• Acta Photonica Sinica
  • Vol. 54, Issue 1, 0130001 (2025)
Yuan AN1,2, Xianhua WANG1,*, Hanhan YE1, Hailiang SHI1..., Shichao WU1, Chao LI1,2 and Erchang SUN1,2|Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics,Hefei Institutes of Physical Science,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Hefei 230031,China
  • 2University of Science and Technology of China,Hefei 230026,China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/gzxb20255401.0130001 Cite this Article
    Yuan AN, Xianhua WANG, Hanhan YE, Hailiang SHI, Shichao WU, Chao LI, Erchang SUN. Study on Ozone Retrieval Algorithm for Monitoring Near Space Ultraviolet Radiation[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2025, 54(1): 0130001 Copy Citation Text show less
    Changes in ozone profiles in typical high,middle and low latitude zones on March 16
    Fig. 1. Changes in ozone profiles in typical high,middle and low latitude zones on March 16
    Changes in ozone profiles in typical high,middle and low latitude regions on July 16
    Fig. 2. Changes in ozone profiles in typical high,middle and low latitude regions on July 16
    Changes in ozone profiles in typical high,middle and low latitude regions on October 16
    Fig. 3. Changes in ozone profiles in typical high,middle and low latitude regions on October 16
    Changes in ozone profiles in typical high,middle and low latitude regions on January 16
    Fig. 4. Changes in ozone profiles in typical high,middle and low latitude regions on January 16
    Changes of ozone profiles at different times in the three northeastern provinces,five southwestern provinces and three central provinces
    Fig. 5. Changes of ozone profiles at different times in the three northeastern provinces,five southwestern provinces and three central provinces
    Schematic diagram of inversion idea
    Fig. 6. Schematic diagram of inversion idea
    The spring relative difference between the inversion results and the TROPOMI Level 2 products with ground-based measurement data
    Fig. 7. The spring relative difference between the inversion results and the TROPOMI Level 2 products with ground-based measurement data
    The summer relative difference between the inversion results and the TROPOMI Level 2 products with ground-based measurement data
    Fig. 8. The summer relative difference between the inversion results and the TROPOMI Level 2 products with ground-based measurement data
    The autumn relative difference between the inversion results and the TROPOMI Level 2 products with ground-based measurement data
    Fig. 9. The autumn relative difference between the inversion results and the TROPOMI Level 2 products with ground-based measurement data
    The winter relative difference between the inversion results and the TROPOMI Level 2 products with ground-based measurement data
    Fig. 10. The winter relative difference between the inversion results and the TROPOMI Level 2 products with ground-based measurement data
    The spring relative difference between the inversion results and the TROPOMI Level 2 products with OMPS_LP Level 2 products in the Xizang region
    Fig. 11. The spring relative difference between the inversion results and the TROPOMI Level 2 products with OMPS_LP Level 2 products in the Xizang region
    The summer relative difference between the inversion results and the TROPOMI Level 2 products with OMPS_LP Level 2 products in the Xizang region
    Fig. 12. The summer relative difference between the inversion results and the TROPOMI Level 2 products with OMPS_LP Level 2 products in the Xizang region
    The autumn relative difference between the inversion results and the TROPOMI Level 2 products with OMPS_LP Level 2 products in the Xizang region
    Fig. 13. The autumn relative difference between the inversion results and the TROPOMI Level 2 products with OMPS_LP Level 2 products in the Xizang region
    The winter relative difference between the inversion results and the TROPOMI Level 2 products with OMPS_LP Level 2 products in the Xizang region
    Fig. 14. The winter relative difference between the inversion results and the TROPOMI Level 2 products with OMPS_LP Level 2 products in the Xizang region
    The spring relative difference between the inversion results and the TROPOMI Level 2 products with OMPS_LP Level 2 products in the Southeast region
    Fig. 15. The spring relative difference between the inversion results and the TROPOMI Level 2 products with OMPS_LP Level 2 products in the Southeast region
    The summer relative difference between the inversion results and the TROPOMI Level 2 products with OMPS_LP Level 2 products in the Southeast region
    Fig. 16. The summer relative difference between the inversion results and the TROPOMI Level 2 products with OMPS_LP Level 2 products in the Southeast region
    The autumn relative difference between the inversion results and the TROPOMI Level 2 products with OMPS_LP Level 2 products in the Southeast region
    Fig. 17. The autumn relative difference between the inversion results and the TROPOMI Level 2 products with OMPS_LP Level 2 products in the Southeast region
    The winter relative difference between the inversion results and the TROPOMI Level 2 products with OMPS_LP Level 2 products in the Southeast region
    Fig. 18. The winter relative difference between the inversion results and the TROPOMI Level 2 products with OMPS_LP Level 2 products in the Southeast region
    Parameters stylesParameters
    Latitude and Longitude(22.31°N,114.17°E)
    Date established1951.01.01
    Ozonesonde operations began1993.10
    Altitude65 m
    Station typeLand(fixed)
    Station classRadiation station
    Time zoneUTC+8
    Climate zoneWarm temperate-dry winter-hot summer
    Table 1. The details of Hong Kong King′s Park ozonesonde station
    NameDatabase parametersRange
    Temporal ResolutionWinter/springDecember,January,February/March,April,May
    Summer/autumnJune,July,August/September,October,November

