-stage reduced matching technology with Global Design Method. International Journal of Numerical Modelling: Electronic Networks, Devices and Fields, 2020 33, e2581.

    [34] J Cui, Y Zhang, Y Xu et al. A 200–240 GHz sub-harmonic mixer based on half-subdivision and half-global design method. IEEE Access, 8, 33461-33470(2020).

    [35] X Liu. A 220 GHz high-efficiency doubler based on function-based harmonic impedance optimization method. Journal of Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves, 43, 225-243(2022).

    [36] H Wei, Y Zhang, C Wu et al. Full waveguide matching design for 220 GHz frequency doubler. J. Infrared Milli. Terahz. Waves, 43, 983-994(2022).

    [37] T Ren, Y Zhang, S Liu et al. A study of the parasitic properties of the Schottky barrier diode. J Infrared Milli Terahz Waves, 38, 143-154(2017).

    [38] F Yang. Discrete schottky diodes based terahertz frequency doubler for planetary science and remote sensing. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, 59, 966-970(2017).

    [39] C Wu, Y Zhang, J Cui et al. A 135-190 GHz broadband self-biased frequency doubler using four-anode Schottky diodes. Micromachines, 10, 277(2019).

    Zhi-Cheng LIU, Jing-Tao ZHOU, Jin MENG, Hao-Miao WEI, Cheng-Yue YANG, Yong-Bo SU, Zhi JIN, Rui JIA. A high output power 340 GHz balanced frequency doubler designed based on linear optimization method[J]. Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves, 2025, 44(2): 170
    Download Citation