• NUCLEAR TECHNIQUES
  • Vol. 47, Issue 5, 050006 (2024)
Yihuizi LIU1,2, Neng ZHANG2, Yueqiang LIU3, Xueyu GONG1,*..., Shuo WANG2, Chunyu LI2, Lian WANG2 and Guangzhou HAO2|Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China
  • 2Southwestern Institute of Physics, Chengdu 610041, China
  • 3General Atomics, San Diego, CA 92186-5608, United States of America
  • show less
    DOI: 10.11889/j.0253-3219.2024.hjs.47.050006 Cite this Article
    Yihuizi LIU, Neng ZHANG, Yueqiang LIU, Xueyu GONG, Shuo WANG, Chunyu LI, Lian WANG, Guangzhou HAO. Influence of kinetic effects on plasma response to resonant magnetic perturbations in HL-2A tokamak[J]. NUCLEAR TECHNIQUES, 2024, 47(5): 050006 Copy Citation Text show less
    Radial profiles of the key equilibrium quantities for HL-2A discharge 36 872 at 1 240 ms (a) The plasma pressure normalized by B02/μ0, (b) The normalized density, (c) The toroidal rotation frequency normalized by the on-axis Alfven frequency, (d) The safety factor
    Fig. 1. Radial profiles of the key equilibrium quantities for HL-2A discharge 36 872 at 1 240 ms (a) The plasma pressure normalized by B02/μ0, (b) The normalized density, (c) The toroidal rotation frequency normalized by the on-axis Alfven frequency, (d) The safety factor
    The layout of the HL-2A plasma boundary and the position of the resonant magnetic perturbation coils (color online)
    Fig. 2. The layout of the HL-2A plasma boundary and the position of the resonant magnetic perturbation coils (color online)
    The MARS-F computed n=1 poloidal spectra of the vacuum field (a) and the total field perturbation (b), which includes the plasma response, compared the amplitude of the resonant harmonics for the perturbed radial field between the vacuum and the total response fields (c), plot shows the amplitude of normal displacement at the poloidal plane (d)
    Fig. 3. The MARS-F computed n=1 poloidal spectra of the vacuum field (a) and the total field perturbation (b), which includes the plasma response, compared the amplitude of the resonant harmonics for the perturbed radial field between the vacuum and the total response fields (c), plot shows the amplitude of normal displacement at the poloidal plane (d)
    The MARS-F computed amplitude of the resonant radial field perturbation bres1 near the plasma edge, for the vacuum field and the total field including the plasma response, as well as the plasma surface displacement near the X-point ξn, while varying the coil phasing Δϕ between the upper and lower rows (color online)
    Fig. 4. The MARS-F computed amplitude of the resonant radial field perturbation bres1 near the plasma edge, for the vacuum field and the total field including the plasma response, as well as the plasma surface displacement near the X-point ξn, while varying the coil phasing Δϕ between the upper and lower rows (color online)
    Comparison of the poloidal spectra of the radial magnetic field perturbation computed with n=1 for (a) the vacuum RMP field, (b) the total field including the resistive fluid plasma response, (c) the total field including the ideal fluid plasma response, and (d) the total field including the ideal-plasma kinetic response
    Fig. 5. Comparison of the poloidal spectra of the radial magnetic field perturbation computed with n=1 for (a) the vacuum RMP field, (b) the total field including the resistive fluid plasma response, (c) the total field including the ideal fluid plasma response, and (d) the total field including the ideal-plasma kinetic response
    The computed poloidal distribution of the total response field (left panels) and the radial displacement of the plasma (right panels) caused by n=1 RMP, assuming (a, b) the resistive fluid plasma model, (c, d) the ideal-plasma fluid model, and (e, f) ideal-plasma kinetic model
    Fig. 6. The computed poloidal distribution of the total response field (left panels) and the radial displacement of the plasma (right panels) caused by n=1 RMP, assuming (a, b) the resistive fluid plasma model, (c, d) the ideal-plasma fluid model, and (e, f) ideal-plasma kinetic model
    MARS-F/K computed the total response field (external + plasma response) for three models at different rotation frequencies, including (a) the radial profiles of the m/n=4/1 resonant component and (b) the maximum amplitude of the poloidal Fourier harmonics (along the minor radius)
    Fig. 7. MARS-F/K computed the total response field (external + plasma response) for three models at different rotation frequencies, including (a) the radial profiles of the m/n=4/1 resonant component and (b) the maximum amplitude of the poloidal Fourier harmonics (along the minor radius)
    The MARS-F computed growth rate of no-wall ideal external kink instability with n=1 under various plasma pressure βN
    Fig. 8. The MARS-F computed growth rate of no-wall ideal external kink instability with n=1 under various plasma pressure βN
    The MARS-F/K computed plasma radial displacement amplitude near the X-point while varying βN in the fluid and full kinetic response model
    Fig. 9. The MARS-F/K computed plasma radial displacement amplitude near the X-point while varying βN in the fluid and full kinetic response model
    The MARS-K computed diagram of the relation between the plasma radial displacement amplitude near the X-point and βN in the different particles' ideal kinetic response model
    Fig. 10. The MARS-K computed diagram of the relation between the plasma radial displacement amplitude near the X-point and βN in the different particles' ideal kinetic response model
    The real and imaginary parts of the normalized perturbed kinetic energy δW^K associated with various drift kinetic effects of thermal ions and electrons, without (a) and with (b) inclusion of the particle collision effect
    Fig. 11. The real and imaginary parts of the normalized perturbed kinetic energy δW^K associated with various drift kinetic effects of thermal ions and electrons, without (a) and with (b) inclusion of the particle collision effect
    Radial profiles illustrating various frequencies
    Fig. 12. Radial profiles illustrating various frequencies
    Yihuizi LIU, Neng ZHANG, Yueqiang LIU, Xueyu GONG, Shuo WANG, Chunyu LI, Lian WANG, Guangzhou HAO. Influence of kinetic effects on plasma response to resonant magnetic perturbations in HL-2A tokamak[J]. NUCLEAR TECHNIQUES, 2024, 47(5): 050006
    Download Citation