    Spatial

    Resolution

    Northern hemisphere polar latitude60° N~90° N
    Northern hemisphere midlatitude30° N~60° N
    Tropical latitude30° N~30° S
    Southern hemisphere midlatitude30° S~60° S
    Southern hemisphere polar latitude60° S~90° S

    Type of ozone

    (Class interval of 30 DU)

    Northern hemisphere polar latitude

    Summer/autumn

    (220~430 DU)

    Winter/spring(220~550 DU)
    Northern hemisphere midlatitude

    Summer/autumn

    (220~430 DU)

    Winter/spring(220~550 DU)
    Tropical latitudeAll year(190~340 DU)
    Southern hemisphere midlatitude

    Summer/autumn

    (220~370 DU)

    Winter/spring(130~430 DU)
    Southern hemisphere polar latitude

    Summer/autumn

    (190~370 DU)

    Winter/spring(130~370 DU)
    Table 2. The structure of the ozone climatology constructed by LAMSAL L N et al.
    Zones typeLatitudeLongitude
    Zones in the high latitude40.0115.0
    42.087.5
    42.0112.5
    46.0130.0
    Zones in the middle latitude30.0102.5
    32.0120.0
    34.0115.0
    36.0117.5
    38.0107.5
    Zones in the low latitude16.0117.5
    22.0115.0
    24.0112.5
    26.0107.5
    Table 3. Longitude and latitude of typical zones at high,middle and low latitudes in China
    January 19March 16August 18October 19
    TpO3 inversion results

    results

    GEOS-Chem inversion

    results

    TpO3 inversion

    results

    GEOS-Chem inversion

    results

    TpO3 inversion

    results

    GEOS-Chem inversion

    results

    TpO3 inversion

    results

    GEOS-Chem inversion

    Difference of peak concentration5.10×10113.20×10116.50×10114.00×1011-2.40×1011-2.50×10112.50×10111.40×1011
    Difference of mean concentration1.97×10111.26×10112.87×10111.75×10111.21×10116.42×10101.65×10118.99×1010
    Difference of standard deviation1.51×10118.67×10102.41×10111.52×1011-3.25×1010-1.19×1092.37×10102.50×108
    R20.9480.9800.9510.9720.9780.9890.9770.989
    Table 4. Comparison of TpO3 inversion results and GEOS-Chem inversion results with the ground-based measurements(molecules/cm3
    SeasonMonthDay
    SpringMarch01/08/15/22/29
    April06/12/9
    May03/10/18/25/31
    SummerJune12/21
    July05/21/26
    August02/09/16/23/30
    AutumnSeptember05/13/20/27
    October13/20/25
    November02/08/16/2/29
    WinterDecember06/13/20/29
    January04/11/18/26
    February01/08/15/22
    Table 5. Specific time of ground-based ozonesonde data at Hong Kong station
    /Median value of Ri from ground-based observations/%Standard deviation of Rifrom ground-based observations/%

    UV radiation caused by

    different ozone products

    /

    TROPOMI

    Product

    GEOS-Chem

    Inversion results

    TROPOMI

    Product

    GEOS-Chem

    Inversion results

    TROPOMIProduct/(×10-6 W·nm-1·m-2

    GEOS-Chem

    Inversion results/(×10-6 W·nm-1·m-2

    Rate of change/%
    March2.532.3316.8310.824.356.71-54.25
    April10.045.3215.3610.081.372.33-70.07
    May3.192.0416.0410.612.043.20-56.86
    Table 6. The spring relative difference statistics between inversion results and TROPOMI level 2 products and ground-based measured data and ultraviolet radiation changes
    /Median value of Ri from ground-based observations/%Standard Deviation of Ri from ground-based observations/%UV radiation caused by different ozone products
    /

    TROPOMI

    Product

    GEOS-Chem

    Inversion results

    TROPOMI

    Product

    GEOS-Chem

    Inversion results

    TROPOMI Product/(×10-6)W·nm-1·m-2

    GEOS-Chem

    Inversion results/(×10-6)W·nm-1·m-2

    Rate of

    change/%

    June6.033.3315.2711.902.914.10-40.89
    July-1.32-0.9311.107.612.923.09-5.82
    August4.403.6812.508.511.551.65-6.45
    Table 7. The summer relative difference statistics between inversion results and TROPOMI level 2 products and ground-based measured data and ultraviolet radiation changes
    /Median value of Ri from ground-based observations/%Standard Deviation of Ri from ground-based observations/%UV radiation caused by different ozone products
    /

