• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 42, Issue 1, 0117001 (2022)
Haibo Zhang1, Jiaojiao Kou1, Qichen Huang1, Yingjie Liu1..., Yuqing Hou1, Xiaowei He1, Mingquan Zhou1 and Rui Zhang2,*|Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Information Science & Technology, Northwest University, Xi′an, Shaanxi 710127, China;
  • 2State Key Laboratory of Military Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Clinical Research Center of Oral Diseases of Shaanxi Province, Department of Orthodontics, Stomatological Hospital of Fourth Military Medical University, Xian, Shaanxi 710032, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS202242.0117001 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Haibo Zhang, Jiaojiao Kou, Qichen Huang, Yingjie Liu, Yuqing Hou, Xiaowei He, Mingquan Zhou, Rui Zhang. Sparse-View Cone-Beam X-Ray Luminescence Computed Tomography Imaging for Optimized Regional Prior Knowledge[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2022, 42(1): 0117001 Copy Citation Text show less
    Sparse-view CB-XLCT imaging algorithm framework based on optimized region knowledge prior
    Fig. 1. Sparse-view CB-XLCT imaging algorithm framework based on optimized region knowledge prior
    Digital rat trunk model and forward simulation results. (a) Digital rat trunk model; (b) sparse 4-angle forward simulation result; (c) full 24-angle forward simulation result
    Fig. 2. Digital rat trunk model and forward simulation results. (a) Digital rat trunk model; (b) sparse 4-angle forward simulation result; (c) full 24-angle forward simulation result
    Reconstruction results with sparse 4-view projection. (a) Proposed method+SB-L1; (b) proposed method+GPSR-L1; (c) proposed method+CoSaMP-L0; (d) proposed method+OMP-L0; (e) SB-L1;(f) GPSR-L1; (g) CoSaMP-L0; (h) OMP-L0
    Fig. 3. Reconstruction results with sparse 4-view projection. (a) Proposed method+SB-L1; (b) proposed method+GPSR-L1; (c) proposed method+CoSaMP-L0; (d) proposed method+OMP-L0; (e) SB-L1;(f) GPSR-L1; (g) CoSaMP-L0; (h) OMP-L0
    Reconstruction results with full 24-view projection. (a) Proposed method+SB-L1; (b) proposed method+GPSR-L1; (c) proposed method+CoSaMP-L0; (d) proposed method+OMP-L0; (e) SB-L1;(f) GPSR-L1; (g) CoSaMP-L0; (h) OMP-L0
    Fig. 4. Reconstruction results with full 24-view projection. (a) Proposed method+SB-L1; (b) proposed method+GPSR-L1; (c) proposed method+CoSaMP-L0; (d) proposed method+OMP-L0; (e) SB-L1;(f) GPSR-L1; (g) CoSaMP-L0; (h) OMP-L0
    Reconstruction results of robust test. (a) Test results for different depth levels; (b) test results for different noise levels
    Fig. 5. Reconstruction results of robust test. (a) Test results for different depth levels; (b) test results for different noise levels
    Surface light signal distribution and sparse 4-view reconstruction results obtained by real simulant experiments. (a) Surface light signal distribution obtained by real simulant experiments; (b) reconstruction results of xy plane and CT slice superposition; (c) reconstruction results of xz plane and CT slice superposition; (d) reconstruction results of yz plane and CT slice superposition
    Fig. 6. Surface light signal distribution and sparse 4-view reconstruction results obtained by real simulant experiments. (a) Surface light signal distribution obtained by real simulant experiments; (b) reconstruction results of xy plane and CT slice superposition; (c) reconstruction results of xz plane and CT slice superposition; (d) reconstruction results of yz plane and CT slice superposition
    MethodLE /mmPNZ /%
    Proposed method+SB-L10.6410.47
    Proposed method+GPSR-L10.7440.51
    Proposed method+CoSaMP-L00.7920.52
    Proposed method+OMP-L00.8700.61
    SB-L11.5222.33
    GPSR-L12.1032.29
    CoSaMP-L02.7132.34
    OMP-L02.8272.25
    Table 1. Quantitative reconstruction results obtained by sparse 4-view projection
    MethodLE /mmPNZ /%
    Proposed method+SB-L10.4860.26
    Proposed method+GPSR-L10.7490.29
    Proposed method+CoSaMP-L00.7710.43
    Proposed method+OMP-L00.7940.51
    SB-L11.8971.77
    GPSR-L11.9371.77
    CoSaMP-L02.0072.25
    OMP-L02.5862.12
    Table 2. Quantitative reconstruction results obtained by full 4-view projection
    AlgorithmLE /mmPNZ /%
    Proposed method+SB0.920.76
    SB2.673.36
    Table 3. Reconstruction quantitative results of real simulant experiments
    Haibo Zhang, Jiaojiao Kou, Qichen Huang, Yingjie Liu, Yuqing Hou, Xiaowei He, Mingquan Zhou, Rui Zhang. Sparse-View Cone-Beam X-Ray Luminescence Computed Tomography Imaging for Optimized Regional Prior Knowledge[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2022, 42(1): 0117001
    Download Citation