• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 60, Issue 2, 0210012 (2023)
Hui Gao, Zhijing Yang*, Wing-Kuen Ling, Jiangzhong Cao, and Weijie Li
Author Affiliations
  • School of Information Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP213314 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Hui Gao, Zhijing Yang, Wing-Kuen Ling, Jiangzhong Cao, Weijie Li. Point Cloud Completion Network Based on Multiencoders and Residual-Transformer[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2023, 60(2): 0210012 Copy Citation Text show less
    Point cloud completion network based on multi-encoders and Residual-Transformer
    Fig. 1. Point cloud completion network based on multi-encoders and Residual-Transformer
    Structure of PRN
    Fig. 2. Structure of PRN
    Entire completion process of the proposed model. (a) Original point cloud; (b) predicted missing part; (c) complete point cloud after merging Fig.3 (a) and Fig.3 (b); (d) point cloud after sampling; (e) complete point cloud after enhancement; (f) ground truth
    Fig. 3. Entire completion process of the proposed model. (a) Original point cloud; (b) predicted missing part; (c) complete point cloud after merging Fig.3 (a) and Fig.3 (b); (d) point cloud after sampling; (e) complete point cloud after enhancement; (f) ground truth
    Comparison of completion visualization effects of different methods on Shapenet-Part dataset
    Fig. 4. Comparison of completion visualization effects of different methods on Shapenet-Part dataset
    Comparison of completion visualization effects of ablation study on Shapenet-Part dataset
    Fig. 5. Comparison of completion visualization effects of ablation study on Shapenet-Part dataset
    CategoryMSN14PF-Net1FCAE26RP-MLP26Proposed method
    Average8.395/5.70411.131/4.28920.121/15.9327.514/3.3965.035/3.294
    Airplane3.113/3.5004.604/2.9976.980/7.0472.892/2.2122.164/2.641
    Bag15.393/7.94221.350/7.18434.774/29.04514.232/5.7487.127/3.340
    Cap16.824/5.84228.984/3.71952.914/37.09417.016/2.5276.950/3.065
    Car8.443/6.9919.643/3.20619.982/15.5508.683/2.5166.103/2.592
    Chair5.934/4.4347.803/2.77416.408/13.7336.049/2.0514.107/2.050
    Guitar5.226/3.3653.195/3.0683.276/3.1851.822/2.3811.693/2.168
    Lamp19.873/9.81924.143/10.55939.082/21.31915.675/9.38914.506/10.085
    Laptop3.543/3.9104.879/2.2629.252/9.6232.832/1.4302.110/1.195
    Motorbike6.802/7.1786.473/5.02814.094/11.5926.197/4.1625.188/3.701
    Mug8.199/6.34010.538/3.77425.223/22.1197.464/3.0545.481/3.316
    Pistol5.092/6.3497.613/4.94410.898/10.1155.399/3.9523.350/4.051
    Skateboard3.441/3.7665.562/2.7888.981/8.9962.693/1.9941.812/2.101
    Table7.257/4.7099.919/3.45419.712/17.6996.722/2.7374.865/2.513
    Table 1. PredGT/PredGT of different methods, results are magnified by 10000
    MethodAirplaneBagCapCarChairGuitarLamp
    Proposed method

    2.164/

    2.461

    7.127/

    3.340

    6.950/

    3.065

    6.103/

    2.592

    4.107/

    2.050

    1.693/

    2.168

    14.506/

    10.085

    Proposed method without RT

    3.208/

    3.356

    9.793/

    6.232

    11.605/

    4.262

    8.464/

    3.730

    6.407/

    3.413

    1.853/

    3.214

    18.528/

    12.221

    MethodLaptopMotorbikeMugPistolSkateboardTableAverage
    Proposed method

    2.110/

    1.195

    5.188/

    3.701

    5.481/

    3.316

    3.350/

    4.051

    1.812/

    2.101

    4.865/

    2.513

    5.035/

    3.294

    Proposed method without RT

    2.975/

    2.013

    5.748/

    5.525

    7.922/

    4.639

    5.621/

    6.031

    7.391/

    4.809

    6.560/

    4.103

    7.390/

    4.888

    Table 2. PredGT/PredGT comparison of ablation study, results are magnified by 10000
    MethodAirplaneBagCapCarChairGuitarLamp
    Proposed method

    2.164/

    2.461

    7.127/

    3.340

    6.950/

    3.065

    6.103/

    2.592

    4.107/

    2.050

    1.693/

    2.168

    14.506/

    10.085

    Proposed method w/o Lo

    5.055/

    7.812

    18.436/

    4.450

    9.441/

    2.961

    7.561/

    3.938

    12.959/

    4.838

    4.534/

    3.363

    15.442/

    14.081

    MethodLaptopMotorbikeMugPistolSkateboardTableAverage
    Proposed method

    2.110/

    1.195

    5.188/

    3.701

    5.481/

    3.316

    3.350/

    4.051

    1.812/

    2.101

    4.865/

    2.513

    5.035/

    3.294

    Proposed method w/o Lo

    3.198/

    4.156

    3.229/

    6.181

    10.524/

    4.145

    4.440/

    10.144

    5.669/

    6.232

    7.862/

    4.432

    8.335/

    5.903

    Table 3. PredGT/PredGT comparison of ablation study, results are magnified by 10000
    Hui Gao, Zhijing Yang, Wing-Kuen Ling, Jiangzhong Cao, Weijie Li. Point Cloud Completion Network Based on Multiencoders and Residual-Transformer[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2023, 60(2): 0210012
    Download Citation