    TROPOMI

    Product

    GEOS-Chem

    Inversion results

    TROPOMI

    Product

    GEOS-Chem

    Inversion results

    TROPOMI Product/(×10-6)W·nm-1·m-2

    GEOS-Chem

    Inversion results/(×10-6)W·nm-1·m-2

    Rate of change/%
    September0.480.8515.949.412.872.92-1.74
    October14.637.4514.4610.163.104.31-39.03
    November1.630.5614.9910.062.012.46-22.39
    Table 8. The autumn relative difference statistics between inversion results and TROPOMI level 2 products and ground-based measured data and ultraviolet radiation changes
    /Median value of Ri from ground-based observations/%Standard Deviation of Ri from ground-based observations/%UV radiation caused by different ozone products
    /

    TROPOMI

    Product

    GEOS-Chem

    Inversion results

    TROPOMI

    Product

    GEOS-Chem

    Inversion results

    TROPOMI Product/

    (×10-6)W·nm-1·m-2

    GEOS-Chem

    Inversion results/(×10-6)W·nm-1·m-2

    Rate of change/%
    December4.643.4717.7911.822.803.36-20.00
    January10.726.4418.4612.101.922.88-50.00
    February13.2510.4416.7411.061.382.17-57.25
    Table 9. The winter relative difference statistics between inversion results and TROPOMI level 2 products and ground-based measured data and ultraviolet radiation changes
    January 5March 4August 19October 5

    results

    TpO3 inversion

    results

    GEOS-Chem inversion

    results

    TpO3 inversion

    results

    GEOS-Chem inversion

    results

    TpO3 inversion

    results

    GEOS-Chem inversion

    results

    TpO3 inversion

    results

    GEOS-Chem inversion

    Difference of peak concentration-1.05×1012-7.97×1011-1.02×1012-8.78×1011-7.92×1011-4.81×1011-7.29×1011-5.23×1011
    Difference of mean concentration-1.37×1011-7.32×1010-1.10×1011-3.95×1010-2.43×1011-1.46×10115.33×1092.46×1010
    Difference of standard deviation-2.26×1011-1.58×1011-1.59×1011-1.10×1011-2.77×1011-1.76×1011-1.06×1011-5.87×1010
    R20.9730.9860.9800.9840.9800.9940.9640.985
    Table 10. Comparison of TpO3 inversion results and GEOS-Chem inversion results with the OMPS_LP products(molecules/cm3
    /Mean value of Ri from OMPS_LP Level 2 products/%Standard Deviation of Ri from OMPS_LP Level 2 products/%UV radiation caused by different ozone products
    /

    TROPOMI

    Product

    GEOS-Chem

    Inversion results

    TROPOMI

    Product

    GEOS-Chem

    Inversion results

    TROPOMI Product/(×10-6)W·nm-1·m-2

    GEOS-Chem

    Inversion results/(×10-6)W·nm-1·m-2

    Rate of change/%
    March 21-0.38-0.3913.569.373.903.559.86
    April 29-0.72-0.1314.698.303.902.6447.73
    May 153.011.8313.428.041.571.541.95
    Table 11. The spring relative difference statistics between inversion results and TROPOMI level 2 products
    /Mean value of Ri from OMPS_LP Level 2 products/%Standard Deviation of Ri from OMPS_LP Level 2 products/%UV radiation caused by different ozone products
    /

    TROPOMI

    Product

    GEOS-Chem

    Inversion results

    TROPOMI

    Product

    GEOS-Chem

    Inversion results

    TROPOMI Product/(×10-6)W·nm-1·m-2

    GEOS-Chem

    Inversion results/(×10-6)W·nm-1·m-2

    Rate of change/%
    June 160.690.6310.856.901.791.5714.01
    July 18-3.57-2.1112.368.322.101.4445.83
    August 30-0.030.6312.296.651.691.2337.40
    Table 12. The summer relative difference statistics between inversion results and TROPOMI level 2 products and OMPS_LP Level 2 products,as well as ultraviolet radiation changes in the Xizang region
    /Mean value of Ri from OMPS_LP Level 2 products/%Standard Deviation of Ri from OMPS_LP Level 2 products/%UV radiation caused by different ozone products
    /

