• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 62, Issue 8, 0815001 (2025)
Long Peng1,*, Weigang Li1, Qifeng Wang1, and Huan Yi2
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Information Science and Engineering, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, Hubei , China
  • 2Hubei New Industry Technician Institute, Xianning 437000, Hubei , China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP241834 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Long Peng, Weigang Li, Qifeng Wang, Huan Yi. Lidar SLAM Algorithm Based on Point Cloud Geometry and Intensity Information[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2025, 62(8): 0815001 Copy Citation Text show less
    Framework of proposed algorithm
    Fig. 1. Framework of proposed algorithm
    Schematic diagram of intensity map construction
    Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of intensity map construction
    Schematic diagram of cylindrical block generation. (a) Schematic diagram of point cloud division into cylinders; (b) schematic diagram of subspace division within each cylinder
    Fig. 3. Schematic diagram of cylindrical block generation. (a) Schematic diagram of point cloud division into cylinders; (b) schematic diagram of subspace division within each cylinder
    Projection map of GICSC descriptor
    Fig. 4. Projection map of GICSC descriptor
    Trajectory diagrams and local enlarged diagrams by different algorithms on the KITTI dataset. (a) Sequence 00; (b) sequence 05; (c) sequence 09
    Fig. 5. Trajectory diagrams and local enlarged diagrams by different algorithms on the KITTI dataset. (a) Sequence 00; (b) sequence 05; (c) sequence 09
    ATE histograms. (a) Sequence 00; (b) sequence 05; (c) sequence 09
    Fig. 6. ATE histograms. (a) Sequence 00; (b) sequence 05; (c) sequence 09
    Trajectory diagrams by different algorithms on the MULRAN dataset
    Fig. 7. Trajectory diagrams by different algorithms on the MULRAN dataset
    Trajectory diagrams of ablation experiment for loop detection. (a) Sequence 00; (b) sequence 05
    Fig. 8. Trajectory diagrams of ablation experiment for loop detection. (a) Sequence 00; (b) sequence 05
    Trajectory diagrams of ablation experiment for feature descriptor. (a) Sequence 00; (b) sequence 05
    Fig. 9. Trajectory diagrams of ablation experiment for feature descriptor. (a) Sequence 00; (b) sequence 05
    SequenceAlgorithmMaximumMeanMedianMinimumRMSESTD
    00A-LOAM15.796.345.140.717.554.10
    LeGO-LOAM11.073.563.070.174.142.11
    SC-LeGO-LOAM4.502.392.260.262.601.03
    ICPSC195.072.150.08
    Proposed4.031.721.590.161.910.84
    05A-LOAM10.002.652.220.833.121.64
    LeGO-LOAM8.122.261.950.402.531.15
    SC-LeGO-LOAM2.861.831.780.541.890.49
    ICPSC19
    Proposed1.991.071.020.141.160.45
    09A-LOAM18.747.395.750.269.445.87
    LeGO-LOAM9.503.972.920.484.722.56
    SC-LeGO-LOAM9.393.772.620.344.602.65
    ICPSC193.781.541.47
    Proposed3.701.551.450.211.680.64
    Table 1. Comparison of ATE for various algorithms on sequence 00, 05, and 09 of the KITTI dataset
    AlgorithmMeanRMSE
    DCC-01DCC-02KAIST-01KAIST-02RS-01RS-02DCC-01DCC-02KAIST-01KAIST-02RS-01RS-02
    A-LOAM49.6228.3943.5634.5886.71117.5688.6733.7953.6340.75106.08136.83
    LIO-SAM29.4624.394.854.4964.9966.9132.8027.225.675.5271.6478.95
    LeGO-LOAM31.1624.8625.5521.0157.9069.0634.6628.1431.0525.1670.9881.49
    SC-LeGO-LOAM6.365.334.645.6021.9527.896.746.235.367.2025.2431.71
    Proposed5.424.133.224.498.5411.935.764.443.555.449.6313.59
    Table 2. Comparison of ATE for various algorithms on the MULRAN dataset
    SequenceAlgorithmMaximumMeanMedianMinimumRMSESTD
    00LeGO-LOAM11.073.563.070.174.142.11
    Proposed+NL9.512.402.130.132.891.61
    Proposed4.031.721.590.161.910.84
    05LeGO-LOAM8.122.261.950.402.531.15
    Proposed+NL4.971.971.980.722.050.56
    Proposed1.991.071.020.141.160.45
    Table 3. ATE Comparison of ablation experiments for loop detection on the sequence 00, 05 of the KITTI dataset
    SequenceAlgorithmMaximumMeanMedianMinimumRMSESTD
    00Proposed +NL9.512.402.130.132.891.61
    Proposed +SC6.702.242.010.112.501.12
    Proposed +ISC4.792.122.000.282.290.86
    Proposed4.031.721.590.161.910.84
    05Proposed +NL4.971.971.980.722.050.56
    Proposed +SC4.791.361.280.401.500.61
    Proposed +ISC3.801.231.210.201.320.48
    Proposed1.991.071.020.141.160.45
    Table 4. ATE Comparison of ablation experiments for feature descriptor