    TROPOMI

    Product

    GEOS-Chem

    Inversion results

    TROPOMI

    Product

    GEOS-Chem

    Inversion results

    TROPOMI Product/(×10-6)W·nm-1·m-2

    GEOS-Chem

    Inversion results/(×10-6 W·nm-1·m-2

    Rate of change/%
    September 20-1.54-1.7415.628.065.503.6650.27
    October 62.880.9816.428.511.621.3024.62
    November 74.121.9217.258.941.521.2224.59
    Table 13. The autumn relative difference statistics between inversion results and TROPOMI level 2 products and OMPS_LP Level 2 products,as well as ultraviolet radiation changes in the Xizang region
    /Mean value of Ri from OMPS_LP Level 2 products/%Standard Deviation of Ri from OMPS_LP Level 2 products/%UV radiation caused by different ozone products
    /

    TROPOMI

    Product

    GEOS-Chem

    Inversion results

    TROPOMI

    Product

    GEOS-Chem

    Inversion results

    TROPOMI Product/(×10-6 W·nm-1·m-2

    GEOS-Chem

    Inversion results/(×10-6 W·nm-1·m-2

    Rate of change/%
    December 259.656.0622.8814.314.073.768.24
    January 77.615.0719.2412.823.012.913.44
    February 8-2.46-1.5116.7710.741.941.3642.65
    Table 14. The winter relative difference statistics between inversion results and TROPOMI level 2 products and OMPS_LP Level 2 products,as well as ultraviolet radiation changes in the Xizang region
    /Mean value of Ri from OMPS_LP Level 2 products/%Standard Deviation of Ri from OMPS_LP Level 2 products/%UV radiation caused by different ozone products
    /

    TROPOMI

    Product

    GEOS-Chem

    Inversion results

    TROPOMI

    Product

    GEOS-Chem

    Inversion results

    TROPOMI Product/(×10-6 W·nm-1·m-2

    GEOS-Chem

    Inversion results/(×10-6 W·nm-1·m-2

    Rate of change/%
    March 200.000.299.095.631.951.97-1.03
    April 21-4.56-2.4411.616.762.752.0633.50
    May 7-7.51-4.0112.346.421.951.5525.81
    Table 15. The spring relative difference statistics between inversion results and TROPOMI level 2 products and OMPS_LP Level 2 products,as well as ultraviolet radiation changes in the Southeast region
    /Mean value of Ri from OMPS_LP Level 2 products/%Standard Deviation of Ri from OMPS_LP Level 2 products/%UV radiation caused by different ozone products
    /

    TROPOMI

    Product

    GEOS-Chem

    Inversion results

    TROPOMI

    Product

    GEOS-Chem

    Inversion results

    TROPOMI Product/(×10-6 W·nm-1·m-2

    GEOS-Chem

    Inversion results/(×10-6 W·nm-1·m-2

    Rate of change/%
    June 246.484.3211.588.091.341.90-41.79
    July 103.672.4812.546.762.662.86-7.52
    August 271.791.439.536.202.913.12-7.22
    Table 16. The summer relative difference statistics between inversion results and TROPOMI level 2 products and OMPS_LP Level 2 products,as well as ultraviolet radiation changes in the Southeast region
    /Mean value of Ri from OMPS_LP Level 2 products/%Standard Deviation of Ri from OMPS_LP Level 2 products/%UV radiation caused by different ozone products
    /

    TROPOMI

    Product

    GEOS-Chem

    Inversion results

    TROPOMI

    Product

    GEOS-Chem

    Inversion results

    TROPOMI Product/(×10-6 W·nm-1·m-2

    GEOS-Chem

    Inversion results/(×10-6 W·nm-1·m-2

    Rate of change/%
    September 28-0.22-0.3910.926.683.933.4812.93
    October 14-1.84-1.278.765.453.002.961.35
    November 151.260.7712.187.041.811.4921.48
    Table 17. The autumn relative difference statistics between inversion results and TROPOMI level 2 products and OMPS_LP Level 2 products,as well as ultraviolet radiation changes in the Southeast region
    /Mean value of Ri from OMPS_LP Level 2 products/%Standard Deviation of Ri from OMPS_LP Level 2 products/%UV radiation caused by different ozone products
    /

    TROPOMI

    Product

    GEOS-Chem

    Inversion results

    TROPOMI

    Product

    GEOS-Chem

    Inversion results

    TROPOMI Product/(×10-6 W·nm-1·m-2

    GEOS-Chem

    Inversion results/(×10-6 W·nm-1·m-2

    Rate of change/%
    December 1-10.66-7.9311.468.203.873.2917.69
    January 15-4.52-3.0810.776.851.051.005.00
    February 16-4.27-2.5011.696.827.315.5132.67
    Table 18. The winter relative difference statistics between inversion results and TROPOMI level 2 products and OMPS_LP Level 2 products,as well as ultraviolet radiation changes in the Southeast region
    Yuan AN, Xianhua WANG, Hanhan YE, Hailiang SHI, Shichao WU, Chao LI, Erchang SUN. Study on Ozone Retrieval Algorithm for Monitoring Near Space Ultraviolet Radiation[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2025, 54(1): 0130001
    Download Citation